1
|
Cocci A, Pezzoli M, Bianco F, Blefari F, Bove P, Cornud F, De Rienzo G, Destefanis P, Di Trapani D, Giacobbe A, Giovanessi L, Laganà A, Lughezzani G, Manenti G, Muto G, Patelli G, Pinzi N, Regusci S, Russo GI, Salamanca JI, Salvi M, Silvestri L, Verweij F, Walser E, Bertolo RG, Iacovelli V, Bertaccini A, Marchiori D, Davila H, Ditonno P, Gontero P, Iapicca G, M De Reijke T, Ricapito V, Pellegrini P, Minervini A, Serni S, Sessa F. Transperineal laser ablation of the prostate as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: The results of a Delphi consensus project. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:271-279. [PMID: 38680587 PMCID: PMC11053328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) with Echolaser® (Echolaser® TPLA, Elesta S.p.A., Calenzano, Italy) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method. Methods Italian and international experts on BPH and PCa participated in a collaborative consensus project. During two rounds, they expressed their opinions on Echolaser® TPLA for the treatment of BPH and PCa answering online questionnaires on indications, methodology, and potential complications of this technology. Level of agreement or disagreement to reach consensus was set at 75%. If the consensus was not achieved, questions were modified after each round. A final round was performed during an online meeting, in which results were discussed and finalized. Results Thirty-two out of forty invited experts participated and consensus was reached on all topics. Agreement was achieved on recommending Echolaser® TPLA as a treatment of BPH in patients with ample range of prostate volume, from <40 mL (80%) to >80 mL (80%), comorbidities (100%), antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment (96%), indwelling catheter (77%), and strong will of preserving ejaculatory function (100%). Majority of respondents agreed that Echolaser® TPLA is a potential option for the treatment of localized PCa (78%) and recommended it for low-risk PCa (90%). During the final round, experts concluded that it can be used for intermediate-risk PCa and it should be proposed as an effective alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients with strong will of avoiding urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Almost all participants agreed that the transperineal approach of this organ-sparing technique is safer than transrectal and transurethral approaches typical of other techniques (97% of agreement among experts). Pre-procedural assessment, technical aspects, post-procedural catheterization, pharmacological therapy, and expected outcomes were discussed, leading to statements and recommendations. Conclusion Echolaser® TPLA is a safe and effective procedure that treats BPH and localized PCa with satisfactory functional and sexual outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cocci
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Pezzoli
- Urology Section, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Bove
- Torvergata Oncoscience Research Centre of Excellence, TOR, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Urology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francois Cornud
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Gaetano De Rienzo
- Urology and Andrology Unit II, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Destefanis
- Unit of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Danilo Di Trapani
- Urology Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Luca Giovanessi
- Urology Unit, Surgical Department, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonino Laganà
- Departement of Urology, “S.Giovanni Evangelista” Hospital, Tivoli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center–IRCCS, Department of Urology, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Manenti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Muto
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Patelli
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Pesenti-Fenaroli Hospital-ASST Bergamo Est, Alzano Lombardo, Italy
| | - Novello Pinzi
- Department of Urology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Swiss International Prostate Center, Geneva, Switzerland
- Clinique Générale Beaulieu, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Juan I.M. Salamanca
- Department of Urology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matteo Salvi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Silvestri
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Verweij
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eric Walser
- Department of Radiology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Riccardo G. Bertolo
- Department of Urology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Bertaccini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Debora Marchiori
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hugo Davila
- Florida Healthcare Specialist, Urology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Florida Cancer Specialist and Research Institute, Vero Beach, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology and Gynecology, Sebastian River Medical Center, Sebastian, FL, USA
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Urology and Andrology Unit II, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Theo M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vito Ricapito
- Department of Urology, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Pierluca Pellegrini
