Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Study

Does intra-articular injection of PRP help patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis after joint puncture? a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review to evaluate whether intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) after joint puncture can aid in the recovery of patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science as of March 3, 2024. Retrieved a total of 392 articles. We included all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All RCTs, including studies on PRP injection after joint puncture in patients with TMJOA. The primary outcome was pain reduction, and the secondary outcome was the improvement of maximal mouth opening (MMO) and joint sounds. All outcome measures were analyzed by calculating the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 392 articles were retrieved, and ultimately, 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. The study involved 199 TMJOA patients. The results indicated that compared to the control group, PRP injection after joint puncture showed significant improvements in alleviating pain (SMD =-0.99; 95% CI =-1.35 ~-0.63; P <0.00001, I2 = 59%) and MMO (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.30 ~ 0.95; P <0.0002, I2 = 54%) among TMJOA patients. However, there was no significant improvement observed in terms of joint sounds (SMD =-0.34; 95% CI = -0.71 ~ 0.02; P = 0.06, I2 = 0%) with the PRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to joint puncture alone, the intra-articular injection of PRP after joint puncture was more effective in relieving pain. At 1-month and 6-month follow-ups, patients in the PRP group showed significant improvements in MMO compared to the control group. However, after 12 months of follow-up, limited evidence indicated significant improvements in MMO and joint sounds.

Efficacy and safety of biological products in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various biological products, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combination treatments, in alleviating pain and improving function in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Our review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL Cochrane databases from the beginning until July 2022 hinged upon the previously designed search strings, and citations were downloaded. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients over 18 years old with hip OA, comparing biological products to placebo or other interventions. Data were collected on pain, hip range of motion, functional status, quality of life, and radiological outcomes. Meta-analysis was done on the above-listed outcomes.

RESULTS

From 18 RCTs involving 1648 patients, we analyzed the efficacy of various biological products. The mean age of patients was 60.2 years (SD 2.4), and the mean follow-up period was 7.22 months. PRP and HA treatments showed no statistically significant differences in VAS scores in the short-term (SMD = - 0.49, 95% CI, - 1.34-0.36), mid-term (SMD = - 0.25, 95% CI - 1.64-1.15), and long-term (SMD = - 0.22, 95% CI - 1.57-1.12) follow-ups. However, significant differences were found in WOMAC pain short-term (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI - 0.06-0.87), mid-term (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI - 0.85-1.83), and long-term outcomes (SMD = - 0.42, 95% CI - 0.80 to - 0.04). Complications were observed in HA (8%), Hylan G-F (4.9%), and GP-C (50%) groups, while PRP and BCC did not report any complications.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicates that biological products, particularly PRP and HA, provide varying degrees of pain relief and functional improvement in hip OA patients, with a generally acceptable safety profile. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the need for further research to establish standardized treatment protocols and long-term efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42022312562.

Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Has No Advantage Over Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microfragmented adipose tissue has been proposed for intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis. There are little data comparing the outcomes of treatment between microfragmented adipose tissue and other biological treatments.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing microfragmented aspirated fat injections to other orthobiologics, hyaluronic acid, and corticosteroid injections for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify pertinent publications in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, including all level 1 to 3 studies from 2000 to 2023. Validated knee scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee) were included as outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence and the modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the analysis. One study had a high risk of bias; 4 studies had some risk of bias. The overall study quality was fair, and the certainty of evidence was low. The pooled estimate for VAS scores did not demonstrate significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months. The pooled estimate for the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life subscales did not demonstrate significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences for both the clinical outcomes and pain scores between microfragmented adipose tissue and other orthobiologics for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. However, modest study quality, some risk of bias, and low certainty of evidence reduce external validity, and these results must be viewed with some caution.

Recent development of mitochondrial metabolism and dysfunction in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disorder characterized by cartilage degradation, synovial inflammation, and altered subchondral bone structure. Recent insights have identified mitochondrial dysfunction as a pivotal factor in OA pathogenesis, contributing to chondrocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, and extracellular matrix degradation. Disruptions in mitochondrial dynamics, including impaired biogenesis, mitophagy, and metabolic shifts from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, exacerbate cartilage damage by promoting the production of reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes such as ADAMTS and MMPs. This review explores the molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial dysfunction in OA, emphasizing its role in cartilage homeostasis and inflammation. Furthermore, it highlights emerging therapeutic strategies targeting mitochondrial pathways, including antioxidants, mitophagy enhancers, and metabolic modulators, as potential interventions to mitigate disease progression, which offer promising avenues for advancing personalized and disease-modifying treatments in OA.

Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study

INTRODUCTION

Non-union fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, contributing to considerable morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments, such as autologous bone grafting, are effective but have limitations, including donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including growth factor-rich concentrate (GFC), have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, leveraging the body's natural healing mechanisms by concentrating and applying growth factors directly to the fracture site. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of GFC injections in the treatment of non-union fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This quasi-experimental study included 17 patients with non-union fractures of various long bones, treated under fluoroscopic guidance with three doses of 5 mL GFC injections, administered 2 weeks apart at the non-union site. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and comorbid conditions were recorded. Growth factor levels were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between the amount of growth factors and treatment outcomes. Radiographic assessments and bony callus appearance were evaluated at the baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up post-last injection.

RESULTS

No adverse effects were reported throughout the duration of the study. The majority of patients (82.4%) showed significant improvement, evidenced by enhanced bony callus formation and reduced non-union signs. No significant correlation was found between the specific growth factor levels and the clinical outcomes of non-union of fractures. However, the presence of comorbid conditions significantly influenced treatment efficacy, underscoring the importance of patient selection in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Administration of GFC injection is safe and potentially efficacious for the treatment of non-union fractures, offering an alternative to traditional surgical interventions. These results laid the foundation for prospective, adequately powered, randomized and non-randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up to further establish the efficacy of GFC in patients with non-union fractures. Moreover, formulation protocols need to be optimized while considering patient-specific variables, to ensure reproducibility and repeatability of outcomes from these studies.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1.

Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is the most prevalent degenerative joint condition that places a substantial financial and medical burden on society. However, due to drawbacks such as inefficiency, adverse effects, and brief duration of action, the clinical efficacy of the current major therapies for knee OA is largely restricted. Therefore, novel medication development is highly required to address these issues. Numerous studies in recent years have established that nanomaterials can be a potential and highly effective way to overcome these challenges. In this review, the anatomical distinctions between healthy and OA knee joints, as well as novel advances in the field of nanomaterials for the treatment of knee OA are summarized. The limits of the present therapeutic strategies for treating knee OA are also highlighted, as well as the potential prospects of nanomaterials in the future.

Addressing Knee Osteoarthritis Pathology Through Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment: A Comprehensive Review

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining popularity across various medical fields, including orthopedics, for its potential in tissue regeneration and wound healing. As intra-articular treatments evolve, PRP has emerged as a promising option for managing knee osteoarthritis, meniscus, and ligament injuries. This review aims to provide an update on the current applications of PRP in treating knee osteoarthritis and its clinical implications in orthopedic and sports medicine. We reviewed 180 eligible studies, and our findings suggest that PRP injections significantly improve knee joint function compared to alternative treatments. The use of PRP across various medical fields has been growing in popularity recently. PRP is a biological product derived from the plasma portion of a patient's own blood, containing a higher concentration of platelets than normal. Its potential for tissue regeneration and wound healing has drawn significant attention from orthopedic surgeons, especially as intra-articular treatment options continue to evolve. The benefits of PRP in treating various osteoarticular conditions have sparked considerable interest within the orthopedic community, particularly for managing knee osteoarthritis, meniscus tears, and ligament injuries. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the current applications of PRP in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis and to offer clinical insights into its use in orthopedic and sports medicine practices. We reviewed 180 relevant titles and abstracts that met the inclusion criteria. Compared to other treatment options, PRP injections significantly enhance knee joint function.

Current Non-Surgical Curative Regenerative Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disease affecting middle-aged and elderly individuals, with knee pain as a common complaint. Standard therapy approaches generally attempt to alleviate pain and inflammation, using various pharmacological and non-pharmacological options. However, the efficacy of these therapies in long-term tissue repair remains debated. As an alternative, regenerative medicine offers a promising strategy, with decreased adverse event rates and increasing evidence of safety and efficacy. This review will outline current advances in regenerative medicine for knee OA, emphasizing outpatient clinic-based therapies that use orthobiological and non-biological products. Different strategies based on orthobiologics are discussed as potential regenerative options for the management of knee OA. Cell-free therapies including platelet-rich plasma, autologous anti-inflammatories, exosomes, human placenta extract, and mitochondrial transplantation are discussed, focusing on their potential for cartilage regeneration. Additionally, cell-based therapies with regenerative properties including bone marrow aspirate concentrate, adipose stromal vascular fraction, microfat, nanofat, stem cell therapy, and genetically modified cells as part of orthobiologics, are being investigated. Also, this study is looking into non-biological approaches such as using gold-induced cytokines, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and ozone therapy. The mechanisms of action, effectiveness, and clinical applications of each therapy are being explored, providing insights into their role in the management of knee OA.

