Hormonal Replacement Therapy in Menopausal Women with History of Endometriosis: A Review of Literature

Menopause and endometriosis

The shift in paradigm from the belief that endometriosis exclusively affects women of reproductive age has brought attention to its manifestation in postmenopausal patients. Despite this emerging awareness, there remains a dearth of information in the literature regarding postmenopausal endometriosis, with uncertainties surrounding its prevalence, clinical significance, optimal management strategies, and prognosis. Clinical manifestations of endometriosis in menopausal patients lack specificity, with pain onset possible at any stage of life. The primary approach for symptomatic postmenopausal endometriosis continues to be surgical excision, serving both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes while mitigating the risk of coexisting malignancies. Managing the disease in postmenopausal women presents challenges due to possible contraindications for menopausal hormone therapy and the elevated risk of recurrence and malignant transformation. However, conclusive data regarding the appropriateness of menopausal hormone therapy in women with endometriosis or a history of the disease are lacking. Current recommendations lean towards prioritizing combined menopausal hormone therapy formulations or tibolone over estrogen-only therapies due to their potentially higher malignancy risk. The possible increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women with endometriosis is likely linked to a history of surgical menopause at an earlier age, but more research is warranted. This narrative review summarizes the available literature and provides insights into the intricate connection between endometriosis and menopause, shedding light on pathogenesis, symptoms, oncologic risk, diagnosis, and treatment.

Postmenopausal Endometriosis: Clinical Insights and Imaging Considerations

Endometriosis is a chronic systemic condition characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial-like tissue outside of the uterus. It occurs most often in reproductive-aged patients and less frequently in postmenopausal women. In postmenopausal patients, endometriosis is more common in those undergoing hormone replacement therapy or taking tamoxifen. The risk of malignant transformation of endometriosis is higher in this older population, especially in those undergoing estrogen-only hormone replacement therapy. Many theories on the postmenopausal pathogenesis of endometriosis have been proposed, ranging from reactivation of premenopausal disease to de novo manifestation. Compared with premenopausal disease, postmenopausal endometriosis is typically less active and extensive, with fewer hemorrhagic components. Patients may be symptomatic, with chronic pelvic pain, or may receive the diagnosis after imaging performed for other indications such as an incidental ovarian lesion. Treatment is typically surgical resection or estrogen-blocking medications. Although the diagnosis requires pathologic confirmation, radiologists play an important role in diagnosing both benign endometriosis and malignant transformation. Pelvic US following a dedicated protocol is an accessible screening tool, with high sensitivity for diagnosis of bowel-invasive disease. MRI has better anatomic resolution and allows simultaneous characterization of adnexal and extrapelvic lesions, thereby providing excellent assessment for malignant transformation.

Clinical Management of Endometriosis in Menopause: A Narrative Review

Endometriosis, an inflammatory disease primarily affecting the pelvis and peritoneum, manifests with pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, and infertility. Despite its ubiquity, the management of endometriosis is challenging due to its heterogeneous presentation, limitations in diagnostic methods, variable therapeutic responses, and personal and socio-cultural impact on quality of life. This review attempts to consolidate the current literature on endometriosis occurring during and beyond menopause, and to present details regarding management strategies that take into account individual outcomes and goals when managing this condition. The topics included in this review are the clinical features and differential diagnosis of pelvic pain in postmenopausal patients, imaging considerations, serum and laboratory biomarkers, indications for surgery, the principles of hormone replacement therapy, the de novo development of endometriosis after menopause, and malignant transformation. Each topic includes a summary of the current literature, utilizing clinical research, case reports, and expert opinion. Despite a better understanding of the impact of endometriosis beyond menopause, there are many limitations to this condition, specifically with regard to cancer risk and indications for surgery. The existing evidence supports the use of shared decision making and the incorporation of patient preferences in guiding clinical management. Future research endeavors must shed light on the natural history of postmenopausal endometriosis through longitudinal studies in order to foster a deeper understanding of its complicated disease course across women's lifespans.

Postmenopausal endometriosis: a challenging condition beyond menopause

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE

Postmenopausal endometriosis is a complex condition that challenges the conventional belief that endometriosis resolves with menopause. Despite the cessation of menstruation, a subset of women continues to experience or develop endometriosis-related symptoms during the postmenopausal period. Thus, this review aimed to shed light on postmenopausal endometriosis, exploring its clinical features, diagnostic considerations, management approaches, and the potential impact on women's health.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used for the research, with only articles in English language, using the following terms: "postmenopausal endometriosis," "menopause," "management," "treatment," and "quality of life," from inception to 2023.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The clinical features of postmenopausal endometriosis include persistent or recurrent pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bowel, or urinary symptoms and, occasionally, abnormal vaginal bleeding. The absence of menstrual cycles presents a diagnostic challenge, as the traditional diagnostic criteria for endometriosis rely on menstrual patterns. Visual cues may be less evident, and the symptoms often overlap with other gynecological conditions, necessitating a thorough evaluation to differentiate postmenopausal endometriosis from other potential causes. Management approaches for postmenopausal endometriosis encompass surgical intervention, hormonal therapies, pain management, and individualized care. Postmenopausal endometriosis significantly impacts the quality of life, sexual health, and long-term well-being of women. Understanding the clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and management approaches of postmenopausal endometriosis is crucial for healthcare professionals to provide effective care and to improve the quality of life of women affected by this condition.

