SGLT2 Inhibitors and Kidney Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Impact of Empagliflozin on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Rate Variability in Kidney Transplant Recipients

AIM

We aimed to investigate the effects of Empagliflozin on cardiac arrhythmias and heart rate variability in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

Twenty-seven diabetic patients who underwent kidney transplantation between August 2020 and August 2023 were included. Patients with HbA1c >8% were received Empagliflozin treatment. A 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring was performed before and one year after beginning Empagliflozin. Holter ECGs were evaluated by a single cardiologist, comparing ventricular ectopic beats (VEB) and supraventricular ectopic beats (SEB) arrhythmias and heart rate variability parameters before and after one year of Empagliflozin treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients completed the study, and the mean patient age was 56.1 ± 10 years. Fifteen of the patients (55.6%) were male. The mean duration since transplant before starting Empagliflozin was 62.8 ± 46.2 months. In follow-up, HbA1c decreased from 8.2% to 7.7%(P = .075), urine protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 0.437 ± 0.428 to 0.267 ± 0.146 gr/g (P = .056), and platelet count increased significantly (P = .004). After one year of treatment, the number of VEBs and SEBs in the patients decreased compared to pretreatment. They decreased from 173.5 ± 460.8 and 514.8 ± 265 beats before treatment to 125.1 ± 231.7 and 125.1 ± 231.7 beats after treatment, respectively, but did not reach statistical significance (P > .05). No significant changes were found in heart rate variability parameters (P > .05). No significant correlation was found between VEBs and SEBs and cardiac inflammation indicators (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study, for the first time, investigated the effect of Empagliflozin on cardiac arrhythmias and heart rate variability in diabetic KTRs. Empagliflozin did not significantly affect cardiac arrhythmias and heart rate variability in KTRs.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Kidney Disease and beyond

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have significantly impacted the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and heart failure (HF), providing benefits beyond glycemic control. This review examines the mechanisms through which SGLT2is provide renal and cardiovascular protection and assesses their clinical efficacy.

Summary

By inducing glucosuria and natriuresis, SGLT2is alleviate multiple complications induced by chronic hyperglycemia. Moreover, SGLT2is reduce albuminuria, improve tubular function, and modulate erythropoiesis. Additionally, they mitigate inflammation and fibrosis by decreasing oxidative stress and downregulating proinflammatory pathways. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant reductions in renal and cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted through PubMed, highlighting the effects of SGLT2is and the results of major clinical trials involving SGLT2is.

Key Messages

SGLT2is play a crucial role in the management of DKD and HF by addressing multiple pathogenic pathways. Currently, SGLT2is are included in clinical guidelines for DKD and HF management, and their benefits extend to nondiabetic populations. Further research is needed to explore SGLT2is' multifaceted mechanisms and potential applications across diverse patient populations and different disease etiologies.

Efficacy of astragalus combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers in the treatment of stage III diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of Astragalus combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers in treating stage III diabetic nephropathy (DN) by meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wiley, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published between August 2007 and August 2022. Clinical studies on Astragalus combined with RAAS blockers for the treatment of stage III DN were included. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 and Stata 14.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 32 papers were included in this meta-analysis, containing 2462 patients from randomized controlled trials, with 1244 receiving the combination treatment and 1218 solely receiving RAAS blockers. Astragalus combined with RAAS blockers yielded a significantly higher total effective rate (TER) (mean difference [MD] 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-5.09) and significantly reduced urinary protein excretion rate (UPER), serum creatinine (Scr), blood urine nitrogen (BUN) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) levels. In subgroup analysis, combining astragalus and angiotensin receptor blocker significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 24 h urinary protein (24hUTP) levels, compared with the combined astragalus and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment. Meanwhile, the latter significantly decreased the urinary microprotein (β2-MG). Importantly, the sensitivity analysis confirmed the study's stability, and publication bias was not detected for UPER, BUN, HbAlc, FPG, or β2-MG. However, the TER, SCr, and 24hUTP results suggested possible publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The astragalus-RAAS blocker combination treatment is safe and improves outcomes; however, rigorous randomized, large-scale, multi-center, double-blind trials are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in stage III DN.

Risk of CKD among patients with DM taking diuretics or SGLT2i: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of CKD and renal function declines using a combination of diuretics and SGLT2i.

