Adrenal Vein Sampling to Distinguish Between Unilateral and Bilateral Primary Hyperaldosteronism: To ACTH Stimulate or Not?

Effect of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation during adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is key for primary aldosteronism subtype identification. However, the value of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation in AVS is still controversial.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we investigated the role of continuous ACTH infusion on the performance and interpretation of bilateral simultaneous AVS using a standard protocol in 59 primary aldosteronism patients. We analyzed the selectivity index and lateralization index in AVS pre and post-ACTH and estimated the prognosis of patients who underwent adrenalectomy with different cutoff points of lateralization index post-ACTH.

RESULTS

The confirmed success rate of bilateral adrenal vein catheterization increased from 84% pre-ACTH to 95% post-ACTH. Fifty percent of the patients had a decline in lateralization index post-ACTH, 30% of patients showed unilateral primary aldosteronism pre-ACTH but bilateral primary aldosteronism post-ACTH according to lateralization index at least 2 pre-ACTH and lateralization index at least 4 post-ACTH. The outcomes of the patients with primary aldosteronism after adrenalectomy indicated that all patients achieved clinical and biochemical success regardless of lateralization index at least 4 or less than 4 post-ACTH. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that lateralization index cutoff 2.58 post-ACTH stimulation yielded the best threshold in lateralization with a sensitivity of 73.1% and a specificity of 92.9%.

CONCLUSION

ACTH stimulation increased the AVS success rates in patients with primary aldosteronism, reduced lateralization index in some cases and decreased the proportion of identified unilateral primary aldosteronism, resulting in some patients losing the opportunity for disease cure. Compared with lateralization index at least 4, a lower cutoff point of lateralization index at least 2.58 after ACTH stimulation has better accuracy of lateralization diagnosis.

Diagnostic consistency between computed tomography and adrenal vein sampling of primary aldosteronism: leading to successful curative outcome after adrenalectomy; a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Adrenal computed tomography (CT) is a useful tool for locating adrenal lesion in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients. However, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is considered as a gold standard for subtype diagnosis of PA. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of CT and AVS for the diagnosis of PA subtypes and evaluate the concordance of surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 264 PA patients having both CT and AVS. Diagnostic consistency between CT and AVS was accessed, and clinical and biochemical outcomes were evaluated at 6 months after adrenalectomy.

RESULTS

Of all, 207 (78%) had a CT unilateral lesion, 31 (12%) CT bilateral lesion, and 26 (10%) CT bilateral normal findings. Among the CT unilateral lesion group, 138 (67%) had ipsilateral AVS lateralization. For CT bilateral lesion and bilateral normal, AVS unilateral lateralization was found in 17 (55%) and 2 (8%), respectively. The consistency between CT lesion and AVS lateralization including CT unilateral with AVS ipsilateral, and CT bilateral lesion with AVS bilateral patients was 63.8% (152/238). Of 77 patients with available data out of 138 patients who underwent adrenalectomy with consistency between CT and AVS, the clinical success rate was 96%, for 17 inconsistency patients out of 22 patients who underwent adrenalectomy, the clinical success rate was 94% after adrenalectomy following the lateralization result of AVS.

CONCLUSION

CT is a useful tool to diagnose the adrenal lesion in PA patients. However, AVS is more sufficient to detect the unilateral PA subtype, which could provide curable treatment to surgical candidates of PA such that AVS can identify patients with contralateral PA in CT unilateral lesion and unilateral PA in CT bilateral lesion. The surgical outcome was successful when an adrenalectomy was performed according to the AVS lateralization result.

Predicting Bilateral Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism Without Adrenal Vein Sampling: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. The final diagnostic step involves subtyping, using adrenal vein sampling (AVS), to determine if PA is unilateral or bilateral. The complete PA diagnostic process is time and resource intensive, which can impact rates of diagnosis and treatment. Previous studies have developed tools to predict bilateral PA before AVS.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of published tools that aim to identify bilateral subtypes of PA.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify published models that sought to subtype PA, and algorithms to predict bilateral PA are reported. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were then performed.

RESULTS

There were 35 studies included, evaluating 55 unique algorithms to predict bilateral PA. The algorithms were grouped into 6 categories: those combining biochemical, radiological, and demographic characteristics (A); confirmatory testing alone or combined with biochemical, radiological, and demographic characteristics (B); biochemistry results alone (C); adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation testing (D); anatomical imaging (E); and functional imaging (F). Across the identified algorithms, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 5% to 100% and 36% to 100%, respectively. Meta-analysis of 30 unique predictive tools from 32 studies showed that the group A algorithms had the highest specificity for predicting bilateral PA, while group F had the highest sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the variability in published predictive algorithms, they are likely important for decision-making regarding the value of AVS. Prospective validation may enable medical treatment upfront for people with a high likelihood of bilateral PA without the need for an invasive and resource-intensive test.

