Medicinal Cannabis for Paediatric Developmental, Behavioural and Mental Health Disorders

Characterizing the Population of a Medical Cannabis Clinic in a Pediatric Hospital

Background: Medical cannabis (MC) is increasingly in use due to recent cultural and political changes. Other than patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome, there is inadequate literature to provide evidence-based support for prescribing MC in pediatric patients. Objectives: Characterize the population receiving an MC recommendation in an ambulatory pediatric palliative care setting and quantify patient/family-reported outcomes. Design: Retrospective chart review of electronic medical record (EMR) data. Setting/Subjects: Total n = 46 consecutive patients receiving medical advice regarding MC (n = 42) in a specialized ambulatory clinic embedded in a palliative care division and n = 4 inpatient in a midwestern U.S. hospital between 2019 and 2022. Measurements: Demographics, diagnosis, symptoms, adverse reactions, patient-reported outcomes, and barriers abstracted from EMR. Results: Our sample included 46 palliative care patients with a mean age of 11.7 years (SD 5.4); 50% had a neurological diagnosis (n = 25); 37% (n = 14) hematological/oncologic; and 13% (n = 6), chronic pain. The most common type of MC recommended was 1:1 Cannabidiol (CBD): tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) tincture. There was a statistically significant decrease in inpatient floor days and cost. Totally, 35% of patients were able to decrease or discontinue other medications. Thematic analysis identified four barriers to use (product unavailable, difficulty obtaining state MC card, cost, and organizational) and subjective symptom improvement. Conclusions: These data characterize the palliative care MC clinic population at our pediatric hospital. Positive outcomes were noted across several symptom domains. MC seems to be associated with lower health care utilization, reduced polypharmacy, and increased quality of life and was used without significant adverse events. In a value-conscious health care environment, the data warrant further exploration.

A Pilot Randomized Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of Medicinal Cannabis in Adolescents with Tourette Syndrome

Introduction: Medicinal cannabis (MC) has potential therapeutic effects in Tourette Syndrome (TS), however there has been limited research in adolescent patients. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of MC in adolescents with TS. Method: This was a phase I/II double-blind, cross-over pilot study comparing MC with matched placebo in adolescents aged 12-18 years with TS. The active medication was Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 10 mg/mL and CBD 15 mg/mL in peppermint-flavored medium-chain triglyceride oil. The dose titration schedule was stratified into two participant weight bands: below 50 kg (max THC 10 mg/day) or ≥50 kg (max THC 20 mg/day). Each treatment phase lasted 10 weeks, with a 4-week washout period. Results: Ten adolescents were randomized (mean age 14.8 years, 50% male) and seven completed the full study protocol. Two adolescents discontinued due to adverse events (one on MC, one placebo) and one was lost to follow-up. The most common adverse event was dizziness (67%). There were no serious adverse events. Among actively enrolled participants, protocol adherence was excellent: study visits 100%, blood test completions 100%, and online questionnaire completion 97.6%. Medication adherence was acceptable in 63.6%. Parents reported a high degree of study design acceptability. On the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale, three participants were rated as much improved on MC compared with one on placebo at 10 weeks. Discussion: The findings suggest that the study protocol is feasible and acceptable to patients with TS and their families. A fully powered study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of MC in adolescent TS.

Cannabinoids for treating psychiatric disorders in youth: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cannabinoids have been of increasing interest mainly due to their putative efficacy in a wide array of psychiatric, psychosomatic, and neurological conditions.

AIMS

This systematic review aims to synthesize results from randomized placebo-controlled trials regarding the efficacy and the dosage of cannabinoids as therapeutics in psychiatric disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults.

METHODS

All publications up to June 30th, 2024, were included from PubMed and Embase. Eligibility criteria in accordance with the PRISMA-guidelines was applied. RCTs providing pre- and post-treatment parameters on cannabinoid therapies for mental disorders in comparison to controls in an age range from 0 to 25 years were included. Effect sizes were calculated as Hedges' g for primary outcomes, and a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to account for dependent outcomes from same study populations.

RESULTS

We identified 7603 records, of which 8 independent clinical trials (reported in 9 publications) met the pre-established eligibility criteria, comprising 474 unique participants (245 treatment, 229 control). Analysis of 13 primary outcomes (of 7 clinical trials) revealed a modest positive overall effect for symptom improvement or normalization of brain physiology (Hedges' g = 0.308, 95% CI: 0.167, 0.448). Autism spectrum disorder studies showed the most consistent evidence (g = 0.264, 95% CI: 0.107, 0.421), while other conditions showed wider confidence intervals. Age-stratified analysis showed that adult populations (mean age 23.3 years, n = 5 outcomes) demonstrated higher effect sizes (g = 0.463, SD = 0.402) compared to pediatric populations (mean age 11.8 years, n = 8 outcomes; g = 0.318, SD = 0.212). Whole plant preparations (g = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.083, 0.573) and pharmaceutical cannabinoids (g = 0.292, 95% CI: 0.069, 0.515) showed comparable effects. CBD dosages ranged from 17.5 mg to 600 mg per day, with no significant correlation between dosage and effect size (ρ = -0.014, p = 0.963). Mild to moderate side effects were reported, but no serious adverse events. Risk of bias assessment ranged from low (n = 3) to high (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

While meta-analysis of effect sizes for primary outcomes revealed modest positive effects, particularly for autism spectrum disorders, the current evidence remains insufficient to broadly recommend cannabinoids for treating mental disorders in youth populations. Larger, controlled studies with standardized outcomes are needed to establish definitive clinical recommendations.