METHODS

We selected the data of subjects who had at least two outpatient records or at least one inpatient record for DM treatment as the DM group from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Patients receiving versus not receiving SGLT2i were defined as the SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i cohorts, respectively. The patients in the two groups were matched 1:1 through propensity score matching based on age, sex, year of index date, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The diuretics-only group had a higher risk of CKD (aHR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.68-3.61) compared to the neither SGLT2i nor diuretics group, while the both SGLT2i and diuretics group and the SGLT2i only group had lower risks (aHR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; aHR, 0.26, 95% CI, 0.17-0.40) than the diuretics-only group. The SGLT2i-only group had a lower risk (aHR, 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.94) than the both SGLT2i and diuretics group.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that diuretics could raise the risk of CKD in diabetic patients, but when used in combination with SGLT2i, they continue to offer protection against CKD.

Narrative review investigating the nephroprotective mechanisms of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease

Background and aims

Outcome trials using sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors have consistently shown their potential to preserve kidney function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Several mechanisms have been introduced which may explain the nephroprotective effect of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors beyond lowering blood glucose. This current narrative review has the objective to describe main underlying mechanisms causing a nephroprotective effect and to show similarities as well as differences between proposed mechanisms which can be observed in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic chronic kidney disease.

Methods

We performed a narrative review of the literature on Pubmed and Embase. The research string comprised various combinations of items including "chronic kidney disease", "sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor" and "mechanisms". We searched for original research and review articles published until march, 2022. The databases were searched independently and the agreements by two authors were jointly obtained.

Results

Sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors show systemic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects. Systemic effects include reduction of blood pressure without compensatory activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Hemodynamic effects include restoration of tubuloglomerular feedback which may improve pathologic hyperfiltration observed in most cases with chronic kidney disease. Current literature indicates that SGLT2i may not improve cortical oxygenation and may reduce medullar oxygenation.

Conclusion

Sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors cause nephroprotective effects by several mechanisms. However, several mediators which are involved in the underlying pathophysiology may be different between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on kidney, cardiovascular, and safety outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

The overall effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 15-30 ml/min per 1.73 m²) remain unclear, and we thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, cardiovascular (CV), and safety outcomes in patients with advanced CKD.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 3, 2022, and reporting effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, CV, or safety outcomes in patients with advanced CKD.

RESULTS

From 2675 records, six RCTs with 2167 participants were included in the quantitative analyses. In patients with advanced CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary kidney outcome (a composite of worsening kidney function, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or kidney death) by 23% (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.04, I² = 0 for the heterogeneity) and slowed the annual decline in eGFR slope, with the difference between SGLT2 inhibitor group and placebo group being 1.24 mL/min/1.73m² per year (95% CI 0.06-2.42, p = 0.04). SGLT2 inhibitors were also associated with a decreased risk of primary CV outcome (a composite of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure) (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, p = 0.03, I² = 0 for the heterogeneity) and with similar risks of adverse events (such as acute kidney injury, fracture, amputation, and urinary tract infection).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risks of primary kidney and CV outcomes and attenuated the progressive decrease in eGFR compared with placebo, with no evidence of additional safety concerns. These observed benefits may support continuing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with advanced CKD before initiating maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation. Future large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the robustness of these results.

Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stage 3/4 CKD: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

After stage 3 CKD, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increased significantly. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with different baseline kidney function or underlying diseases.

METHOD

To identify eligible trials, we systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021. The primary cardiovascular outcome was defined as a combination of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. Baseline kidney functions (stage 3a CKD: eGFR45-59mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 3b CKD: eGFR30-44mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 4 CKD: eGFR<30mL/min per 1.73m2) and underlying diseases (Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (Preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) were used to stratify efficacy and safety outcomes. The results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis to ensure that they were reliable.

RESULTS

In the present study, a total of eleven trials were included that involved a total of 27,823 patients with stage 3/4 CKD. The treatment and control groups contained 14,451 and 13,372 patients, respectively. In individuals with stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes by 26% (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.69-0.80], I2 = 0.00%), by 30% in patients with stage 3a CKD (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.59-0.84], I2 = 18.70%), by 23% in patients with stage 3b CKD (HR 0.77, [95% CI 0.66-0.90], I2 = 2.12%), and by 29% in patients with stage 4 CKD (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.53-0.96], I2 = 0.00%). The risk of primary outcomes was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.63-0.80], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with type 2 diabetes, by 28% (HR 0.72, [95% CI 0.56-0.93], I2 = 37.23%) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, by 21% (HR 0.79, [95% CI 0.70-0.89], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and by 25% (HR 0.75, [95% CI 0.64-0.88], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

For stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, and these benefits were consistent throughout the spectrum of different kidney functions, even in stage 4 CKD. There was no evidence of increased adverse outcomes across different baseline clinical complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Comparison of Adverse Kidney Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Linagliptin Use in Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Patients in a Real-World Setting

