Clinical Disease Severity Mediates the Relationship between Stride Length and Speed and the Risk of Falling in Parkinson’s Disease

Use of a Robotic Walking Device for Home and Community Mobility in Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gait impairments in Parkinson disease (PD) contribute to decreased quality of life. This randomized controlled trial examined immediate- and longer-term effects of a single joint robotic exoskeleton device (EXOD), the Honda Walking Assist device, on gait.

METHODS

Participants (n = 45) with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3) were randomized to a robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) group (n = 23) or control (CON) group (n = 22). The RAGT group was tested with and without the EXOD at baseline and then received supervised in-home and community training with the EXOD twice weekly for 8 weeks. The CON group received no interventions. Outcome measures included gait speed (primary), gait endurance (6-minute walk test), perceived ease of walking, and questionnaires and logs assessing performance of daily activities, freezing of gait, and daily activity levels.

RESULTS

Forty participants completed the study. No significant immediate impact of EXOD usage on participants' gait measures was found. Differences in gait speed and secondary outcome measures postintervention were not significantly different between the RAGT and CON groups. Participants with greater disease severity (worse baseline motor scores) had greater improvements in stride length during unassisted walking after the intervention than those with lower severity (mean difference: 3.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-6.40; P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

All RAGT participants could use the EXOD safely. The RAGT treatment used in this mostly low impairment population of people with PD may be ineffective and/or was insufficiently dosed to see a positive treatment effect. Our findings suggest that RAGT interventions in PD may be more effective in individuals with greater motor impairments.

A biomechanical analysis of turning during gait in individuals with different subtypes of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Turning while walking is a complex component of locomotor capacity, which can be challenging in the daily lives of people with Parkinson's disease. The aim of the study was to compare biomechanical strategies during turning of gait in individuals with Parkinson's disease and its different clinical subtypes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, comprising of 43 individuals with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, divided in subgroups: akineto-rigid, dominant tremor and mixed. Motor impairment was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. The gait biomechanical parameters (number of steps, step length, cadence, amplitude, velocity and radius of the turn) were analyzed during turning in a kinematics laboratory. In the statistical analysis, a comparison was made between subgroups, and correlations between biomechanical parameters.

FINDINGS

There was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups. In the correlation analysis, notable correlations were found between the anticipatory step length and the following variables: number of steps (r = -0.418), step length while turning (r = 0.805), step length after turning (r = 0.644), average velocity (r = 0.830), average velocity while turning (r = 0.755), and maximum velocity (rho = 0.835).

INTERPRETATION

The difficulties primarily occur during the anticipatory phase of the turn, which affects the entire task. The greater the length of the anticipatory step, the greater the length of the step taken to turn as well as the step taken after turning. And the greater the velocity, the greater the step length, and to fewer steps taken to perform the task.

Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation

Introduction

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a neurological disorder that is potentially reversible and clinically characterized by a specific triad of symptoms, including gait disturbance, cognitive disorders, and urinary incontinence. In INPH assessment, the most commonly used test is the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), but a more comprehensive assessment would be necessary. The first aim of the present study is to verify the sensitivity of a protocol with both clinical and instrumental outcome measures for gait and balance in recognizing INPH patients. The second aim is to verify the most important spatio-temporal parameters in INPH assessment and their possible correlations with clinical outcome measures.

Methods

Between January 2019 and June 2022, we evaluated 70 INPH subjects. We assessed balance performances with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and TUG, both single (ST) and dual task (DT). We also performed an instrumental gait assessment with the GAITRite electronic walkway system, asking the patients to walk on the carpet for one minute at normal speed, fast speed, and while performing a dual task. We compared the results with those of 20 age-matched healthy subjects (HS).

Results

INPH patients obtained statistically significant lower scores at the BBS, SPPB, and TUG DT but not at the TUG ST, likely because the DT involves cognitive factors altered in these subjects. Concerning instrumental gait evaluation, we found significant differences between HS and INPH patients in almost all spatio-temporal parameters except cadence, which is considered a relevant factor in INPH guidelines. We also found significant correlations between balance outcome measures and gait parameters.

Discussion

Our results confirm the usefulness of BBS and suggest improving the assessment with SPPB. Although the TUG ST is the most commonly used test in the literature to evaluate INPH performances, it does not identify INPH; the TUG DT, instead, might be more useful. The GAITRite system is recognized as a quick and reliable tool to assess walking abilities and spatio-temporal parameters in INPH patients, and the most useful parameters are stride length, stride width, speed, and the percentage of double support. Both clinical and instrumental evaluation may be useful in recognizing subjects at risk for falls.

