1
|
Takács A, Hardi E, Cavalcante BGN, Szabó B, Kispélyi B, Joób-Fancsaly Á, Mikulás K, Varga G, Hegyi P, Kivovics M. Advancing accuracy in guided implant placement: A comprehensive meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement Methods. J Dent 2023; 139:104748. [PMID: 37863173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis aimed to determine the accuracy of currently available computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) modalities under in vitro conditions and investigate whether these novel techniques can achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. DATA In vitro studies comparing the postoperative implant position with the preoperative plan were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN Tool) and a sensitivity analysis was conducted using funnel plots. SOURCES A systematic search was performed on April 18, 2023, using the following three databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. No filters or restrictions were applied during the search. RESULTS A total of 5,894 studies were included following study selection. Robotic- and static CAIS (sCAIS) had the most accurate and clinically acceptable outcomes. sCAIS was further divided according to the guidance level. Among the sCAIS groups, fully guided implant placement had the greatest accuracy. Augmented reality-based CAIS (AR-based CAIS) had clinically acceptable results for all the outcomes except for apical global deviation. Dynamic CAIS (dCAIS) demonstrated clinically safe results, except for horizontal apical deviation. Freehand implant placement was associated with the greatest number of errors. CONCLUSIONS Fully guided sCAIS demonstrated the most predictable outcomes, whereas freehand sCAIS demonstrated the lowest accuracy. AR-based and robotic CAIS may be promising alternatives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of robotic CAIS and investigate the accuracy of various CAIS modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Takács
- Department of Community Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 40. 1088 Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eszter Hardi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 52. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bianca Golzio Navarro Cavalcante
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oral Biology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4. 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bence Szabó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Barbara Kispélyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 47. 1088 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Árpád Joób-Fancsaly
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 52. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Mikulás
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 47. 1088 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Varga
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oral Biology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4. 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12. 7624 Pécs, Hungary; Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor utca 68. 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Márton Kivovics
- Department of Community Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 40. 1088 Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan S, Sáenz-Ravello G, Diaz L, Wu Y, Davó R, Wang F, Magic M, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW. The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5418. [PMID: 37629460 PMCID: PMC10455221 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The present systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of zygomatic implant (ZI) placement using dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS), static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), and a free-hand approach in patients with severe atrophic edentulous maxilla and/or deficient maxilla. METHODS Electronic and manual literature searches until May 2023 were performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Clinical trials and cadaver studies were selected. The primary outcome was planned/placed deviation. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the survival of ZI and surgical complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and meta-regression was utilized to compare fiducial registration amounts for d-CAIS and the different designs of s-CAIS. RESULTS A total of 14 studies with 511 ZIs were included (Nobel Biocare: 274, Southern Implant: 42, SIN Implant: 16, non-mentioned: 179). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the d-CAIS group were 1.81 mm (95% CI: 1.34-2.29) at the entry point and 2.95 mm (95% CI: 1.66-4.24) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 3.49 degrees (95% CI: 2.04-4.93). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the s-CAIS group were 1.19 mm (95% CI: 0.83-1.54) at the entry point and 1.80 mm (95% CI: 1.10-2.50) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 2.15 degrees (95% CI: 1.43-2.88). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the free-hand group were 2.04 mm (95% CI: 1.69-2.39) at the entry point and 3.23 mm (95% CI: 2.34-4.12) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 4.92 degrees (95% CI: 3.86-5.98). There was strong evidence of differences in the average entry, apex, and angular deviation between the navigation, surgical guide, and free-hand groups (p < 0.01). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the number of fiducial screws and the planned/placed deviation regarding entry, apex, and angular measurements. CONCLUSION Using d-CAIS and modified s-CAIS for ZI surgery has shown clinically acceptable outcomes regarding average entry, apex, and angular deviations. The maximal deviation values were predominantly observed in the conventional s-CAIS. Surgeons should be mindful of potential deviations and complications regardless of the decision making in different guide approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengchi Fan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Second Dental Clinic, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Gustavo Sáenz-Ravello
