Algo-Functional Indexes and Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait after Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis

The Italian version of the Majeed pelvic score: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation

PURPOSE

The assessment of functional outcomes after pelvic ring fracture remains a controversial topic. The Majeed pelvic score (MPS) is the most commonly used pelvic-specific questionnaire in the literature. The aim of this study is translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of MPS.

METHODS

The study was articulated in two phases. Phase 1 consisted in translation and cross-cultural adaptation of MPS, from English into Italian. The psychometric properties were tested on 52 Italian patients (Phase 2). Construct validity was assessed by correlation with Short-Form 12 (SF-12). 33 patients repeated the questionnaire after 14 days to assess its reproducibility. All data were subsequently analyzed (descriptive statistics, multitrait analysis, reliability and construct validity assessment).

RESULTS

The questionnaire was clear and easily understood (no missing data). A ceiling effect was detected for all items of the scale. Multitrait analysis showed good results for each outcome measure, except for the item "walking distance" that showed poor item discriminant validity. A significant correlation between the MPS and the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-12 was found, while there was a weak correlation with the mental component summary (MCS). The questionnaire showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.91-0.99) and very good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.92-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the MPS has demonstrated to be reliable and valid in the evaluation of patients with pelvic ring fractures. There is still however a need for an instrument capable of evaluating the mental component in these types of injuries.

Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury with sacroiliac screw

BACKGROUND

To analyze the perioperative bleeding and hidden blood loss (HBL) of sacroiliac screw minimally invasive treatment of pelvic posterior ring injury and explore the influential factors of HBL after operation for providing reference for clinical treatment.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 369 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries treated with sacroiliac screws internal fixation at our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022. The research was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry in July 2022 (ChiCTR2200061866). The total blood loss (TBL) and HBL of patients were counted, and the factors such as gender, age, and surgical duration were statistically analyzed. The influential factors of HBL were analyzed by multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

The TBL was 417.96 ± 98.05 ml, of which the visible blood loss (VBL) was 37.00 ± 9.0 ml and the HBL was 380.96 ± 68.8 ml. The HBL accounted for 91.14 ± 7.36% of the TBL. Gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth had significant effects on the HBL (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The HBL was the main cause of anemia after minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury with a sacroiliac screw. Gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth were closely related to the occurrence of HBL. In clinical treatment, we should consider these influential factors and take effective measures to reduce the impact of HBL on patients.

Quantitative gait analysis of patients with severe sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a chronic painful condition responsible for up to 30% of back pain. Treatment modalities include physiotherapy, intraarticular analgesic injections, ablation techniques or SIJ fusion. The severity of SIJ dysfunction is commonly assessed via subjective pain or disability scales. Quantitative gait analysis offers an objective means of evaluating patients with SIJ dysfunction prior to its surgical treatment.

METHODS

Ten patients diagnosed with severe SIJ dysfunction were matched with 10 healthy controls. All individuals underwent quantitative 3D gait analysis using the Qualisys program and statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in gait parameters between the two groups.

RESULTS

Two groups of data were obtained; angular parameters described by the Gait Profile Score (GPS) and spatiotemporal parameters described in standard SI units. Statistically significant differences were found between the patient and control group for parameters: overall GPS (P=0.049), hip abduction/adduction (P=0.017) and ankle plantar/dorsal flexion (P=0.003), stride length (P=0.002), step length (P=0.001), swing time (P=0.03) and initial double limb support (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is the first to perform complex quantitative gait analysis of patients with SIJ dysfunction and to compare it with healthy individuals. These results can provide clinicians with baseline gait values for these patients to objectively quantify the extent of their disease.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Lithuanian Version of the Majeed Pelvic Score

Background and Objectives: There are no valid patient-based pelvic ring function assessment tools in Lithuania. The most widely used instrument is the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), which is proven to be an effective tool for assessing pelvic function after pelvic injuries. The aims of our study were: (1) the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the MPS for the Lithuanian-speaking population, (2) to test the psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the MPS (MPS-LT) at follow-up two-time points after pelvic fractures. Materials and Methods: The MPS was translated and culturally adapted. Psychometric properties of the MPS-LT were determined in one patient group (n = 40) at two time-points during follow-up examination from 1.5 to 3 months (mean 2 months) and from 11 to 20 months (mean 12 months). Results: At the mean time of 2 months after trauma, Cronbach’s α of the MPS-LT was 0.65. Correlation of the MPS-LT with the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS) was r = 0.84 (p < 0.001), and with the Lithuanian SF-36, PCS was r = 0.53 (p < 0.001). At the mean time follow-up of 12 months, Cronbach’s α was 0.86, correlation with the IPS was r = 0.92 (p < 0.001), and with the Lithuanian SF-36, PCS – r = 0.82 (p < 0.001). At the 2-month follow-up, neither floor nor ceiling effects were reached, but at 12 months, 27.5% of patients reached the ceiling effect, while none reached the floor effect. The effect size of the MPS-LT was 1.66. Conclusions: The MPS-LT has limited ability to measure functional outcomes at 2 months after pelvic fracture. In contrast, at the 12-month follow-up examination, the MPS-LT had a good ability to assess pelvic function, and it was sensitive to health changes. The MPS-LT can be used as a pelvic function assessment tool after pelvic fractures for the Lithuanian-speaking population.