Platelet Activity and Its Correlation with Inflammation and Cell Count Readings in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Insights into the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors for the Length of Stay and Readmission in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

Background/Objectives: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is characterized by complex pathophysiology, leading to increased hospitalizations and mortality. Inflammatory biomarkers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) provide valuable diagnostic insights.

METHODS

This study evaluates the prognostic relationship between NLR, PLR, and, in a specific subcohort, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), alongside length of stay (LOS) and 90-day readmission rates in CHF patients, irrespective of heart failure phenotype. A retrospective analysis of 427 CHF admissions (males = 57.84%) was conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age of the entire population was 68.48 ± 11.53 years. The average LOS was 8.33 ± 5.26 days, with a readmission rate of 73 visits (17.09%) for 56 patients. The NLR (3.79 ± 3.32) showed a low but positive correlation with the LOS (r = 0.222, p < 0.001). Conversely, the PLR (144.84 ± 83.08) did not demonstrate a significant association with the LOS. The NLR presented a low negative correlation for days until the next admission (r = -0.023, p = 0.048). In a prespecified subanalysis of 323 admissions, the NT-proBNP exhibited a low positive Pearson correlation with the NLR (r = 0.241, p < 0.001) and PLR (r = 0.151, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of the NLR across heart failure phenotypes may suggest the role of systemic inflammation in understanding and managing CHF.

Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of Monocyte Subsets in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

Chronic heart failure (CHF) results when the heart cannot consistently supply the body's tissues with oxygen and required nutrients. CHF can be categorized as heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There are different causes and mechanisms underlying HF pathogenesis; however, inflammation can be regarded as one of the factors that promotes both HFrEF and HFpEF. Monocytes, a subgroup of leukocytes, are known to be cellular mediators in response to cardiovascular injury and are closely related to inflammatory reactions. These cells are a vital component of the immune system and are the source of macrophages, which participate in cardiac tissue repair after injury. However, these monocytes are not as homogenous as thought and can present different functions under different cardiovascular disease conditions. In addition, there is still an open question regarding whether the functions of monocytes and macrophages should be regarded as causes or consequences in CHF development. Therefore, the aim of this work was to summarize current studies on the functions of various monocyte subsets in CHF with a focus on the role of a certain monocyte subset in HFpEF and HFrEF patients, as well as the subsets' relationship to inflammatory markers.

Relationship Between the Eosinophil/Monocyte Ratio and Prognosis in Decompensated Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the value of the eosinophil/monocyte ratio (EMR) for predicting the prognosis of decompensated heart failure (HF).

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. We included adults (≥18 years old) diagnosed with decompensated HF for whom EMR data were available. The patients were divided into three groups according to EMR tertiles (T1 [EMR≤0.15], T2 [0.15<EMR≤0.32], and T3 [EMR>0.32]). The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization.

Results

Initially, the records of 2264 patients with decompensated HF were screened; 1883 of these patients had EMR data and were therefore included in the study. There were 627 patients in the T1 group, 628 in the T2 group, and 628 in the T3 group. The risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization was significantly different among the three groups (Log rank test, P=0.007). Compared with the T3 group, both the T1 group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16–1.94, P=0.002) and the T2 group (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03–1.74, P=0.030) had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization. A Cochran-Armitage test for trend showed a positive correlation between the EMR and the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF. There was a significant difference between the three groups in terms of cardiovascular death (Log rank test, P<0.001) and HF rehospitalization (Log rank test, P=0.03).

Conclusion

The EMR is positively correlated with the risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization in patients with decompensated HF. Specifically, the lower the EMR, the higher the risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization.