Modulation of PARP-1 Activity in a Broad Time Window Attenuates Memorizing Fear

The hippocampal FTO-BDNF-TrkB pathway is required for novel object recognition memory reconsolidation in mice

Memory reconsolidation refers to the process by which the consolidated memory was restored after reactivation (RA). Memory trace becomes labile after reactivation and inhibition of memory reconsolidation may disrupt or update the original memory trace, which provided a new strategy for the treatment of several psychiatric diseases, such as drug addiction and post-traumatic stress disorder. Fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) is a novel demethylase of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and it has been intensively involved in learning and memory. However, the role of FTO in memory reconsolidation has not been determined. In the present study, the function of FTO in memory reconsolidation was investigated in the novel object recognition (NOR) model in mice. The results showed that RA of NOR memory increased hippocampal FTO expression in a time-dependent manner, while FTO inhibitor meclofenamic acid (MA) injected immediately, but not 6 h after RA disrupted NOR memory reconsolidation. MA downregulated BDNF expression during NOR memory reconsolidation in the hippocampus, while the TrkB agonist 7,8-Dihydroxyflavone (7,8-DHF) reversed the disruptive effects of MA on NOR memory reconsolidation. Furthermore, overexpression of FTO increased BDNF expression via decreasing mRNA m6A in HT22 cells. Taken together, these results indicate that FTO may up-regulate the BDNF-TrkB pathway to promote NOR memory reconsolidation through m6A modification.

Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase 1 and parthanatos in neurological diseases: From pathogenesis to therapeutic opportunities

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is the most extensively studied member of the PARP superfamily, with its primary function being the facilitation of DNA damage repair processes. Parthanatos is a type of regulated cell death cascade initiated by PARP-1 hyperactivation, which involves multiple subroutines, including the accumulation of ADP-ribose polymers (PAR), binding of PAR and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), release of AIF from the mitochondria, the translocation of the AIF/macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) complex, and massive MIF-mediated DNA fragmentation. Over the past few decades, the role of PARP-1 in central nervous system health and disease has received increasing attention. In this review, we discuss the biological functions of PARP-1 in neural cell proliferation and differentiation, memory formation, brain ageing, and epigenetic regulation. We then elaborate on the involvement of PARP-1 and PARP-1-dependant parthanatos in various neuropathological processes, such as oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity, autophagy damage, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Additional highlight contains PARP-1's implications in the initiation, progression, and therapeutic opportunities for different neurological illnesses, including neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), multiple sclerosis (MS), epilepsy, and neuropathic pain (NP). Finally, emerging insights into the repurposing of PARP inhibitors for the management of neurological diseases are provided. This review aims to summarize the exciting advancements in the critical role of PARP-1 in neurological disorders, which may open new avenues for therapeutic options targeting PARP-1 or parthanatos.

EphrinA4 mimetic peptide impairs fear conditioning memory reconsolidation in lateral amygdala

Fear memory may undergo a process after memory reactivation called reconsolidation. To examine the roles of ephrinA4 in fear memory reconsolidation an inhibitory ephrinA4 mimetic peptide (pep-ephrinA4), that targets the EphA binding site and inhibits EphA activation, was used. Pep-ephrinA4 was microinjected into the lateral amygdala (LA) of fear-conditioned rats 24 h after training and 30 min before tone CS memory retrieval. Memory retrieval was unaffected by pep-ephrinA4. However, the animals were impaired in fear memory tested 1 h or 24 h afterward when compared to controls. Fear-conditioned animals injected with pep-ephrinA4 into LA immediately after long-term memory retrieval were unaffected when tested 24 h afterward. Microinjection into LA of a peptide originated from an ephrinA4 site that does not interact with EphA did not affect fear memory reconsolidation. Rats that were administrated with pep-ephrinA4 systemically 24 h after fear conditioning and 30 min before CS memory retrieval were impaired in long-term fear conditioning memory tested 24 h afterward when compared to the control peptide. These results show that ephrinA4 binding sites are needed for long-term fear memory reconsolidation in LA and may serve as a target for the treatment of fear-related disorders by blocking reconsolidation.