Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Age-specific Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Chemonucleolysis with Condoliase versus Microendoscopic Discectomy in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Introduction

Condoliase-based chemonucleolysis and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) are considered to be minimally invasive treatments for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of both treatments, specifically focusing on whether the outcomes vary by age group.

Methods

Patients with LDH who received intradiscal condoliase injections (condoliase group) or underwent MED (MED group) with 1-year follow-up were enrolled in this study. A numerical rating scale (NRS) was developed for leg and back pains. Using magnetic resonance imaging, changes in disc height and degeneration were evaluated. The data were assessed at baseline and at 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. The therapy was considered effective in patients whose NRS for leg pain improved by ≥50% at 1 year from baseline and for whom surgery was not required. Comparative analyses were conducted between the condoliase and MED groups and among the <20, 20-39, 40-59, and ≥60 year age groups.

Results

In this study, a total of 345 patients (condoliase group, n=233; MED group, n=112) were enrolled. Subsequent surgery was required in 23 patients (9.9%) in the condoliase group because of the ineffectiveness of the condoliase therapy. Because of herniation recurrence, reoperation was required in five patients (4.5%) in the MED group. The efficacy rates were respectively 74.4% and 74.6% in the condoliase and MED groups, and no intergroup or age-group differences were found. The condoliase group had a significantly higher decrease in disc height when compared with the MED group (9.0% vs. 4.4%, p<0.05). Compared with the older age group, the younger age group had a greater decrease in disc height and disc degeneration; however, their recovery was better than that of the older age group. Among the age groups, the herniation reduction rate did not significantly vary.

Conclusions

Condoliase and MED had equivalent 1-year outcomes, with no differences observed in efficacy across age groups. For informed decision-making, the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment must be understood.

Pretreatment Prognostic Factors for Intradiscal Condoliase Injection in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: Insights from Clinical and MRI-Based Quantitative Analysis

Background/Objectives: Intradiscal condoliase injection is a minimally invasive and effective treatment option for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the appropriate use, efficacy, and potential outcomes of this therapy have to be carefully considered because condoliase can only be administered once in life. The aim of this study is to identify factors that predict the efficacy of condoliase injection before treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 115 patients with LDH treated with intradiscal condoliase injection. The patients' background and MRI-based evaluations were used to measure various pretreatment parameters, including age, sex, symptom duration, comorbidity of psychological factors, disc height, herniated mass area, and contrast ratios within the disc and herniation. Clinical response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in leg pain on a numerical rating scale 3 months after treatment. Factors with significance in the univariate analysis were further examined using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Among the 115 patients, 73.9% had a ≥50% post-treatment pain reduction. The predictive factors for poorer outcomes included a longer symptom duration, psychological comorbidities, a smaller herniated mass size, a higher disc height, and a higher contrast ratio within the disc. No significant associations were found between the treatment efficacy and patient age or contrast ratio within the herniation. Conclusions: This study identified several pre-treatment factors that predict the efficacy of intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH. Treatment decisions should be made with particular attention to patients with a longer symptom duration, psychological factors, and fewer degenerative discs. The most important determinant of treatment efficacy may be how condoliase acts on the herniation mass.

Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation With Incomplete Motor Deficits in a Professional Footballer: A Case Report

Although there are reports on good short-term outcomes of condoliase injection therapy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), reports on the improvement of motor deficits, athlete-specific outcomes, or physiotherapy are lacking. We present a case of a 20-year-old male professional footballer who had low back pain, right gluteal pain, and numbness in the right lateral lower leg. The conservative treatment for L4/L5 disc herniation did not improve his symptoms, which were accompanied by incomplete motor deficits of the tibialis anterior (TA) and extensor hallucis longus (EHL) muscles. Thus, he was administered condoliase injection therapy. Approximately 13 weeks after the injection, his symptoms had completely disappeared, and his motor deficits had improved. After 14 weeks, the patient was able to return to competition. Condoliase injection therapy for athletes is one of the useful treatments with the potential to avoid surgery and return to competition, and it may also be effective for athletes with mild incomplete motor deficits.

Efficacy of Chemonucleolysis with Condoliase in Patients Aged under 20 Years

Introduction

Chemonucleolysis with condoliase is a minimally invasive treatment option for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). However, studies reporting the efficacy of condoliase in patients aged <20 years are scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of condoliase therapy for LDH in the aforementioned population.

