Stromal Factors as a Target for Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers

Unlocking the Potential of Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pharmaceutical agents capable of disrupting immune checkpoint signaling, leading to T-cell activation and a robust anti-tumor response [...].

Current status of skin cancers with a focus on immunology and immunotherapy

Skin cancer is one of the most widespread cancers, with a significant global health effect. UV-induced DNA damage in skin cells triggers them to grow and proliferate out of control, resulting in cancer development. Two common types of skin cancer include melanoma skin cancer (MSC) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer, and NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and other forms. The incidence of skin cancer is increasing in part owing to a demographic shift toward an aging population, which is more prone to NMSC, imposing a considerable financial strain on public health services. The introduction of immunostimulatory approaches for cancer cell eradication has led to significant improvements in skin cancer treatment. Over the last three decades, monoclonal antibodies have been used as powerful human therapeutics besides scientific tools, and along with the development of monoclonal antibody production and design procedures from chimeric to humanized and then fully human monoclonal antibodies more than 6 monoclonal antibodies have been approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) and have been successful in skin cancer treatment. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology, immunology, and therapeutic approaches of different types of skin cancer.

Immunomodulation of Skin Cancer

Skin cancer represents a major public health issue with a tremendous cost to healthcare systems in the United States and worldwide [...].

Tumor Microenvironment as a Therapeutic Target in Melanoma Treatment

The role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor growth and therapy has recently attracted more attention in research and drug development. The ability of the microenvironment to trigger tumor maintenance, progression, and resistance is the main cause for treatment failure and tumor relapse. Accumulated evidence indicates that the maintenance and progression of tumor cells is determined by components of the microenvironment, which include stromal cells (endothelial cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem cells, and immune cells), extracellular matrix (ECM), and soluble molecules (chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles). As a solid tumor, melanoma is not only a tumor mass of monolithic tumor cells, but it also contains supporting stroma, ECM, and soluble molecules. Melanoma cells are continuously in interaction with the components of the microenvironment. In the present review, we focus on the role of the tumor microenvironment components in the modulation of tumor progression and treatment resistance as well as the impact of the tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in melanoma.

LL-37 Might Promote Local Invasion of Melanoma by Activating Melanoma Cells and Tumor-Associated Macrophages

LL-37 can stimulate various skin-resident cells to contribute to tumor development. Since tumor (T) stage is determined by the vertical invasion of tumor cells in melanoma, we hypothesized that the LL-37 expression level is correlated with the T stage in melanoma patients. Immunohistochemical staining of LL-37 was performed in each stage of melanoma (Tis-T4), suggesting the ratio of LL-37-expressing cells correlate positively to T stage severity. Next, to examine pro-angiogenetic factors induced by LL-37 stimulation, the B16F10 melanoma model was used. Intra-tumorally administered CRAMP, the mouse ortologe of LL-37, significantly increased the mRNA expression of CXCL5, IL23A, MMP1a, and MMP9 in B16F10 melanoma. To confirm the induction of pro-angiogenic factors, A375 human melanoma cells were stimulated by LL-37 in vitro. The mRNA expression of CXCL5, IL23A, and MMP9, but not MMP1, were significantly increased by LL-37 stimulation. Moreover, LL-37-stimulated A375 culture supernatant promoted tube networks, suggesting that these tumor-derived factors promote the pro-angiogenic effect on tumor development. In contrast to melanoma cell lines, M2 macrophages stimulated by LL-37 in vitro significantly increased their expression and secretion of MMP-1, but not MMP-9 expression. Collectively, these results suggest that LL-37 stimulates both tumor cells and macrophages to promote melanoma invasion by the induction of pro-angiogenic factors.

A CD8+ T cell-associated immune gene panel for prediction of the prognosis and immunotherapeutic effect of melanoma

Background

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is the most frequently encountered tumor of the skin. Immunotherapy has opened a new horizon in melanoma treatment. We aimed to construct a CD8⁺ T cell-associated immune gene prognostic model (CDIGPM) for SKCM and unravel the immunologic features and the benefits of immunotherapy in CDIGPM-defined SKCM groups.

Method

Single-cell SKCM transcriptomes were utilized in conjunction with immune genes for the screening of CD8⁺ T cell-associated immune genes (CDIGs) for succeeding assessment. Thereafter, through protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks analysis, univariate COX analysis, and multivariate Cox analysis, six genes (MX1, RSAD2, IRF2, GBP2, IFITM1, and OAS2) were identified to construct a CDIGPM. We detected cell proliferation of SKCM cells transfected with IRF2 siRNA. Then, we analyzed the immunologic features and the benefits of immunotherapy in CDIGPM-defined groups.

Results

The overall survival (OS) was much better in low-CDIGPM group versus high CDIGPM group in TCGA dataset and GSE65904 dataset. On the whole, the results unfolded that a low CDIGPM showed relevance to immune response-correlated pathways, high expressions of CTLA4 and PD-L1, a high infiltration rate of CD8⁺ T cells, and more benefits from immunotherapy.

Conclusion

CDIGPM is an good model to predict the prognosis, the potential immune escape from immunotherapy for SKCM, and define immunologic and molecular features.

Circulating biomarkers of response to immunotherapy and immune-related adverse events

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, response rates vary, and these treatments have a high rate of immune-related side effects, which can be limiting. Thus, tests to predict who will respond and who may experience side effects are of critical importance toward realizing the ultimate goal of precision oncology.

AREAS COVERED

We review several of the most recent advances in circulating biomarkers that have been reported to be useful in predicting response and immune-related adverse events (irAE) to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies (CBI). We focus on high-quality studies published within the last few years. We highlight significant findings, identify areas for improvement, and provide recommendations on how these biomarkers may be translated into clinical utility.

EXPERT OPINION

As newer immunotherapies are developed, there is a pressing need to identify circulating biomarkers that can help predict responses and side effects. Current studies are mostly small-scale and retrospective; there is a need for larger-scale and prospective studies to help validate several of the biomarkers detailed here. As oncology focuses more on precision-based approaches, it is likely that a combination of biomarkers, including circulating ones as detailed here, will have critical utility in guiding clinical decisions.