Clinical Implementational and Site-Specific Workflows for a 1.5T MR-Linac

Characterization of spatial integrity with active and passive implants in a low-field magnetic resonance linear accelerator scanner

Background and Purpose

Standard imaging protocols can guarantee the spatial integrity of magnetic resonance (MR) images utilized in radiotherapy. However, the presence of metallic implants can significantly compromise this integrity. Our proposed method aims at characterizing the geometric distortions induced by both passive and active implants commonly encountered in planning images obtained from a low-field 0.35 T MR-linear accelerator (LINAC).

Materials and Methods

We designed a spatial integrity phantom defining 1276 control points and covering a field of view of 20x20x20 cm3. This phantom was scanned in a water tank with and without different implants used in hip and shoulder arthroplasty procedures as well as with active cardiac stimulators. The images were acquired with the clinical planning sequence (balanced steady-state free-precession, resolution 1.5x1.5x1.5 mm3). Spatial integrity was assessed by the Euclidian distance between the control point detected on the image and their theoretical locations. A first plane free of artefact (FPFA) was defined to evaluate the spatial integrity beyond the larger banding artefact.

Results

In the region extending up to 20 mm from the largest banding artefacts, the tested passive and active implants could cause distortions up to 2 mm and 3 mm, respectively. Beyond this region the spatial integrity was recovered and the image could be considered as unaffected by the implants.

Conclusions

We characterized the impact of common implants on a low field MR-LINAC planning sequence. These measurements could support the creation of extra margin while contouring organs at risk and target volumes in the vicinity of implants.

Simulating an intra-fraction adaptive workflow to enable PTV margin reduction in MRIgART volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate SBRT

Purpose

This study simulates a novel prostate SBRT intra-fraction re-optimization workflow in MRIgART to account for prostate intra-fraction motion and evaluates the dosimetric benefit of reducing PTV margins.

Materials and methods

VMAT prostate SBRT treatment plans were created for 10 patients using two different PTV margins, one with a 5 mm margin except 3 mm posteriorly (standard) and another using uniform 2 mm margins (reduced). All plans were prescribed to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and adapted onto each daily MRI dataset. An intra-fraction adaptive workflow was simulated for the reduced margin group by synchronizing the radiation delivery with target position from cine MRI imaging. Intra-fraction delivered dose was reconstructed and prostate DVH metrics were evaluated under three conditions for the reduced margin plans: Without motion compensation (no-adapt), with a single adapt prior to treatment (ATP), and lastly for intra-fraction re-optimization during delivery (intra). Bladder and rectum DVH metrics were compared between the standard and reduced margin plans.

Results

As expected, rectum V18 Gy was reduced by 4.4 ± 3.9%, D1cc was reduced by 12.2 ± 6.8% (3.4 ± 2.3 Gy), while bladder reductions were 7.8 ± 5.6% for V18 Gy, and 9.6 ± 7.3% (3.4 ± 2.5 Gy) for D1cc for the reduced margin reference plans compared to the standard PTV margin. For the intrafraction replanning approach, average intra-fraction optimization times were 40.0 ± 2.9 seconds, less than the time to deliver one of the four VMAT arcs (104.4 ± 9.3 seconds) used for treatment delivery. When accounting for intra-fraction motion, prostate V36.25 Gy was on average 96.5 ± 4.0%, 99.1 ± 1.3%, and 99.6 ± 0.4 for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. The minimum dose received by the prostate was less than 95% of the prescription dose in 84%, 36%, and 10% of fractions, for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Intra-fraction re-optimization improves prostate coverage, specifically the minimum dose to the prostate, and enables PTV margin reduction and subsequent OAR sparing. Fast re-optimizations enable uninterrupted treatment delivery.

A new workflow of the on-line 1.5-T MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in achieving dose constraints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of patients who underwent on-line adaptive radiation therapy using a 1.5-T MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The workflow in MRgART was established by reviewing the disease site, number of fractions, and re-planning procedures. Five cases of prostate cancer were selected to evaluate the feasibility of the new workflow with respect to achieving dose constraints.

