Malignant Pleural Effusions-A Review of Current Guidelines and Practices

Exploratory pilot study to characterize the immune landscapes of malignant pleural effusions and their corresponding primary tumors from patients with breast carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a frequent complication of advanced malignancies. In this pilot study, we characterized the immune landscapes of MPEs, compared them to their primary tumor (PT) samples from breast carcinoma (BC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LADC), and tested the utility of multiplexed image technology in cytological samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the immune contexture of 6 BC and 5 LADC MPEs and their PTs using 3 multiplex immunofluorescence panels. We explored the associations between sample characteristics and pleural effusion-free survival.

RESULTS

No MPE samples had positive programmed death-ligand 1 expression in malignant cells, although 3 of 11 PTs has positive programmed death-ligand 1 expression (more than 1% expression in malignant cells). Overall, in LADC samples, cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3)+ T cells and CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells predominated (median percentages for MPEs versus PTs: 45.6% versus 40.7% and 4.7% versus 6.6%, respectively) compared with BC. CD68+ macrophages predominated in the BC samples (medians for MPEs 61.2% versus PTs for 57.1%) but not in the LADC samples. Generally in PTs, CD3+CD8+ forkhead box P3+ T cells and the median distances from the malignant cells to CD3+CD8+Ki67+ and CD3+ programmed cell death protein 1 + T cells correlated to earlier MPE after PT diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The immune cell phenotypes in the MPEs and PTs were similar within each cancer type but different between BC versus LADC. An MPE analysis can potentially be used as a substitute for a PT analysis, but an expanded study of this topic is essential.

Hyperthermic intrathoracic/intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus conventional intrapleural/intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the malignant effusion: a multi-center randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intrathoracic/intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus conventional intrapleural/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was carried out in 8 cancer centers across China. Patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion were randomly assigned to the study group or control group. Patients in the study group were treated with cisplatin-based hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), while the control group was treated with conventional intrapleural or intraperitoneal chemotherapy using same chemotherapeutic regime as the study group. The objective response rate (ORR) was analyzed as primary outcome. Quality-of-life (QOL) score was recorded as secondary outcome using the questionnaire 30 (QLQ-C30) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). The efficacy and safety of the two treatments were compared.

RESULTS

Total 135 patients were recruited and randomized in this study, with 67 patients in the study group and 68 patients in the control group. The ORR in the study group (80.70%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (31.03%, p < 0.001). However, neither changes of QOL scores, nor incidence rates of adverse events were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.076 and 0.197, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of HITHOC or HIPEC is superior to that of conventional modality for the treatment of malignant effusion with comparable side effects.

Value of human epididymis secretory protein 4 in differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion: an analysis of two cohorts

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) is a useful diagnostic marker for lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid HE4 for MPE.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind diagnostic test accuracy study.

METHODS

Patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion were enrolled in two cohorts (Hohhot and Changshu). Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was used to detect pleural fluid HE4. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the net benefit of HE4 was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 66 MPEs and 86 benign pleural effusions (BPEs) were enrolled in the Hohhot cohort. In the Changshu cohort, 26 MPEs and 32 BPEs were enrolled. In both cohorts, MPEs had significantly higher pleural fluid HE4 than BPEs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HE4 was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.81) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67-0.91) in the Changshu cohort. At a threshold of 1300 pmol/L, HE4 had sensitivities of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.56) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73) in the Changshu cohort. The corresponding specificities were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00) in the Changshu cohort. In subgroup analyses, HE4 had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.78 (0.71-0.85) in exudates and an AUC of 0.69 (0.57-0.81) in patients with negative effusion cytology. The DCA revealed that HE4 determination had a net benefit in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Pleural fluid HE4 has moderate diagnostic accuracy for MPE and has net benefit in pleural effusion patients with unknown etiology.

Malignant pleural effusion diagnosis and therapy

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a serious complication of advanced tumor, with relatively high morbidity and mortality rates, and can severely affect the quality of life and survival of patients. The mechanisms of MPE development are not well defined, but much research has been conducted to gain a deeper understanding of this process. In recent decades, although great progress has been made in the management of MPE, the diagnosis and treatment of MPE are still major challenges for clinicians. In this article, we provide a review of the research advances in the mechanisms of MPE development, diagnosis and treatment approaches. We aim to offer clinicians an overview of the latest evidence on the management of MPE, which should be individualized to provide comprehensive interventions for patients in accordance with their wishes, health status, prognosis and other factors.

Chinese herbal injections versus intrapleural cisplatin for lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in patients with advanced lung cancer that can severely compromise the quality of life and limit life expectancy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) may be beneficial in improving quality of life. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to explore several CHIs used for lung cancer patients with MPE.

Methods

Seven databases were systematically searched for eligible RCTs from inception to November 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical effective rate. Secondary outcomes were the improvement rate of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Data analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 and R software 4.1.0. Both pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA were conducted. Competing interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Evidence grading was evaluated using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis online software (https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/).

Results

A total of 44 studies involving 2,573 patients were included. The combined Huachansu injection (HCS) with intrapleural cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloro-platinum, DDP) had the highest probability of improving the clinical effective rate (SUCRA, 84.33%). The Kangai injection (KA) combined with DDP had the most improvement rate of KPS score (SUCRA, 80.82%), while the Fufangkushen injection (FFKS) alone was more likely to reduce AEs including gastrointestinal reactions (SUCRA, 89.92%), leukopenia (SUCRA, 91.85%), and chest pain (SUCRA, 98.17%). FFKS combined with DDP ranked the best in reducing the incidence of fever (SUCRA, 75.45%).

Conclusions

Our NMA showed that CHIs alone or combined with DDP could improve clinical effectiveness and quality of life and reduce AEs, compared to DDP alone. HSC and KA, combined with DDP, may be the most effective considering clinical effective rate and improvement of KPS score, respectively. FFKS, either used alone or in combination therapy with DDP, may be the best in reducing AEs. However, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to further support the evidence.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021285275.

Scheule A, Markowiak T, Ried M. The Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusion With Permanent Indwelling Pleural Catheters

BACKGROUND

40 000 to 60 000 people develop malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in Germany each year. The most common causes are lung cancer and breast cancer. Patients with pleural carcinomatosis have a median survival time of four months.

METHODS

We investigated the current health services situation regarding treatment with indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) versus talc pleurodesis (TP) in Germany based on registry data from the Federal Statistical Office, the Pleural Tumor Registry of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery, and the IPC registry of the ewimed GmbH company. In addition, we conducted a selective literature review on IPC and TP.

RESULTS

The symptoms of dyspnea and thoracic pressure determine the need for therapy in MPE. Both TP and IPC are effective treatment options for MPE. Both therapeutic procedures are considered equally effective with respect to the relief of dyspnea, post-interventional quality of life, and complication rates. TP yields a higher rate of successful pleurodesis than IPC (relative risk: 1.56; 95% confidence interval: [1.26; 1.92]; p < 0.0001), while patients who receive an IPC stay in the hospital for a shorter time than those who undergo TP (a difference of slightly more than two days). The survival of patients with MPE is not affected by which of the two local therapeutic procedures is chosen.

CONCLUSION

The indication for either IPC or TP needs to be determined individually for each patient on the basis of his or her general condition, symptoms, clinical situation ("trapped lung"), and prognosis.