Horizons in Endometriosis: Proceedings of the Montreux Reproductive Summit, 14-15 July 2023

Endometriosis is a complex and chronic gynaecological disorder that affects millions of women worldwide, leading to significant morbidity and impacting reproductive health. This condition affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age and is characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, potentially leading to symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The Montreux summit brought a number of experts in this field together to provide a platform for discussion and exchange of ideas. These proceedings summarise the six main topics that were discussed at this summit to shed light on future directions of endometriosis classification, diagnosis, and therapeutical management. The first question addressed the possibility of preventing endometriosis in the future by identifying risk factors, genetic predispositions, and further understanding of the pathophysiology of the condition to develop targeted interventions. The clinical presentation of endometriosis is varied, and the correlation between symptoms severity and disease extent is unclear. While there is currently no universally accepted optimal classification system for endometriosis, several attempts striving towards its optimisation - each with its own advantages and limitations - were discussed. The ideal classification should be able to reconcile disease status based on the various diagnostic tools, and prognosis to guide proper patient tailored management. Regarding diagnosis, we focused on future tools and critically discussed emerging approaches aimed at reducing diagnostic delay. Preserving fertility in endometriosis patients was another debatable aspect of management that was reviewed. Moreover, besides current treatment modalities, potential novel medical therapies that can target underlying mechanisms, provide effective symptom relief, and minimise side effects in endometriotic patients were considered, including hormonal therapies, immunomodulation, and regenerative medicine. Finally, the question of hormonal substitution therapy after radical treatment for endometriosis was debated, weighing the benefits of hormone replacement.

Endometriosis in Menopausal Women-A New Age Is Coming? Literature Review

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue, that leads to dysmenorrhea, painful intercourse and infertility. The shift in paradigm from the previous belief that endometriosis exclusively impacts women of reproductive age has brought attention to the condition in both premenarchal and postmenopausal women. Currently, 2-4% of postmenopausal women have endometriosis. Many women experience menopausal symptoms during the peri- and postmenopausal periods and require extensive investigations and monitoring in order to avoid the recurrence of endometriosis symptoms or the risk of malignant transformation when treatment with menopausal hormones is elected. Our goal was to compile and present a clear and concise overview of the existing literature on postmenopausal endometriosis, offering an up-to-date and precise summary of the available information.

Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risks of Various Cancers in Postmenopausal Women with De Novo or a History of Endometriosis

This study examined the impact of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the occurrence of various cancers in postmenopausal women with de novo or a history of endometriosis. In the datasets for ten cancers (cervical, uterine, ovarian, breast, colon, gastric, liver, lung, pancreatic, and thyroid), women who received HRT (the HRT group) and those who did not (the control group) were selected by a 1:1 matching with those who met the study criteria. In the dataset for each cancer, the incidence of each cancer was very low (0.2% to 1.5% in the HRT group and 0.2% to 1.3% in the control group). The duration of HRT was 1.3 ± 2.1 years. After adjusting for co-variables, HRT was a significant risk factor for uterine cancer (p < 0.05). However, the risk of liver cancer decreased significantly with duration of HRT (p < 0.05). Moreover, combined estrogen and progesterone decreased the risks of liver and thyroid cancers significantly (p < 0.05), and estrogen alone decreased the risks of breast and lung cancers significantly (p < 0.05). Tibolone was not associated with the risk of any of the cancers assessed. These results can help guide the use of HRT in women with de novo or a history of endometriosis.

New insights about endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: pathogenesis, risk factors, prediction and diagnosis and treatment

Previous studies have shown that the risk of malignant transformation of endometriosis in premenopausal women is approximately 1%, significantly impacting the overall well-being and quality of life of affected women. Presently, the diagnostic gold standard for endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) continues to be invasive laparoscopy followed by histological examination. However, the application of this technique is limited due to its high cost, highlighting the importance of identifying a non-invasive diagnostic approach. Therefore, there is a critical need to explore non-invasive diagnostic methods to improve diagnostic precision and optimize clinical outcomes for patients. This review presents a comprehensive survey of the current progress in comprehending the pathogenesis of malignant transformation in endometriosis. Furthermore, it examines the most recent research discoveries concerning the diagnosis of EAOC and emphasizes potential targets for therapeutic intervention. The ultimate objective is to improve prevention, early detection, precise diagnosis, and treatment approaches, thereby optimizing the clinical outcomes for patients.