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance of Oral Diseases (CESOD), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380420, Chile
| | - Leonardo Diaz
- Postgraduate School, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380420, Chile
| | - Yiqun Wu
- Second Dental Clinic, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Rubén Davó
- Department of Implantology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vithas Davó Instituto Dental, 03016 Alicante, Spain
| | - Feng Wang
- Second Dental Clinic, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Marko Magic
- School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Bilal Al-Nawas
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Peer W. Kämmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
González Rueda JR, Galparsoro Catalán A, de Paz Hermoso VM, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Pato Mourelo J, Montero Martín J, Hernández Montero S. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:150. [PMID: 36918837 PMCID: PMC10015906 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Zygomatic implants are widely used in the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae, but implant placement is not without risks, and it can potentially cause damage to related anatomical structures. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the accuracy of static navigation systems in placing zygomatic dental implants in comparison to dynamic navigation systems. METHODS Sixty zygomatic dental implants were randomly allocated to one of three study groups, categorized by which implant placement strategy was used: A: computer-aided static navigation system (n = 20) (GI); B: computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (NI); or C: free-hand technique (n = 20) (FHI). For the computer-aided study groups, a preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of the existing situation was performed in order to plan the approach to be used during surgery. Four zygomatic dental implants were inserted in each of fifteen polyurethane stereolithographic models (n = 15), with a postoperative CBCT scan taken after the intervention. The pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were then uploaded to a software program used in dental implantology to analyze the angular deviations, apical end point, and coronal entry point. Student's t-test was used to analyze the results. RESULTS The results found statistically significant differences in apical end-point deviations between the FHI and NI (p = 0.0053) and FHI and GI (p = 0.0004) groups. There were also statistically significant differences between the angular deviations of the FHI and GI groups (p = 0.0043). CONCLUSIONS The manual free-hand technique may enable more accurate placement of zygomatic dental implants than computer-assisted surgical techniques due to the different learning curves required for each zygomatic dental implant placement techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ramón González Rueda
- grid.464699.00000 0001 2323 8386Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
| | - Agustín Galparsoro Catalán
- grid.464699.00000 0001 2323 8386Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elena Riad Deglow
- grid.464699.00000 0001 2323 8386Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho
- grid.464699.00000 0001 2323 8386Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
- grid.11762.330000 0001 2180 1817Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús Pato Mourelo
- grid.5924.a0000000419370271Department of Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Navarra Spain
| | - Javier Montero Martín
- grid.11762.330000 0001 2180 1817Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Sofía Hernández Montero
- grid.464699.00000 0001 2323 8386Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach. J Dent 2023; 130:104436. [PMID: 36736529 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The assessment of the accuracy of flapless placement of zygomatic implants in edentulous maxilla using dynamic navigation. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was carried out on 20 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups, the flapless (Group 1; n=10) and the conventional (Group 2; n=10). In each case two zygomatic implants were inserted under local anaesthesia, one on the right and one on the left side guided by a dynamic navigation system. The surgical procedure was identical in the two groups except for the reflection of the mucoperiosteal flap which was eliminated in the flapless cases. Postoperative CBCT scans were used to assess the accuracy of the placement of zygomatic implants. RESULTS Osseointegration was achieved for all the implants, except one case in the flapless group. Statistically significant differences in the accuracy of the position of the zygomatic implants was found between the flapless and the conventional groups, measured at the apex and the entry points of the implants (p < 0.01). The average apical and coronal deviations were 5 mm and 3 mm, respectively; the angular deviation was 6°, and 2 mm vertical apical disparity was detected between the planned and the achieved surgical position. