Impact of Arterial Calcification of the Lower Limbs on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia is a Residual Bleeding Risk Factor among Patients with Lower Extremity Artery Disease

AIM

Lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) is a high-risk factor for bleeding. However, the specific risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD remain unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD after endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 732 consecutive patients with LEAD who underwent EVT between January 2018 and December 2019. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, target lesions, and medications were compared between patients with and without chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Predictive bleeding risk factors were explored using Cox regression analysis with differential models.

RESULTS

In model 1, a body mass index (BMI) ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, high bleeding risk, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were predictive bleeding risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.52; p＜0.01; HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 3.40; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.33-5.84; p＜0.01; respectively). In model 2, a BMI ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, anemia (＜11 g/dL), low platelet count (＜10*104/µL), chronic kidney disease, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were independent risk factors for bleeding (model 2: HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.12-3.56; p=0.02; HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.39-3.90; p＜0.01; HR 2.71; 95% CI 1.64-4.50; p＜0.01; HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.00-5.89; p=0.05; HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.25-5.45; p＜0.01; HR 2.79; 95% CI 1.24-5.63; p=0.01; respectively) Conclusions: CLTI is a residual and predictive risk factor for bleeding in patients with LEAD. We have to pay attention to the bleeding events of patients with CLTI after EVT during follow-up.

Calcification detection on upper extremity arteries: a comparison of ultrasonic and X-ray methods

Background

Vascular calcification (VC) has been observed in patients with hemodialysis, whereas few studies have investigated calcification in the upper extremity vasculature. Both ultrasound and X-ray are used to investigate the calcification of arteries in patients. However, there is a lack of data on the consistency between these two methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of VC in the radial and ulnar arteries of hemodialysis patients and investigate the detection consistency in VC between ultrasound and X-ray.

Methods

Ultrasound and X-ray examinations were performed in the radial and ulnar arteries of both the left and right upper extremities of 40 patients on hemodialysis. The calcification status of arteries was evaluated by the calcification index from ultrasound and X-ray respectively. Clinical variables of patients were collected from all the involved patients.

Results

Of the 40 patients, VC was detected in 31 patients by ultrasound, while X-ray detected VC in 22 patients. Compared to ultrasound assessment, X-ray assessment was 73.21% sensitive but only 66.35% specific with a positive predictive value of 53.95% for detecting calcifications in the radial or ulnar artery. The level of agreement between ultrasound and X-ray results was fair. In addition, our data showed that more ulnar arteries had VCs than the corresponding radial arteries.

Conclusion

Ultrasound is more sensitive in detecting the presence of calcified atherosclerotic lesions. Ultrasound and X-ray exhibited fair consistency. Ultrasound screening for upper extremity radial and ulnar arteries in hemodialysis patients may deserve attention to explore its clinical significance.

Anatomical Distribution Patterns of Peripheral Arterial Disease According to Patient Characteristics: A Unicentral Cohort Study

Purpose

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disease with multiple risk factors and affects patients worldwide. Several international studies have established correlations between anatomical topography/distribution of atherosclerosis and comorbidities in patients with PAD. In this cohort study, we aimed to analyze the patterns of atherosclerosis (site, distribution, and degree) in patients who underwent lower limb computed tomography angiography and arterial angiography by identifying the atherosclerotic plaque(s) that were possibly responsible for thrombi. Additionally, we aimed to determine any relationship between comorbidities and identified patterns.

Patients and Methods

Between January 2015 and January 2021, we retrospectively recruited 140 patients at King Fahd Hospital of the University of Saudi Arabia. Data collected included patient characteristics, risk factors, and metabolic disorders, such as hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. Patients with incomplete records or unavailable radiological images were excluded.

Results

The infrapopliteal territory was the most common segment that was affected. HTN, DM, and dyslipidemia were found in 81.4%, 77.9%, and 62.9% of patients, respectively. Correlation analyses revealed that DM was the only independent metabolic disorder associated with a PAD distribution pattern in the femoropopliteal segment (p=0.039), thus denoting distal involvement. No significant association was found between PAD distribution and the severity of stenosis.

Conclusion

Segmental involvement in PAD varies with the risk factors and metabolic comorbidities present in patients. DM is an independent predictor of the anatomical distribution of PAD. The identification of such an anatomical distribution is paramount for screening procedures, early detection of disease, and prevention of complications, particularly limb amputation.