Usefulness of Serial Multiorgan Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Acute Heart Failure: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort

[Use of clinical ultrasound in primary care: Markers in congestive heart failure]

The patient with heart failure (HF) is a frequent scenario in primary care consultations. The presence of subclinical congestion is a predictor of rehospitalization and adverse events in these patients. The assessment of congestion is complex due to the low sensitivity of classic symptoms and signs, which leads to underdiagnosis, delayed initiation of treatment and a greater likelihood of complications. The family doctor should be familiar with new techniques for congestion assessment, such as the study of venous congestion with ultrasound and pulmonary ultrasound. This makes it possible to know the existence of subclinical congestion in a more realistic way. Clinical ultrasound in the hands of the family doctor individualizes decongestive therapy in patients with HF in an accurate, fast and safe way.

Assessment of venous congestion with venous excess ultrasound score in the prognosis of acute heart failure in the emergency department: a prospective study

Aims

In acute decompensated heart failure (HF), systemic venous congestion contributes to patients' symptoms and hospital admissions. The purpose of our study is to determine if venous congestion, examined using the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, predicts HF-related hospitalization and mortality in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with acute decompensated HF.

Methods and results

Fifty patients admitted for acute HF in ED underwent ultrasound (US) assessment according to the VExUS score within the first 24 and 72 h. All patients were followed up with a telephone call at 30 and 60 days after hospital discharge. On admission, 56% had a VExUS score of 3. After 72 h, 32% had no more signs of congestion at the Doppler VExUS examination (inferior vena cava < 2 cm, VExUS score of 0); a similar percentage still exhibited a VExUS score of 3 despite therapy. Eighty per cent of patients were hospitalized after admission to the ED, while six (15%) died in-hospital; all exhibited a first-assessment VExUS score of 3. No patient with a VExUS score < 3 died during the study. During short-term follow-up, 18 patients were readmitted to the ED for acute decompensated HF. Ninety-four per cent of the readmitted patients had a VExUS score of 3 at the Doppler assessment at the first ED admission.

Conclusion

Severe venous congestion, defined as a VExUS score of 3 at the initial assessment of patients with acute decompensated HF, predicts inpatient mortality, HF-related death, and early readmission.

Portal vein pulsatility: An important sonographic tool assessment of systemic congestion for critical ill patients

In this editorial we comment on the article by Kuwahara et al, published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Cardiology. In this interesting paper, the authors showed a correlation between portal vein pulsatility ratio, examined by bedside ultrasonography, and prognosis of hospitalized patients with acute heart failure. Systemic congestion is being notoriously underdetected in the acutely ill population with conventional methods like clinical examination, biomarkers, central venous pressure estimation and X-rays. However, congestion should be a key therapeutic target due to its deleterious effects to end organ function and subsequently patient prognosis. Doppler flow assessment of the abdominal veins is gaining popularity worldwide, as a valuable tool in estimating comprehensively congestion and giving a further insight into hemodynamics and patient management.

The Application of Point of Care Ultrasound to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a condition with several cardiopulmonary etiologies that has the potential of progressing to right heart failure without proper intervention. After a history, physical exam, and investigations, cases of suspected PH typically undergo imaging via a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). This is a resource-intensive procedure that is less accessible in remote communities. However, point of care ultrasound (POCUS), a portable ultrasound administered at the bedside, has potential to aid in the diagnostic process of PH.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched to screen the intersection of POCUS and PH. Studies involved adult patients, and only English articles were accepted. Reviews, case reports, unfinished research, and conference abstracts were excluded. Our aim was to identify primary studies that correlated POCUS scan results and additional clinical findings related to PH.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included after our search. In these studies, POCUS was effective in identifying dilatation of inferior vena cava (IVC); internal jugular vein (IJV); and hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins in patients with PH. The presence of pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, or b-lines on POCUS are also associated with PH.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests important potential for the use of POCUS in the initial screening of PH. IVC and basic cardiopulmonary POCUS exams are key for PH screening in patients with dyspnea. Right-heart dilatation can be visualized, and peripheral veins may be scanned based on clinical suspicion. POCUS offers screening as an extension of a physical exam, with direct visualization of cardiac morphology. However, more studies are required to develop a statistically validated POCUS exam for PH diagnosis. More studies should also be conducted at the primary-care level to evaluate the value of screening using POCUS for PH in less-differentiated patients.

Correlation analysis between lung ultrasound scores and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure in patients with acute heart failure admitted to the emergency intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

No convenient, inexpensive, and non-invasive screening tools exist to identify pulmonary hypertension (PH) - left heart disease (LHD) patients during the early stages of the disease course. This study investigated whether different methods of lung ultrasound (LUS) could be used for the initial investigation of PH-LHD.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective observational study which was performed in the Zigong Fourth People's Hospital. We consecutively enrolled patients with heart failure (HF) admitted to the emergency intensive care unit from January 2018 to May 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography and LUS were performed within 24 h before discharge. We used the Spearman coefficient for correlation analysis between ultrasound scores and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP). Bland-Altman plots were generated to inspect possible bias, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to assess the relationship between ultrasound scores and an intermediate and high echocardiographic probability of PH-LHD.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled in this study, with an overall median age of 79 (interquartile range: 71.5-84.0) years. Among the 71 patients, 36 (50.7%) cases were male, and 26 (36.6%) had an intermediate and high echocardiographic probability of PH. All four LUS scores in patients with an intermediate and high probability of PH were significantly higher than in patients with a low probability of PH (P <0.05). The correlation coefficient (r) between different LUS scoring methods and PASP was moderate for the 6-zone (r=0.455, P <0.001), 8-zone (r=0.385, P=0.001), 12-zone (r=0.587, P <0.001), and 28-zone (r=0.535, P <0.001) methods. In Bland-Altman plots, each of the four LUS scoring methods had a good agreement with PASP (P <0.001). The 8-zone and 12-zone methods showed moderately accurate discriminative values in differentiating patients with an intermediate and high echocardiographic probability of PH (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LUS is a readily available, inexpensive, and risk-free method that moderately correlates with PASP. LUS is a potential screening tool used for the initial investigation of PH-LHD, especially in emergencies or critical care settings.

