Endometrial Cancer and BRCA Mutations: A Systematic Review

[Prophylactic hysterectomy (Lynch syndrome, BRCA and others)]

Endometrial cancer is the 4th most common cancer in women in France, with an increasing incidence partly due to the increase in diabetes and obesity. A genetic predisposition is found in approximately 5% of cases, notably Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hamartomatous tumor syndrome (Cowden syndrome), and BRCA1/2 mutations. Although no organized screening is in place for endometrial cancer in the general population, individual screening is recommended for most of these at-risk populations. Prophylactic surgery is a key strategy to reduce the risk of endometrial cancer in high-risk women. For patients with Lynch syndrome, recommendations favor a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy starting at age 40, after childbearing is complete. Hormonal supplementation with natural estrogens is important until the physiological age of menopause to reduce bone and cardiovascular risks and to improve the quality of life, including sexual health, for these women. In Cowden syndrome and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the lack of data limits surgical recommendations, although prophylactic hysterectomy may be considered starting at age 40, once childbearing is complete. For patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, while risk-reducing adnexal surgery is recommended, hysterectomy remains debated. It requires a personalized assessment with patients based on the benefit/risk balance.

Real-World Molecular Testing Rates and Patterns in Patients With Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study estimated the real-world utilization of biomarker testing among patients with primary advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) and characterized testing according to demographic and clinical characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database was used. Records from January 1, 2013, to August 31, 2023, for women age 18 years and older with pA/rEC were searched for DNA mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) testing; a subsample data set (advEndo Spotlight) was searched from April 1, 2013, to November 30, 2022, for additional biomolecular testing. Testing rates were reported by index year and molecular marker. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with testing.

RESULTS

The full data set included 2,982 patients, of whom 53% were age 65 years and older; most were non-Hispanic White (56%) and received care in a community setting (73%). The advEndo Spotlight subsample (n = 509) had similar characteristics. From 2013 to 2021, testing for any biomarker increased from 53% to 89% (MMR/MSI, 17% to 81%; ER/PR, 45% to 62%; HER2, 15% to 43%). Patients who received care at an academic versus community facility, had commercial/other insurance versus Medicare/Medicaid, had primary advanced versus recurrent EC, had endometrioid versus nonendometrioid carcinoma, or had no previous surgery as part of primary treatment were more likely to receive testing.

CONCLUSION

Molecular testing rates in pA/rEC have increased over time, likely due in part to incorporation of biomarker testing into treatment guidelines. This highlights an unmet need to ensure universal access to testing in patients with pA/rEC. Understanding these factors can inform approaches to increase access to molecular testing and increase testing rates.

Atypical cancer risk profile in carriers of Italian founder BRCA1 variant p.His1673del: Implications for classification and clinical management

BACKGROUND

BRCA1:c.5017_5019del (p.His1673del) is a founder variant relatively frequent in Northern Italy. Despite previous suggestion of pathogenicity, variant classification in public databases is still conflicting, needing additional evidence.

METHODS

Maximum likelihood penetrance of breast/ovarian and other cancer types was estimated using full pedigree data from 53 informative Italian families. The effect of the variant on BRCA1-ABRAXAS1 interaction was assessed using a GFP-fragment reassembly-based PPI assay. Results were combined with additional data from multiple sources to classify the variant according to ACMG/AMP classification rules specified for BRCA1/2.

RESULTS

Variant-carriers displayed increased risk for ovarian cancer (HR = 33.0, 95% CI = 7.0-155.0; cumulative risk at age 70 = 27.6%, 95% CI = 12.6-40.0%) but not for breast cancer (HR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.2-2.2). An increased risk of uterine cancer (HR = 8.0, 95% CI = 1.03-61.6) emerged, warranting further evaluation. Likelihood-ratio in favor of pathogenicity was 98898642.82 under assumption of standard BRCA1 breast and ovarian penetrance, and 104240832.84 after excluding breast cancer diagnoses (based on penetrance results). Functional analysis demonstrated that the variant abrogates the BRCA1-ABRAXAS1 binding, supporting the PS3 code assignment within the ACMG/AMP rule-based model. Collectively, these findings allowed to classify the variant as pathogenic.

CONCLUSION

Pathogenicity of BRCA1:c.5017_5019del(p.His1673del) has been confirmed; however, breast cancer risk in Italian families is not increased, unlike in families from other countries and in carriers of most BRCA1 pathogenic variants. The knowledge of atypical risk profiles for this and other variants will pave the way for personalized management based on specific genotype.