Background: To compare the effects of empagliflozin and linagliptin use on kidney outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in a real-world setting. Methods: The study involved a propensity score-matched cohort comprising new users of empagliflozin or linagliptin with T2DM between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 from a large healthcare delivery system in Taiwan. Clinical outcomes assessed: acute kidney injury (AKI), post-AKI dialysis, and mortality. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative risk of empagliflozin or linagliptin use; a linear mixed model was used to compare the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time. Results: Of the 7,042 individuals, 67 of 3,521 (1.9%) in the empagliflozin group and 144 of 3,521 (4.1%) in the linagliptin group developed AKI during the 2 years follow-up. Patients in the empagliflozin group were at a 40% lower risk of developing AKI compared to those in the linagliptin group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.82, p = 0.001). Stratified analysis showed that empagliflozin users ≥65 years of age (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.13, p = 0.148), or with a baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57-1.65, p = 0.899), or with a baseline glycohemoglobin ≦7% (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.51-2.00, p =0.973) experienced attenuated benefits with respect to AKI risk. A smaller decline in eGFR was observed in empagliflozin users compared to linagliptin users regardless of AKI occurrence (adjusted β = 1.51; 95% CI, 0.30-2.72 ml/min/1.73 m², p = 0.014). Conclusion: Empagliflozin users were at a lower risk of developing AKI and exhibited a smaller eGFR decline than linagliptin users. Thus, empagliflozin may be a safer alternative to linagliptin for T2DM patients.

Cardiovascular benefits from SGLT2 inhibition in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients is not impaired with phosphate flux related to pharmacotherapy

The beneficial cardiorenal outcomes of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been substantiated by multiple clinical trials, resulting in increased interest in the multifarious pathways by which their mechanisms act. The principal effect of SGLT2i (-flozin drugs) can be appreciated in their ability to block the SGLT2 protein within the kidneys, inhibiting glucose reabsorption, and causing an associated osmotic diuresis. This ameliorates plasma glucose elevations and the negative cardiorenal sequelae associated with the latter. These include aberrant mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative stress burden, endothelial cell dysfunction, pernicious neurohormonal activation, and the development of inimical hemodynamics. Positive outcomes within these domains have been validated with SGLT2i administration. However, by modulating the sodium-glucose cotransporter in the proximal tubule (PT), SGLT2i consequently promotes sodium-phosphate cotransporter activity with phosphate retention. Phosphatemia, even at physiologic levels, poses a risk in cardiovascular disease burden, more so in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There also exists an association between phosphatemia and renal impairment, the latter hampering cardiovascular function through an array of physiologic roles, such as fluid regulation, hormonal tone, and neuromodulation. Moreover, increased phosphate flux is associated with an associated increase in fibroblast growth factor 23 levels, also detrimental to homeostatic cardiometabolic function. A contemporary commentary concerning this notion unifying cardiovascular outcome trial data with the translational biology of phosphate is scant within the literature. Given the apparent beneficial outcomes associated with SGLT2i administration notwithstanding negative effects of phosphatemia, we discuss in this review the effects of phosphate on the cardiometabolic status in patients with T2DM and cardiorenal disease, as well as the mechanisms by which SGLT2i counteract or overcome them to achieve their net effects. Content drawn to develop this conversation begins with proceedings in the basic sciences and works towards clinical trial data.

Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Renal Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were initially demonstrated in recent trials. However, the magnitude of renal benefits for CKD patients with different baseline features and underlying diseases remains unclear.

Method: We systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021 to identify eligible trials. The primary outcome was a composite of worsening kidney function, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or renal death. Efficacy and safety outcomes were stratified by baseline features, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, proteinuria, and renal function.

Results: A total of nine studies were included. These studies included 25,749 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m² and 12,863 patients with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) >300 mg/g. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary renal outcome by 30% in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m² (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.58–0.83], I² = 0.00%) and by 43% in patients with UACR > 300 mg/g (HR 0.57, [95% CI 0.48–0.67], I² = 16.59%). A similar benefit was observed in CKD patients with type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 inhibitors had no clear effects on renal outcomes in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m² combined with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.51–1.06], I² = 0.00%). However, they reduced the risk of major renal outcomes by 46% (HR 0.54, [95% CI 0.38–0.76], I² = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and macroalbuminuria (defined as UACR > 300 mg/g). SGLT2 inhibitors did not significantly reduce the risk of major renal outcomes in CKD patients with heart failure (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m²: HR 0.81, [95% CI 0.47–1.38], I² = 0.00%; UACR > 300 mg/g: HR 0.66, [95% CI 0.41–1.07], I² = 0.00%). SGLT2 inhibitors showed consistent renal benefits across different levels of eGFR (P interaction = 0.48).

Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary outcome in CKD patients. However, for patients with different features and underlying diseases, there exists differences in the renal protective effect.

Advances in understanding the innate immune-associated diabetic kidney disease

Millions of human deaths occur annually due to chronic kidney disease, caused by diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Despite having effective drugs controlling the hyperglycemia and high blood pressure, the incidence of DKD is increasing, which indicates the need for the development of novel therapies to control DKD. In this article, we discussed the recent advancements in the basic innate immune mechanisms in renal tissues triggered under the diabetes environment, leading to the pathogenesis and progression of DKD. We also summarized the currently available innate immune molecules-targeting therapies tested against DKD in clinical and preclinical settings, and highlighted additional drug targets that could potentially be employed for the treatment of DKD. The improved understanding of the disease pathogenesis may open avenues for the development of novel therapies to rein in DKD, which consequently, can reduce morbidity and mortality in humans in the future.

Use of Anti-Diabetic Agents in Non-Diabetic Kidney Disease: From Bench to Bedside

New drugs were recently developed to treat hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, metformin remains the first-line anti-diabetic agent because of its cost-effectiveness. It has pleiotropic action that produces cardiovascular benefits, and it can be useful in diabetic nephropathy, although metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a hindrance to its use in patients with kidney failure. New anti-diabetic agents, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, also produce cardiovascular or renal benefits in T2D patients. Their glucose-independent beneficial actions can lead to cardiorenal protection via hemodynamic stabilization and inflammatory modulation. Systemic hypertension is relieved by natriuresis and improved vascular dysfunction. Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback can be restored by SGLT-2 inhibition, reducing glomerular hypertension. Patients with non-diabetic kidney disease might also benefit from those drugs because hypertension, proteinuria, oxidative stress, and inflammation are common factors in the progression of kidney disease, irrespective of the presence of diabetes. In various animal models of non-diabetic kidney disease, metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors were favorable to kidney morphology and function. They strikingly attenuated biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in diseased kidneys. However, whether those animal results translate to patients with non-diabetic kidney disease has yet to be evaluated. Considering the paucity of new agents to treat kidney disease and the minimal adverse effects of metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors, these anti-diabetic agents could be used in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease. This paper provides a rationale for clinical trials that apply metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors to non-diabetic kidney disease.

Diabetic Nephropathy: Novel Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the major microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease. The standard treatments for diabetic patients are glucose and blood pressure control, lipid lowering, and renin-angiotensin system blockade; however, these therapeutic approaches can provide only partial renoprotection if started late in the course of the disease. One major limitation in developing efficient therapies for DN is the complex pathobiology of the diabetic kidney, which undergoes a set of profound structural, metabolic and functional changes. Despite these difficulties, experimental models of diabetes have revealed promising therapeutic targets by identifying pathways that modulate key functions of podocytes and glomerular endothelial cells. In this review we will describe recent advances in the field, analyze key molecular pathways that contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease, and discuss how they could be modulated to prevent or reverse DN.

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors for Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus among Kidney Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors for treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) among kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

We conducted electronic searches in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception through April 2020 to identify studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant patients with DM. Study results were pooled and analyzed utilizing random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 132 patients (baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 64.5 ± 19.9 mL/min/1.73m2) treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors were included in our meta-analysis. SGLT-2 inhibitors demonstrated significantly lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (WMD = -0.56% [95%CI: -0.97, -0.16]; p = 0.007) and body weight (WMD = -2.16 kg [95%CI: -3.08, -1.24]; p < 0.001) at end of study compared to baseline level. There were no significant changes in eGFR, serum creatinine, urine protein creatinine ratio, and blood pressure. By subgroup analysis, empagliflozin demonstrated a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) and body weight. Canagliflozin revealed a significant decrease in HbA1C and systolic blood pressure. In terms of safety profiles, fourteen patients had urinary tract infection. Only one had genital mycosis, one had acute kidney injury, and one had cellulitis. There were no reported cases of euglycemic ketoacidosis or acute rejection during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Among kidney transplant patients with excellent kidney function, SGLT-2 inhibitors for treatment of DM are effective in lowering HbA1C, reducing body weight, and preserving kidney function without reporting of serious adverse events, including euglycemic ketoacidosis and acute rejection.