The Outcomes at 3 Years in 82 Knees with Kellgren and Lawrence 2-3 Osteoarthritis Treated with an Autologous Protein Fluid Concentrate Produced with a Fluid Volume Reducer

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition with significant emotional and economic impacts. Current treatment options may only provide temporary pain relief and are not regenerative, thus the progression of knee OA is not deterred and total knee arthroplasty is inevitable. Injection therapies with orthobiologics possess regenerative potential and are an emerging treatment option. We present a prospective study aimed at examining patients with knee OA who had received an autologous platelet concentrate fluid (APCF) injection produced through a fluid volume reducer.

METHODS

This was an observational review of the results following an APCF injection in a cohort of patients at a single site. Patients were included in the study if they were diagnosed with K/L grade 2-3 knee OA and treated with an APCF knee injection. Patients were excluded if they had obtained an orthobiologic injection in the three months prior to study enrollment or if baseline data were unavailable. Knee score and function score were used to assess patients at the baseline and post-injection follow-ups.

RESULTS

Improvements for knee score were statistically significant for the follow-ups at three months, six months, one year, and three years. Function score improved, with statistically significant changes for the three month and three year follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that there is some utility in using APCF injection for knee OA, with improvements that may be sustained up to three years in some patients.

Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Continuous Outcomes for the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials that assess the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and report a continuous primary outcome measure with statistical significance.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database was performed on August 10, 2024. All randomized controlled trials addressing the use of PRP for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were included that reported statistically significant primary continuous outcomes. The continuous fragility index (CFI) and continuous fragility quotient (CFQ) were calculated using approximative method, as previously described using the mean and standard deviation of the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

There were a total of 34 eligible outcomes available for analysis. The overall median CFI across all included studies was 5.7 (IQR: 4.8-9.9). The overall median CFQ across all included studies was 0.131 (IQR: 0.055-0.243). Loss to follow-up was greater than the CFI in only 3 of 34 eligible outcomes (8.8%). The most analyzed outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (n = 9) with a median CFI of 6.6 and median CFQ of 0.250. The outcome with the highest median CFI was the WOMAC stiffness subscale at 93. Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a nonstatistically significant trend toward decreasing CFI (-0.497) and a statistically significant decrease in CFQ (-0.681; p = 0.03) with increasing grades of osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an overall median CFI of 5.7 and CFQ of 0.131 for RCTs that report statistically significant continuous outcomes for the use of PRP in treating symptomatic knee OA. Although there are no current guidelines regarding statistical fragility of continuous outcomes, these results can be considered fragile given statistical significance may be reversed with only a few changes in patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Interventional Study

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disorder causing pain, stiffness, and reduced function, significantly impacting the quality of life. Current treatments mainly provide symptomatic relief, with limited efficacy in halting disease progression. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a biological therapy rich in growth factors, has gained attention as a potential treatment for knee OA due to its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the efficacy of PRP in managing primary knee OA.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective interventional study included 100 patients diagnosed with primary knee OA, categorized using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale. Leukocyte-reduced PRP was prepared using the double-spin method and injected into the knee joint. The efficacy of PRP was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores at six weeks, three months, and six months post-injection. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with significance set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in the WOMAC and VAS scores were observed at all-time points post-PRP injection. The WOMAC score decreased from a baseline of 81.06 to 63.52 at six months (p < 0.001), and the VAS score reduced from 7.53 to 3.09 (p < 0.001). PRP was more effective in patients with lower body mass index (BMI) and less severe OA (Grades 1 and 2). Adverse events were mild, with 18% reporting mild pain or swelling.

CONCLUSION

PRP therapy significantly improves pain and function in patients with primary knee OA, particularly in early-stage disease. The treatment is generally safe, with minor adverse effects. PRP presents a promising non-surgical option, especially for those seeking to delay or avoid knee arthroplasty.

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome and the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections: A Systematic Review

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is one of the most prevalent causes of lateral hip pain. The incidence rate is as high as 1.8 patients per 1000 annually, with females predominantly affected. We compared and analysed the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating GTPS. Literature search was carried out on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane by two independent reviewers using the terms: 'Greater Trochanteric Pain syndrome' and 'Platelet-rich plasma'. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool were used to assess bias. Nine studies were shortlisted and reviewed for patient sample size, diagnostic modalities, the presence of tendinopathy or bursitis, the number of PRP injections administered, and the length of symptom relief achieved. We analysed nine studies between 2013 to 2024 comprising of a total of 508 patients who received treatment with PRP injections for lateral hip pain. There was an improvement and sustained relief in symptoms in eight studies, while one reported no change. Many studies indicated PRP injections to be more effective than corticosteroid injections (CSI) in treating GTPS. PRP appears to be an effective injectable treatment option for GTPS, which does not respond to conservative therapy. However, due to the limitations of the current literature, there is a need for more large-scale, high-quality randomized clinical trials to assess further the effectiveness of PRP for treating GTPS.