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gemma L, Pecoraro A, Sebastianelli A, Spatafora P, Sessa F, Nicoletti R, Gravas S, Campi R, Serni S, Gacci M. Impact of minimally invasive surgical procedures for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia on ejaculatory function: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00795-2. [PMID: 38355729 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00795-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are affected by potentially bothersome side effects on sexual, and, above all, ejaculatory function. Several minimally invasive techniques have been proposed in the last years in order to overcome these consequences. Our aim is to summarize and evaluate the efficacy on LUTS relieve and the impact on sexual/ejaculatory function of Rezum, prostate artery embolization (PAE), implantation of a prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and the temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND). METHODS A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to October 2022, according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023466515). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective studies and non-comparative or comparative studies assessing the impact on functional and ejaculatory function after minimally invasive surgical therapies for Male LUTS were evaluated. Risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for comparative studies, and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) for RCTs. RESULTS Overall, 47 studies were included (n = 4 for TIND; n = 9 for Rezum; n = 13 for PUL; n = 21 for PAE). Most studies relied on prospective patient cohorts and were rated as low risk of bias. Across studies assessing the efficacy of Rezum, a significant improvement in terms of IPSS (ranging from -47% to -56%) and Qmax (ranging from +39% to +87%) was reported. On the other hand, according to IIEF-5 score, Rezum had a minimal impact on sexual function (ranging from -1% to -3%). PUL showed a positive impact on IPSS (ranging from -35% to -58.2%) and Qmax (ranging from +49.9% to +114.7%) and sexual function. Finally, PAE showed encouraging functional results with IPSS score reducing from -12.8% to 63.3% and Qmax improving from +8% to 114.9% but the available evidence regarding the potential impact of PAE on sexual outcomes were limited. CONCLUSION Rezum, PAE, PUL and TIND are safe and feasible techniques associated with a significant functional improvement. While available data suggest a minimal impact of Rezum and PUL on ejaculatory function, the evidence after PAE and TIND are still limited. Therefore, our review lays the foundation for further research aiming to identify the criteria to select best candidates for uMIST to tailor the management in light of specific patient- and disease- factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gemma
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Spatafora
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stavros Gravas
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Porto JG, Titus R, Camargo F, Bhatia A, Ahie N, Blachman-Braun R, Malpani A, Lopategui DM, Herrmann TRW, Marcovich R, Shah HN. Minimally invasive techniques in quest of Holy Grail of surgical management of enlarged prostates: a narrative review. World J Urol 2024; 42:35. [PMID: 38217727 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04747-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Past decade has seen a renewed interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for management of enlarged prostate. This narrative review aims to explore newer MIST for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) which are not yet integrated into established societal guidelines. METHODS We conducted a literature search across PubMed, Google Scholar, and FDA ClinicalTrials.gov databases on June 1st, 2023, to identify studies published within the past decade exploring various MISTs for BPH. Additionally, we gathered insights from abstracts presented in meetings of professional associations and corporate websites. We broadly classified these procedures into three distinct categories: energy-based, balloon dilation, and implant/stent treatments. We collected detail information about the device, procedure details, its inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcome. RESULTS Our review reveals that newer energy-based MISTs include Transperineal Laser Ablation, Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation, and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. In the sphere of balloon dilation, Transurethral Columnar Balloon Dilation and the Optilume BPH Catheter System were gaining momentum. The noteworthy implants/stents that are on horizon include Butterfly Prostatic Retraction Device, Urocross Expander System, Zenflow Spring System, and ProVee Urethral Expander System. CONCLUSION The exploration of various MISTs reflects ongoing efforts to enhance patient care and address limitations of existing treatments. This review provides a bird-eye view and valuable insights for urologists and researchers seeking to navigate the dynamic landscape of MISTs in the quest for effective and minimally invasive solutions for enlarged prostates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao G Porto
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Renil Titus
- Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Feres Camargo
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ansh Bhatia
- Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nehizena Ahie
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ruben Blachman-Braun
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ankur Malpani
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Diana M Lopategui
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Robert Marcovich
