Ejaculatory Abstinence Affects the Sperm Quality in Normozoospermic Men-How Does the Seminal Bacteriome Respond?

Association of abstinence time with semen quality and fertility outcomes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Infertility affects 186 million people worldwide, with male factors contributing to 50% of infertility cases. Semen analysis is a key for diagnosing male factor infertility, but sperm parameters can be influenced by ejaculatory abstinence (EA) duration. Shortening or prolonging EA can impact on semen quality and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, but the optimal EA duration remains unclear, particularly for infertility patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study conducts a comprehensive meta-analysis to explore the impact of varying abstinence durations on semen quality and fertility outcomes.

METHODS

Three English database (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) as well as four Chinese database (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals database, WanFang database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database) were searched from 2000 to August 2023. The classical meta-analysis and "one-stage" dose-response meta-analysis were conducted to compare the associations of different abstinence durations (short-term abstinence vs. long-term abstinence) on semen quality in healthy adult and different type of infertile patients.

RESULTS

There were 85 eligible studies were finally included. The meta-analysis of volume (mean difference [MD] = -0.95 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.16 to -0.74 mL), total sperm count (TSC) (MD = -102.45×106 , 95% CI: -117.98×106 to -86.91×106 ), sperm concentration (SC) (MD = -11.88×106 /mL, 95% CI: -18.96×106 /mL to -4.80×106 /mL), DNA fragmentation index (DFI) (MD = -2.37%, 95% CI: -4.73% to -0.01%) in healthy men showed a significant decrease with different abstinence durations (short-term abstinence vs. long-term abstinence). The meta-analysis of infertile men showed significant decrease in volume in various subgroups (MD range: -0.73 to -1.17 mL) with P < 0.01; TSC (MD = -61.93×106 , 95% CI: -88.84×106 to -35.01×106 ), SC (MD = -5.39×106 /mL, 95% CI: -9.97×106 to -0.81×106 /mL), DFI (MD = -5.63%, 95% CI: -10.19% to -1.06%) in unexplained infertility subgroup; significant increase in viability (MD = 6.14%, 95% CI: 3.61% to 8.68%) in the unexplained infertility subgroup. The dose-response meta-analysis showed that TSC in oligozoospermia showed a nonlinear increase (coefficient from 3.38 to -5.76, P from 0.02 to 0.22) and the truncation point was around the 4th to 5th abstinence day. The percentage of progressive motile sperm (PR) in asthenozoospermia showed a significant decrease (coefficient = -2.39, 95% CI: -4.28 to -0.50). For fertility outcomes of different ARTs, only the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the intrauterine insemination (IUI) subgroup showed a significant decrease around the 3rd day (coefficient = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term abstinence may be associated with limited improvements in semen quality in healthy men but could be more beneficial for infertile men, especially within the first 4 days of abstinence. Caution is urged in making definitive conclusions about the causal relationship between abstinence time and semen quality changes due to potential confounding and interactions.

Outcomes comparison of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with high DNA fragmentation: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The testicular sperm instead of ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in infertile men with high sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is a controversial topic. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether couples with high level of SDF will benefit more from intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular sperm (Testi-ICSI) as compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated sperm (Ejac-ICSI).

Methods

A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), encompassing studies from the earliest record until May 2022. We included studies analyzing comparative pregnancy outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for ICSI in infertile men with high DNA fragmentation. The risks of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, respectively.

Results

Eleven studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that SDF levels revealed a significant difference association [odds ratio (OR) =-25.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): -34.82, -16.81; I2=94%; P<0.00001] between testicular and ejaculated sperm. Compared with Ejac-ICSI, a non-significant tendency was observed for fertilization rates (FRs) in the Testi-ICSI group (OR =0.87; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.12; I2=81%; P=0.28). However, there was significant difference pointing to better outcomes for Testi-ICSI in clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) (OR =2.36; 95% CI: 1.71, 3.24; I2=0%; P<0.00001), live birth rates (LBRs) (OR =3.10; 95% CI: 2.13, 4.51; I2=4%; P<0.00001) and miscarriage rates (MRs) (OR =0.28; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.60; I2=0%; P=0.001).

Conclusions

Results of this updated meta-analysis reveal that SDF rates are lower in testicular sperm than in ejaculated sperm and that Testi-ICSI is correlated with better clinical outcomes, including higher CPRs, higher LBRs, and lower MRs in infertile males with high SDF levels. Nevertheless, with the overall low to moderate quality of the studies, further well-designed controlled studies are required.

Improved sperm DNA fragmentation levels in infertile men following very short abstinence of 3-4 hours

Background

Limited data exists on possible approaches to improve sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) when no identifiable cause is found. The effect of short abstinence on sperm parameters has been extensively studied, but rarely reported on the effect on DFI in infertile men. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a second ejaculate provided after very short abstinence demonstrates lower DFI rates in infertile men.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, a tertiary university affiliated hospital. All men having DFI testing in addition to the standard semen analysis were identified via a prospectively collected database. Infertile men were instructed to provide two semen samples 3-4 hours apart (the first sample was given after 2-5 days of abstinence) to test the effect on DFI levels. Data analysis was performed for the comparison of the change in sperm parameters and DFI between samples and between men with DFI above and under 30%.

