Postischemic Neuroprotection of Aminoethoxydiphenyl Borate Associates Shortening of Peri-Infarct Depolarizations

Nonpharmacological modulation of cortical spreading depolarization

AIMS

Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a wave of pathologic neuronal dysfunction that spreads through cerebral gray matter, causing neurologic disturbance in migraine and promoting lesion development in acute brain injury. Pharmacologic interventions have been found to be effective in migraine with aura, but their efficacy in acutely injured brains may be limited. This necessitates the assessment of possible adjunctive treatments, such as nonpharmacologic methods. This review aims to summarize currently available nonpharmacological techniques for modulating CSDs, present their mechanisms of action, and provide insight and future directions for CSD treatment.

MAIN METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed, generating 22 articles across 3 decades. Relevant data is broken down according to method of treatment.

KEY FINDINGS

Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions can mitigate the pathological impact of CSDs via shared molecular mechanisms, including modulating K⁺/Ca²⁺/Na⁺/Cl^- ion channels and NMDA, GABA_A, serotonin, and CGRP ligand-based receptors and decreasing microglial activation. Preclinical evidence suggests that nonpharmacologic interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, therapeutic hypothermia, and lifestyle changes can also target unique mechanisms, such as increasing adrenergic tone and myelination and modulating membrane fluidity, which may lend broader modulatory effects. Collectively, these mechanisms increase the electrical initiation threshold, increase CSD latency, slow CSD velocity, and decrease CSD amplitude and duration.

SIGNIFICANCE

Given the harmful consequences of CSDs, limitations of current pharmacological interventions to inhibit CSDs in acutely injured brains, and translational potentials of nonpharmacologic interventions to modulate CSDs, further assessment of nonpharmacologic modalities and their mechanisms to mitigate CSD-related neurologic dysfunction is warranted.

The Prognostic Significance of Early Glycemic Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on Stroke Subtype

It is still unclear whether early glycemic profile after admission for acute ischemic stroke (IS) has the same prognostic significance in patients with lacunar and non-lacunar infarction. Data from 4011 IS patients admitted to a Stroke Unit (SU) were retrospectively analyzed. Lacunar IS was diagnosed by clinical criteria. A continuous indicator of early glycemic profile was calculated as the difference of fasting serum glucose (FSG) measured within 48 h after admission and random serum glucose (RSG) measured on admission. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association with a combined poor outcome defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at SU discharge, or 1-month mortality. Among patients without hypoglycemia (RSG and FSG > 3.9 mmol/L), an increasing glycemic profile increased the likelihood of a poor outcome for non-lacunar (OR, 1.38, 95%CI, 1.24-1.52 in those without diabetes; 1.11, 95%CI, 1.05-1.18 in those with diabetes) but not for lacunar IS. Among patients without sustained or delayed hyperglycemia (FSG < 7.8 mmol/L), an increasing glycemic profile was unrelated to outcome for non-lacunar IS but decreased the likelihood of poor outcome for lacunar IS (OR, 0.63, 95%CI, 0.41-0.98). Early glycemic profile after acute IS has a different prognostic significance in non-lacunar and lacunar patients.

Neuroprotective and antioxidant properties of new quinolylnitrones in in vitro and in vivo cerebral ischemia models

Cerebral ischemia is a condition affecting an increasing number of people worldwide, and the main cause of disability. Current research focuses on the search for neuroprotective drugs for its treatment, based on the molecular targets involved in the ischemic cascade. Nitrones are potent antioxidant molecules that can reduce oxidative stress. Here we report the neuroprotective properties and the antioxidant power of the six new quinolylnitrones (QNs) 1-6 for their potential application in stroke therapy. QNs 1-4 are 2-chloro-8-hydroxy-substituted QNs bearing N-t-butyl or N-benzyl substituents at the nitrone motif located at C3, whereas QN5 and QN6 are 8-hydroxy QNs bearing N-t-butyl or N-benzyl substituents at the nitrone motif located at C2, respectively. In vitro neuroprotection studies using QNs 1-6 in an oxygen-glucose-deprivation model of cerebral ischemia, in human neuroblastoma cell cultures, indicate that all QNs have promising neuroprotective, anti-necrotic, anti-apoptotic, and anti-oxidant properties against experimental ischemia-reperfusion in neuronal cultures. QN6 stands out as the most balanced nitrone out of all tested QNs, as it strongly prevents decreased neuronal metabolic activity (EC₅₀ = 3.97 ± 0.78 μM), as well as necrotic (EC₅₀ = 3.79 ± 0.83 μM) and apoptotic cell death (EC₅₀ = 3.99 ± 0.21 μM). QN6 showed high capacity to decrease superoxide production (EC₅₀ = 3.94 ± 0.76 μM), similar to its parent molecule α-phenyl-tert-butyl nitrone (PBN) and the well-known anti-oxidant molecule N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). Thus, QN6 demonstrated the highest antioxidant power out of the other tested QNs. Finally, in vivo treatment with QN6 in an experimental permanent stroke model elicited a significant reduction (75.21 ± 5.31%) of the volume size of brain lesion. Overall, QN6 is a potential agent for the therapy of cerebral ischemia that should be further investigated.

NS1619 Alleviate Brain-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-Induced Brain Injury by Regulating BKca Channel and Nrf2/HO-1/NF-ĸB Pathway

Brain induced extracellular vesicle (BDEV) elevates after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and contributes to secondary brain injury. However, the role of BDEV in TBI remains unclear. In this study, we determined the mechanisms of BDEV in brain injury and explored whether neuroprotective drug BKca channel opener NS1619 may attenuate BDEV-induced brain injury. We injected BDEV and lactadherin, respectively, to mimic the up and downregulation of BDEV after TBI and illustrated the role of BDEV in vivo. In vitro, the membrane potential and calcium concentration of HT-22, bEnd3, and BV-2 were measured by fluorescent staining. The effects of BDEV and NS1619 on HT-22 were evaluated by CCK-8, LDH release assay, Na⁺/k⁺-ATPase activity, JC-1 staining, DHE staining, and 4-HNE staining, respectively. The role of BDEV and NS1619 on the Nrf2/HO-1/p65 pathway was also evaluated in HT-22. Finally, we administrated TBI mice with NS1619 to clarify the role of NS1619 against BDEV in vivo. Our results suggested that BDEV aggravated and lactadherin mitigated TBI-induced EB leakage, brain edema, neuronal degeneration, apoptosis, ROS level, microgliosis, MMP-9 activity, and NF-κB activation. In vitro, BDEV-caused depolarized membrane potential and calcium overload were significantly attenuated by NS1619 in HT-22, bEnd3, and BV-2. BDEV markedly decreased cell viability, Na⁺/k⁺-ATPase activity, and caused mitochondrial dysregulation, oxidative stress, and NF-ĸB activation. NS1619 pretreatment alleviated above process and enhanced antioxidant system Nrf2/HO-1 in HT-22. Finally, NS1619 administration significantly inhibited neuroinflammation response and improved TBI outcome after TBI. NS1619 treatment also reduced 4-HNE content and NF-ĸB activation and enhanced Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Our data showed that BDEV aggravated brain injury by perturbing cell membrane potential, calcium homeostasis, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. The BKca channel opener NS1619 attenuated BDEV-induced pathological process in vitro and in vivo by modulating the BKca channel and Nrf2/HO-1/NF-ĸB pathway.