Patterns and Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Mutations among Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Endometrial Cancer: The Jordanian Exploratory Cancer Genetics (Jo-ECAG) Endometrial Study

Most of endometrial cancers are sporadic, with 5% or less being attributed to inherited pathogenic germline mutations and mostly related to the Lynch syndrome. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate patterns and frequencies of germline mutations in patients with endometrial cancer in an Arab region. Consecutive patients with endometrial cancer (n = 130), regardless of their age and family history, were enrolled. Germline genetic testing, using an 84-gene panel, was performed on all. Almost half of the patient population (n = 64, 49.2%) was tested based on international guidelines, while the remaining patients (n = 66, 50.8%) were tested as part of an ongoing universal germline genetic testing program. Among the whole group, 18 (13.8%) patients had positive pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants. The most common variants encountered were in MLH1 (n = 4, 22.2%), PMS2 (n = 3, 16.7%), ATM, MSH2, MUTYH, and BRCA2 (n = 2, 11.1% each). In addition, three (2.3%) patients were found to have an increased risk allele of the APC gene. P/LP variants were more common among patients with carcinosarcoma and clear cell carcinoma, younger patients (age ≤ 50 years), and in patients with a non-metastatic disease. We conclude that germline genetic variants, mostly in genes related to the Lynch syndrome, are relatively common among Arab patients with endometrial cancer.

Type I or Type II Endometrial Carcinoma? Role of BRCA1 Immunohistochemistry

OBJECTIVES

Investigation of diagnostic and prognostic relevance of BRCA1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

Ninty four specimens of endometrial carcinomas were evaluated. Full sections stained with hematoxylin & eosin were revaluated for assessment of tumor type, grade, myometrial, & lympho-vascular invasion (LVI). Tissue microarray blocks were constructed using the pencil tip method and immunostained with Anti-BRCA1 antibody. BRCA1 was correlated with clinicopathological parameters as well as disease free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference (P=0.001) between serous and endometroid carcinomas regarding BRCA1 expression where most cases of serous carcinoma showed negative expression. No statistically significant difference was found between BRCA1 positive and negative cases regarding disease free survival (DFS) or overall survival. Serous histotype, high grade, advanced stage, and omental deposits were the parameters significantly associated with decreased DFS.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study can support inclusion of BRCA1 IHC in a panel to differentiate both endometroid and serous carcinomas. The current study found no prognostic relevance for BRCA1 in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival.

PARP inhibitors in non-ovarian gynecologic cancers

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have transformed the treatment of ovarian cancer, particularly benefiting patients whose tumors harbor genomic events that result in impaired homologous recombination (HR) repair. The use of PARPi over recent years has expanded to include subpopulations of patients with breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Their potential to benefit patients with non-ovarian gynecologic cancers is being recognized. This review examines the underlying biological rationale for exploring PARPi in non-ovarian gynecologic cancers. We consider the clinical data and place this in the context of the current treatment landscape. We review the development of PARPi strategies for treating patients with endometrial, cervical, uterine leiomyosarcoma, and vulvar cancers. Furthermore, we discuss future directions and the importance of understanding HR deficiency in the context of each cancer type.

NRG-GY012: Randomized phase 2 study comparing olaparib, cediranib, and the combination of cediranib/olaparib in women with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

This paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This was open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA-GO sequencing panel.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41-86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression-free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91-2.3] p = .935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43-1.14] p = .064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA-GO panel results were not associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.

Risk of endometrial cancer after RRSO in BRCA 1/2 carriers: a multicentre cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To know the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) in a population of women with BRCA 1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO).

METHODS

The study cohort included data from 857 women with BRCA mutations who underwent RRSO visited four hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, from January 1, 1999 to April 30, 2019. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of EC was calculated in these patients using data from a regional population-based cancer registry.

RESULTS

After RRSO, eight cases of EC were identified. Four in BRCA 1 carriers and four in BRCA2 carriers. The expected number of cases of EC was 3.67 cases, with a SIR of 2.18 and a 95% CI (0.93-3.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, the risk of EC in BRCA1/2 carriers after RRSO is not greater than expected. Hysterectomy is not routinely recommended for these patients.

BRCA 1/2 mutations and risk of uterine cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to investigate the association between BRCA1/2 mutation and uterine cancer incidence.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We systematically searched three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to August 2023; and reviewed 23 cohorts and cross-sectional studies to explore the association between BRCA1/2 mutations and uterine cancer incidence.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprised a total of 21 cohort studies and 2 cross-sectional studies after the screening process. According to meta-analysis the prevalence of the BRCA1/2 gene in patients with uterine cancer was 0.02 (95%CI = [0.01,0.03], P < 0.01, I2 = 94.82%) CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis investigates a 2% prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with uterine cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations might be more conscious of uterine malignancies.

