Racial Differences in Incident Genitourinary Cancer Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database

Adjusting for Population Differences in the National Cancer Database to Better Represent United States Cancer Cases: A Reference Tool for Researchers

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is widely used in US cancer outcomes research, but its reliance on Commission on Cancer-approved hospitals can underrepresent certain populations, skew data, and limit generalizability of findings. Current literature is representative up through 2014. We sought to adjust NCDB cancer cases to better reflect total US cancer population in a useful way for cancer outcomes research.

METHODS

Incident cancer cases in the NCDB from 2016-2020 were compared with the US Cancer Statistics (USCS) database, which contains nearly 100% of new cancer cases. NCDB case coverage was defined as percentage of cases the NCDB represents of USCS cases. Coverage was determined for the entire cohort (age 20+ years), and sub-analyses were performed for age, sex, race/ethnicity, residence location, and cancer sites.

RESULTS

From 2016-2020, 6,515,675 cancer cases were diagnosed in the NCDB and 9,311,593 in the USCS, yielding 70% NCDB case coverage over 5 years, which increased from 68 to 73%. The lowest case coverage was among men, 85+-year-olds, American Indian/Alaskan Native people, and Hispanic/Latino individuals (65%, 59%, 42%, and 55%). The Mountain region was the least represented (49%) as was nonmetropolitan residence (64%). Similar underrepresentation was seen among top cancers. Missingness of data was also captured.

CONCLUSIONS

Though NCDB's representation of US cancer cases is improving, gaps remain, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and residence location, further exacerbated by missing variables. We provide investigators using the NCDB with a way to represent cancer case data to better tailor research questions and frame outcomes.

Disparities in Testicular Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Background: Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in adolescents and young adults, and evidence has emerged regarding disparities that affect different groups of patients. Methods: In this article, we conducted a thorough review of this area and summarized the existing literature. Results: Some of the pertinent findings from our review include poorer outcomes for various groups including the native Māori population of New Zealand, those who live in the United States-Mexico border region, those who live in Eastern Europe, those who are uninsured and those with poorer socioeconomic status, amongst others. In the United States specifically, there is significant evidence showing that racial/ethnic minorities, compared to white patients, tend to fare worse with later presentation at higher stages and worse survival rates. Hispanic patients in particular appear to have the potential for more aggressive tumor biology than other groups and are projected to have the highest incidence rates in the US by 2026. Conclusions: Overall, disparities exist in many aspects of testicular cancer and are striking in some instances, and further research is needed in this arena and in potential solutions.

Trends in genitourinary cancer mortality in the United States: analysis of the CDC-WONDER database 1999-2020

Introduction

Sociodemographic disparities in genitourinary cancer-related mortality have been insufficiently studied, particularly across multiple cancer types. This study aimed to investigate gender, racial, and geographic disparities in mortality rates for the most common genitourinary cancers in the United States.

Methods

Mortality data for prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database between 1999 and 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were analyzed by year, gender, race, urban-rural status, and geographic region using a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Overall, AAMRs for prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer declined significantly, while testicular cancer-related mortality remained stable. Bladder and kidney cancer AAMRs were 3-4 times higher in males than females. Prostate cancer mortality was highest in black individuals/African Americans and began increasing after 2015. Bladder cancer mortality decreased significantly in White individuals, Black individuals, African Americans, and Asians/Pacific Islanders but remained stable in American Indian/Alaska Natives. Kidney cancer-related mortality was highest in White individuals but declined significantly in other races. Testicular cancer mortality increased significantly in White individuals but remained stable in Black individuals and African Americans. Genitourinary cancer mortality decreased in metropolitan areas but either increased (bladder and testicular cancer) or remained stable (kidney cancer) in non-metropolitan areas. Prostate and kidney cancer mortality was highest in the Midwest, bladder cancer in the South, and testicular cancer in the West.

Discussion

Significant sociodemographic disparities exist in the mortality trends of genitourinary cancers in the United States. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research to address these disparities and improve outcomes for all populations affected by genitourinary cancers.

Comparison of Capture Rates of the National Cancer Database Across Race and Ethnicity

Importance

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is an invaluable and widely used resource for cancer research, but the current state of representation of different racial and ethnic groups compared with the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) database is unknown.

Objective

To examine whether Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals have lower representation in the NCDB compared with the USCS database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study assessed individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, and January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, in the NCDB and USCS databases. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to October 2023.

Exposure

Time.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the absolute percentage change (APC) in capture rate across the study period.

Results

The cohort included 5 175 007 individuals (0.50% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.10% Asian or Pacific Islander, 12.01% Black, 6.58% Hispanic, and 77.81% White) who were diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Capture rates were the lowest for individuals who were Hispanic (40.83% in 2004-2006 and 54.75% in 2017-2019; P < .001) or American Indian or Alaska Native (20.72% in 2004-2006 and 41.41% in 2017-2019; P < .001). The APCs were positive for both racial categories across all 4 cancers. However, overall APCs for Hispanic individuals (13.92%) remained lower than the overall APCs of White individuals (22.23%; P < .001). The APCs were greater for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals than for White individuals for prostate (14.68% vs 11.57%) and breast (21.61% vs 17.90%) cancer (P < .001), but the APCs for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals were lower than for White individuals for lung cancer (24.54% vs 33.03%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of individuals diagnosed with cancer in the NCDB, Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer were undercaptured in the NCDB, but their representation improved over time. Increased study is needed to determine where these populations predominantly seek cancer care.