Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review

Sirtuin 1 Is a Potential Target for the Treatment of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication by Modulating Pyroptosis

Neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) pathogenesis associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) remains unclear. However, pyroptosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various central nervous system disorders. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the potential role of pyroptosis in NIC progression. Additionally, the present study investigated the possible involvement of Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), a protein recognized for its neuroprotective properties, in mitigating the progression of NIC by alleviating pyroptosis. In the current study, a rat model of NIC associated with LSS was successfully constructed by inserting a silicone strip into the vertebral plates. The Basso Beattie Bresnahan score was employed to assess the motor function of rats. Western blot analysis was performed to measure the levels of pyroptosis-related proteins in rat spinal cord tissue. Meanwhile, PC-12 cells were cultured with H2O2 to establish an in vitro model of oxidative stress, allowing to investigate the effects of Sirt1 on cell pyroptosis and oxidative stress in H2O2-treated cells. The current results showed that rats with NIC developed both motor and sensory dysfunction. Additionally, NIC surgery notably elevated NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3), apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), gasdermin D N-terminal (GSDMD-N), and IL-1β levels in the spinal cord tissues of rats, suggesting that pyroptosis is activated in the context of NIC. Significantly, downregulation of Sirt1 exacerbated malondialdehyde and reactive oxygen species levels, and simultaneously reduced GSH levels in H2O2-stimulated PC-12 cells, suggesting that Sirt1 deficiency can aggravate oxidative stress. Meanwhile, downregulation of Sirt1 also led to increased levels of NLRP3, ASC, GSDMD-N, and cleaved caspase 1 in H2O2-stimulated PC-12 cells, suggesting that Sirt1 deficiency can further enhance the pyroptosis in these cells. Targeting pyroptosis signaling may yield new insights into the treatment of NIC. The mechanisms mediated by pyroptosis could offer valuable perspectives on the pathogenesis and management of this condition.

Which Kind of Prognosis is Better in the Treatment of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation with Coblation Nucleoplasty?

Introduction

Coblation nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure developed for the treatment of symptomatic disc herniation.

Methods

We evaluated 118 cases of cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs treated with coblation nucleoplasty. The clinical results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and efficacy. Complications and the re-surgery rate were also evaluated. The procedure was carried out under CT guidance, and the patients were followed up for 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years postoperative.

Results

At the 5-year follow-up, the VAS score in the cervical and lumbar groups significantly decreased from 6.20 to 2.43 and 6.11 to 3.29, respectively. While MacNab scores were indistinguishable at the 6-month follow-up, they differed significantly between the cervical (58.2%) and lumbar (34.9%) groups at the 5-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, 6 patients in the cervical group and 11 in the lumbar group underwent conventional operation. The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty at the 5-year follow-up was higher in cervical group (81.82%) compared with lumbar group (61.90%).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that coblation nucleoplasty is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with cervical and lumbar disc herniation. The long-term benefits of this procedure were more pronounced in patients with cervical disc herniation.

Clinical Trial Registration

The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400089145).

Biomechanical assessment of anterior plate system, bilateral pedicle screw and transdiscal screw system for high-grade spondylolisthesis: a finite element study

Introduction

Limited information regarding the biomechanical evaluation of various internal fixation techniques for high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is available. The stiffness of the operated segment and stress on the hardware can profoundly influence clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate biomechanical profiles of various fusion methods used for high-grade spondylolisthesis by using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods

An FE lumbar spine model of healthy spine was developed based on a patient's CT scan. High-grade (III-IV) spondylolisthesis (SP model) was created by sliding L5 anteriorly and modifying L5-S1 facet joints. Three treatment scenarios were created by adding various implants to the model. These scenarios included L5-S1 interbody cage in combination with three different fixation methods-the anterior plate system (APS), bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS), and transdiscal screw system (TSS). Range of motion (ROM), von Mises stress on cage, internal fixation as well as on the adjacent annuli were obtained and compared. The resistance to slippage was investigated by applying shear force on L5 vertebra and measuring its displacement regarding to S1.

Results

Under different loading conditions all treatment scenarios showed substantial reduction of ROM in comparison with SP model. No notable differences in ROM were observed between treatment models. There was no notable difference in cage stress among models. The von Mises stress on the internal fixation in the TSS model was less than in APS and BPSS. The TSS model demonstrated superior resistance to shear load compared to APS and BPSS. No discernible difference was observed between the SP, APS, BPSS, and TSS models when compared the ROM for adjacent level L4-L5. TSS's von Mises stress of the adjacent annulus was higher than in APS and BPSS.

Conclusions

The TSS model exhibited biomechanical superiority over the APS and BPSS models.

Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review

Objectives

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) refers to a narrowing of the space within the spinal canal, which can occur at any level but is most common in the lumbar spine. Open laminectomy and minimally invasive laminectomy (MIL) procedures are the most common surgical gold standard techniques for treating LSS. This study aims to review clinical and biomechanical literature to draw comparisons between open laminectomy and various MIL techniques. The MIL variation comprises microendoscopic decompression laminotomy, unilateral partial hemilaminectomy, and microendoscopic laminectomy.

Methods

A review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed 25 clinical, 6 finite element, and 3 cadaveric studies associated with treating LSS. We reviewed literature that discusses factors such as operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, effect on elderly patients, patients' satisfaction, and adjacent segment disease degeneration for the clinical studies, whereas the range of motion (ROM), von Mises stresses, and stability was compared in biomechanical studies.

Results

MIL involves less bone and ligament removal, resulting in shorter hospital stays and lower reoperation and complication rates than open laminectomy. It improves the quality of health-related living standards and reduces postoperative pain. Biomechanical studies suggest that laminectomy and facetectomy increase annulus stress and ROM, leading to segmental instability.

Conclusion

Although theoretically, MIL means less tissue injury, pain, and faster recovery in the short term, the long-term results depend on the adequacy of the decompression procedure and tend to be independent of MIL or open laminectomy.

Sagittal Realignment Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A Comprehensive EOS Imaging Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis can effectively improve sagittal alignment in elderly patients. With the growing focus on sagittal balance in spinal surgery, this study aimed to evaluate post-decompression alignment changes and identify the factors influencing these changes using the EOS imaging system.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 elderly patients who underwent decompression surgery alone for lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiologic parameters, measured using the EOS system, and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively, at two weeks postoperatively, and at one year postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the improvement of the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) by 25 mm or more. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors affecting sagittal alignment changes.

RESULTS

Significant sagittal alignment improvements were observed postoperatively, including a notable increase in thoracic kyphosis and a decrease in SVA observed at one year. Clinical outcomes, such as the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and EQ-5D, significantly improved at both two weeks and one year postoperatively compared to preoperative values (all p-values < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater preoperative SVA and higher ODI were significant predictors of sagittal alignment changes (odds ratio [OR] for SVA = 1.014, OR for ODI = 1.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients can result in significant improvements in sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes. The study suggests that decompression alone is a viable surgical option for elderly patients, particularly those with a greater preoperative sagittal imbalance and disability, even in the absence of major deformities.

Clinical efficacy of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

Objective

To assess the clinical impact of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) in managing patients with adjacent vertebrae following lumbar fusion.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 21 patients, with a mean age of 67.4 years, who underwent ULBD for adjacent vertebra disease at our department from January 2021 to November 2023. We reviewed demographic data, surgical techniques, imaging studies, and patient-reported outcomes. The study compared Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and imaging outcomes before surgery, immediately post-surgery, and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery.

Results

Evaluation of 21 patients with adjacent segment disease (ASD) (13 males, 8 females; mean age 67.42 years) was performed with follow-ups at various intervals post-surgery. Postoperative VAS, NRS, JOA, and SF-36 scores showed significant improvements compared to preoperative scores. Immediately after surgery, there were significant improvements in NRS score (2.76 ± 0.70 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85, P < 0.05) and JOA score (15.38 ± 1.02 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01, P < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores. Similarly, at 12 months post-surgery, significant improvements were observed in NRS score (1.52 ± 0.51 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85, P < 0.05) and JOA score (25.0 ± 1.10 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01, P < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores. The clinical satisfaction rate was 95.0% among all patients, with postoperative imaging examinations revealing a significant decompression effect. No complications were reported among the surgical patients.

Conclusions

This study suggests that endoscopic ULBD can be a safe and effective technique for managing symptomatic ASD, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients with ASD. Endoscopic ULBD may serve as an alternative treatment option for ASD with lumbar stenosis.

The 3-Steps Approach for Lumbar Stenosis with Anatomical Insights, Tailored for Young Spine Surgeons

