Topical Cyclosporine in Oral Lichen Planus-A Series of 21 Open-Label, Biphasic, Single-Patient Observations

Lichen Planus: What is New in Diagnosis and Treatment?

Lichen planus (LP), an idiopathic, multifaceted chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, affects approximately 0.5-1% of the population. The various clinical manifestations of LP fall into three broad categories, namely cutaneous, appendageal, and mucosal, with further subclassification depending on the morphology and distribution patterns of individual lesions. There is mounting evidence that LP has systemic associations, including autoimmune conditions, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disorders. Cutaneous hypertrophic and mucosal forms of LP are at a heightened risk for malignant transformation. Familiarity with these potential associations in conjunction with long-term follow-up and regular screening could lead to a timely diagnosis and management of concomitant conditions. In addition, the frequent quality of life (QoL) impairment in LP underscores the need for a comprehensive approach including psychological evaluation and support. Several treatment strategies have been attempted, though most of them have not been adopted in clinical practice because of suboptimal benefit-to-risk ratios or lack of evidence. More recent studies toward pathogenesis-driven treatments have identified Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as apremilast, and biologics targeting the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 pathway as novel therapeutic options, resulting in a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP. This contemporary review focuses on the diagnosis and management of LP, and places emphasis on more recently described targeted treatment options.

An improved scoring system for monitoring oral lichen planus: A preliminary clinical study

OBJECTIVES

To design an improved oral lichen planus (OLP) scoring system, which can be widely applied.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A new scoring system that took reticulation, hyperemia and ulceration (RHU) into account, named as RHU scoring system, was designed for OLP patients' management. The patients were also scored for the reticulation/erythema/ulcer (REU) scoring system, physician global assessment (PGA), numerical rating scale (NRS) and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). The reliability and validity analyses were utilized to assess the RHU scoring system. We further applied the RHU scoring system to examine the treatment outcomes of topical dexamethasone sodium phosphate and general hydroxychloroquine hydrochloride among OLP patients.

RESULTS

Forty-eight OLP patients from two medical centers were recruited. This new scoring system has reliability with an internal consistency index Cronbach α 0.49. The Pearson correlation of RHU score with PGA and REU score were 0.891 and 0.675 (p < 0.05) respectively, reflecting satisfactory standard validity. A 10% change in RHU score was used as the disease condition evaluation standard, reflecting satisfactory discriminating validity (t = -5.821, p < 0.001). During follow-ups, scores of all scales decreased at each re-visit. The drop between each visit of OHIP-14 fluctuated compared with the RHU system and NRS.

CONCLUSIONS

As a semi-quantitative score system, the RHU scoring system can reflect the severity of OLP patients with hyperemia and ulceration lesions more accurately and sensitively compared with other score systems, which provides the potential to be widely used.

The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Cyclosporine-A in Dermatology: A Systematic Review

Cyclosporine-A (Cyc-A) was initially prescribed as systemic therapy for patients receiving solid organ transplants or in patients with graft versus host disease (GVHD). Topical Cyc-A is an ideal form of Cyclosporine in the treatment of mucocutaneous disorders as it causes fewer systemic side effects and has more stable results than steroids; however, poor absorption through the skin makes the development of new formulations necessary to improve skin permeability. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical Cyc-A in different dermatological conditions. A thorough systematic review was performed on PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases as well as Google Scholar, and relevant studies from 2000 until January 3rd, 2022, were selected. The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Topical Cyc-A was observed to be an effective medication in the treatment of oral lichen planus, psoriasis, burning mouth syndrome, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, and Zoon's balanitis. Adverse side effects such as dysphagia, burning sensation, lips swealing, and gastrointestinal upset were reported following Cyc-A mouthwash use, whereas mild erythema, dryness, and fissuring of the skin were observed following the Cyc-A lipogel application. Topical Cyc-A was found to be a good alternative to traditional treatment regimens for immune-mediated mucocutaneous conditions. Cyc-A can be considered as a safe and efficient option in cases of long-term treatment as it does not have the same adverse effects of long-term steroids. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.