Development of scaffold-free tissue-engineered constructs derived from mesenchymal stem cells with serum-free media for cartilage repair and long-term preservation

Synovial mesenchymal stem cells (sMSCs) have great potential for cartilage repair, but their therapeutic design to avoid adverse effects associated with unknown factors remains a challenge. In addition, because long-term preservation is indispensable to maintain high quality levels until implantation, it is necessary to reduce their fluctuations. This study aimed to investigate the properties and feasibility of novel scaffold-free tissue-engineered constructs using serum-free media and to develop long-term preservation methods. sMSCs were cultured in serum-free media, seeded at high density in a monolayer, and finally developed as a sheet-like construct called "gMSC1". The properties of frozen gMSC1 (Fro-gMSC1) were compared with those of refrigerated gMSC1 (Ref-gMSC1) and then examined by their profile. Chondrogenic differentiation potential was analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and quantification of glycosaminoglycan content. Xenografts into the cartilage defect model in rats were evaluated by histological staining. gMSC1 showed nearly similar properties independent of the preservation conditions. The animal experiment demonstrated that the defect could be filled with cartilage-like tissue with good integration to the adjacent tissue, suggesting that gMSC1 was formed and replaced the cartilage. Furthermore, several chondrogenesis-related factors were significantly secreted inside and outside gMSC1. Morphological analysis of Fro-gMSC1 revealed comparable quality levels to those of fresh gMSC1. Thus, if cryopreserved, gMSC1, with no complicated materials or processes, could have sustained cartilage repair capacity. gMSC1 is a prominent candidate in novel clinical practice for cartilage repair, allowing for large quantities to be manufactured at one time and preserved for a long term by freezing.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10616-024-00637-y.

Platelet lysate for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

Intra-articular injection-based therapy is often used aside conservative treatment and lifestyle modifications to manage knee osteoarthritis (KO) patients. Conventional injections contain steroids and hyaluronic acid, while more recently multipotential adult stem cell, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet lysate (PL) injections have been used to promote cartilage regeneration or repair. The aim of the current study is to analyse current evidence on PL injections for the treatment of KO and to determine if these are effective and how these perform compared to other injection regimens. The databases of Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched on 30 June 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool for animal studies and Cochrane RoB 2 as well as ROBINS-I tool for human studies. Studies were included if these were in English, any year, and regarded animals with osteoarthritis (OA) or human adult patients with OA. In vitro trials and non-adult human studies were excluded. Results on OA symptom stage and severity, and pain were recorded. The research retrieved three human studies (n = 48, n = 25, n = 58) and four animal studies: one rabbit, two studies, and one rat study. PL was found to decrease KO symptoms at follow-up ≤ 1 year with respect to baseline levels and when compared to hyaluronic acid or platelet-rich plasma. Symptoms returned 6 months-1 year after the final administration, with studies showing peak efficacy at approximately 6 months. Animal studies showed clinical improvements, reduction of lameness, and partial effect on the cartilage regeneration of the seven studies, two had a high risk of bias, four were associated to some concerns, and one had low risk. A major source of bias in these studies was the use of questionnaires and scoring that could be subject to interpretation. Overall, PL was well-tolerated and showed efficacy comparable to PRP; when pain control was assessed, it showed similar efficacy compared to hyaluronic acid. These findings may support its use in clinical trials to confirm these initial findings; future research should also focus on the comparison with other non-surgical treatments, on a more detail of the potential regenerative properties, and to optimise the treatment schedule.

A Review of Current Approaches to Pain Management in Knee Osteoarthritis with a Focus on Italian Clinical Landscape

The global cases of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are projected to increase by 74.9% by 2050. Currently, over half of patients remain dissatisfied with their pain relief. This review addresses unmet needs for moderate-to-severe KOA pain; it offers evidence and insights for improved management. Italian experts from the fields of rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedics, primary care, and pain therapy have identified several key issues. They emphasized the need for standardized care protocols to address inconsistencies in patient management across different specialties. Early diagnosis is crucial, as cartilage responds better to early protective and structural therapies. Faster access to physiatrist evaluation and reimbursement for physical, rehabilitative, and pharmacological treatments, including intra-articular (IA) therapy, could reduce access disparities. Concerns surround the adverse effects of oral pharmacological treatments, highlighting the need for safer alternatives. Patient satisfaction with corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid-based IA therapies reduces over time and there is no consensus on the optimal IA therapy protocol. Surgery should be reserved for severe symptoms and radiographic KOA evidence, as chronic pain post-surgery poses significant societal and economic burdens. The experts advocate for a multidisciplinary approach, promoting interaction and collaboration between specialists and general practitioners, to enhance KOA care and treatment consistency in Italy.