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Hemendra N Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Kollenburg R, van Riel L, Bloemen P, de Reijke T, Beerlage H, de Bruin D, Oddens J. Transperineal laser ablation as treatment for benign prostatic obstruction: Safety, feasibility and functional outcomes-A pilot study. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:52-59. [PMID: 38179027 PMCID: PMC10764162 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) requires anaesthesia and hospitalization. Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) is a novel minimally invasive treatment for BPO, which has been performed using local anaesthetics and conscious sedation. Objectives The aim of this study is to assess safety, feasibility and functional outcomes of TPLA for the treatment of LUTS in men fit also for standard surgery. Methods This prospective, multicentre, interventional pilot study included 20 patients. Eligible patients were men ≥40 years of age, with urodynamically proven bladder outlet obstruction, a peak urinary flow of 5-15 mL/s and a prostate volume of 30-120 cc. All subjects underwent Soractelite™ TPLA using the Echolaser® X4 system. Two to four fibres were placed in the prostate, whereafter laser light induced coagulative necrosis. Twelve months of follow-up included uroflowmetry, an ultrasound of the prostate and PROMs (IPSS and IIEF). Results Twenty patients were treated with TPLA using local anaesthetics and optional sedation. Sixteen patients were treated in an outpatient setting, using only local anaesthetics in 12 of them; four were treated in the operating room, whereof two under general anaesthesia. No device related adverse events occurred, nor did any grade ≥3 adverse events during follow-up. Post-TPLA, 10 men continued spontaneous voiding, and 10 men developed a urinary retention treated by a temporary indwelling catheter for 15.2 ± 3.5 days. At 12 months, Qmax improved from 9.7 ± 3.5 to 14.9 ± 6.0 (p = 0.015), IPSS improved from 21.3 ± 5.2 to 10.9 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), QoL improved from 4.9 ± 0.9 to 1.9 ± 1.1 (p < 0.0001), IIEF-15 total score remained stable and 11/13 patients (85%) preserved antegrade ejaculation. Conclusions TPLA is a safe and feasible treatment for men with LUTS due to BPO. TPLA can be performed in an outpatient setting under only local anaesthetics. Functional and quality of life outcomes improved significantly at 12 months, and erectile function remained stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob van Kollenburg
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Luigi van Riel
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Paul Bloemen
- Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Theo de Reijke
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Harrie Beerlage
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Daniel de Bruin
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jorg Oddens
- UrologyAmsterdam University Medical CentresAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Busetto GM, Checchia A, Recchia M, Tocci E, Falagario UG, Annunziata G, Annese P, d’Altilia N, Mancini V, Ferro M, Crocetto F, Tataru OS, Gianfrancesco LD, Porreca A, Giudice FD, Berardinis ED, Bettocchi C, Cormio L, Carrieri G. Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea? Asian J Androl 2023; 26:00129336-990000000-00138. [PMID: 37921510 PMCID: PMC10919430 DOI: 10.4103/aja202357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The increasing importance of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), while avoiding side effects and maintaining sexual function, has allowed for the development of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs). Recently, the European Association of Urology guidelines reported a paradigm shift from the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to the management of nonneurogenic male LUTS. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used MISTs: ablative techniques such as aquablation, prostatic artery embolization, water vapor energy, and transperineal prostate laser ablation, and nonablative techniques such as prostatic urethral lift and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND). MISTs are becoming a new promise, even if clinical trials with longer follow-up are still lacking. Most of them are still under investigation and, to date, only a few options have been given as a recommendation for use. They cannot be considered as standard of care and are not suitable for all patients. Advantages and disadvantages should be underlined, without forgetting our objective: treatment of LUTS and re-treatment avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Maria Busetto
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Andrea Checchia
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “G. Tatarella” Hospital, Cerignola 71042, Italy
| | - Marco Recchia
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “G. Tatarella” Hospital, Cerignola 71042, Italy
| | - Edoardo Tocci
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | | | | | - Pasquale Annese
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Nicola d’Altilia
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Vito Mancini
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Urology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | | | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- G. E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures 540142, Romania
| | - Luca Di Gianfrancesco
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Padua 35128, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Padua 35128, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Roma 00161, Italy
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Roma 00161, Italy
| | - Carlo Bettocchi
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Luigi Cormio