Efficacy of cannabis-based medicine in the treatment of Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by motor and phonic tics. It is a condition that affects between 0.3% and 0.7% of children, and its pathophysiology remains largely elusive. TS is associated with structural and functional alterations in corticostriatal circuits and neurochemical imbalances. Even though TS is currently incurable, there are established treatment options available, including behavioral therapy and neuroleptics. The use of cannabis-based medicine for tic management is an emerging therapeutic strategy, although its efficacy is still under investigation. It is hypothesized to interact with the endogenous cannabinoid system, but further research is required to ascertain its safety and effectiveness in TS.

AIM

In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to assess the effectiveness of cannabis-based medicine in the treatment of TS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Sciences until February 2024. We included clinical trials and cohort studies investigating the efficacy of cannabis-based medicine in the treatment of TS. Data extraction focused on baseline characteristics of the included studies and efficacy outcomes, including scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS), and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). We conducted the meta-analysis using Review Manager version 5.4. software. We compared the measurements before and after drug intake using mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In total, 357 articles were identified for screening, with nine studies included in the systematic review and 3 in the meta-analysis. These studies involved 401 adult patients with TS treated with cannabis. YGTSS revealed a significant reduction in total scores (MD = -23.71, 95% CI [-43.86 to -3.55], P = 0.02), PUTS revealed a significant decrease in scores (MD = -5.36, 95% CI [-8.46 to -2.27], P = 0.0007), and Y-BOCS revealed no significant difference in score reduction (MD = -6.22, 95% CI [-12.68 to 0.23], P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The current study indicates promising and potentially effective outcomes with the use of cannabis-based medicine in mitigating the severity of tics and premonitory urges. However, there is a need for larger, placebo-controlled studies with more representative samples to validate these findings.

Dronabinol Is Not a Game Changer in Pediatric Palliative Care: Results from a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Patients with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) often suffer from restlessness, spasticity, pain, and seizures. Dronabinol (DRB) may have a relieving effect; however, data on the effectiveness of DRB in children with LLCs are limited to outpatients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DRB.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of inpatients.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2021, 1219 patients were admitted. Of these, 63 patients (63.5% male, age: 10.4 (SD = 6.3) years) were treated with DRB; 96.8% had a neurological disease, and 26 patients were started on DRB (group A), while 37 were admitted with existing DRB (group B). The effective doses were 0.21 (SD = 0.11) in group A and 0.48 (SD = 0.5) mg/kg/BW/day in group B (p = 0.01). Subjective response rates to DRB in both groups (good/moderate effect) were 9.5%/38.1% for spasticity and 1.6%/25.4% for restlessness. However, no reduction in seizures, restlessness, or demand medication was observed in 24 h protocols when patients started DRB in group A. Three patients experienced severe side effects (e.g., respiratory depression). Other side effects included fatigue (22.2%) and behavioral problems (14.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective positive effects could not be confirmed by more objective data. Side effects can be severe. Thus, DRB should be started in a well-monitored setting and only with clear indications.

Effects of Medical Cannabis Treatment for Autistic Children on Anxiety and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Interests: An Open-Label Study

Background: The literature supports the benefits of medical cannabis for core and comorbid symptoms in autistic individuals and anxiety-related symptoms in individuals without autism. However, no study has specifically investigated how cannabidiol (CBD)-rich cannabis affects anxiety subtypes in autistic children or its relationship with restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBI). Understanding the effects of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on anxiety subtypes and RRBI could offer more precise treatment approaches to managing anxiety symptoms and reducing RRBI frequency in autistic children. Objectives: To examine (1) the impact of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on autistic children's (1a) anxiety levels and subtypes and (1 b) RRBI and subtypes and (2) whether changes in anxiety explain changes in RRBI following cannabis treatment. Method: In this open-label study, we analyzed data from 65 autistic children (5-12 years) who had participated in research on the effects of CBD-rich cannabis on children with autism. Their parents completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-revised to assess the frequency and severity of six subgroups of their children's recurrent behaviors and the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders for symptoms related to five types of anxiety disorders. They completed these assessments at three time points: (T1) before treatment, (T2) after 3 months, and (T3) after 6 months of treatment. Results: The results indicated reduced RRBI and symptoms related to various anxiety subtypes in autistic children following 6 months of CBD-rich cannabis treatment. Specifically, we observed significant differences in the autistic children's overall anxiety and in some anxiety subtypes (i.e., general, social, panic, and separation anxieties). Significant improvements were observed in RRBI, including the total score, and specifically in compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors. Our findings revealed that reduced anxiety, particularly within the panic- and separation-related subtypes, predicted a subsequent decrease in RRBI, specifically sameness behaviors, following cannabis treatment. Conclusions: The findings of the cannabis treatment's potential benefits for alleviating anxiety symptoms, leading to reduced RRBI, may provide evidence for the meaningful relationship between these variables and for the potential benefits of cannabis treatment for autistic children. We strongly recommend further double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using standardized assessments to validate these findings.

