Reintervention of Residual Aortic Dissection after Type A Aortic Repair: Results of a Prospective Follow-Up at 5 Years

Novel Indexes in the Assessment of Cardiac Enlargement Using Chest Radiography: A New Look at an Old Problem

Background: Chest X-rays are among the most frequently used imaging tests in medical practice. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of the cardio-thoracic ratio (CTR) and transverse cardiac diameter (TCD) and compare them with novel chest X-ray parameters used in screening for cardiac enlargement. Methods: CTR, TCD, and five other non-standard new radiographic indexes, including basic spherical index (BSI), assessing changes in cardiac silhouette in chest radiographs in posterior-anterior projection were related to increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) assessed in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Results: TCD, CTR, and BSI were the best predictors of both LVH and increased LVEDV diagnosed in CMR. The best sensitivity, along with good specificity in LVH prediction, defined as left ventricular mass/body surface area (BSA) > 72 g/m2 in men or >55 g/m2 in women, was observed when TCD and BSI parameters were used jointly (69.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.4-83.0% and 80.0%, 95% CI: 51.9-95.7%, respectively). In the prediction of cardiac enlargement defined as LVEDV/BSA > 117 mL/m2 in men or >101 mL/m2 in women, BSI > 137.5 had the best sensitivity and specificity (85.0%, 95% CI: 62.1-96.8% and 82.4%, 95% CI: 65.5-93.2%, respectively). Conclusions: TCD may be valuable in the assessment of patients suspected of having cardiac enlargement. CTR and BSI serve as complementary tools for a more precise approach. TCD appears particularly useful for the prediction of LVH, while BSI demonstrates greater utility as an indicator of increased LVEDV.

Long-term outcomes in thoracic aortic surgery: 11 year single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections provide a complex surgical cohort termed thoracic aortic surgery. Regular follow-up at specialist clinics with cross-sectional imaging is recommended. Identifying risk factors that lead to re-operations as well as the requirement for and appropriate length of follow-up remain points of debate.

METHODS

Patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery performed at a single centre from January 2012 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical information, operative details, histological reports, post-operative outcomes and follow up were collected from electronic patient records. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and R Studio.

RESULTS

409 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study with a median follow-up of 3.8 years (IQR 1.6-7.6). The prevalence of all cause re-operations was 10.8% (n = 44). The median time to re-operation was 1.8 years. 68% of the reoperations occurred within the first 5 years. Multi and univariate logistic regression identified young age, arteritis and/or aortitis as the main risk factors associated with increased risk of re-operation. Connective tissue disease and systemic inflammatory diseases approached but didn't meet statistical significance. Bicuspid aortic valve pathology was associated with reduced risk of re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery have a high rate of re-operation. The first 5 years represent a high-risk period and follow-up with cross-sectional imaging during that time by specialist aortic services is essential. Patient with aortitis remain at high risk and should be treated by appropriate by specialist aortic services with subspecialty interest and expertise on treating patients with aortitis.

Unpredictable Aortic Behavior in Identifying Risk Factors for Reintervention: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

 Although advancements in the management of thoracic aortic disease have led to a reduction in acute mortality, individuals requiring postoperative reintervention experience substantially worse long-term clinical outcomes and increased mortality. We aimed to identify the risk factors for postoperative reintervention in this high-risk population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This prospective observational cohort study included patients who survived endovascular or open surgical treatment for thoracic aortic disease between January 2009 and June 2020. We excluded those with inflammatory or traumatic thoracic aortic diseases. The risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

 The study included 95 genetically tested patients aged 54.13 ± 12.13 years, comprising 67 men (70.53%) and 28 women (29.47%). Primary open surgery was performed in 74.7% and endovascular repair in 25.3% of the patients. Of these, 35.8% required one or more reinterventions at the time of follow-up (3 ± 2.5 years, mean ± standard deviation). The reintervention rate was higher in the endovascular repair group than in the open repair group. Among the potential risk factors, only residual aortic dissection emerged as an independent predictor of reintervention (odds ratio: 3.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-8.64).

CONCLUSION

 Reintervention after primary thoracic aortic repair remains a significant clinical issue, even in high-volume tertiary centers. Close follow-up and personalized care at aortic centers are imperative. In our cohort of patients with thoracic aortic disease undergoing open or endovascular surgery, postoperative residual dissection was independently associated with the necessity of reintervention, emphasizing the importance of intensified clinical monitoring in these patients.

Long-Term Results and Quality of Life after Surgery for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A: Contemporary Single-Centre Experience

Background: Aortic dissection is still afflicted with significant morbidity and mortality. This research seeks to assess long-term outcomes and quality of life after emergency surgery for acute aortic dissection type A. Methods: A total of 413 patients were analysed, who had been operated upon between 2000 and 2016 at our centre. We compared our results of the early (2000-2007) versus late (2008-2016) period with regards to 30-day and follow-up mortality and need for reoperation, including risk factor analysis. Quality of life was assessed via the SF-36 survey. Results: Calculated perioperative risk by EuroSCORE increased significantly from early, 24.9%, to late, 38.0%, p < 0.001. Thirty-day rates of mortality decreased significantly from 26.7% to 17.4%, p = 0.03. Survival at 1-, 5-, and 10-years was 92.3% vs. 91.8% (p = 0.91), 75.2% vs. 81.0% (p = 0.29), and 53.4% vs. 69.7% (p = 0.04). Freedom from reoperation was comparable between groups at follow-up: 74.0% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.28. Quality of life was impaired. Conclusions: Despite more complex severity of disease and operative procedures, the results of surgery for type A aortic dissection improved significantly over time at 30-day and 10-year follow-up. Quality of life was significantly impaired compared to a healthy reference population.