Validation of Gait Measurements on Short-Distance Walkways Using Azure Kinect DK in Patients Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis

Muscle dysfunction, skeletal muscle fibrosis, and disability are associated with weakness in patients with end-stage renal disease. The main purpose of this study was to validate the effectiveness of a proposed system for gait monitoring on short-distance 1.5 m walkways in a dialysis center. Gaits with reduced speed and stride length, long sit-to-stand time (SST), two forward angles, and two unbalanced gait regions are defined in the proposed Kinect v3 gait measurement and analysis system (K3S) and have been considered clinical features in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with poor dialysis outcomes. The stride and pace calibrations of the Kinect v3 system are based on the Zeno Walkway. Its single rating intraclass correlation (ICC) for the stride is 0.990, and its single rating ICC for the pace is 0.920. The SST calibration of Kinect v3 is based on a pressure insole; its single rating ICC for the SST is 0.871. A total of 75 patients on chronic dialysis underwent gait measurement and analysis during walking and weighing actions. After dialysis, patients demonstrated a smaller stride (p < 0.001) and longer SST (p < 0.001). The results demonstrate that patients' physical fitness was greatly reduced after dialysis. This study ensures patients' adequate physical gait strength to cope with the dialysis-associated physical exhaustion risk by tracing gait outliers. As decreased stride and pace are associated with an increased risk of falls, further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical benefits of monitoring gait with the proposed reliable and valid system in order to reduce fall risk in hemodialysis patients.

Effectiveness of Center of Pressure Trajectory as Anticipatory Postural Adjustment Measurement in Parkinson's Disease With Freezing of Gait History

BACKGROUND

Evidence showed that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have a history of freezing of gait (FOG) have hypometric anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) during gait initiation (GI) compared to PD without FOG.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to test the feasibility of center of pressure (COP) displacement during GI as the measure of APA in PD with and without a history of FOG.

METHODS

Patients with PD underwent COP trajectory measurements, including duration, length, velocity, and acceleration in different phases of APA (APA1, APA2a, APA2, and LOC), as well as evaluation of New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q), Tinetti balance and gait score, and Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty (PIGD) score in the on and off medication states.

RESULTS

The duration (seconds) of APA2a, APA2b, and LOC were highest while velocity in mediolateral direction (X) (m/s), including APA1, APA2a, APA2b, and LOC showed lowest in PD with FOG. Velocity in the mediolateral direction in different phases of APA increased in patients with FOG after dopaminergic therapy. APA2a (seconds) and APA2b (X) (m/s) were significantly associated with NFOG-Q part II, APA2b (X) (m/s) was significantly associated with NFOG-Q part III, and APA2a (seconds) was significantly associated with Tinetti balance and gait and PIGD score.

CONCLUSIONS

PD with FOG history showed a favorable response of APAs to dopaminergic replacement. The APA parameters by COP trajectory, especially lateral COP shift toward the stance foot (APA2b (X) (m/s) and APA2a (seconds)) are surrogate markers to assess PD with FOG history.

Assessing the Feasibility of Using Electrochemical Skin Conductance as a Substitute for the Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test in the Composite Autonomic Scoring Scale and Its Correlation with Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31 in Parkinson's Disease

The Composite Autonomic Scoring Scale (CASS) is a quantitative scoring system that integrates the sudomotor, the cardiovagal, and the adrenergic subscores, and the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31 (COMPASS 31) is based on a well-established comprehensive questionnaire designed to assess the autonomic symptoms across multiple domains. We tested the hypothesis that electrochemical skin conductance (Sudoscan) can be a substitute for the quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART) in the sudomotor domain and assessed its correlation with COMPASS 31 in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Fifty-five patients with PD underwent clinical assessment and cardiovascular autonomic function tests and completed the COMPASS 31 questionnaire. We compared the modified CASS (integrating the Sudoscan-based sudomotor, adrenergic, and cardiovagal subscores) and CASS subscores (the sum of the adrenergic and cardiovagal subscores). The total weighted score of COMPASS 31 was significantly correlated with both the modified CASS and the CASS subscore (p = 0.007 and p = 0.019). The correlation of the total weighted score of COMPASS 31 increased from 0.316 (CASS subscores) to 0.361 (modified CASS). When we added the Sudoscan-based sudomotor subscore, the case numbers for autonomic neuropathy (AN) increased from 22 (40%, CASS subscores) to 40 (72.7%, modified CASS). The modified CASS not only better reflects the exact autonomic function, but also improves the characterization and quantification of AN in patients with PD. In areas in which a QSART facility is not easily available, Sudoscan could be a time-saving substitution.

The Executive-Function-Related Cognitive-Motor Dual Task Walking Performance and Task Prioritizing Effect on People with Parkinson's Disease

To safely walk in a community environment requires dual cognitive-walking ambulation ability for people with Parkinson's disease (PD). A past study showed inconsistent results on cognitive-walking performance for PD patients, possibly due to the various cognitive tasks used and task priority assignment. This study designed cognitive-walking tests that used executive-related cognitive tasks to evaluate patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease who did not have obvious cognitive deficits. The effect of assigning task prioritization was also evaluated. Sixteen individuals with PD (PD group) and 16 individuals without PD (control group) underwent single cognitive tests, single walking tests, dual walking tests, and prioritizing task tests. Three types of cognitive, spatial memory, Stroops, and calculation tasks were employed. The cognitive performance was evaluated by response time, accuracy, and speed-accuracy trade off composite score. The walking performance was evaluated by the temporal spatial gait characteristics and variation in gait. The results showed that the walking performance of the PD group was significantly worse than the control group in both single and dual walking conditions. The group difference in cognitive performance was shown in composite score under the dual calculation walking task but not under the single task. While assigning priority to walking, no group difference in walking was observed but the response accuracy rate of PD groups declined. This study concluded that the dual task walking test could sharpen the cognitive deficits for early-stage PD patients. The task priority assignment might not be recommended while testing gait deficits since it decreased the ability to discriminate group differences.