Attitude, Practices, and Barriers to Menopausal Hormone Therapy Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

To guarantee the delivery of thorough and scientifically supported menopausal care, it is imperative to allocate resources towards ongoing education and training for physicians. Therefore, it is essential to assess the attitudes, practices, and obstacles faced by physicians in Saudi Arabia when it comes to menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

METHOD

An online survey was conducted from June to September 2023 to investigate the attitudes, practices, and barriers of physicians in Saudi Arabia, regarding menopausal HRT. The study population consisted of practicing physicians in Saudi Arabia specializing in gynecology, endocrinology, family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice at various levels, including consultants, senior registrars, and residents. The survey link was distributed to the intended research participants in Saudi Arabia using several social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, WhatsApp, and Instagram) utilizing a Google Form hyperlink.

RESULTS

A total of 95 physicians participated in this study. A total of 60.0% of the study participants agreed that in general, HRT should be offered to menopausal women who have menopausal symptoms. Besides, around 24.2% of them agreed that in general, HRT should be offered to menopausal women who do not have menopausal symptoms. The most commonly reported methods of obtaining up-to-date information about HRT were Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia publication and journal articles, contributing 36.8% (n=35) and 24.2% (n=23), respectively. The most commonly reported type of systemic (i.e. non-vaginal) HRT for women with premature menopause (menopause <40 years) without contraindications was combined oral contraceptive pill accounting for 33.7% (n=32). More than half of the study participants (53.6%; n=51) reported experiencing difficulty or barriers related to prescribing HRT. The most commonly reported difficulties and barriers related to HRT prescribing were consumer preferences for complementary/alternative therapies, difficulty explaining HRT risks and benefits to women, and lack of suitable HRT products accounting for 27.4% (n=26), 21.1% (n=20), and 16.8% (n=16), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nuanced perspectives of Saudi Arabian physicians regarding HRT for postmenopausal women are revealed in this study. Electronic published societal guidelines and Ministry of Health publications are examples of vital information resources that physicians must have access to. Difficulties associated with the prescription of HRT, including product shortages and consumer preferences, underscore the criticality of confronting obstacles in clinical practice. Additional investigation is suggested in order to enhance physicians' knowledge and implementation of guidelines, specifically for patient cohorts whose medical histories are unique.

Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Postmenopausal Women with De Novo Endometriosis or a History of Endometriosis

The effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the malignant transformation of postmenopausal endometriosis remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of HRT on ovarian cancer occurrence in postmenopausal women with de novo endometriosis or a history of endometriosis. A total of 10,304 women that received HRT (the HRT group) and 10,304 that did not (the control group) were selected by 1:1 matching those that met the study criteria. Incidences of ovarian cancer (0.3% in the HRT group and 0.5% in the control group) and cumulative incidence rates of ovarian cancer were similar in the two groups. The overall mean duration of HRT was 1.4 ± 2.2 years, but the duration of HRT in women with ovarian cancer was 2.2 ± 2.9 years. After adjusting for co-variables, receipt of HRT, duration of HRT, combined use of estrogen and progesterone, and tibolone were not found to be risk factors for ovarian cancer. However, the use of estrogen alone was found to be a significant risk factor for ovarian cancer (HR 2.898; 95% CI 1.251–6.715; p = 0.013). With the exception of HRT using estrogen alone, HRT did not increase the risk of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women with a history of endometriosis or de novo endometriosis.

Menopausal hormone therapy in women with benign gynaecological conditions and cancer

The efficacy of menopausal hormone therapy for bothersome menopausal symptoms is well established. However, there are a range of benign and malignant gynaecological conditions that pose a challenge in managing menopausal symptoms. Their hormone-dependent nature either raises concerns about symptom recurrence or malignant disease progression making decisions about menopausal hormone therapy complex for both clinicians and patients. It appears there is a small potential for symptom recurrence with menopausal hormone therapy use in menopausal women with a history of severe endometriosis. Malignant transformation of previous endometriotic lesions is likely to be rare but is not adequately understood. In this setting, combined hormone therapy is preferred, including in woman post-hysterectomy. Uterine fibroids are not a contraindication to menopausal hormone therapy use but women with large fibroids at menopause should have regular follow-up of their fibroids. Generally, menopausal hormone therapy is considered appropriate for women with cervical cancer and most ovarian cancers except for low grade serous tumours. Endometrial cancer requires an individualised discussion. The overall quality of data in this area is poor but suggests women with a low risk of recurrence may consider hormonal therapy, balancing symptom impact with prognosis.