New therapeutic targets for endometrial cancer: a glimpse into the preclinical sphere

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the only gynecologic malignancy showing increasing trends in incidence and mortality. While standard treatment has been effective primarily for early-stage EC, precision medicine with tailored therapy has revolutionized the management of this disease. Genome sequencing analyses have identified four sub-types of EC. Treatments for primary and metastatic disease can now be tailored more accurately to achieve better oncologic results.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the most relevant and updated evidence in the literature regarding EC molecular analysis and its role in risk classification, prognostication, and guidance for tailored and target therapies in early and advanced/metastatic stages. In addition, it provides updated information on optimal surgical management based on molecular classification and highlights key advances and future strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

EC molecular analysis yields the potential of tailoring adjuvant treatment by escalating or deescalating therapy, as shown for POLE-mutated and p53-mutated tumors. Moreover, the expression of specific molecular signatures offers the possibility to employ novel target therapies, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors that have demonstrated a significant benefit on prognosis. New treatment guidelines are still being established, and ongoing studies are exploring the potential prognostic role of further sub-stratifications of the four molecular classes and treatment options.

Endometrial Cancer Risk Among Germline BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: Review of Our Current Understanding and Next Steps

PURPOSE

To review the literature exploring endometrial cancer (EC) risk among surgical candidates with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) to guide decisions around risk-reducing (rr) hysterectomy in this population.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted of the current literature that influences clinical practice and informs expert consensus. We present our understanding of EC risk among BRCA1/2 PV carriers, the risk-modifying factors specific to this patient population, and the available research technology that may guide clinical practice in the future. Limitations of the existing literature are outlined.

RESULTS

Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs, those with a personal history of tamoxifen use, those who desire long-term hormone replacement therapy, and/or have an elevated BMI are at higher risk of EC, primarily endometrioid EC and/or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, and may benefit from rr-hysterectomy. Although prescriptive clinical guidelines specific to BRCA1/2 PV carriers could inform decisions around rr-hysterectomy, limitations of the current literature prevent more definitive guidance at this time. A large population-based study of a contemporary cohort of BRCA1/2 PV carriers with lifetime follow-up compared with cancer-gene negative controls would advance this topic and facilitate care decisions.

CONCLUSION

This review validates a potential role for rr-hysterectomy to address EC risk among surgical candidates with BRCA1/2 PVs. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for rr-hysterectomy in BRCA1/2 PV carriers are essential to ensure equitable access to this preventive measure, supporting insurance coverage for patients with either BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs to pursue rr-hysterectomy. Overall, this review highlights the complexity of EC risk in BRCA1/2 PV carriers and offers a comprehensive framework to shared decision making to inform rr-hysterectomy for BRCA1/2 PV carriers.

ZFP57 promotes ovarian cancer progression by transcriptionally regulating BRCA1 and managing G1 checkpoint

Ovarian cancer (OC) which is one of the frequently-occurring gynecologic malignant tumors, endangers the health of women. The zinc finger protein 57 (ZFP57) plays crucial functions during the progression of cancer and is reported as a prognostic and therapeutic candidate in a variety of cancer. However, the biological function as well as the underlying mechanism of ZFP57 during OC progression remains unknown. Here, ZFP57 expression was found prominently increased in OC tissues and correlated with the prognosis of OC patients. Knock down of ZFP57 in OC cells inhibited the cell proliferation and migration, and also arrested the cells at G1 phase as well as accelerated the apoptosis. Additionally, ZFP57 transcriptionally regulated BRCA1 expression in OC, indicating that ZFP57 may affect BRCA1 mediated G1 checkpoint to regulate the cell cycle of OC cells and further influence the progression of OC. Taken together, our present study discovered a novel function of ZFP57 in OC, suggesting that ZFP57 could be potentially treated as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for OC patients.

Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review

This narrative review aims to clarify the role of breast and gynecological risk-reduction surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. We examine the indications, contraindications, complications, technical aspects, timing, economic impact, ethical issues, and prognostic benefits of the most common prophylactic surgical options from the perspectives of a breast surgeon and a gynecologist. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The databases were explored from their inceptions to August 2022. Three independent reviewers screened the items and selected those most relevant to this review's scope. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are significantly more likely to develop breast, ovarian, and serous endometrial cancer. Because of the Angelina effect, there has been a significant increase in bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) since 2013. BRRM and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) significantly reduce the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. RRSO has significant side effects, including an impact on fertility and early menopause (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction). Hormonal therapy can help with these symptoms. Because of the lower risk of developing breast cancer in the residual mammary gland tissue after BRRM, estrogen-only treatments have an advantage over an estrogen/progesterone combined treatment. Risk-reducing hysterectomy allows for estrogen-only treatments and lowers the risk of endometrial cancer. Although prophylactic surgery reduces the cancer risk, it has disadvantages associated with early menopause. A multidisciplinary team must carefully inform the woman who chooses this path of the broad spectrum of implications, from cancer risk reduction to hormonal therapies.