Acetabular Peri-Prosthetic Fractures—A Narrative Review

Effectiveness of Virtual Surgical Planning and Three-Dimensional Anatomical Models in Radiological Reconstruction of Center of Rotation and Pelvic Brim in Patients with Anterior Column Defects Requiring Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Background: The aim of this study was to show that virtual surgical planning (VSP) and printed anatomical models support the reconstruction of the center of rotation (COR) and pelvic BRIM during revision hip surgery using a dual-mobility revision cup system in patients with anterior pelvic column damage and soft tissue envelope deficiency. Methods: Patients with anterior pelvic column damage and soft tissue envelope deficiency underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Virtual planning included assessment of bone segmentation, positioning of the cementless revision cup while maintaining the COR, and the assumed inclination and anteversion angles. Results: The diameter of the planned revision cups was 65.5 ± 2.1 mm, and the diameter of the revision cups used was 65.3 ± 2.1 mm. The difference in COR position in the horizontal axis was 7.8 ± 9.3 mm, in the vertical axis was 4.3 ± 5.9 mm, and in the axial plane was 1.6 ± 3.3 mm. The differences in inclination angle and in the anteversion angle were 12.4° and 8.7°, respectively. Conclusions: The use of VSP and 3D models supports the process of performing RHA surgery in patients with damage to the anterior pelvic column and soft tissue envelope deficiency.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures as a complication of total hip arthroplasty

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. As the number of total hip arthroplasties performed annually increases, so has the incidence of periprosthetic fractures, with the topic being spotlighted more frequently in the orthopaedic community. There is a particular sparsity of literature regarding periprosthetic acetabular fractures, with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty being traditionally far more commonly reported. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, classifications, and management strategies for periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Total Hip Arthroplasty-Current Challenges

In 1891, Professor Themistocles Glück in Germany was the first to replace a femoral head in hip joints destroyed by tuberculosis using ivory [...].

[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures and defects : Trauma meets ortho]

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are considered to be a severe and challenging complication in total hip arthroplasty. To date, there are no internationally applicable standardized recommendations which can assist orthopedic surgeons and trauma surgeons in the treatment of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to report on the current state of knowledge on periprosthetic acetabular fractures, to present the commonly used classification systems and to demonstrate appropriate treatment algorithms together with personal experiences.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective search of the existing literature was carried out and the commonly used classification systems and treatment options for periprosthetic acetabular fractures were compiled and are discussed in relation to the in-house cases.

RESULTS

The comparison of the classification systems showed that frequently only fractures which have a purely traumatic origin are included among periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Insufficiency fractures within the framework of acetabular defects, which also belong to the group of acetabular fractures, are frequently included in revision arthroplasty. The management of defects with appropriate implants represents a challenge. By the combination of osteosynthesis and implant replacement, the selection of implants can often be de-escalated.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures represent a complex operation for both trauma surgeons and for specially trained orthopedic surgeons, which necessitate a high level of expertise. By the cooperation between trauma surgeons and orthopedic surgeons good treatment results can be achieved and recommendations for the selection of implants can be made.