New Pharmacological Therapies in the Treatment of Epilepsy in the Pediatric Population

Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain neuron activity, predisposing individuals to seizures. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) categorizes epilepsy into the following groups: focal, generalized, generalized and focal, and unknown. Infants are the most vulnerable pediatric group to the condition, with the cause of epilepsy development being attributed to congenital brain developmental defects, white matter damage, intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury, perinatal stroke, or genetic factors such as mutations in the Sodium Channel Protein Type 1 Subunit Alpha (SCN1A) gene. Due to the risks associated with this condition, we have investigated how the latest pharmacological treatments for epilepsy in children impact the reduction or complete elimination of seizures. We reviewed literature from 2018 to 2024, focusing on the age group from 1 month to 18 years old, with some studies including this age group as well as older individuals. The significance of this review is to present and compile research findings on the latest antiseizure drugs (ASDs), their effectiveness, dosing, and adverse effects in the pediatric population, which can contribute to selecting the best drug for a particular patient. The medications described in this review have shown significant efficacy and safety in the studied patient group, outweighing the observed adverse effects. The main aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the current state of knowledge regarding the newest pharmacotherapy for childhood epilepsy.

Unraveling the Endocannabinoid System: Exploring Its Therapeutic Potential in Autism Spectrum Disorder

The salient features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) encompass persistent difficulties in social communication, as well as the presence of restricted and repetitive facets of behavior, hobbies, or pursuits, which are often accompanied with cognitive limitations. Over the past few decades, a sizable number of studies have been conducted to enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of ASD. Preclinical rat models have proven to be extremely valuable in simulating and analyzing the roles of a wide range of established environmental and genetic factors. Recent research has also demonstrated the significant involvement of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric diseases, including ASD. In fact, the ECS has the potential to regulate a multitude of metabolic and cellular pathways associated with autism, including the immune system. Moreover, the ECS has emerged as a promising target for intervention with high predictive validity. Particularly noteworthy are resent preclinical studies in rodents, which describe the onset of ASD-like symptoms after various genetic or pharmacological interventions targeting the ECS, providing encouraging evidence for further exploration in this area.

Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a patient with epilepsy: Staring down the challenge of inattention versus nonconvulsive seizures

Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disorder of recurrent seizures which often is comorbid with anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability (ID), and other psychiatric manifestations. Treating both epilepsy and behavioral symptoms from psychiatric disorders can result in polypharmacy with interactions of medications leading to both worsened efficacy of antiseizure medications due to psychotropic effects and worsening of psychiatric symptoms due to antiseizure medication side effects. We aim to suggest pragmatic strategies for the neurologist in the diagnosis and management of comorbid ADHD in patients with epilepsy based on the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Commission guidelines and additional literature review. The screening tool of choice for the symptoms of ADHD is validated in the country of practice and written in the language of the family, though various screening tools and advantages and disadvantages of each will be discussed. Once ADHD is diagnosed, recent safety data suggest that Methylphenidate, Amphetamine, and Atomoxetine are generally safe for patients with epilepsy. We present a case of a child with epilepsy and ADHD and discuss the clinical signs, symptoms, and strategies for treatment as well as when to refer to child psychiatry.

Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Neurological Disorders: A Comprehensive Review

Cannabidiol (CBD), derived from Cannabis sativa, has gained remarkable attention for its potential therapeutic applications. This thorough analysis explores the increasing significance of CBD in treating neurological conditions including epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease, which present major healthcare concerns on a worldwide scale. Despite the lack of available therapies, CBD has been shown to possess a variety of pharmacological effects in preclinical and clinical studies, making it an intriguing competitor. This review brings together the most recent findings on the endocannabinoid and neurotransmitter systems, as well as anti-inflammatory pathways, that underlie CBD's modes of action. Synthesized efficacy and safety assessments for a range of neurological illnesses are included, covering human trials, in vitro studies, and animal models. The investigation includes how CBD could protect neurons, control neuroinflammation, fend off oxidative stress, and manage neuronal excitability. This study emphasizes existing clinical studies and future possibilities in CBD research, addressing research issues such as regulatory complications and contradicting results, and advocates for further investigation of therapeutic efficacy and ideal dose methodologies. By emphasizing CBD's potential to improve patient well-being, this investigation presents a revised viewpoint on its suitability as a therapeutic intervention for neurological illnesses.