The combined application of pulsed electromagnetic fields and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of early-stage knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of combined treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in improving pain and functional mobility among patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). We hypothesize that this combined therapy can yield superior treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Based on the different treatment regimens, we divided 48 patients diagnosed with Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III KOA into 3 groups: the PRP group, the PEMFs group, and the PRP + PEMFs group. Each subtype of KOA patients was randomly assigned to different treatment groups. In the PRP group, patients received intra-articular injections of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma once a month for 3 consecutive months. In the PEMFs group, patients receive low-frequency PEMFs irradiation therapy with a frequency of 30 Hz and intensity of 1.5 mT, once daily, 5 times a week, for a consecutive treatment period of 12 weeks. In the PRP + PEMFs group, patients receive both of the aforementioned treatment protocol. The treatment effects on patients are evaluated at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 post-treatment. Assessment parameters include visual analog scale for pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lequesne Index score, and knee joint range of motion.

RESULTS

From the 4th to the 12th week of treatment, the visual analog scale scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores, and Lequesne index scores of patients in all 3 groups gradually decreased, while knee joint mobility gradually increased (P < .05). At weeks 4, 8, and 12 after treatment, the PRP combined with PEMFs group showed significantly better scores compared to the PRP group and the PEMFs group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). A total of 7 patients experienced adverse reactions such as knee joint swelling, low-grade fever, and worsening knee joint pain after treatment, all of which disappeared within 1 week after treatment. The incidence of complications did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (P = .67).

CONCLUSION

PRP, PEMFs, and the combination of PRP and PEMFs therapy all effectively alleviate knee joint pain and improve joint function. However, compared to single treatment modalities, the combined therapy of PRP and PEMFs demonstrates more pronounced efficacy.

Exploring Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: An In-Depth Analysis

The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in all medical fields is currently gaining popularity (1). PRP is a biological product that can be defined as a segment of the plasma fraction of autologous blood with a platelet concentration level above the baseline (2). The fact that it has uses in tissue regeneration and wound healing has caught the eye of orthopedic surgeons as well, as intra-articular treatments have continued to evolve. Its benefits in the treatment of different osteoarticular pathologies are of great interest in the evolving orthopedic community, targeting mostly knee osteoarthritis, meniscus and ligament injuries (3). The purpose of this review is to update the reader on the current uses of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis pathology and to provide clinical feedback on its uses in the fields of orthopedic and sports medicine practice (4). We proceeded in studying 180 titles and abstracts eligible for inclusion. Compared to alternative treatments, PRP injections greatly improve the function of the knee joint.

Artificial intelligence can be used in the identification and classification of shoulder osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis on plain radiographs: a training study of 7,139 radiograph sets

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Knowledge concerning the use AI models for the classification of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is lacking. We aimed to analyze how a deep learning (DL) model trained to identify and grade GHOA on plain radiographs performs. Our secondary aim was to train a DL model to identify and grade AVN on plain radiographs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A modified ResNet-type network was trained on a dataset of radiographic shoulder examinations from a large tertiary hospital. A total of 7,139 radiographs were included. The dataset included various projections of the shoulder, and the network was trained using stochastic gradient descent. Performance evaluation metrics, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess the network's performance for each outcome.

RESULTS

The network demonstrated AUC values ranging from 0.73 to 0.93 for GHOA classification and > 0.90 for all AVN classification classes. The network exhibited lower AUC for mild cases compared with definitive cases of GHOA. When none and mild grades were combined, the AUC increased, suggesting difficulties in distinguishing between these 2 grades.

CONCLUSION

We found that a DL model can be trained to identify and grade GHOA on plain radiographs. Furthermore, we show that a DL model can identify and grade AVN on plain radiographs. The network performed well, particularly for definitive cases of GHOA and any level of AVN. However, challenges remain in distinguishing between none and mild GHOA grades.

Why Kinematic Alignment Makes Little Sense in Valgus Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Narrative Review

There is a debate about the best alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment (MA) targets in combination with necessary soft tissue releases are the gold standard for TKA in end-stage valgus osteoarthritis. Some authors propagate kinematic alignment (KA) with the aim of restoring the patient's native alignment and minimizing the need for soft tissue releases. Our previous studies showed that MA with standardized soft tissue release produces reproducible results, and that the preoperative phenotype does not influence the results of patients with valgus osteoarthritis. These data suggest that there is no functional advantage to preserving valgus alignment in patients with valgus osteoarthritis. Many patients with valgus osteoarthritis present with a compromised medial collateral ligament and leaving the knee in valgus could increase the risk of secondary instability. The current literature supports MA TKA with soft tissue release as the gold standard. While using more sophisticated enabling technologies like robotic surgery might allow for aiming for very slight (1-2°) valgus alignment on the femoral side, any valgus alignment outside this range should be avoided. This review paper summarizes our current knowledge on the surgical techniques of TKA in patients with valgus osteoarthritis.

Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Knee Osteoarthritis

This comprehensive review provides an in-depth analysis of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as potential treatments for knee osteoarthritis. It explores their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety considerations, and the importance of personalised treatment approaches. The review highlights promising findings regarding the ability of PRP and BMAC to alleviate symptoms, improve joint function, and potentially slow disease progression. It emphasises the need for further research into long-term outcomes, direct comparative studies, protocol standardisation, biomarker identification, and cost-effectiveness assessments to enhance clinical practice. While the review does not directly compare PRP and BMAC, it provides valuable insights into their respective roles in knee osteoarthritis management. The review aims to contribute to evidence-based advancements in regenerative therapies for knee osteoarthritis by addressing critical research priorities and refining treatment strategies.

Are patients with knee osteoarthritis aware that platelet-rich plasma is a treatment option?

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disease, particularly affecting the knees. This condition is often managed through various treatments, including intra-articular injections such as corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP has shown promising outcomes in recent studies although it does lack strong endorsement in some clinical guidelines due to inconsistent results and lack of standardized results. This study was conducted to assess patient awareness and the frequency of PRP offered for the treatment of knee OA, compared to CS and HA. In a cross-sectional study, 46 knee OA patients were surveyed regarding their knowledge and experiences of CS, HA, and PRP injections. The questionnaires were administered between September 2022 and February 2023. Additionally, the study evaluated the severity of patients knee OA, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and gathered demographic information from the participants. CS injections were offered to 93.5%, and 100% of participants had previously heard of this type of injection. HA injections were offered to 37%, and 65.9% of participants had heard of them. PRP was offered to 2%, and 6.5% had ever heard of it. This study underscores the limited awareness and utilization of PRP among knee OA patients. Patients and physicians need to be more informed of all of the treatment options available for knee OA, especially orthobiologics such as PRP. Future research in larger, diverse populations is needed.

One-shot platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is non-inferior to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of supraspinatus tendinosis

PURPOSE

Supraspinatus tendinosis (ST) refers to the intratendinous degeneration of the supraspinatus tendon. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is one of the possible conservative treatments for supraspinatus tendinosis. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single ultrasound-guided PRP injection in the treatment of supraspinatus tendinosis and to assess its non-inferiority to the widely used shockwave therapy.

METHODS

Seventy-two amateur athletes (35 male, mean age: 43.75 ± 10.82, range 21-58 years old) with ST were finally included in the study. All the patients underwent clinical evaluation at baseline, (T0) and at 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) follow-up using the following clinical scales: the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), Constant Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH). A T0 and T3 ultrasound examination was also performed. The findings observed in the recruited patients were compared to the clinical results observed in a retrospective control group made up of 70 patients (32 male, mean age = 41.29 ± 13.85, range 20-65 years old) treated by extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT).

RESULTS

VAS, DASH and Constant scores significantly improved from T0 to T1; the improvement in clinical scores was kept until T3. No local nor systemic adverse events were observed. An improvement in the tendon structure was observed on ultrasound examination. PRP showed a non-statistical inferiority, in terms of efficacy and safety, compared to ESWT.

CONCLUSION

The PRP one-shot injection is a valid conservative treatment to reduce pain, and improve both quality of life and functional scores in patients with supraspinatus tendinosis. Furthermore, the PRP intratendinous one-shot injection showed a non-inferiority in terms of efficacy at the 6-month follow-up, compared to ESWT.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common cause of shoulder pain seen in 3%-5% of the population. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is platelet-rich blood with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties that has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with AC. The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes of range of motion (ROM) and subjective outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS), disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) scores. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, and manuscripts were screened using defined preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion/exclusion using PICOS criteria and extracted data regarding ROM and subjective outcome scores. Nineteen total articles were included. Eleven of the 19 studies recorded ROM as a dependent variable. All articles reported improved ROM with PRP injection when compared to baseline. When recording degrees of shoulder ROM in different planes at the latest follow-up, there were a total of 67 comparative data points for PRP vs. control. Of the 67 comparisons, 62 (93%) had a larger final ROM in the PRP group. VAS scores were reported in 16 of the 19 studies, DASH scores were reported in eight of the 19 articles, and SPADI scores were reported in seven of the 19 articles. VAS, DASH, and SPADI scores were all superior in the PRP group compared to the control. Two studies reported the same final VAS score, but the PRP groups had a larger overall improvement. Of the studies that reported objective ROM outcomes, the PRP group had greater ROM at the longest follow-up compared to control in the vast majority of comparisons. For the studies that reported subjective outcomes, all patients that received PRP had a decrease in VAS pain scores and an improvement in DASH and SPADI questionnaires.

