Analyzing the Fitting of Novel Preformed Osteosynthesis Plates for the Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Fractures

Optimal Plate Choice for High-Neck Mandibular Condyle Fracture: A Mechanistic Analysis of 16 Options

(1) Background: Mandibular fractures are common, with the condylar process being a frequent site of injury, accounting for 25-45% of cases. This research aims to assess the mechanical suitability of various plates for high-neck condyle fractures. (2) Methods: Polyurethane models mimicking high-neck condyle fractures were utilized in this study. Sixteen distinct plate designs, constructed from titanium sheets, were tested. The figures underwent force assessments on a durability testing apparatus, and the relationship between used force and fracture movement was documented. (3) Results: For high-neck breaking, the two straight plates emerged as the most effective, aligning with established osteosynthesis standards. The second-best plate exhibited nearly half the strength of the gold standard. (4) Conclusions: In response to the aim of this study, considering the mechanical aspects, the double plain plate stands out as the optimal choice for osteosynthesis in cases of high-neck fractures of the mandibular condylar process. In addition, the authors propose the Mechanical Excellence Factor (MEF) as a superior metric for appraising a plate's mechanical force, surpassing the conventional Plate Design Factor (PDF).

Patient-specific plates for facial fracture surgery: A retrospective case series

OBJECTIVES

Surgeons often encounter challenges when treating maxillofacial fractures using conventional methods that involve trimming or bending ready-made titanium plates for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) since it can be time-consuming, imprecise, and inconvenient. This retrospective case series aimed to introduce a novel bone reduction method that utilizes virtual planning, patient-specific surgical guides, and titanium plates.

METHODS

Seven patients with mandibular symphysis or subcondylar fractures resulting from facial trauma underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or facial CT scans, and their medical histories were documented. Virtual surgery was conducted based on three-dimensional (3D) stereolithography images derived from CT scans using the FaceGide software (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea). ORIF was performed using patient-specific surgical guides and plates that were designed, printed, and milled. Radiographic, clinical, and occlusal evaluations were conducted at two weeks and six weeks postoperatively. Subsequently, 3D images from virtual surgery and postoperative CT scans were compared.

RESULTS

The comparison of 3D virtual surgery and postoperative images revealed minimal surface differences of less than 1 mm. T-scan evaluations indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two- and six-week postoperative assessments. Favorable clinical outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

This novel method demonstrated stable outcomes in terms of occlusion and healing, with no notable complications. Consequently, this approach may serve as a viable alternative to conventional methods.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Facial fracture surgery that utilizes patient-specific surgical guides and plates within a digital workflow can facilitate meticulous surgical planning, reducing the risk of complications and minimizing operation time.

Quantitative Assessment of the Restoration of Original Anatomy after 3D Virtual Reduction of Long Bone Fractures

Background: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of 3D image-based virtual reduction by validating the evaluation criteria according to guidelines suggested by the AO Surgery Reference. Methods: For this experiment, 19 intact radial ORTHObones (ORTHObones radius, 3B Scientific, Germany, Hamburg) without any fractures were prepared. All ORTHObones with six cortical marking holes (three points on the distal part and three points on the proximal part) were scanned using a CT scanner twice (before/after intentional fracture of the ORTHObone). After the virtual reduction of all 19 ORTHObones, accuracy evaluations using the four criteria (length variation, apposition variation, alignment variation, Rotation Variation) suggested in the AO Surgery Reference were performed. Results: The mean (M) length variation was 0.42 mm, with 0.01 mm standard deviation (SD). The M apposition variation was 0.48 mm, with 0.40 mm SD. The M AP angulation variation (for alignment variation) was 3.24°, with 2.95° SD. The M lateral angulation variation (for alignment variation) was 0.09°, with 0.13° SD. The M angle of axial rotation was 1.27° with SD: 1.19°. Conclusions: The method of accuracy evaluation used in this study can be helpful in establishing a reliable plan.