Monopolar and Bipolar Combination Injuries of the Clavicle: Retrospective Incidence Analysis and Proposal of a New Classification System

Midshaft clavicle fractures with associated ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint injuries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Isolated midshaft clavicle fractures (MCF) and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but simultaneous cases are rare and often receive insufficient clinical attention, resulting in missed diagnoses. Moreover, there is no consensus on the injury mechanism, classification, and treatment, and the prognosis remains poorly summarized. This review aims to provide an overview of MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries, focusing on injury mechanism, classification, treatment, and prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the literature published between 1962 and 2024 on PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE using the search terms "clavicle fracture [Title/Abstract]) AND (acromioclavicular [Title/Abstract])". Studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients with MCF and ipsilateral ACJ injuries were included. 37 studies were included after screening. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Data on study design, patient demographics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were extracted for qualitative analysis. We then summarized key findings and presented our insights.

RESULTS

MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries are often associated with comorbidities such as rib fractures, hemopneumothorax, scapula fractures, neurovascular injuries, and atypical MCF displacement patterns. These cases should raise suspicion for combined injuries. Due to the "floating" nature of the lateral clavicle, the "Piano Key Sign" is typically negative and not reliable for diagnosis. Initial ACJ evaluation may be inconclusive, so reevaluation after MCF fixation is recommended. Type IV ACJ injuries can be underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs, and additional axillary radiographs and CT scans may better visualize posterior clavicle displacement. Most researchers believe ACJ capsule and ligament damage occurs first, but is insufficient to cause significant dislocation, suggesting that isolated MCF may involve combined ACJ injury with intact coracoclavicular ligaments. Notably, most patients reported favorable outcomes without major complications within two years, regardless of treatment approach.

CONCLUSIONS

MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries are rare and often missed when ACJ injuries are mild. The injury mechanism is unclear, and no classification system exists to indicate severity. These injuries are typically treated separately without a unified protocol. Despite promising outcomes, further studies are needed to address these issues and improve understanding of long-term results.

Post-Traumatic Left Subclavian Artery Pseudoaneurysm Secondary to Clavicular Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review

Subclavian artery pseudoaneurysms are rare but potentially life-threatening vascular injuries frequently associated with trauma such as clavicle fractures. In this paper we describe the case of a 49-year-old male who developed a post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the subclavian artery after a bicycle accident. The diagnosis was delayed due to non-specific symptoms and an initially missed aneurysm on computed tomography imaging. Persistent pain, swelling, and erythema in the subclavian region prompted further detailed diagnostics, which ultimately revealed the pseudoaneurysm. The patient was successfully treated with endovascular stent-graft implantation. We screened the PubMed database to identify similar cases managed exclusively through endovascular intervention. Reports of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms and those treated with open surgery were excluded. Variables such as time to diagnosis, clinical presentation, features of pseudoaneurysms, and complications were analyzed to highlight the role of endovascular techniques as a minimally invasive and effective treatment option. These cases pose both a diagnostic and a therapeutic challenge, as early recognition of symptoms is crucial to prevent serious complications including thrombosis, neurological deficits, and even limb loss.

Ipsilateral Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation and midshaft clavicle fracture: A case report

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. While acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are much less common. However, ipsilateral combinations of these injuries are quite rare with only a few cases reported in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 29-year-old man who sustained a combination of ipsilateral AC joint dislocation and midshaft clavicle fracture. He underwent open reduction and plate fixation of the clavicle fracture, as well as semi-rigid surgical implants used to restore both the AC ligaments and the coracoclavicular joint. one year follow-up revealed that the patient had a complete range of motion and excellent shoulder scores. This case presents a rare presentation of such combination of injuries, contributing valuable insights to the literature on such rare injuries.

CONCLUSION

Combined midshaft clavicle fractures and AC joint dislocations are considered quite rare. Timely diagnosis of such injuries leads to great functional outcomes. AC joint dislocation should be suspected with midshaft clavicle fractures and should be investigated radiologically and clinically in an appropriate manner. Still, there is no consensus on the optimal management of such injuries.

Mid-shaft Clavicle Fracture with Disguised Ipsilateral Type IV Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation - A Rare Case Report

Introduction

Clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular (AC) joint disruptions are very common injuries. However, both injuries occurring simultaneously are very rare entities.

Case Report

In this article, we report a case of 21-year-old gentleman with a history of road traffic accident with a right mid-shaft clavicle fracture. We planned for the right clavicle plating. Intraoperatively incidentally, we found that the patient is having type 4 rockwood AC joint disruption with complete posterior displacement and gross instability. We repaired it after plating the clavicle using Ethibond with intraosseous sutures and augmented with trans acromion k wire. Later, k wire was removed, and the patient regained full range of motion shoulder after subsequent follow-up and physiotherapy.

Conclusion

Clavicle fractures with ipsilateral AC joint disruptions are very rare. Diagnosing the AC joint disruption and appropriate management is very essential to regain the shoulder function and outcome.

[Treatment strategy for severe implosion injuries of the lateral chest wall]

In the majority of cases implosion injuries to the thoracic wall are caused by blunt, massive force acting on the thorax. Basically, different regions and directions of the acting energy have to be taken into account. In common usage, the term implosion injury has become established, especially for the sequelae of lateral energy impact. Particular attention should be paid to the stability of the shoulder girdle, the underlying hemithorax and its intrathoracic organs.

Ipsilateral Rockwood type IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation and midshaft clavicle fracture: a case report and review of the literature

The combination of ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint dislocation and midshaft clavicle fracture is rare. In the last 30 years, only 29 cases have been reported in literature. We present a case of a 55-year-old woman with this combined injury pattern on the right side after a fall from a bicycle. She underwent open reduction and plate fixation of the clavicle fracture and repair of both the acromioclavicular ligaments and the coracoclavicular joint with semi-rigid surgical implants. Six months of follow-up showed satisfactory results with full range of motion. In addition, we provide an overview of the literature regarding this rare injury pattern with treatment options and functional outcomes.