Corticotropin Stimulation in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Patients With Primary Aldosteronism: The ADOPA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is usually recommended to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) before definitive surgical or medical treatment is offered. Whether a treatment decision based on AVS with or without corticotropin (ACTH) stimulation leads to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate whether treatment decisions based on AVS with or without ACTH stimulation lead to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China from July 8, 2020, to February 20, 2023, among patients with PA aged 18 to 70 years. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the initiation of treatment. An intention-to-diagnose analysis was conducted.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either ACTH-stimulated or non-ACTH-stimulated AVS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission after 12 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission after 12 months of follow-up, dosages of antihypertensive agents, rate of successful bilateral AVS, and adverse events.

Results

Of 228 patients with PA, 115 were randomized to the non-ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 41.0-57.0 years]; 70 males [60.9%]) and 113 to the ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 43.5-56.5 years]; 63 males [55.8%]). A total of 68 patients (59.1%) underwent adrenalectomy in the non-ACTH group and 65 (57.5%) in the ACTH group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission who were managed on the basis of AVS with vs without ACTH stimulation (with: 56 of 113 [49.6%]; without: 59 of 115 [51.3%]; P = .79). There also was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups (26 of 115 [22.6%] and 31 of 113 [27.4%], respectively; P = .40). The intensity of therapy with antihypertensives, successful catheterization of bilateral adrenal veins, and incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this RCT, treatment of PA on the basis of non-ACTH-stimulated or ACTH-stimulated AVS did not lead to significant differences in clinical outcomes for the patients. These results suggest that ACTH stimulation during AVS may not have clinical benefit, at least in the Chinese population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461535.

Role of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Guiding Surgical Decision in Primary Aldosteronism

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is recommended for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA) to identify lateralized or bilateral sources of aldosterone excess, allowing for better decision-making in regard to medical or surgical management on a case-by-case basis. To date, no consensus exists on protocols to be used during AVS, especially concerning sampling techniques, the timing of sampling, and whether or not to use adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. Interpretation criteria for selectivity, lateralization, and contralateral suppression vary from one expert center to another, with some favoring strict cut-offs to others being more permissive. Clinical and biochemical post-operative outcomes can also be influenced by AVS criteria utilized to indicate surgical therapy.In this review, we reanalyze studies on AVS highlighting the recent pathological findings of frequent micronodular hyperplasia adjacent to a dominant aldosteronoma (APA) overlapping with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) etiologies, as opposed to the less frequent unilateral single aldosteronoma. The variable expression of melanocortin type 2 receptors in the nodules and hyperplasia may explain the frequent discordance in lateralization ratios between unstimulated and ACTH- stimulated samples. We conclude that aldosterone values collected during simultaneous bilateral sampling, both at baseline and post-ACTH stimulation, are required to adequately evaluate selectivity, lateralization, and contralateral suppression during AVS, to better identify all patients with PA that can benefit from a surgical indication. Recommended cut-offs for each ratio are also presented.

Mass spectrometry-based cortisol profiling during adrenal venous sampling reveals misdiagnosis for subtyping primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of secondary hypertension. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for subtyping PA. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference between immunoassays and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for measuring cortisol levels that affect the judgement of AVS.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

PATIENTS

Included 72 patients who were diagnosed with PA and had undergone AVS.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients were grouped according to whether they received adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation during AVS, and the cortisol results were measured using immunoassay and LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

There were 48 patients in the without ACTH stimulation group and 24 in the post-ACTH stimulation group during AVS (bilateral adrenal vein cannulation success rate, 56.25% vs. 83.33%). ACTH stimulation was beneficial for increasing the success rate of AVS (p < .001). Immunoassays were linearly correlated with LC-MS/MS when cortisol concentrations were <1750 nmol/L (r = .959, p < .001). When cortisol concentrations were >17,500 nmol/L, no correlation was found between the two methods (p = .093). The two methods were consistent for the detection of cortisol for evaluating the success of cannulation for AVS. Five percent of patients showed discordant lateralization of aldosterone production according to the cortisol LC-MS/MS and immunoassay results in the without ACTH group, and 15% showed discordant lateralization in the post-ACTH group.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunoassay method can be used to determine whether cannulation is successful. The final decision for lateralization may be more appropriate based on LC-MS/MS results.

Indices of ACTH-stimulated adrenal venous sampling as predictors of postsurgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of indices of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) on postsurgical outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA).