RESULTS

Between December 2021 and September 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent MRgART using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Of these, 20 had prostate cancer, 10 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 had pancreatic cancer, 5 had lymph node oligo-metastasis, 3 had renal cancer, 3 had bone metastasis, 2 had liver metastasis from colon cancer, and 1 had a mediastinal tumor. Among a total of 247 fractions, 235 (95%) were adapt-to-shape (ATS)-based re-planning. The median ATS re-planning time in all 50 cases was 17 min. In the feasibility study, all dose constraint sets were met in all 5 patients by ATS re-planning. Conversely, a total of 14 dose constraints in 5 patients could not be achieved by virtual plan without using adaptive re-planning. These dose constraints included the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc in the planning target volume and the maximum dose of the rectal/bladder wall.

CONCLUSION

A new workflow of 1.5-T MRgART was established and found to be feasible. Our evaluation of the dose constraint achievement demonstrated the effectiveness of the workflow.

Intra-fraction motion of pelvic oligometastases and feasibility of PTV margin reduction using MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy

Purpose

This study assesses the impact of intra-fraction motion and PTV margin size on target coverage for patients undergoing radiation treatment of pelvic oligometastases. Dosimetric sparing of the bowel as a function of the PTV margin is also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Seven patients with pelvic oligometastases previously treated on our MR-linac (35 Gy in 5 fractions) were included in this study. Retrospective adaptive plans were created for each fraction on the daily MRI datasets using PTV margins of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm. Dosimetric constraint violations and GTV coverage were measured as a function of PTV margin size. The impact of intra-fraction motion on GTV coverage was assessed by tracking the GTV position on the cine MR images acquired during treatment delivery and creating an intra-fraction dose distribution for each IMRT beam. The intra-fraction dose was accumulated for each fraction to determine the total dose delivered to the target for each PTV size.

Results

All OAR constraints were achieved in 85.7%, 94.3%, and 100.0% of fractions when using 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins while scaling to 95% PTV coverage. Compared to plans with a 5 mm PTV margin, there was a 27.4 ± 12.3% (4.0 ± 2.2 Gy) and an 18.5 ± 7.3% (2.7 ± 1.4 Gy) reduction in the bowel D_0.5cc dose for 2 mm and 3 mm PTV margins, respectively. The target dose (GTV V_{35 Gy}) was on average 100.0 ± 0.1% (99.6 - 100%), 99.6 ± 1.0% (97.2 - 100%), and 99.0 ± 1.4% (95.0 - 100%), among all fractions for the 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins on the adaptive plans when accounting for intra-fraction motion, respectively.

Conclusion

A 2 mm PTV margin achieved a minimum of 95% GTV coverage while reducing the dose to the bowel for all patients.

A pilot study of same-day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MR-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT)

We conducted a prospective pilot study evaluating the feasibility of same day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MRI-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT) for urgent palliative indications (NCT#03824366). All (16/16) patients were able to complete 99% of their first on-table attempted fractions, and no grades 3-5 toxicities occurred.

MRI-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A NEW PARADIGM

Radiotherapy is one of the key treatment modalities for primary prostate cancer. During the last decade, significant advances were made in radiotherapy technology leading to increasing both physical and biological precision. Being a loco-regional treatment approach, radiotherapy requires accurate target dose deposition while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Conventional radiotherapy is based on computerized tomography (CT) images both for radiotherapy planning and image-guidance, however, shortcomings of CT as soft tissue imaging tool are well known. Nowadays, our ability to further escalate radiotherapy dose using hypofractionation is limited by uncertainties in CT-based image guidance and verification. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well established imaging method for pelvic organs. In prostate cancer specifically, MRI accurately depicts prostate zonal anatomy, rectum, bladder, and pelvic floor structures with previously unseen precision owing to its sharp soft tissue contrast. The advantages of including MRI in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer radiotherapy are multifold. MRI allows for true adaptive radiotherapy to unfold based on daily MRI images taken before, during and after each radiotherapy fraction. It enables accurate dose escalation to the prostate and intraprostatic tumor lesions. Technically, MRI high-strength magnetic field and linear accelerator high energy electromagnetic beams are hardly compatible, and important efforts were made to overcome these technical challenges and integrate MRI and linear accelerator into one single treatment device, called MRI-linac. Different systems are produced by two leading vendors in the field and currently, there are around 100 MRI-linacs worldwide in clinical operations. In this narrative review paper, we discuss historical perspective of image guidance in radiotherapy, basic elements of MRI, current clinical developments in MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy, and challenges associated with the use of MRI-linac in clinical practice.