Background/Objectives: Lumbar decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis is an intervention which addresses a degenerative condition affecting many patients. This article presents a meticulous three-phase surgical approach, derived from our clinical experiences and intertwining anatomical insights, offering a nuanced perspective tailored for the educational needs of young spinal surgeons. Methods: Six hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery at a single institution were included in the present study. A retrospective analysis of patient demographics and surgical techniques was performed. All surgeries were performed by a consistent surgical team, emphasizing uniformity in approach. The surgical technique involves a meticulous three-phase process comprising exposure and skeletal visualization; microscopic identification and decompression; and undermining of the spinous process base and contralateral decompression. Results: Presenting results from 530 patients, the study examines demographic characteristics, health profiles, operative details, complications, and clinical assessments. The three-phase approach demonstrates low complication rates, absence of recurrences, and improved clinical outcomes, emphasizing its efficacy. Conclusions: The three-phase surgical approach emerges as a valuable educational tool for both novice and seasoned spinal surgeons. Rooted in anatomical insights, the structured methodology not only caters to the educational needs of young surgeons, but also ensures a standardized and safe procedure. The emphasis on tissue preservation and anatomical points aligns with current trends toward minimally invasive techniques, promising enhanced patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Comparative effects of different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of different posterior decompression techniques for LSS. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative spinal diseases that result in claudication, back and leg pain, and disability. Currently, posterior decompression techniques are widely used as an effective treatment for LSS.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed using the EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. A Bayesian random effects model was constructed to incorporate the estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons and rank the interventions in order.

RESULTS

In all, 14 eligible studies comprising 1,260 patients with LSS were included. Five interventions were identified, namely, spinal processes osteotomy (SPO), conventional laminotomy/laminectomy (CL), unilateral laminotomy/laminectomy (UL), bilateral laminotomy/ laminectomy (BL), and spinous process-splitting laminotomy/laminectomy (SPSL). Among these, SPO was the most promising surgical option for decreasing back and leg pain and for lowering the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). SSPL had the shortest operation time, while SPSL was associated with maximum blood loss. SPO and UL were superior to other posterior decompression techniques concerning lesser blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay, respectively. Patients who underwent BL had the lowest postoperative complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Overall, SPO was found to be a good surgical choice for patients with LSS.

Advances in Multifunctional Electronic Catheters for Precise and Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy in Minimally Invasive Surgery

The advent of catheter-based minimally invasive surgical instruments has provided an effective means of diagnosing and treating human disease. However, conventional medical catheter devices are limited in functionalities, hindering their ability to gather tissue information or perform precise treatment during surgery. Recently, electronic catheters have integrated various sensing and therapeutic technologies through micro/nanoelectronics, expanding their capabilities. As micro/nanoelectronic devices become more miniaturized, flexible, and stable, electronic surgical catheters are evolving from simple tools to multiplexed sensing and theranostics for surgical applications. The review on multifunctional electronic surgical catheters is lacking and thus is not conducive to the reader's comprehensive understanding of the development trend in this field. This review covers the advances in multifunctional electronic catheters for precise and intelligent diagnosis and therapy in minimally invasive surgery. It starts with the summary of clinical minimally invasive surgical instruments, followed by the background of current clinical catheter devices for sensing and therapeutic applications. Next, intelligent electronic catheters with integrated electronic components are reviewed in terms of electronic catheters for diagnosis, therapy, and multifunctional applications. It highlights the present status and development potential of catheter-based minimally invasive surgical devices, while also illustrating several significant challenges that remain to be overcome.

Do Six-Week Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression?

BACKGROUND

Little research has been done to evaluate the prognostic value of short-term postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on long-term PROs following lumbar decompression (LD). We evaluated the prognostic value of short-term PROs on long-term PROs through 2 years after LD.

METHODS

A single spine surgeon database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing primary LD with 6-week postoperative PROs reported. The demographics, perioperative traits, and preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROs were recorded. The PROs included the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, PRO measure information system for physical function (PROMIS-PF), and Oswestry disability index. Two-step multivariate linear regression was performed to determine the predictive value of 6-week PROs for the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROs.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included. The 6-week Oswestry disability index, VAS for leg pain, and 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) are all positive predictors for their respective outcomes at 6 months. Additionally, the 6-week PROMIS-PF was a negative predictor of the 6-month PHQ-9. The 6-week PROMIS-PF positively predicted the PROMIS-PF through 1 year, and the PHQ-9 was a positive predictor of the PHQ-9 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-week postoperative PROs are predictive of the same outcomes at 6 months, the PROMIS-PF is predictive through 1 year, and the PHQ-9 is predictive through 2 years. Determining the predictive value of early postoperative PROs can be helpful in understanding the likely postoperative trajectory following LD and informing patient expectations.

Comparative Analysis of Microendoscopic and Open Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at L1-L2 or L2-L3

BACKGROUND

Several reports have highlighted comparable surgical outcomes between microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) and open laminectomy (open) for lumbar spinal stenosis. However, the unilateral approach in MEL may present challenges for the upper lumbar levels, where facet joints are located deeper inside. Our objective was to compare surgical outcomes and radiographic evaluations for single-level decompression cases at L1-L2 or L2-L3 between MEL and open laminectomy.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who underwent single-level decompression for upper lumbar spinal stenosis at 12 distinguished spine centers from April 2017 to September 2021. Baseline demographics, preoperative, and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes, along with imaging parameters, were compared between the MEL and open groups. To account for potential confounding, patients' backgrounds were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method based on propensity scores.