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was noted in three cases, one in flapless group and two in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS Flapless placement of zygomatic implants guided by dynamic navigation offered satisfactory safety and accuracy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This is the first clinical trial to prove the feasibility and accuracy of flapless placement of zygomatic implant with minimal morbidity. The study highlights the innovative reflection of the Schneiderian membrane under guided surgical navigation. The procedure can be performed under local anaesthesia, which offers clinical advantages. Adequate training on the use of dynamic navigation is mandatory before its use in clinical cases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pomares-Puig C, Sánchez-Garcés MA, Jorba-García A. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. J Dent 2023; 130:104443. [PMID: 36720424 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the computer-guided "double factor" technique for treating fully edentulous patients. METHODS A proof of concept prospective study was designed. Ten consecutive patients requiring full arch dental implant supported rehabilitation in a private practice were enrolled between October 2021 and March 2022. All patients were treated by means of an All-on-four®, and implants were planned and placed according to the "double factor" technique. This technique merges the static and dynamic computer-guided surgical approach in the same surgery. The primary outcome was the accuracy of implant placement, measured by overlapping post- and pre-operative cone-beam computerized tomography with the implant planning. Additionally, PROMs and patient quality of life after surgery were evaluated using different questionnaires. Descriptive and bivariate data analyses were performed. Statistical significance was considered for p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 48 implants were placed using the "double factor" technique, and 12 full-arch immediate loading prostheses were delivered. The mean angular deviation was 3.74° (standard deviation [SD]: 2). The total linear deviation at the apex and platform of the implant was 1.25 mm (SD: 0.55) and 1.42 mm (SD: 0.64), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between tilted and axial implants, the upper and lower jaw, or the right and left side. High self-reported satisfaction was registered, and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) score improved postoperatively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The "double factor" technique is a valid and accurate treatment approach for fully edentulous patients. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The double factor technique merges the advantages of both the dynamic and static computer assisted surgery approaches, affording accurate and predictable results when treating fully edentulous patients in a minimally invasive manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Angeles Sánchez-Garcés
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Researcher at the IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Adrià Jorba-García
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stünkel R, Zeller AN, Bohne T, Böhrnsen F, Wedi E, Raschke D, Kauffmann P. Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study. Int J Implant Dent 2022; 8:41. [PMID: 36198996 PMCID: PMC9535055 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00430-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nowadays, 3D planning and static for dynamic aids play an increasing role in oral rehabilitation of the masticatory apparatus with dental implants. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement using a 3D-printed drilling guide and an intraoral real-time dynamic navigation system. Methods A total of 60 implants were placed on 12 partially edentulous lower jaw models. 30 were placed with pilot drilling guides, the other half with dynamic navigation (DENACAM®). In addition, implant placement in interdental gaps and free-end situations were investigated. Accuracy was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Results Both systems achieved clinically acceptable results, yet more accurate results regarding the offset of implant base and tip in several spatial dimensions were achieved using drilling guides (each p < 0.05). With regard to angulation, real-time navigation was more precise (p = 0.0016). Its inaccuracy was 3°; the template-guided systems was 4.6°. Median horizontal deviation was 0.52 mm at base and 0.75 mm at tip using DENACAM®. When using the pilot drill guide, horizontal deviation was 0.34 mm in the median and at the tip by 0.59 mm. Regarding angulation, it was found that the closer the drill hole was to the system's marker, the better navigation performed. The template did not show this trend (p = 0.0043; and p = 0.0022). Conclusion Considering the limitations of an in vitro study, dynamic navigation can be used be a tool for reliable and accurate implantation. However, further clinical studies need to follow in order to provide an evidence-based recommendation for use in vivo. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-022-00430-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Stünkel
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexander-Nicolai Zeller
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | | | - Florian Böhrnsen
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - David Raschke
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Kauffmann