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “L. Bonomo” Hospital, Andria 76123, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Destefanis P, Sibona M, Vitiello F, Vercelli E, Micai L, Montefusco G, Mangione C, Bracco F, Colucci F, De Nunzio C, Gontero P. Trans - Perineal laser ablation of the prostate in high surgical risk patients affected by severe lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic obstruction. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023:10.1038/s41391-023-00736-5. [PMID: 37853099 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00736-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In our study, we aimed to test the efficacy and safety of Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of the prostate (TPLA®) in the surgical treatment of high-risk Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) patients. METHODS We defined a high-risk BPO patient as an elderly man affected by severe comorbidities, among which coagulation issues due to pre-existent medications or diseases. From October 2020 to June 2022, we prospectively enrolled high-risk patients affected by a moderate to severe and/or complicated BPO condition. The analysis of the efficacy of the Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation was defined as the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints were post-operative surgical complications and patient-reported quality of life. RESULTS Globally, 40 consecutive patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) age was 80 (72.5-84) years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (5-7). Median prostate volume was 38 (30.5-73) cc. In all cases, a TPLA® procedure was performed under local anesthesia, and patients being discharged within the same day of the procedure. A progressive reduction of median prostate volumes was reported at 3 and 6 months post-operatively, compared to baseline [38 (30.5-73) vs 35 (26-49) vs 34 (28-49) cc, p < 0.001]. Median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improved accordingly [25 (19-30) vs 10.5 (7.5-13) vs 8 (6-11.5), p < 0.001]. A permanent bladder catheter was successfully removed in 13 out of 23 (56.5%) cases. Within 90 days from surgery, 19 (47.5%) patients experienced at least one surgical complication. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, complications were classified as grade I in 16 (40%) cases, grade II in 9 (22.5%), and grade III in 1 (2.5%). We did not observe any grade IV or V complications. CONCLUSIONS The Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate is a feasible, safe, and effective Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, when offered to elderly, high-risk patients affected by severe Benign Prostatic Obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Destefanis
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mattia Sibona
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Federico Vitiello
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Eugenia Vercelli
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Micai
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlotta Mangione
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bracco
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Urology Unit, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mandal S. Round up. Indian J Urol 2023; 39:91-93. [PMID: 37304984 PMCID: PMC10249521 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_102_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
|
8
|
Tzelves L, Nagasubramanian S, Pinitas A, Juliebø-Jones P, Madaan S, Sienna G, Somani B. Transperineal laser ablation as a new minimally invasive surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of existing literature. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872231198634. [PMID: 37745187 PMCID: PMC10515526 DOI: 10.1177/17562872231198634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate is a new, minimally invasive technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with promising effectiveness and safety outcomes. This systematic review aims to provide an update of existing literature. Methods A literature review was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 up to April 2023. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed independently by three authors. Results A total of 11 studies were included, among which 9 were observational, 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 animal study, while 2 of them were comparative (1 with prostatic artery embolization and 1 with transurethral resection of the prostate). Functional outcomes were improved in the majority of studies both for objective (maximum flow rate and post-void residual) and subjective outcomes (improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life). Complication rates ranged between 1.9% and 2.3% for hematuria, 3.7% and 36.3% for dysuria, 1.9% and 19% for acute urinary retention, 0.6% and 9.1% for orchitis/urinary tract infections, and 0.6% and 4.8% for prostatic abscess formation. Regarding sexual function, >95% of patients retained their ejaculation while erectile function was maintained or improved. Conclusion TPLA of the prostate is an innovative, minimally invasive technique for managing patients with BPH. Existing studies indicate an effective technique in reducing International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores, post-void residual reduction, and increase in Qmax, albeit the measured improvements in terms of Qmax are not equal to transurethral resection of the prostate. Although sexual function is maintained, the mean catheterization time is 7 days, and no long-term data are available for most patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Tzelves
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Alexandros Pinitas
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens ‘Gennimatas’, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Sanjeev Madaan
- Department of Urology, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - Giampaolo Sienna
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|