RESULTS

Among the 2487 patients undergoing decompression surgery, 118 patients (4.7%) underwent single-level decompression at L1-L2 or L2-L3. Finally, 80 patients (51 in the MEL group, 29 in the open group) with postoperative data were deemed eligible for analysis. The MEL group exhibited significantly improved postoperative EuroQol 5-Dimension values compared to the open group. Additionally, the MEL group showed a lower facet preservation rate according to computed tomography examination, whereas the open group had a higher incidence of retrolisthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall surgical outcomes were similar, the MEL group demonstrated potential advantages in enhancing EuroQol 5-Dimension scores. The MEL group's lower facet preservation rate did not translate into a higher postoperative instability rate.

Effectiveness and safety of interspinous spacer versus decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

Our meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether interspinous spacer (IS) results in better performance for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) when compared with decompressive surgery (DS).

BACKGROUND DATA

DS and IS are common surgeries for the treatment of LSS. However, controversy remains as to whether the IS is superior to DS.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for prospective randomized controlled trials that compared IS versus DS for LSS. The retrieved results were last updated on July 30, 2023.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 852 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data indicated that IS was superior to DS considering shorter operation time (P = .003), lower dural violation rate (P = .002), better Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical function score (P = .03), and smaller foraminal height decrease (P = .004), but inferior to DS considering the higher rate of reoperation (P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding hospital stay (P = .26), blood loss (P = .23), spinous process fracture (P = .09), disc height decrease (P = .87), VAS leg pain score (P = .43), VAS back pain score (P = .26), Oswestry Disability Index score (P = .08), and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire symptom severity (P = .50).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we considered that IS had similar effects with DS in hospital stay, blood loss, spinous process fracture, disc height decrease, VAS score, Oswestry Disability Index score, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom severity, and was better in some indices such as operation time, dural violation, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical function, and foraminal height decrease than DS. However, due to the higher rate of reoperation in the IS group, we considered that both IS and DS were acceptable strategies for treating LSS. As a novel technique, further well-designed studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IS.

Radical decompression without fusion for L5 radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis

Background

The highest incidence of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs in the L5-S1 segment and its anatomical features differ from those of other segments. Few previous reports have exhaustively assessed surgical outcomes after decompression surgery, limiting the materials to patients with LFS at the L5-S1 segment. We aimed to prospectively investigate instability and neurological improvement following our novel surgical technique for LFS at L5-S1, named "radical decompression" of the nerve root.

Methods

Patients with foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 who underwent surgery using our technique were prospectively evaluated two years postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and two years postoperatively. The following radiological parameters at L5-S1 were measured: lateral translation, sagittal translation, the difference in sagittal translation (DST) between flexion and extension, disc wedging angle, lordotic angle, the difference in lordotic angle (DLA) between flexion and extension, and disc height. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using paired t-tests. In addition, the patients were classified into a disc group (Group D) and a non-disc group (Group ND) according to whether a discectomy was performed intraoperatively. Changes in each parameter before and after surgery were compared between the groups.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis. The JOA scores improved in all patients. The mean preoperative and two-year postoperative JOA scores were 14.5±3.2 (range, 8-21) and 24.3±3.3 (range, 18-29), respectively (P<0.01). All JOABPEQ categories improved two years postoperatively (P<0.05). None of the patients underwent revision surgery. No significant changes were observed in any of the radiological parameters. No significant differences in the changes in each parameter before and after surgery were found between groups D and ND.

Conclusions

Our surgical technique resulted in good neurological recovery and was associated with a low risk of postoperative segmental instability, regardless of additional discectomy.

Efficacy of Repeat Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Reoperation of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of repeat percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) reoperation.

Patients and Methods

This study included patients with LSS who relapsed following treatment with PELD therapy between March 2017 and March 2020. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and at final follow-up. The modified MacNab criteria were used to assess clinical effects. All complications were recorded.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 3 years, 24 patients with LSS who underwent repeat PELD were identified. The patients' mean operative time was 122.3±29.2 min, blood loss was 12.5±5.3 mL, and mean hospital stay was 7.0±1.9 days. VAS leg-pain score improved from 6.1±1.0 to 2.0±1.2 (P<0.001), VAS back-pain score improved from 6.2±0.8 to 2.1±1.1 (P<0.001), and ODI improved from 68.9±6.0 to 20.9±5.6 (P <0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the good-to-excellent rate was 83.3%. Postoperative complications, including hematoma, nerve root injury, and dural injury, developed in four patients.

Conclusion

Repeat PELD for reoperation in patients with LSS has a good clinical effect, and is recommended in routine clinical practice. Careful intraoperative manipulation is recommended to prevent complications.