Translational Research Opportunities Regarding Homologous Recombination in Ovarian Cancer

18F-FDG Micro PET/CT imaging to evaluate the effect of BRCA1 knockdown on MDA-MB231 breast cancer cell radiosensitivity

•

BRCA1 gene knockdown improves the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells.

•

BRCA1 gene knockdown combination with radiotherapy downregulates multiple biomarkers of poor prognosis.

•

18F-FDG Micro PET/CT imaging was able to evaluate the radiosensitizing effect of the BRCA1 gene in vitro experiment.

Objective

Radioresistance of tumor cells is a major factor associated with failure of radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to investigate the effect of BRCA1 knockdown on MDA-MB231 breast cancer cell radiosensitivity.

Materials and methods

Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) was used to knockdown BRCA1 gene in MDA-MB231 cells. Cell viability and proliferative capacity were assessed by CCK-8 and colony formation assays, respectively. We established xenograft models in nude mice to evaluate tumor volume and tumor weight. The mice were imaged by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after RT to evaluate changes in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and tumor SUV_max/muscle SUV_max (TMR). Changes in HIF-1α, Glut-1 and Ki-67 were analyzed and the correlation between ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and tumor biology was analyzed.

Results

Compared with the control cells, RT significantly reduced cell viability and colony formation capacity in cells with the BRCA1 gene knockdown. In vivo assays showed that there was obvious delay in the tumor growth in the shBRCA1+RT group compared with the control group. ¹⁸F-FDG Micro PET/CT indicated a reduction in glucose metabolism in the shBRCA1+RT group, with statistically significant differences in both the SUV_max and TMR. The data showed the expression of HIF-1α, Glut-1 and Ki-67 was downregulated in the shBRCA1+RT group, and both SUVmax and TMR had significant correlation with tumor biology.

Conclusion

These results demonstrated that BRCA1 knockdown improves the sensitivity of MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells to RT. In addition, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging allows non-invasive analysis of tumor biology and assessment of radiosensitivity.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: From the Beginning to the Latest Developments

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, diagnosed as muscle invasive in 25% of cases. Although several studies have demonstrated an overall 5% absolute survival benefit at 5 years with cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant treatment, administration of chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients is still a matter of debate. This may be due to the perceived modest survival benefit, cisplatin-based chemotherapy ineligibility, or fear of delaying potentially curative surgery in non-responders. However, immunotherapy and novel targeted therapies have shown to prolong survival in advanced disease and are under investigation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to reduce systemic relapse and improve cure rates. Genomic characterization of MIBC could help select the most effective chemotherapeutic regimen for the individual patient. Large cohort studies on neoadjuvant treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and molecular therapies, alone or combined with chemotherapy, are ongoing. In this review, we trace the development of neoadjuvant therapy in MIBC and explore recent advances that may soon change clinical practice.

Advances in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Using PARP Inhibitors and the Underlying Mechanism of Resistance

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, it has high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. Poly(ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors selectively target DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in tumor cells that cannot be repaired and induce the synthetic lethality of BRCA1/2 mutation cancers. PARP inhibitors are clinically used to treat recurrent ovarian cancer and show significant efficacy in ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects. PARP inhibitors also have significant clinical benefits in patients without HR defects. With the increasingly extensive clinical application of PARP inhibitors, the possibility of acquiring drug resistance is high. Therefore, clinical strategies should be adopted to manage drug resistance of PARP inhibitors. This study aims to summarize the indications and toxicity of PARP inhibitors, the mechanism of action, targeted treatment of drug resistance, and potential methods to manage drug-resistant diseases. We used the term "ovarian cancer" and the names of each PARP inhibitor as keywords to search articles published in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) on Pubmed, along with the keywords "clinicaltrials.gov" and "google.com/patents" as well as "uspto.gov." The FDA has approved olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Talazoparib and veliparib are currently in early trials and show promising clinical results. The mechanism underlying resistance to PARP inhibitors and the clinical strategies to overcome them remain unclear. Understanding the mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors and their relationship with platinum resistance may help with the development of antiresistance therapies and optimization of the sequence of drug application in the future clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.

Moving towards Personalized Medicine in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the recommended treatment, with the highest level of evidence, for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, only a minority of patients receive this treatment, mainly due to patient comorbidities, the relatively small survival benefit, and the lack of predictive biomarkers to select those patients most likely to benefit from this multimodal approach. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy has been recommended for patients with high-risk MIBC, although randomized trials have not provided conclusive evidence on the impact of this approach. At present, however, this situation is changing, largely due to our improved knowledge of the molecular biology of bladder cancer, which has enabled us to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be used to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Moreover, new active treatments, especially immunotherapy, have shown promising results in the neoadjuvant setting. In addition, the gene expression profile of bladder tumors can be used to classify them into different subtypes, which correlate with specific clinical-pathological characteristics and with treatment response or resistance. Therefore, the main objective for the near future is to introduce these translational breakthroughs into routine clinical practice in order to personalize treatment for each patient.