The Therapeutic Role of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure: From Pathophysiologic Mechanisms to Clinical Evidence with Pooled Analysis of Relevant Studies across Safety and Efficacy Endpoints of Interest

Treatment options for heart failure in individuals with overweight or obesity: a review

Obesity and heart failure are interlaced global epidemics, each contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Obesity is not only a risk-factor for heart failure, but also complicates its management, by distinctive pathophysiological mechanisms and cumulative comorbidities, requiring tailored treatment plan. To present current treatment options for heart failure in individuals with overweight/obesity, emphasizing available pharmacological therapies, non-pharmacological strategies, and the management of related comorbidities. We conducted a comprehensive literature review regarding the results of heart failure treatments in individuals with overweight/obesity, including cornerstone interventions as well as emerging therapeutic options. Specific drug classes, including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have demonstrated consistent efficacy in heart failure irrespective of body mass index, while diuretics remain a key for fluid management. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have shown promising results in improving relevant outcomes and warrant further research. Non-pharmacological approaches, including weight-loss strategies and lifestyle modifications, have shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life. Managing heart failure in individuals with overweight/obesity requires a multidisciplinary, individualized approach integrating pharmacological and non-pharmacological options. Emerging therapies and preventive strategies arise to address the unique challenges in this population and provide improved outcomes.

Effect of Hypoglycemic Drugs on Patients with Heart Failure with or without T2DM: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Background

Anti-diabetic drugs have been noted to have a cardioprotective effect in patients with diabetes and heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of various anti-diabetic drugs on the prognosis of HF patients with and without diabetes.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before November 2024 that investigated the use of anti-diabetic medications in patients with HF. Primary outcomes included re-admission due to HF, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTpro-BNP) levels, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of different anti-diabetic drugs.

Results

A total of 33 RCTs involving 29,888 patients were included. Sotagliflozin was the most effective in reducing the risk of re-admission due to HF and all-cause death, with a cumulative probability of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. Liraglutide reduced the risk of cardiovascular death in HF patients with a cumulative probability of 0.97 and had the best efficacy in reducing NTpro-BNP levels with a cumulative probability of 0.69. Empagliflozin was best in improving LVEF in HF patients, with a cumulative probability of 0.69.

Conclusions

This Bayesian network meta-analysis demonstrates that sotagliflozin may be the best option for HF patients with and without diabetes. However, due to the small number of articles in this study, our results must be treated cautiously. Subsequently, there is an urgent need for more high-quality studies to validate our findings.

Have SGLT-2 inhibitors DELIVERed an EMPhatic win in heart failure and chronic kidney disease?

INTRODUCTION

Major global guidelines currently recommend sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) as the first-line agent in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who have either established cardiovascular disease (eCVD), heart failure (HF), or chronic kidney disease (CKD), regardless of baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Moreover, SGLT-2i are currently included in guideline-directed medical therapy as one of the pillars for people with HF and CKD, regardless of T2D. These recommendations are based on positive cardio-renal outcomes from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

AREAS COVERED

Following an extensive search in electronic databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov, we critically analyzed the RCTs that assessed cardio-renal outcome trials of SGLT-2i and put a perspective on how SGLT-2i delivered an emphatic win for people with HF and CKD, with or without T2D.

EXPERT OPINION

From thirteen high-quality RCTs, including five cardiovascular outcome trials, five HF outcome trials, three renal outcome trials, and a pooled meta-analysis, it is evident that SGLT-2i has delivered an emphatic win in people with HF and CKD, with or without T2D, with an acceptable safety profile. Ongoing RCTs shall further enlighten whether SGLT-2i will be effective in polycystic kidney disease, lupus nephritis, vasculitis, end-stage CKD with or without hemodialysis, and renal transplant.

The Emerging Role of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in the Management of Obesity-Related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Benefits beyond What Scales Can Measure?

Obesity is a significant predisposing factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although a substantial proportion of individuals with HFpEF also have obesity, those with obesity are under-represented in clinical trials for heart failure. In turn, current guidelines provided limited recommendations for the medical management of this patient population. Both obesity and diabetes induce a pro-inflammatory state that can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and coronary microvascular impairment, finally resulting in HFpEF. Additionally, obesity leads to increased epicardial and chest wall adiposity, which enhances ventricular interdependence. This condition is further aggravated by plasma and blood volume expansion and excessive vasoconstriction, ultimately worsening HFpEF. Despite the well-documented benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists in subjects with diabetes, obesity, or both, their role in obesity-related HFpEF remains unclear. In light of the recently published literature, this review aims to investigate the potential mechanisms and synthesize the available clinical evidence regarding the role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity-related HFpEF.

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The effectiveness and safety of a novel class of hypoglycemic medications known as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have not been completely established in relation to acute heart failure (AHF). Consequently, we sought to compare the prognostic and safety outcomes of patients administered SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of AHF.

Methods

An extensive search of the Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE was conducted for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that have evaluated the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in AHF from the inception of these drugs to the present. We compiled data related to cardiovascular safety and prognosis. Aggregated risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), or standardized mean differences (SMD) were generated for all outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), to evaluate the predictive significance of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with AHF.

