Patients' Lived Experience in a Multicomponent Intervention for Fibromyalgia Syndrome in Primary Care: A Qualitative Interview Study

Exploring patient activation and self-management experiences in adults with fibromyalgia: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Objectives

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition that affects involvement in daily activities, including self-care and household responsibilities. Self-management strategies are a primary focus in treatment recommendations. However, their effectiveness depends on an individual's readiness and capacity to adopt health-promoting behaviours. This study aims to explore the experiences of adults in their self-management journey, focusing on the barriers and facilitators influencing patient activation (PA) and effective self-management.

Methods

A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted. An electronic search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect and AMED. The studies were screened against eligibility criteria to ensure their relevance. The quality of the included studies was assessed against the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) questionnaire for qualitative studies and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Findings from the papers were synthesized via the three-stage thematic synthesis process, and common themes were identified.

Results

Nine studies with a total of 130 participants were included. Four major analytical themes were identified, including legitimizing FMS, the value of medical support, receiving peer and social support, and learning to self-manage.

Conclusion

Self-management of FMS requires patients to be actively involved in managing their health. These findings highlight that support from HCPs, family members and peers helps patients learn how to self-manage and engage in health-promoting behaviours. Clinicians treating people with FMS should prioritize education, empathy and personalized support.

Self-management interventions for chronic widespread pain including fibromyalgia: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

ABSTRACT

Supporting behavioural self-management is increasingly important in the care for chronic widespread pain (CWP), including fibromyalgia. Understanding peoples' experiences of these interventions may elucidate processes and mechanisms that lead to or hinder their intended impact. We conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring peoples' experiences of self-management interventions for CWP, including fibromyalgia. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Primary qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included if they explored people's self-management intervention experiences for their CWP, including fibromyalgia. Screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal were conducted by 2 reviewers. Data analysis was conducted through thematic synthesis. Twenty-three studies were included, mostly were rated as high or moderate quality. We developed 4 analytic themes: A multifaceted experience of the intervention, potential for transformative experience of group cohesion, a new outlook, and striving for change after the loss of support. Broadly, personalisation was perceived as beneficial and people experienced a range of emotional experiences. These appeared to support positive behavioural and cognitive changes. For most, group activities promoted acceptance and support, fostering new perspectives and improved self-management, although some found aspects of group contexts challenging. Lack of on-going support after interventions led to challenges in applying behavioural strategies, and some struggled without social support from the group. The experiences of self-management interventions for CWP reflect a complex, multifaceted process. Although many reported positive experiences, addressing issues with integration of physical activity, group dynamics and postintervention support may improve effectiveness for a broader range of people.

Changes in cognition, coping, pain and emotions after 12-months access to the digital self-management program EPIO

Background

Psychosocial pain self-management interventions can be of support for people living with chronic pain. Since psychosocial support is not always accessible, digital health interventions may increase outreach of these types of evidence-based interventions.

Objectives

To explore participants' experiences from 12-month access to the digital pain self-management program EPIO, particularly in terms of any behavioral and/or psychological changes experienced.

Methods

Participants (N = 25) engaged in individual semi-structured interviews following 12-month access to the EPIO intervention. Qualitative thematic analyses were conducted seeking to identify any behavioral and/or psychological changes experienced through intervention use, and what contributed to these changes.

Results

Participants were predominantly women (72%), median age 46 (range 26-70), with a range of self-reported pain conditions and the majority reporting pain duration >10 years (64%). Analyses identified three main themes and subsequent sub-themes: (1) Changes in Cognition; insight and self-awareness, acceptance and shifting focus, (2) Changes in Coping; pain, emotions, and activity pacing, and (3) Content and Functionality Specific Engagement; breathing and other mind-body exercises, thought-reflection exercises, and functionalities.

Conclusions

People with chronic pain experienced positive behavioral and/or psychological changes in terms of cognition and coping after 12 months access to the EPIO digital pain self-management program. The most prominent changes included increased understanding of the connection between own thoughts, feelings, and behavior, gaining concrete strategies to cope with everyday life living with pain, and utilizing these strategies to reduce pain and interference of pain, as well as to improve emotion regulation and psychological wellbeing.

Journey of Hope for Patients with Fibromyalgia: From Diagnosis to Self-Management-A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic, debilitating condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and psychological distress. There is a lack of qualitative studies on the unique experiences of patients with FMS in Arab countries, particularly through social media. Despite the availability of diagnostic criteria, diagnosing and managing patients remains challenging. This study aimed to describe the experiences of patients with FMS in Arab countries, their understanding of the illness, and perceptions of treatment.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using a content analysis of patients' narratives published in a supportive group, describing their experiences with fibromyalgia. The dataset included 2305 quotes from 192 main posts and 2113 comments collected between 2019 and 2024.

RESULTS

The analysis of the posts and associated comments revealed six main themes: patients' experiences with the syndrome, symptoms, searching for a doctor, pharmacological management, self-management, and the impact of fibromyalgia and peer support. Most posts and comments focused on patients' experiences with self-management approaches and coping strategies, highlighting significant noncompliance with therapeutic modalities. Factors influencing patients' experiences and decisions included their relationship with physicians, medication side effects, personal fears, and physical and mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FMS in Arab countries face similar challenges to those in other regions, including physical, psychological, social, and economic impacts. Many patients reject conventional therapeutic management strategies and adopt coping mechanisms to mitigate adverse effects and healthcare costs. The findings suggest that the physician-patient relationship, as well as the physician's knowledge and attitude toward fibromyalgia syndrome, are the cornerstones of gaining patients' trust.

Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Program for Fibromyalgia Patients in a Primary Care Setting (FIBROCARE Program): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Objectives: Multicomponent, non-pharmacological therapies are the preferred first-line treatments for fibromyalgia (FM), but little is known about them in primary care settings. Our study assessed the effectiveness of the FIBROCARE Program in improving the quality of life, functional impact, mood, and pain of people with FM. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that was not blinded for both patients and the professionals delivering the treatments in the study groups. We compared a group receiving non-pharmacological multicomponent group therapy (MT) based on health education, physical exercise, and cognitive-behavioral therapy with another group receiving the usual clinical care. The MT group was treated in the primary care context in Catalonia (Spain) through 12 consecutive weekly sessions. Both groups were followed up with at the end of the MT group sessions and 6 and 12 months after the group sessions with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) v2 Health Survey questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D), the Visual Analog Scale, and the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04049006). Results: Improvements in pain intensity, functional impact, physical health, fatigue, and emotional problems that affect daily activities in the MT group lasted up to 12 months. Benefits measured by the SF-36 Mental Health dimension and the HADS-A subscale were lost after 6 months. Effects on the SF-36 Social Functioning dimension and HADS-D present at 6 months persisted for up to 12 months. Generally, the longer the time since the FM diagnosis, the better was a patient's mood. Conclusions: The FIBROCARE Program effectively improves all the studied health outcomes except patient mood, since anxiety symptoms persist. The program should reinforce patient psychological support overall, focusing particularly on the years initially after diagnosis.

Effectiveness of the SYNCHRONIZE + Brief Intervention in Improving Mediterranean Diet Adherence, Nutritional Quality and Intake Pattern in Persons with Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions are being researched to treat fibromyalgia. However, the impact of nutrition as a key treatment component is little studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SYNCHRONIZE + lifestyle multidisciplinary intervention in improving adherence to the Mediterranean diet, nutrition quality and dietary intake pattern in persons with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

METHODS

A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted in primary care. Data were collected using the 17-item energy-restricted Mediterranean Adherence Screener (er-MEDAS), the food frequency questionnaire (sFFQ) and the 24 h recall questionnaire (24 HR), in addition to chrono-nutritional, anthropometric, and body composition data, at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12- month follow-up visits, and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 158 participants were evaluated. Results showed the effectiveness of the intervention in improving adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The adherence depended on the group-time interaction being positive and significant at 3 and 6 months post-intervention in the INT group and on the participant age and educational level. Specifically, the intake of legumes, fruits, vegetables, nuts and blue fish was increased, while the intake of sweets and pastries, butter and cream and red and processed meat was reduced. Furthermore, the intake of chips and candies was also reduced, and the consumption of fermented food (yogurts, cheese, kefir) increased. Thus, general diet quality improved. Interestingly, the intake of key nutrients such as protein and iron increased. Furthermore, the number of night eaters was decreased significantly. Muscle mass index was also improved in the intervention group. These results were maintained in the medium to long term.

CONCLUSION

SYNCHRONIZE + is a brief, low-cost, multidisciplinary intervention effective in improving adherence to the Mediterranean diet and improving nutritional and dietary intake patterns in persons with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Further evaluation of the effect on quality of life and symptoms is needed.

The lived experience of mothers living with fibromyalgia syndrome: A phenomenological inquiry

INTRODUCTION

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a complex chronic pain condition that negatively impacts women's daily lives, particularly their roles as mothers and wives. A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted to explore the lived experiences of motherhood and daily life among women diagnosed with fibromyalgia.

METHODS

A sample of 10 women affected by FMS was recruited between January and February 2020. Participants were interviewed in a face-to-face, in-depth interview using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were collected until saturation, and Colaizzi's method was used to analyse data.

RESULTS

This qualitative analysis identified five themes: A trauma preceding diagnosis, Pervasive feelings of misunderstanding, A struggle to maintain strength among limitations, Challenges in fulfilling maternal roles, and Persistent sexual discomfort. The latter two themes emerged as the most prominent.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the significant impact of fibromyalgia on women's family lives and suggest the need for a more comprehensive care programme.

Usefulness of a Multicomponent Group Intervention Program for Fibromyalgia Patients in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Health Professionals

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perceptions and experiences of health professionals who participated in a multicomponent program for fibromyalgia (FM) patients based on health education, physical exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy.

METHODS

In this qualitative, descriptive study that was based on a pragmatic and utilitarian approach, we conducted two focus groups (FGs) with 12 professionals (nurses and general practitioners) from the primary healthcare system of Spain who had been trained as FM experts. A thematic content analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

The findings were organized into four key domains, each with explanatory emerging themes. Overall, the professionals positively valued the program for the knowledge gain it offered, its integrated approach, the group effect and other benefits to patients. Work overload and peers' lack of acknowledgement of the program's value were identified as barriers. A reduction in the amount of content in each session, the creation of quality-of-care indicators and the promotion of the new professional role (FM expert) were proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The FM experts supported the program and recognized its usefulness. To implement the program within the primary healthcare system, the program needs to be adjusted to accommodate professionals' and patients' reality, and institutional health policies must be improved by providing training on FM to the healthcare community.