1
|
Trubitsina NP, Zemlyanko OM, Matveenko AG, Bondarev SA, Moskalenko SE, Maksiutenko EM, Zudilova AA, Rogoza TM, Zhouravleva GA. Prion-Dependent Lethality of sup35 Missense Mutations Is Caused by Low GTPase Activity of the Mutant eRF3 Protein. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:3434. [PMID: 40244414 PMCID: PMC11989363 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26073434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2025] [Revised: 04/02/2025] [Accepted: 04/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025] Open
Abstract
The essential SUP35 gene encodes yeast translation termination factor Sup35/eRF3. The N-terminal domain of Sup35 is also responsible for Sup35 prionization that leads to generation of the [PSI+] prion. Previously we isolated different types of sup35 mutations (missense and nonsense) and demonstrated that sup35 nonsense mutations (sup35-n) are incompatible with the [PSI+] prion, leading to lethality of sup35-n [PSI+] haploid cells. Here, we show that sup35 missense mutations (sup35-m) within conservative regions of the Sup35 C-domain result in lethality of [PSI+] cells because of weak activity of Sup35/eRF3 as a translation termination factor. Mutant Sup35 maintain their ability to be incorporated into pre-existing [PSI+] aggregates and to form amyloid aggregates in vitro, while sup35-m mutations do not influence the [PSI+] prion induction and stability. All these mutations (D363N, R372K, T378I) are located in the conservative GTPase region of Sup35, decreasing the GTPase activity of mutated proteins. We propose that such low activity of mutant Sup35 combined with aggregation of Sup35 constituting the [PSI+] prion is not sufficient to maintain the viability of yeast cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina P. Trubitsina
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
| | - Olga M. Zemlyanko
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
- Laboratory of Amyloid Biology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Andrew G. Matveenko
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
| | - Stanislav A. Bondarev
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
- Laboratory of Amyloid Biology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Svetlana E. Moskalenko
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
- St. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Evgeniia M. Maksiutenko
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
| | - Anna A. Zudilova
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
| | - Tatiana M. Rogoza
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
- St. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Galina A. Zhouravleva
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (N.P.T.); (O.M.Z.); (A.G.M.); (S.A.B.); (S.E.M.); (E.M.M.); (A.A.Z.); (T.M.R.)
- Laboratory of Amyloid Biology, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Processing of Fluorescent Proteins May Prevent Detection of Prion Particles in [ PSI+] Cells. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11121688. [PMID: 36552198 PMCID: PMC9774836 DOI: 10.3390/biology11121688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Yeast is a convenient model for studying protein aggregation as it is known to propagate amyloid prions. [PSI+] is the prion form of the release factor eRF3 (Sup35). Aggregated Sup35 causes defects in termination of translation, which results in nonsense suppression in strains carrying premature stop codons. N-terminal and middle (M) domains of Sup35 are necessary and sufficient for maintaining [PSI+] in cells while preserving the prion strain's properties. For this reason, Sup35NM fused to fluorescent proteins is often used for [PSI+] detection and investigation. However, we found that in such chimeric constructs, not all fluorescent proteins allow the reliable detection of Sup35 aggregates. Particularly, transient overproduction of Sup35NM-mCherry resulted in a diffuse fluorescent pattern in the [PSI+] cells, while no loss of prions and no effect on the Sup35NM prion properties could be observed. This effect was reproduced in various unrelated strain backgrounds and prion variants. In contrast, Sup35NM fused to another red fluorescent protein, TagRFP-T, allowed the detection of [PSI+] aggregates. Analysis of protein lysates showed that Sup35NM-mCherry is actively degraded in the cell. This degradation was not caused by vacuolar proteases and the ubiquitin-proteasomal system implicated in the Sup35 processing. Even though the intensity of this proteolysis was higher than that of Sup35NM-GFP, it was roughly the same as in the case of Sup35NM-TagRFP-T. Thus, it is possible that, in contrast to TagRFP-T, degradation products of Sup35NM-mCherry still preserve their fluorescent properties while losing the ability to decorate pre-existing Sup35 aggregates. This results in diffuse fluorescence despite the presence of the prion aggregates in the cell. Thus, tagging with fluorescent proteins should be used with caution, as such proteolysis may increase the rate of false-negative results when detecting prion-bearing cells.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sergeeva AV, Belashova TA, Bondarev SA, Velizhanina ME, Barbitoff YA, Matveenko AG, Valina AA, Simanova AL, Zhouravleva GA, Galkin AP. Direct proof of the amyloid nature of yeast prions [PSI+] and [PIN+] by the method of immunoprecipitation of native fibrils. FEMS Yeast Res 2021; 21:6360323. [PMID: 34463335 DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foab046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prions are proteins that can exist in several structurally and functionally distinct states, one or more of which is transmissible. Yeast proteins Sup35 and Rnq1 in prion state ([PSI+] and [PIN+], respectively) form oligomers and aggregates, which are transmitted from parents to offspring in a series of generations. Several pieces of indirect evidence indicate that these aggregates also possess amyloid properties, but their binding to amyloid-specific dyes has not been shown in vivo. Meanwhile, it is the specific binding to the Congo Red dye and birefringence in polarized light after such staining that is considered the gold standard for proving the amyloid properties of a protein. Here, we used immunoprecipitation to extract native fibrils of the Sup35 and Rnq1 proteins from yeast strains with different prion status. These fibrils are detected by electron microscopy, stained with Congo Red and exhibit yellow-green birefringence after such staining. All these data show that the Sup35 and Rnq1 proteins in prion state form amyloid fibrils in vivo. The technology of fibrils extraction in combination with standard cytological methods can be used to identify new pathological and functional amyloids in any organism and to analyze the structural features of native amyloid fibrils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra V Sergeeva
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Tatyana A Belashova
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, St. Petersburg Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.,Laboratory of Amyloid Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Stanislav A Bondarev
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Marya E Velizhanina
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.,Laboratory of Signal Regulation, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Podbelsky Chaussee, 3 , Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Yury A Barbitoff
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Andrew G Matveenko
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Anna A Valina
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Angelina L Simanova
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Galina A Zhouravleva
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| | - Alexey P Galkin
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.,Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, St. Petersburg Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|