Results

We identified 4,053 patients from 13 studies. Patients experienced a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96, P = 0.01), readmission rates (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98, P = 0.02), the number of heart failure exacerbation events (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.95, P = 0.02), and the number of rehospitalization events due to heart failure (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.86, P < 0.05) in the SGLT2 inhibitors-treatment group compared to a placebo or standard care (control group). SGLT2 inhibitors improved patient quality of life (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.09, P = 0.002). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with enhanced diuresis in patients with AHF (MD = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.36-4.29, P < 0.05). Overall, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the level of serum NT-proBNP (MD = -497.62, 95% CI: -762.02 to -233.21, P < 0.05) and did not increase the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.01, P = 0.06).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a better prognosis in patients with AHF than in patients not treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. It is safe and effective to initiate SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with AHF.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2024.9.0015, identifier (INPLASY202490015).

Recent Advances in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Atrial Remodeling

Atrial cardiomyopathy and remodeling play pivotal roles in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), involving complex changes in atrial structure and function. These changes facilitate the progression of AF and HF by creating a dynamic interplay between mechanical stress and electrical disturbances in the heart. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), initially developed for the management of type 2 diabetes, have demonstrated promising cardiovascular benefits, being currently one of the cornerstone treatments in HF management. Despite recent data from randomized clinical trials indicating that SGLT2is may significantly influence atrial remodeling, their overall effectiveness in this context is still under debate. Given the emerging evidence, this review examines the molecular mechanisms through which SGLT2is exert their effects on atrial remodeling, aiming to clarify their potential benefits and limitations. By exploring these mechanisms, this review aims to provide insights into how SGLT2is can be integrated into strategies for preventing the progression of atrial remodeling and HF, as well as the development of AF.

The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on markers of subclinical atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of classical cholesterol-lowering drugs to mitigate the adverse impacts of dyslipidaemia on atherosclerosis, many patients still face a substantial residual risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). This risk is partially attributed to non-traditional pathophysiological pathways. Latest evidence suggests that sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are beneficial for patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or established CVD by reducing morbidity and mortality. However, the underlying mechanisms of this benefit have not been clearly elucidated. It has been hypothesized that one possible mechanism could be the attenuation of subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) progression.

AIM

The objective of this narrative review is to examine the present evidence concerning the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on markers of SA.

RESULTS

The current evidence on the efficacy of SGLT2 on SA, endothelial function and arterial stiffness remains controversial. Findings from observational and randomized studies are quite heterogeneous; however, they converge that the antiatherosclerotic activity of SGLT2 inhibitors is not strong enough to be widely used for prevention of atherosclerosis progression in patients with or without T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms and the possible beneficial impact of SGLT2i on primary and secondary CVD prevention through attenuation of premature atherosclerosis progression.

The Role of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure Management: The Continuing Challenge of Clinical Outcome Endpoints in Heart Failure Trials

The introduction of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may be regarded as the first effective treatment in these patients. However, this proposition must be evaluated from the perspective of the complexity of clinical outcome endpoints in heart failure. The major goals of heart failure treatment have been categorized as: (1) reduction in (cardiovascular) mortality, (2) prevention of recurrent hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure, and (3) improvement in clinical status, functional capacity, and quality of life. The use of the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in SGLT2 inhibitor HFpEF trials flowed from the assumption that hospitalization for heart failure is a proxy for subsequent cardiovascular death. The use of this composite endpoint was not justified since the effect of the intervention on both components was clearly distinct. Moreover, the lack of convincing and clinically meaningful effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on metrics of heart failure-related health status indicates that the effect of this class of drugs in HFpEF patients is essentially restricted to an effect on hospitalization for heart failure. In conclusion, SGLT2 inhibitors do not represent a substantial breakthrough in the management of HFpEF.

The Prognostic Role of Spot Urinary Sodium and Chloride in a Cohort of Hospitalized Advanced Heart Failure Patients: A Pilot Study

Recent studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of spot urinary sodium (UNa+) in acutely decompensated chronic HF (ADCHF) patients. However, data on the prognostic role of UNa+ and spot urinary chloride (UCl-) in patients with advanced HF are limited. In the present prospective pilot study, we examined the predictive value of UNa+ and UCl- concentration at baseline, at 2 h and at 24 h after admission for all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization up to 3 months post-discharge. Consecutive advanced HF patients (n = 30) admitted with ADCHF and aged > 18 years were included in the study. Loop diuretics were administered based on the natriuresis-guided algorithm recommended by the recent HF guidelines. Exclusion criteria were cardiogenic shock, acute coronary syndrome, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh category C), and sepsis. UNa+ at baseline (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.75, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.58-0.93), p = 0.019) and at 2 h after admission (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.96, p = 0.005) showed good and excellent discrimination, respectively. UCl- at 2 h after admission (AUC = 0.75, 95%CI (0.57-0.93), p = 0.017) demonstrated good discrimination. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, UNa+ at 2 h (p = 0.02) and dose of loop diuretics at admission (p = 0.03) were the only factors independently associated with the study outcome. In conclusion, UNa+ and UCl- may have a prognostic role in hospitalized advanced HF patients.