Results

A total of 52 men provided double ejaculates 3-4 hours apart. In the entire group, DFI decreased from 38.9%±21.4% to 35.1%±21.6% in the second sample (P<0.001). Semen volume was lower on the second sample (2.3±1.4 vs. 1.5±0.9 mL, P<0.001), while the remaining parameters did not change. Forty out of 52 patients (76.9%) had improved DFI (average of 6.0±4.0 percentage points). Change in DFI varied with 22/52 (42.3%) and 7/52 (13.5%) of patients found to have decreases in DFI >5% and >10% in the second ejaculate, respectively. For men with DFI of 30-40%, 64% (7/11) of DFIs reduced to the under 30% range. First DFI value was the only parameter associated with DFI decrease to under 30% in multivariate models [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.98; P=0.04].

Conclusions

This study identified significant improvements in DFI in infertile men providing a second sample after 3-4 hours. Controlled trials are needed to determine if reproductive outcomes are improved using a second ejaculate for infertile men with high initial sperm DFI values.

Short-interval second ejaculation improves sperm quality, blastocyst formation in oligoasthenozoospermic males in ICSI cycles: a time-lapse sibling oocytes study

Background

Does short-interval second ejaculation improve sperm quality, embryo development and clinical outcomes for oligoasthenozoospermia males received intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment?

Methods

All enrolled male patients underwent short-interval secondary ejaculation on the day of oocyte retrieval, and 786 sibling MII oocytes from 67 cycles were equally divided into two groups based on whether the injected spermatozoons originated from the first or second ejaculation. Semen parameters, embryo development efficiency, morphokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups to assess the efficiency and clinical value of short-interval second ejaculation in ICSI cycles.

Results

Short-interval second ejaculation significantly improved sperm motility, normal morphological rate, and sperm DNA integrity both before and after sperm swim-up. The high-quality blastocyst rate (24.79% versus 14.67%), available blastocyst rate (57.56% versus 48.44%), and oocyte utilization rate (52.93% versus 45.29%) were significantly higher in the second ejaculation group (P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate (59.09% versus 47.37%), implantation rate (42.11% versus 32.35%) and live birth rate (40.91% versus 31.58%) were higher in the second ejaculation group, but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). Time-lapse analysis showed that morphokinetic time points after the 7-cell stage were earlier in the second ejaculation group but without a significant difference (P>0.05), and abnormal embryo cleavage patterns between the two groups were not significantly different (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Short-interval second ejaculation significantly improves sperm quality in oligoasthenozoospermic males, and is beneficial for blastocyst formation efficiency in ICSI cycles. This study suggested a non-invasive and simple but effective strategy for improving ICSI treatment outcomes.

Trends in sperm quality by computer-assisted sperm analysis of 49,189 men during 2015-2021 in a fertility center from China

Background

Sperm quality, including semen volume, sperm count, concentration, and total and progressive motility (collectively, "semen parameters"), has declined in the recent decades. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) provides sperm kinematic parameters, and the temporal trends of which remain unclear. Our objective is to examine the temporal trend of both semen parameters and kinematic parameters in Shanghai, China, in the recent years.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed semen parameters and kinematic parameters of 49,819 men attending our reproductive center by using CASA during 2015-2021. The total sample was divided into two groups: samples that surpassed the WHO guideline (2010) low reference limits ("above reference limit" group, ARL; n = 24,575) and samples that did not ("below reference limit" group, BRL; n = 24,614). One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, independent samples t-test, and covariance analysis were used to assess the differences among groups. Year, age, and abstinence time were included in the multiple linear regression model of the ARL group to adjust the confounders and depict the trends in sperm quality.

Results

Among all the total sample and the ARL and BRL groups, the age of subjects increased in recent years. Semen volume and sperm count showed declined tendency with years in the total sample, the ARL and BRL groups, and the subgroup of age or abstinence time, whereas sperm velocities showed increased tendency with years on the contrary. The multiple linear regression model of the ARL group, adjusting for age and abstinence time, confirmed these trends. Semen volume (β1= -0.162; CI: -0.172, -0.152), sperm count (β1= -9.97; CI: -10.813, -9.128), sperm concentration (β1 = -0.535; CI: -0.772, -0.299), motility (β1 = -1.751; CI: -1.830, -1.672), and progressive motility (β1 = -1.12; CI: -0.201, -0.145) decreased with year, whereas curvilinear line velocity (VCL) (β1 = 3.058; CI: 2.912, 3.203), straight line velocity (VSL) (β1 = 2.075; CI: 1.990, 2.161), and average path velocity (VAP) (β1 = 2.305; CI: 2.224, 2.386) increased over time (all p < 0.001). In addition, VCL, VSL, and VAP significantly declined with age and abstinence time.

Conclusion

The semen parameters declined, whereas the kinematic parameters increased over the recent years. We propose that, although sperm count and motility declined over time, sperm motion velocity increased, suggesting a possible compensatory mechanism of male fertility.