Endometriosis-associated cancer

Endometriosis will affect about 10% of the female population and not only can it significantly impact adversely on quality of life and result in infertility, but data are accumulating that malignant transformation is an important consideration. Endometriosis can be histologically typical or atypical, ovarian, superficial peritoneal or deep infiltrating. The precursor for malignant transformation appears to be the ovarian atypical endometriosis component. Ovarian cancer is the most important associated cancer, primarily endometrioid and clear cell cancer. These are the only subtypes wherein a direct clonal relationship between endometriosis, as a direct precursor, and cancer has been made. There is no substantive evidence to support an altered association of borderline cancers of the ovary, serous ovarian cancers and breast, endometrial or cervical cancers. This review provides an overview of the prevailing data pertaining to the molecular and genetic aberrations that accompany the transformation of atypical endometriosis to malignancy and the accumulated epidemiologic evidence which supports the association.

Progestogens as a component of menopausal hormone therapy: the right molecule makes the difference

Optimizing menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) requires an awareness of the benefits and risks associated with the available treatments. This narrative review, which is based on the proceedings of an Advisory Board meeting and supplemented by relevant articles identified in literature searches, examines the role of progestogens in MHT, with the aim of providing practical recommendations for prescribing physicians. Progestogens are an essential component of MHT in menopausal women with a uterus to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and reduce the risk of cancer associated with using unopposed estrogen. Progestogens include natural progesterone, dydrogesterone (a stereoisomer of progesterone), and a range of synthetic compounds. Structural differences and varying affinities for other steroid receptors (androgen, glucocorticoid, and mineralocorticoid) confer a unique biological and clinical profile to each progestogen that must be considered during treatment selection. MHT, including the progestogen component, should be tailored to each woman, starting with an estrogen and a progestogen that has the safest profile with respect to breast cancer and cardiovascular effects, while addressing patient-specific needs, risk factors, and treatment goals. Micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone appear to be the safest options, with lower associated cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and breast cancer risks compared with other progestogens, and are the first-choice options for use in ‘special situations,’ such as in women with high-density breast tissue, diabetes, obesity, smoking, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism, among others.

Risk factors of progression to endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate risk factors of progression to endometrial cancer (EC) in women with non-atypical and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (EH).

Methods

The data of 62,333 women with EH diagnostic codes from 2007 to 2018 were sourced from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases. The data from 11,525 women with non-atypical EH and 2,219 women with atypical EH who met the selection criteria were extracted for analysis.

Results

Risk of EC in women with EH decreased in 40–49 year olds compared to other ages (non-atypical EH: [≤39 vs. 40–49 years] HR, 0.557; 95% CI, 0.439–0.708; P<0.001; [≤39 vs. ≥50 years] P = 0.739; atypical EH: [≤39 vs. 40–49 years] HR, 0.391; 95% CI, 0.229–0.670; P = 0.001; [≤39 vs. ≥50 years] P = 0.712). Risk of EC increased with increase in number of follow-up biopsies in women with non-atypical EH (1 biopsy: HR, 1.835; 95% CI, 1.282–2.629; P = 0.001; ≥2 biopsies: HR, 3.644; 95% CI, 2.585–5.317; P<0.001) and in women receiving ≥2 follow-up biopsies with atypical EH (HR, 3.827; 95% CI, 1.924–7.612; P = 0.001). Time of progression to EC decreased in women ≥50 years old with non-atypical EH compared to other ages (P = 0.004) and showed no differences among ages in women with atypical EH (P = 0.576). Progestational agents were a protective factor for EC in women with non-atypical EH (HR, 0.703; 95% CI, 0.565–0.876; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

In this claim data analysis, women ≤39 and ≥50 years old with EH were at a high risk for progression to EC, and repeat follow-up biopsy after a diagnosis of EH increased detection of EC. Progestational agents were an effective modality to prevent EC in women with non-atypical EH.

Endometriosis in Menopause-Renewed Attention on a Controversial Disease

Endometriosis, an estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease characterized by the ectopic presence of endometrial tissue, has been the topic of renewed research and debate in recent years. The paradigm shift from the belief that endometriosis only affects women of reproductive age has drawn attention to endometriosis in both premenarchal and postmenopausal patients. There is still scarce information in literature regarding postmenopausal endometriosis, the mostly studied and reported being the prevalence in postmenopausal women. Yet, other important issues also need to be addressed concerning diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. We aimed at summarizing the currently available data in literature in order to provide a concise and precise update regarding information available on postmenopausal endometriosis.

How can we manage patients over forty with endometriosis?

Peri/postmenopausal endometriosis is not as rare as once we thought. Accumulated data revealed that around 1/3-1/4 of women with surgically-diagnosed endometriosis after the age of 40. The uneasiness of the issue of malignant transformation or malignancy in such women created a challenge for us. Here the management strategy for women with endometriosis after the age of 40 is discussed in the light of scientific evidence.