General and Case-Specific Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in the Public Opinion

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in outpatient psychiatry - is there an association to perceived discrimination and devaluation?

Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are gaining significance in the field of psychiatry, with patient satisfaction being a key measure. However, it is unclear if patient satisfaction in psychiatry is influenced by variables outside the treatment setting. This brief report thus examines the possible impact of perceived discrimination and devaluation (PDD) on patient satisfaction in the psychiatric outpatient setting. Data from 1,126 individuals who were undergoing or had recently completed treatment at 15 outpatient centers of the Psychiatric University Clinic in Basel, Switzerland, was analyzed. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Münsterlingen Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (MüPF), and perceived stigma was measured with the Perceived Discrimination Devaluation Scale. The results revealed a positive small effect size relationship between MüPF and PDD, suggesting that patients who perceived less stigma report higher treatment satisfaction. This relationship may affect most ratings, with the total MüPF score remaining relatively robust against this potential influence. Linear regression analysis indicated that a one-unit increase in PDD score could lead to a maximum change of 1.8 points on the 7-point Likert scale for the MüPF item correlating highest with PDD and 0.4 points on the total MüPF score. These findings highlight the importance of considering perceived stigma when evaluating patient satisfaction with psychiatric outpatient treatment. Future research should investigate associations between stigma, patient satisfaction, treatment outcome, as well as other external factors that may influence patient satisfaction in psychiatric settings.

Treatment-seeking threshold and accessibility of psychiatric outpatient services in Switzerland: the relationship with stigma and self-esteem

Perceived stigmatization and low self-esteem are linked to poorer mental health outcomes, but their impact on treatment-seeking thresholds and the importance of outpatient service location remain unclear. The study included 525 outpatients of the University Psychiatric Clinic (UPK) Basel, Switzerland, of whom 346 were treated at inner city services and 179 at services located on the main site of the UPK at the outer city limits. Perceived discrimination and devaluation (PDD), self-esteem (SE), treatment-seeking threshold (TST), and accessibility were measured via a self-reported questionnaire. The PDD consisted of 12 items evaluating beliefs about the level of stigma towards individuals with mental illness in the general population on a 5-point Likert scale. SE, TST and accessibility were assessed through single-item 7-point Likert scales. PDD and SE were positively correlated (p < 0.001), suggesting that lower perceived stigma was linked to higher self-esteem, and were not associated with TST. The relationship between PDD and SE remained consistent after controlling for age, gender, and nationality. Age was negatively correlated with TST (p = 0.022), while gender did not significantly influence any of the variables. There was little variation regarding PDD, with emergencies at the site of the psychiatric clinic and substance use disorder (SUD) patients reporting higher levels of stigmatization. Emergency patients and those with SUD and personality disorder reported the lowest SE ratings. TST showed a broad range and was highest for emergency services and transcultural psychiatry patients. Differences in accessibility were mainly linked to the location, with outpatient service users in the inner city reporting better accessibility (p < 0.001) and higher SE (p = 0.009). In comparison to patients using services with planned contacts only, patients in emergency settings differed by higher TST (p = 0.018) and better ratings of accessibility (p = 0.004). In conclusion, there was a relevant amount of stigmatization, impaired self-esteem, and, for some outpatient services, high thresholds to seek treatment. Future research should explore other factors influencing TST. The findings highlight the need to address stigmatization and accessibility when planning mental health services.

[The Attitude of the Public Concerning Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients]

OBJECTIVE

To examine the attitude of the general public in Basel concerning the use of coercive measures while dealing with psychiatric patients. The common population indirectly governs the use of coercive measures in psychiatry by its stigmatization of people with psychiatric illnesses, and its attitude towards treatment in psychiatry and by local opinion leaders and reactions of social networks.

METHODS

The answers of 1,112 persons from a representative population survey were evaluated. Participants were mailed case vignettes and questionnaires, and asked if they considered involuntary admission, coercive medication, and/or seclusion as acceptable measures in dealing with psychiatric patients.

RESULTS

When symptoms of a psychotic disorder were present, 31.5% approved of at least one coercive measure, with 22% approval in the case of a borderline personality disorder, and 20.7% in the case of alcohol dependency. However, the overall rejection of coercive measures by the general public in Basel was high. The differential approval of the examined coercive measures depending on psychiatric symptoms was in line with professional medical and ethical guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Public attitudes have an indirect influence on the local use of coercive measures and should be included in the specialist psychiatric discourse.