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

This retrospective study determined biochemical and clinical outcomes based on ACTH-stimulated AVS parameters (lateralisation index [LI], contralateral ratio [CLR], and ipsilateral ratio [ILR]) in 251 patients with PA at 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Modified complete biochemical success was achieved in 8 of 12 (66.7%) patients with LI = 3-4, 39 of 47 (83.0%) with LI = 4-10, and 155 of 169 (91.7%) with LI ≥ 10 (p = .004 for trend). Modified complete biochemical success was achieved in 29 of 38 (76.3%) patients with CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2, 73 of 86 (84.9%) with CLR = 0.25-1 and ILR > 2, and 100 of 104 (96.2%) with CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (p = .001 for trend). After adjusting for confounders, modified complete biochemical success was associated with an LI ≥ 10 (odds ratio [OR] = 6.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-29.93) using LI = 3-4 as a reference and combined CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (OR = 11.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.49-53.01) using combined CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2 as a reference. Using combined CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2 as a reference, complete clinical success was associated with combined CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.03-9.28) and combined CLR = 0.25-1 and ILR > 2 (OR = 4.92; 95% CI = 1.64-14.76).

CONCLUSION

LI ≥ 10 may be appropriate for achieving biochemical success. With ILR > 2, CLR < 0.25, and CLR < 1 may be appropriate for achieving biochemical and clinical success, respectively.

Effect of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Stimulation During Simultaneous Bilateral Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

The aim of the study was to investigate the significance and influence of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients with simultaneous bilateral adrenal vein sampling (AVS). All patients diagnosed with PA underwent simultaneous bilateral AVS with ACTH. In 95 patients, the post-ACTH SI significantly increased (p<0.001), and it gradually decreased from t10-t30 after ACTH stimulation (p<0.001). The unsuccessful catheterization decreased after ACTH stimulation. Time points within 20 min after ACTH stimulation were better for sampling, and the selectivity did not increase over longer periods. According to lateralization before and after ACTH stimulation, the patients could be divided into 3 groups (U, unilateral; B, bilateral): U/U , U/B or B/U, and B/B. Compared with the U/U group, in the U/B or B/U and B/B groups, the lateralization index (LI) was lower both at baseline and after ACTH stimulation (p<0.0001), the contralateral index (CLI) was higher after ACTH stimulation (p<0.003), the serum potassium level was higher (p<0.001), and the carbon dioxide combining power (CO2CP) and base excess (BE) levels were lower. In conclusion, in simultaneous bilateral AVS, ACTH stimulation had significant effects on increasing the catheterization selectivity. Lateralization change was observed after stimulation. After ACTH stimulation, fewer patients could be diagnosed with lateralized PA. Patients with consistent lateralized PA showed a more serious phenotype.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Stimulated Adrenal Venous Sampling Underestimates Surgically Curable Primary Aldosteronism: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Review of Contemporary Studies

[Figure: see text].

What Did We Learn from the Molecular Biology of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasia? From Histopathology to Translational Genomics

Approximately one-tenth of the general population exhibit adrenal cortical nodules, and the incidence has increased. Afflicted patients display a multifaceted symptomatology-sometimes with rather spectacular features. Given the general infrequency as well as the specific clinical, histological, and molecular considerations characterizing these lesions, adrenal cortical tumors should be investigated by endocrine pathologists in high-volume tertiary centers. Even so, to distinguish specific forms of benign adrenal cortical lesions as well as to pinpoint malignant cases with the highest risk of poor outcome is often challenging using conventional histology alone, and molecular genetics and translational biomarkers are therefore gaining increased attention as a possible discriminator in this context. In general, our understanding of adrenal cortical tumorigenesis has increased tremendously the last decade, not least due to the development of next-generation sequencing techniques. Comprehensive analyses have helped establish the link between benign aldosterone-producing adrenal cortical proliferations and ion channel mutations, as well as mutations in the protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway coupled to cortisol-producing adrenal cortical lesions. Moreover, molecular classifications of adrenal cortical tumors have facilitated the distinction of benign from malignant forms, as well as the prognostication of the individual patients with verified adrenal cortical carcinoma, enabling high-resolution diagnostics that is not entirely possible by histology alone. Therefore, combinations of histology, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation multi-omic analyses are all needed in an integrated fashion to properly distinguish malignancy in some cases. Despite significant progress made in the field, current clinical and pathological challenges include the preoperative distinction of non-metastatic low-grade adrenal cortical carcinoma confined to the adrenal gland, adoption of individualized therapeutic algorithms aligned with molecular and histopathologic risk stratification tools, and histological confirmation of functional adrenal cortical disease in the context of multifocal adrenal cortical proliferations. We herein review the histological, genetic, and epigenetic landscapes of benign and malignant adrenal cortical neoplasia from a modern surgical endocrine pathology perspective and highlight key mechanisms of value for diagnostic and prognostic purposes.