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Learning Curve and Comparison of Dynamic Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Navigation System in Young Professionals. Dent J (Basel) 2022; 10:dj10100187. [PMID: 36285997 PMCID: PMC9600962 DOI: 10.3390/dj10100187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the learning curve and accuracy of implant placement by young professionals using a dynamic computer-assisted surgical system for dental implant placement. Ten students tried to place eight implants with a dynamic surgical system in predefined positions on two consecutive weekends, resulting in 160 implant placements in total. Postoperatively, the positions of the implants were scanned with an intraoral scanner and compared for deviations at the entry point, the apex, as well as angular deviations to the master model. The mean values of all measurements improved; statistical significance was found for the changes in the angle as well as for the position of the implants to the apex (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the young professionals indicated subjective improvement in handling the dynamic surgery system. Navigated surgical dental implant placement can be learned quickly and can support young professionals in everyday clinical practice, especially in difficult anatomic situations.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu Y, Tao B, Lan K, Shen Y, Huang W, Wang F. Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022; 33:362-376. [PMID: 35113463 PMCID: PMC9305866 DOI: 10.1111/clr.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the accuracy of a real‐time dynamic navigation system applied in zygomatic implant (ZI) surgery and summarize device‐related negative events and their management. Material and methods Patients who presented with severely maxillary atrophy or maxillary defects and received dynamic navigation‐supported ZI surgery were included. The deviations of entry, exit, and angle were measured after image data fusion. A linear mixed‐effects model was used. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Device‐related negative events and their management were also recorded and analyzed. Results Two hundred and thirty‐one zygomatic implants (ZIs) with navigation‐guided placement were planned in 74 consecutive patients between Jan 2015 and Aug 2020. Among them, 71 patients with 221 ZIs received navigation‐guided surgery finally. The deviations in entry, exit, and angle were 1.57 ± 0.71 mm, 2.1 ± 0.94 mm and 2.68 ± 1.25 degrees, respectively. Significant differences were found in entry and exit deviation according to the number of ZIs in the zygomata (p = .03 and .00, respectively). Patients with atrophic maxillary or maxillary defects showed a significant difference in exit deviation (p = .01). A total of 28 device‐related negative events occurred, and one resulted in 2 ZI failures due to implant malposition. The overall survival rate of ZIs was 98.64%, and the mean follow‐up time was 24.11 months (Standard Deviation [SD]: 12.62). Conclusions The navigation‐supported ZI implantation is an accurate and reliable surgical approach. However, relevant technical negative events in the navigation process are worthy of attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqun Wu
- Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Baoxin Tao
- Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Kengliang Lan
- Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Yihan Shen
- Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nica DF, Gabor AG, Duma VF, Tudericiu VG, Tudor A, Sinescu C. Sinus Lift and Implant Insertion on 3D-Printed Polymeric Maxillary Models: Ex Vivo Training for In Vivo Surgical Procedures. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204718. [PMID: 34682841 PMCID: PMC8538196 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the increased efficiency achieved by dental practitioners when carrying out an ex vivo training process on 3D-printed maxillaries before performing in vivo surgery. Materials and Methods: This developed ex vivo procedure comprises the following phases: (i) scanning the area of interest for surgery; (ii) obtaining a 3D virtual model of this area using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT); (iii) obtaining a 3D-printed model (based on the virtual one), on which (iv) the dental practitioner simulates/rehearses ex vivo (most of) the surgery protocol; (v) assess with a new CBCT the 3D model after simulation. The technical steps of sinus augmentation and implant insertion could be performed on the corresponding 3D-printed hemi-maxillaries prior to the real in vivo surgery. Two study groups were considered, with forty patients divided as follows: Group 1 comprises twenty patients on which the developed simulation and rehearsal procedure was applied; Group 2 is a control one which comprises twenty patients on which similar surgery was performed without this procedure (considered in order to compare operative times without and with rehearsals). Results: Following the ex vivo training/rehearsal, an optimal surgery protocol was developed for each considered case. The results of the surgery on patients were compared with the results obtained after rehearsals on 3D-printed models. The performed quantitative assessment proved that, using the proposed training procedure, the results of the in vivo surgery are not significantly different (p = 0.089) with regard to the ex vivo simulation for both the mezio-distal position of the implant and the distance from the ridge margin to sinus window. On the contrary, the operative time of Group 1 was reduced significantly (p = 0.001), with an average of 20% with regard to in vivo procedures performed without rehearsals (on the control Group 2). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the use of 3D-printed models can be beneficial to dental surgeon practitioners, as well as to students who must be trained before performing clinical treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Florina Nica
- School of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 2A Eftimie Murgu Place, 300070 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Alin Gabriel Gabor
- Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania; (A.G.G.); (A.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Virgil-Florin Duma