Utility of VExUS score in the peri-operative care unit, intensive care unit, and emergency setting - A systematic review

Background and Aims

The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score presents a prospect of valuable clinical utility. The study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of the VExUS score in detecting venous congestion across emergency, critical care, and peri-operative contexts; assessing its utility in improved patient outcomes; and exploring its relationship with established parameters.

Methods

This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023421034). A comprehensive literature search, employing pre-defined search terms related to the VExUS score in diverse clinical contexts, was conducted on articles published between 2000 and 15 May 2023 across databases- PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Scopus, Elsevier Clinical Key, and Google Scholar. Bias risk assessment was carried out using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies tool. Given the significant heterogeneity across studies concerning participants, interventions, outcomes, and study designs, data pooling for a meaningful meta-analysis was not feasible.

Results

The review included 15 articles comprising observational studies, case series, and case reports. Most patients exhibited moderate-to-severe venous congestion based on their baseline VExUS scores. Higher VExUS scores correlated with a greater risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in post-operative patients. The VExUS score strongly correlated with central venous pressure; specific components, such as the intra-renal monophasic pattern, portal-pulsatility, and inferior vena cava diameter, exhibited robust predictive value for venous congestion.

Conclusion

VExUS score is valuable in assessing and predicting venous congestion, especially regarding AKI prediction risk and guiding interventions. However, its utility in predicting outcomes in acute heart failure patients appears less certain.

Usefulness of Systemic Venous Ultrasound Protocols in the Prognosis of Heart Failure Patients: Results from a Prospective Multicentric Study

Mortality and re-admission rates for decompensated acute heart failure (AHF) is increasing overall and risk stratification might be challenging. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of systemic venous ultrasonography in patients hospitalized for AHF. We prospectively recruited 74 AHF patients with a NT-proBNP level above 500 pg/mL. Then, multi-organ ultrasound assessments (lung, inferior vena cava (IVC), pulsed-wave Doppler (PW-Doppler) of hepatic, portal, intra-renal and femoral veins) were performed at admission, discharge, and follow-up (for 90 days). We also calculated the Venous Excess Ultrasound System (VExUS), a new score of systemic congestion based on IVC dilatation and pulsed-wave Doppler morphology of hepatic, portal and intra-renal veins. An intra-renal monophasic pattern (area under the curve (AUC) 0.923, sensitivity (Sn) 90%, specificity (Sp) 81%, positive predictive value (PPV) 43%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98%), a portal pulsatility > 50% (AUC 0.749, Sn 80%, Sp 69%, PPV 30%, NPV 96%) and a VExUS score of 3 corresponding to severe congestion (AUC 0.885, Sn 80%, Sp 75%, PPV 33%, and NPV 96%) predicted death during hospitalization. An IVC above 2 cm (AUC 0.758, Sn 93.l% and Sp 58.3) and the presence of an intra-renal monophasic pattern (AUC 0. 834, sensitivity 0.917, specificity 67.4%) in the follow-up visit predicted AHF-related re-admission. Additional scans during hospitalization or the calculation of a VExUS score probably adds unnecessary complexity to the assessment of AHF patients. In conclusion, VExUS score does not contribute to the guidance of therapy or the prediction of complications, compared with the presence of an IVC greater than 2 cm, a venous monophasic intra-renal pattern or a pulsatility > 50% of the portal vein in AHF patients. Early and multidisciplinary follow-up visits remain necessary for the improvement of the prognosis of this highly prevalent disease.

Time to FOCUS - 'Palliative Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound'

Point-of-care diagnosis has become the need of the hour and along with its guided interventions, ultrasound could be utilised bedside in a palliative care patient. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in palliative care medicine is fast emerging and has varied applications ranging from performing bedside diagnostic evaluation to the performance of interventional paracentesis, thoracocentesis and chronic pain interventions. Handheld ultrasound devices have transformed the application of POCUS and should revolutionise the future of home-based palliative care. Palliative care physicians should be enabled to carry out bedside ultrasounds at home care and hospice setting for achieving rapid symptom relief. The aim of POCUS in palliative care medicine should be adequate training of palliative care physicians, transforming the applicability of this technology to OPD as well as community driven to achieve home outreach. The goal is towards empowering technology by reaching out to the community rather than the terminally ill patient transported for the hospital admission. Palliative care physicians should receive mandatory training in POCUS to enable diagnostic proficiency and early triaging. The inclusion of ultrasound machine in an outpatient palliative care clinic brings about value addition in rapid diagnosis. Limiting POCUS application to certain selected sub-specialities such as emergency medicine, internal medicine and critical care medicine should be overcome. This would need acquiring higher training as well as improvised skill sets to perform bedside interventions. Ultrasonography competency among palliative care providers proposed as palliative medicine point-of-care ultrasound (PM-POCUS) could be achieved by imparting dedicated POCUS training within the core curriculum.