Anterior variable-angle locked plating versus tension band wiring of simple and complex patella fractures - a biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical performance of novel anterior variable-angle locking plates versus tension band wiring used for fixation of simple and complex patella fractures.

METHODS

Sixteen pairs of human cadaveric knees were used to simulate two-part simple transverse AO/OTA 34-C1 and five-part complex AO/OTA 34-C3 patella fractures. The complex fracture pattern was characterized with a medial and a lateral proximal fragment, together with an inferomedial, an inferolateral and an inferior fragment mimicking comminution around the distal patella pole. Eight pairs with simple fractures were split for fixation via either tension band wiring (TBW) through two parallel cannulated screws or anterior variable-angle locked plating, whereas other eight pairs with complex fractures were split for either TBW through two parallel cannulated screws plus circumferential cerclage wiring, or anterior variable-angle locked plating using a cortical caudo-cranial polar screw. Each specimen was tested over 5000 cycles with a range of motion from 90° flexion to full extension by pulling on the quadriceps tendon. Interfragmentary movements were captured by motion tracking.

RESULTS

For both fracture types, the longitudinal and shear articular displacements, measured between the proximal and distal fragments at the central patella aspect between 1000 and 5000 cycles, together with the relative rotations of these fragments around the mediolateral axis were all significantly smaller following anterior variable-angle locked plating versus TBW, p ≤ 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

From a biomechanical perspective, anterior locked plating of both simple and complex patella fractures resulted in less interfragmentary displacement under extended cyclic loading.

The 36-Month Survival Analysis of Conservative Treatment Using Platelet-Rich Plasma Enhanced With Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a musculoskeletal disease that leads to pain, stiffness, and deformity of the load-bearing knee joints. Biologic products including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) are now in the spotlight for the treatment of KOA owing to their role of disease-modifying potential effect. There are still limited studies on the survival rate of KOA treated with biological intervention. We conducted this study to evaluate the primary outcome as the survival rate of KOA treated with PRP enhanced with injectable PRF that helps avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.

METHODS

There were 368 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were informed about this prospective cohort study protocol and signed written consent forms. Each participant received one injection of 4 ml of PRP and 4 ml of injectable PRF (iPRF), the so-called "PRP enhanced with iPRF". Clinical assessment was evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) at the second, fourth, sixth, 12th, 18th, 24th, 30th, and 36th-month post-treatment. If the VAS pain score improved by more than 80% compared to the previous treatment, there was no need for a repeated dose. If the pain scores improved by 50% to 80% compared to the previous treatment, the participants were advised a repeated dose. However, if the pain scores improved by less than 50% compared to the previous treatment, the participants were advised to undergo surgical intervention instead of a repeated dose. The primary outcome was recorded as any surgical treatment (either arthroscopic knee surgery, unicondylar arthroplasty, or total knee arthroplasty) at any time point post-treatment. The secondary outcome was recorded as the interval (months) between first-to-second, second-to-third, and third-to-fourth injections.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate of knees that did not require surgical intervention during the 36-month follow-up was 80.18%. The mean number of injections was 2.52±0.07 times for overall participants. The mean interval time was 5.42±0.36, 8.92±0.47, and 9.58±0.55 months for the first-to-second, second-to-third, and third-to-fourth injections.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the usage of PRP enhanced with iPRF as a biologic modality for the treatment of KOA. This treatment modality provides a satisfactory survival rate at the 36-month follow-up. The longer interval between each injection supports the disease-modifying effect of PRP enhanced with iPRF.

Intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with hemophilia and painful knee joint cartilage degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthropathy causes pain to people with hemophilia (PWH). One of the current controversies is whether injections of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are effective in relieving the knee pain of PWH.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative literature review was conducted on the efficacy of PRP injections in the knees of PWH.

EXPERT OPINION

Intra-articular PRP knee injections are widely used in patients with knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and delay total knee arthroplasty. Although numerous publications have supported the use of PRP in knee osteoarthritis, there is still major controversy regarding its true usefulness, given that a number of studies with a high degree of evidence have failed to show the efficacy of PRP. With respect to painful hemophilic arthropathy, the use of PRP injections is even more controversial, as there are only four publications on the subject supporting the use of PRP in hemophilia, all of them with a low degree of evidence. A publication with grade 1 evidence recommended against the use of PRP in hemophilic arthropathy because its efficacy has not been demonstrated. My opinion is that intra-articular PRP injections should not be used in hemophilia until there is more evidence of its benefits.