- 3OM Optomechatronics Group, Faculty of Engineering, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 2 Elena Dragoi, 310177 Arad, Romania
- Doctoral School, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Ave., 300222 Timisoara, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-751-511451
| | | | - Anca Tudor
- Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania; (A.G.G.); (A.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Cosmin Sinescu
- Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania; (A.G.G.); (A.T.); (C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spille J, Jin F, Behrens E, Açil Y, Lichtenstein J, Naujokat H, Gülses A, Flörke C, Wiltfang J. Comparison of implant placement accuracy in two different preoperative digital workflows: navigated vs. pilot-drill-guided surgery. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7:45. [PMID: 33928447 PMCID: PMC8085150 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00322-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of a new implant navigation system on two different digital workflows. Methods A total of 18 phantom jaws consisting of hard and non-warping plastic and resembling edentulous jaws were used to stimulate a clinical circumstance. A conventional pilot-drill guide was conducted by a technician, and a master model was set by using this laboratory-produced guide. After cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D scanning of the master models, two different digital workflows (marker tray in CBCT and 3D-printed tray) were performed based on the Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine files and standard tessellation language files. Eight Straumann implants (4.1 mm × 10 mm) were placed in each model, six models for each group, resulting in 144 implant placements in total. Postoperative CBCT were taken, and deviations at the entry point and apex as well as angular deviations were measured compared to the master model. Results The mean total deviations at the implant entry point for MTC (marker tray in CBCT), 3dPT (3d-printed tray), and PDG (pilot-drill guide) were 1.024 ± 0.446 mm, 1.027 ± 0.455 mm, and 1.009 ± 0.415 mm, respectively, and the mean total deviations at the implant apex were 1.026 ± 0.383 mm, 1.116 ± 0.530 mm, and 1.068 ± 0.384 mm. The angular deviation for the MTC group was 2.22 ± 1.54°. The 3dPT group revealed an angular deviation of 1.95 ± 1.35°, whereas the PDG group showed a mean angular deviation of 2.67 ± 1.58°. Although there were no significant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05), the navigation groups showed lesser angular deviations compared to the pilot-drill-guide (PDG) group. Implants in the 3D-printed tray navigation group showed higher deviations at both entry point and apex. Conclusions The accuracy of the evaluated navigation system was similar with the accuracy of a pilot-drill guide. Accuracy of both preoperative workflows (marker tray in CBCT or 3D-printed tray) was reliable for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Spille
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Feilu Jin
- Department of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Eleonore Behrens
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Yahya Açil
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Lichtenstein
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hendrik Naujokat
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Aydin Gülses
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christian Flörke
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörg Wiltfang
- Christian Albrechts University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dynamic-Assisted Navigational System in Zygomatic Implant Surgery: A Qualitative and Quantitative Systematic Review of Current Clinical and Cadaver Studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 79:799-812. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
12
|
Dynamic Navigation for Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report about a Protocol with Intraoral Anchored Reference Tool and an Up-To-Date Review of the Available Protocols. Methods Protoc 2020; 3:mps3040075. [PMID: 33167345 PMCID: PMC7711909 DOI: 10.3390/mps3040075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Dynamic Navigation is a computer-aided technology that allows the surgeon to track the grip instruments while preparing the implant site in real time based on radiological anatomy and accurate pre-operative planning. The support of this technology to the zygoma implant placement aims to reduce the risks and the errors associated with this complex surgical and prosthetic treatment. Various navigation systems are available to clinicians currently, distinguished by handling, reliability, and the associated economic and biological benefits and disadvantages. The present paper reports on the different protocols of dynamic navigations following a standard workflow in correlation with zygomatic implant supported rehabilitations and describes a case of maxillary atrophy successfully resolved with this technology. An innovative and minimally invasive dynamic navigation system, with the use of an intraoral anchored trust marker plate and a patient reference tool, has been adopted to support the accurate insertion of four zygomatic implants, which rapidly resolved maxillary atrophy from a 75-year-old male system. This approach provided an optimal implant placement accuracy reducing surgical invasiveness.
Collapse
|
13
|
Science, Innovation and Education as Pillars of High-Quality Implant Dentistry: Overcoming Challenges through Innovation Dictates Trends. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051575. [PMID: 32455900 PMCID: PMC7290361 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|