Quality of Life after Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery in the United Kingdom: The QUADS Study

BACKGROUND

 Acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition that carries significant mortality and morbidity; a proportion of the survivors might require further aortic procedures in the mid-/long-term follow-up. Quality of life (QoL) after TAAD is not well studied. Quality of life after Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery (QUADS) is the first multicentre study to assess QoL in survivors of surgically treated TAAD.

METHODS

 A tailored questionnaire for survivors of TAAD was designed with patient and public involvement. Patients who underwent surgery from 2018 to 2022 in eight United Kingdom centres were invited to participate. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative prospectively collected data were collated and analyzed retrospectively. The data were analyzed with SPSS v29. Patient's questionnaire was validated with a Cronbach's alpha analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and AMOS confirmatory factor analysis. Three groups were created according to QoL (Good, Fair, Poor).

RESULTS

 A total of 162 patients were recruited. Majority were male with a mean age of 63 years (24-92). Surgical procedures for TAAD were root and ascending aorta replacement (n = 61, 38%), ascending (n = 81, 50%), and/or arch replacement (n = 20, 12%). Eleven patients (7%) required later intervention. Patient's answers regarding overall QoL were good (n = 67, 41%), fair (n = 89, 55%), and poor (n = 6, 4%). Neurological complications, circulatory arrest duration, reoperation for bleeding, postoperative myocardial infraction, arrhythmias, wound infection, and patient destination at discharge have been identified as main variables impacting on QoL after TAAD surgery across different domains of this questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

 QUADS questionnaire is the first tailored and validated questionnaire for TAAD survivors. Results in the United Kingdom population suggest that it is a useful tool to assess QoL after TAAD surgery.

Clinical study of reoperation for acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

The initial operation for type A aortic dissection has limitations, and there may be a need for reoperation in cases such as giant pseudoaneurysm formation and reduced blood supply to the distal vessels. In this study, we collected case data of patients who underwent cardiac major vascular surgery at our hospital to analyze the effectiveness of reoperation treatment options for type A aortic dissection and to summarize our treatment experience.

Method

Between June 2018 and December 2022, 62 patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) underwent reoperation after previous surgical treatment. Of these, 49 patients (45 males) underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with a mean age of (49.69 ± 10.21) years (30-75 years), and 13 patients (11 males) underwent thoracoabdominal aortic replacement (TAAR) with a mean age of (41.00 ± 11.18) years (23-66 years). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the recorded data of 62 patients. In addition, we summarized and analyzed their Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) results and perioperative complications.

Outcome

In the EVAR group, 47 patients (95.92%) were successfully implanted with overlapping stents, and 2 patients died in the perioperative period. Postoperative complications included cerebral infarction (4.08%), acute renal insufficiency (30.61%), pulmonary insufficiency and need for ventilator (6.12%), poor wound healing (2.04%), postoperative reoperation (16.33%), and lower limb ischemia (2.04%). In the TAAR group, 12 patients (92.31%) were successfully revascularized and 1 patient died in the perioperative period. Postoperative complications included cerebral infarction (7.69%), acute kidney injury (46.15%), pulmonary insufficiency and need for ventilator (15.38%), poor wound healing (30.77%) and postoperative reoperation (15.38%).

Conclusion

According to the results of the study, compared with TAAR, EVAR was less invasive, faster recovery, and offered a better choice for some high-risk and high-age patients with comorbid underlying diseases. However, the rate of revascularization was higher after EVAR than TAAR due to vascular lesions. Compared with the use of ascending aortic replacement + hemi-aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection in many countries and regions, the use of ascending aortic replacement + aortic arch replacement + elephant trunk stent is more traumatic in China, but facilitates reoperation. For young patients, the choice of treatment should be individualized combining vascular lesions and long-term quality of life.

Aortic elastic fiber degeneration during acute type a aortic dissection and reverse aortic remodeling

BACKGROUND

Progression of proximal or distal aortic dilatation is defined as reverse aortic remodeling after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) that may be dependent on aortic wall degeneration.

METHODS

We investigated whether aortic wall degeneration is associated with reverse aortic remodeling leading to aortic reoperation after surgery for ATAAD. Altogether, 141 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for ATAAD at Tampere were evaluated. The resected ascending aortic wall at surgery was processed for 42 degenerative, atherosclerotic and inflammatory histological variables. Patients undergoing aortic reoperations (Redos) were compared with those without aortic reoperations (Controls) during a mean 4.9-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Redos were younger than Controls (56 and 66 years, respectively, P < 0.001), and had less frequently previous cardiac surgery prior to ATAAD. Initial surgery encompassed replacement of the ascending aorta in the majority. There were 21 Redos in which one patient died during follow-up as compared with 51 deaths in Controls (log Rank P = 0.002). Histology of the aortic wall revealed increased elastic fiber fragmentation, loss, and disorganization in Redos as compared with Controls (2.1 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5, Point score unit (PSU), P = 0.043 and 1.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.8, PSU, P = 0.016, respectively). Moderate atherosclerosis occurred less often in Redos vs. Controls (9.5% vs. 33%, PSU, P = 0.037, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this exploratory study, histopathology reveals distinctive aortic wall degeneration during ATAAD. Reverse aortic remodeling after ATAAD is associated with the presence of ascending aortic wall elastic fiber fragmentation, loss and disorganization during ATAAD.