Outcomes of Primary Repair and Anastomosis for Traumatic Colonic Injuries in a Tertiary Trauma Center

Penetrating colon trauma - outcomes related to single versus multiple colonic suture injuries

INTRODUCTION

There is no conclusive evidence to guide surgical management in the presence of multiple colonic injuries as opposed to a single colonic injury, and whether multiple colonic suture lines are associated with worse outcomes than single suture lines.

AIM

We reviewed the outcomes of penetrating colonic trauma in relation to whether patients had single versus multiple colonic suture lines (primary repair or anastomosis) following laparotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre in South Africa from (2012-2020) for all patients over 18 years who had sustained penetrating colon injury.

RESULTS

541 cases were included: 409 with single suture line and 54 with multiple suture lines. There were no differences between groups in terms of mechanism of injury (gunshot vs stab; p = 0.328), Injury Severity Score (p = 0.071), or Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (p = 0.396). Admission lactate was worse for multiple suture line patients (p = 0.049), but no other blood gas parameters were different, and there was no higher incidence of damage control surgery (p = 0.558) or ICU admission (p = 0.156) for this group. There was a higher rate of diversion in the multiple suture line group (p < 0.001). Univariable logistic regression did not show an increased risk of gastro-intestinal complications, suture line leak rate, or mortality for multiple suture lines compared to single.

CONCLUSION

It appears that there is no appreciable difference in outcome between patients with a single colonic suture line compared to patients with more than one suture line following trauma laparotomy. In light of this, each injury should be treated on its own merit, in the context of the patient's overall physiological condition, without undue fear of leaving the patient with more than one colonic suture line. However, judicious use of diversion remains advisable.

Penetrating Colon Trauma-the Effect of Injury Location on Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence to suggest that the more distal a penetrating colonic injury, the poorer its expected outcome, prompting consideration of diversion rather than anastomosis when faced with left colonic injury. The clinical outcomes of penetrating colonic trauma in relation to their anatomical location within the colon were reviewed.

METHODS

A review was performed over eight years (2012-2020) of all patients over 18 years who had sustained penetrating colon injury and presented to our trauma centre in South Africa. Direct comparison was made between right colon vs left colon injuries.

RESULTS

A total of 450 patients were included; right colon: 260, left colon: 190. Gunshots predominated in the right colon, and the PATI was higher in this group. There were minimal differences in admission physiology and blood gas parameters between groups, but higher damage control surgery and ICU admission rates for the right colon group. There were similar rates of primary repair, anastomosis, and stoma between groups. Leak rates were no different between the two groups, and although overall complication rates were higher for the right colon, there was no difference with regard to gastro-intestinal and other complications, nor for mortality. While regression analysis did identify PATI to be a risk factor for overall complications and mortality, it failed to do so for anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not demonstrate any difference in anastomotic leak rates or mortality between right vs left colonic injury. We recommend that all colonic injuries should be treated on their own merit, balanced against the patient's condition, regardless of anatomical location within the colon.