Tumor-Specific miRNA Signatures in Combination with CA19-9 for Liquid Biopsy-Based Detection of PDAC

Expression of Selected miRNAs in Undifferentiated Carcinoma with Osteoclast-like Giant Cells (UCOGC) of the Pancreas: Comparison with Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC) of the pancreas represents a rare subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite a distinct morphology and specific clinical behavior, UCOGCs exhibit unexpected similarities in regard to DNA mutational profiles with conventional PDAC. Treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is particularly challenging, with limited prospects for cure. As with many other malignant neoplasms, the exploration of microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) in regulating the biological characteristics of pancreatic cancer is undergoing extensive investigation to enhance tumor diagnostics and unveil the therapeutic possibilities. Herein, we evaluated the expression of miR-21, -96, -148a, -155, -196a, -210, and -217 in UCOGCs and poorly differentiated (grade 3, G3) PDACs. The expression of miR-21, miR-155, and miR-210 in both UCOGCs and G3 PDACs was significantly upregulated compared to the levels in normal tissue, while the levels of miR-148a and miR-217 were downregulated. We did not find any significant differences between cancerous and normal tissues for the expression of miR-96 and miR-196a in G3 PDACs, whereas miR-196a was slightly, but significantly, downregulated in UCOGCs. On the other hand, we have not observed significant differences in the expression of the majority of miRNAs between UCOGC and G3 PDAC, with the exception of miR-155. UCOGC samples demonstrated lower mean levels of miR-155 in comparison with those in G3 PDACs.

Exploring miRNA‑target gene profiles associated with drug resistance in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) are closely related to drug resistance in patients with breast cancer (BC); however, only a few roles of the exosomal miRNA-target gene networks have been clinically implicated in drug resistance in BC. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the differential expression of exosomal miRNAs associated with drug resistance and their target mRNAs. In vitro microarray analysis was used to verify differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in drug-resistant BC. Next, tumor-derived exosomes (TDEs) were isolated. Furthermore, it was determined whether the candidate drug-resistant miRNAs were also significant in TDEs, and then putative miRNAs in TDEs were validated in plasma samples from 35 patients with BC (20 patients with BC showing no response and 15 patients with BC showing a complete response). It was confirmed that the combination of five exosomal miRNAs, including miR-125b-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-484, miR-1246-5p and miR-1260b, was effective for predicting therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with an area under the curve value of 0.95, sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 95%. Public datasets were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to drug resistance and it was revealed that BAK1, NOVA1, PTGER4, RTKN2, AGO1, CAP1, and ETS1 were the target genes of exosomal miRNAs. Networks between DEMs and DEGs were highly correlated with mitosis, metabolism, drug transport, and immune responses. Consequently, these targets could be used as predictive markers and therapeutic targets for clinical applications to enhance treatment outcomes for patients with BC.

Emerging Horizons in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: The Role of Circulating microRNAs as Early Detection Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, primarily due to a late diagnosis. Recent studies have focused on identifying non-invasive biomarkers for early detection, with microRNAs (miRNAs) emerging as promising candidates. This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for the early detection of PDAC, analyzing their diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies published from January 2013 to October 2023 focusing on miRNA biomarkers for early PDAC detection were included. Data synthesis was performed through a narrative approach due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Key findings include the elevated levels of specific miRNAs, such as miR-18a, miR-106a, and miR-25, in early-stage PDAC patients compared to controls. The integration of miRNA profiles with traditional biomarkers like CA19-9 showed improved diagnostic performance. However, challenges in the standardization of miRNA evaluation methodologies were noted. Circulating miRNAs demonstrate significant potential as non-invasive biomarkers for early PDAC detection. Despite promising results, further research and standardization are necessary for clinical application.

Extracellular vesicle biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarkers have promising diagnosis and screening capacity for several cancers, but the diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer (PC) is controversial. The aim of our study was to review the diagnostic performance of EV biomarkers for PC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Web Of Science databases from inception to 18 Feb 2022. We identified studies reporting the diagnostic performance of EV biomarkers for PC and summarized the information of sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), or receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve) in according to a pre-designed data collection form. Pooled sensitivity and specificity was calculated using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

We identified 39 studies, including 2037 PC patients and 1632 noncancerous, seven of which were conducted independent validation tests. Seventeen studies emphasized on EV RNAs, sixteen on EV proteins, and sixteen on biomarker panels. MiR-10b, miR-21, and GPC1 were the most frequently reported RNA and protein for PC diagnosis. For individual RNAs and proteins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79% (95% CI: 77-81%) and 87% (95% CI: 85-89%), 72% (95% CI: 69-74%) and 77% (95% CI: 74-80%), respectively. the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EV RNA combined with protein panels were 84% (95% CI: 81-86%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-91%), respectively. Surprisingly, for early stage (stage I and II) PC EV biomarkers showed excellent diagnostic performance with the sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 87-93%) and the specificity of 94% (95% CI: 92-95%). Both in sensitivity and subgroup analyses, we did not observe notable difference in pooled sensitivity and specificity. Studies might be limited by the isolation and detection techniques of EVs to a certain extent.

CONCLUSIONS

EV biomarkers showed appealing diagnostic preference for PC, especially for early stage PC. Solving the deficiency of technologies of isolation and detection EVs has important implications for application these novel noninvasive biomarkers in clinical practice.