Continuous Cold Flow Device Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Myths and Reality

Background and Objectives: To assess the effect of continuous cold flow (CCF) therapy on pain reduction, opioid consumption, fast recovery, less perioperative bleeding and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: Patients affected by knee osteoarthritis between September 2020 and February 2022 were enrolled in this case-control study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50, each): the study group received postoperative CCF therapy while the control group was treated by cold pack (gel ice). The CCF device is a computer-assisted therapy with continuous cold fluid, allowing a selective distribution, constant and uniform, of cold or hot on the areas to be treated. In both groups, pre- and postoperative evaluations at 6, 24, 72 h and at the fifth day were conducted using Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), opioid consumption, passive range of motion, preoperative hematocrit, total blood loss by Gross formula, transfusion requirement and patient satisfaction questionnaire. Results: One hundred patients, 52 women (52%), were included in the study. Reduction of pain, opioid consumption and increase in passive range of movement were statistically significantly demonstrated in the study group on the first and third days. Patients were satisfied with adequate postoperative pain management due to CCF therapy (p = 0.01) and they would recommend this treatment to others (p = 0.01). Conclusions: A continuous cold flow device in the acute postoperative setting after total knee arthroplasty is associated with pain reduction and improving early movement. Patients were almost satisfied with the procedure. The management of perioperative pain control could improve participation in the early rehabilitation program as demonstrated by the increase in ROM, psychological satisfaction and reduction in opioid use.

Platelet-rich plasma use in meniscus repair treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

Background

There is conflicting clinical evidence whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapies could translate to an increased meniscus healing rate and improved functional outcomes. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the failure rate and patient-reported functional outcomes in meniscus repair augmented with and without PRP.

Methods

We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that compared the clinical efficacy of meniscus repair performed with PRP versus without PRP. The primary outcome was the meniscus repair failure rate, while the secondary outcomes were knee-specific patient-reported outcomes, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm knee scale, visual analog scale, Tegner activity level score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying the studies according to the PRP preparation technique to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity among studies.

Results

Our meta-analysis included nine studies (two RCTs and seven non-RCTs) with 1164 participants. The failure rate in the PRP group was significantly lower than that in the non-PRP group [odds ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.42, 0.96), P = 0.03]. Furthermore, the PRP group was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the visual analog scale for pain [Mean difference (MD): − 0.76, 95% CI (− 1.32, − 0.21), P = 0.007] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-symptom [MD: 8.02, 95% CI (2.99, 13.05), P = 0.002] compared with the non-PRP group. However, neither the IKDC score nor the Lysholm knee scale showed any differences between the two groups. In addition, the results of subgroup analyses favored PRP over platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) regarding the IKDC score.

Conclusions

Although meniscus repairs augmented with PRP led to significantly lower failure rates and better postoperative pain control compared with those of the non-PRP group, there is insufficient RCT evidence to support PRP augmentation of meniscus repair improving functional outcomes. Moreover, PRP could be recommended in meniscus repair augmentation compared with PRFM. PRFM was shown to have no benefit in improving functional outcomes.

Current Trends in Knee Arthroplasty: Are Italian Surgeons Doing What Is Expected?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Italian surgeons' behavior during knee arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All orthopedic surgeons who specialized in knee replacement surgeries and were members of the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) between January 2019 and August 2019 were asked to complete a survey on the management of knee arthroplasty. Data were collected, analyzed, and presented as frequencies and percentages.

RESULTS

One-hundred and seventy-seven surgeons completed the survey and were included in the study. Ninety-five (53.7%) surgeons were under 40 years of age. Eighty-five surgeons (48%) worked in public hospitals and 112 (63.3%) were considered "high volume surgeons", with more than 100 knee implants per year. Postero-stabilized total knee arthroplasty was the most commonly used, implanted with a fully cemented technique by 162 (91.5%) surgeons. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was a rarer procedure compared to TKA, with 77% of surgeons performing less than 30% of UKAs. Most common TKA pre-operative radiological planning included complete antero-posterior (AP) weight-bearing lower limb radiographs, lateral view and patellofemoral view (used by 91%, 98.9% and 70.6% of surgeons, respectively). Pre-operative UKA radiological images included Rosenberg or Schuss views, patellofemoral view and magnetic resonance imaging (66.1%, 71.8% and 46.3% of surgeons, respectively). One hundred and thirty-two surgeons (74.6%) included an AP weight-bearing lower limb X-ray one year after surgery in the post-operative radiological follow-up. Furthermore, 119 surgeons (67.2%) did not perform a post-operative patellofemoral view because it was not considered useful for radiological follow-up. There was no uniformity in the timing and features of post-operative follow-up, with 13 different combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Italian surgeons perform TKA more commonly than UKA. Pre-operative TKA planning is quite uniform rather than UKA planning. Despite literature evidence, there is no agreement on follow-up. It may be useful to create a uniform checklist, including correct timing and exams needed. This analysis is also part of a society surgical educational project for training doctor.