Methods

Condoliase administration was determined based on adequate informed consent. The study enrolled 138 patients (mean age, 41.3±15.4 years) with LDH who received condoliase injections with a follow-up period of 1 year. The patients were divided into Group Y (age, <20 years) and Group A (age, 20-70 years). The clinical outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) values. Changes in disk height and degeneration were evaluated. These data were obtained at baseline and at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. Condoliase therapy was considered to be effective if it improved the VAS score for leg pain by ≥50% at 1 year from baseline and prevented surgery.

Results

Groups Y and A consisted of 15 and 123 patients, respectively. Condoliase therapy was effective in 9 patients (60.0%) in Group Y and 96 patients (78.0%) in Group A. The rates of Pfirrmann grade deterioration and recovery were substantially higher in Group Y than in Group A (83.3% vs. 45.8% and 50.0% vs. 16.3%, respectively). While the disk height reduction in Group Y was greater at 3 months, it recovered to the same level as that in Group A at 1 year. In Group Y, patients who did not respond to the treatment exhibited a considerably higher preoperative ODI (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Chemonucleolysis with condoliase is considered to have limited efficacy in patients aged <20 years. Caution should be taken when managing cases showing lumbar instability or existing disability. While chemonucleolysis with condoliase is a less invasive treatment option for LDH, the administration should be decided upon with sufficient consent considering the potential limited efficacy and disk degeneration.

Characteristics in patients with very early therapeutic response of condoliase chemonucleolysis for lumbar disc herniation

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using condoliase chemonucleolysis (CC) requires more time than surgery to demonstrate therapeutic effects. This study aimed to identify patients who show significant improvement in leg pain very early after CC and to determine pretreatment factors that can predict a very early therapeutic response.

METHODS

The study included 52 patients who underwent CC for treatment-resistant LDH. Scores for low back and leg pain measured by a numerical rating scale were assessed at four time points (1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after CC). Patients who reported subjective pain relief the day after treatment and further exhibited an improved straight leg raising (SLR) angle compared to pretreatment were classified as "very early responders (VER)".

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients, 39 (75%) were VER, and 13 (25%) were non-VER. The VER showed earlier improvement in leg pain. The VER had a significantly higher proportion of positive SLR test patients (p = 0.01) and a significantly smaller pretreatment SLR angle compared to the non-VER (VER vs. non-VER: 40.6 ± 19.0 vs. 63.1 ± 16.9, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the level, type, and size of LDH and the disc regression rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a smaller pretreatment SLR angle are more likely to experience very early or early symptomatic relief, with a significant and sustained reduction in leg pain up to 3 months after CC treatment.

Indication and Limitation of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Intradiscal condoliase injection for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) was developed in Japan in 2018. The treatment is intermediate between conservative therapy and surgery, and its frequency is increasing. Condoliase is limited to a single application over a lifetime, rendering it important to understand the indications and predictors of its effectiveness. This review aimed to summarize published studies and provide appropriate indications and limitations for appropriate patient selection based on existing findings.

Methods

While adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases to identify articles reporting the clinical outcomes of intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH. Data extraction focused on the effective rate, prognostic factors, and posttreatment imaging changes and was used in the meta-analysis.

Results

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed 78% total response, 11% posttreatment surgery, and 42% posttreatment Pfirrmann-classification-grade progression rates. Posttreatment intervertebral disc degeneration was potentially associated with an improved response rate and disc regeneration one year posttreatment, especially in young patients. The Regimen for patients aged <20 and >70 years should be carefully selected, including those with a disease duration of >1 year, recurrent LDH, small-sized LDH, vertebral instability, and inadequate duration (<3 months) of conservative therapy.

Conclusions

Although long-term outcomes and imaging changes must be evaluated owing to the heterogeneity of previous studies, intradiscal condoliase injection is a minimally invasive and cost-effective treatment option for patients with LDH. Treatment indications should be determined after carefully evaluating evidence from previous conservative and surgical treatments.

Immediate Effects, Detailed Clinical Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors of Chemonucleolysis Using Condoliase for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Chemonucleolysis utilizing condoliase is a minimally invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) aimed at reducing intervertebral disc pressure and enhancing symptoms. In this study, lower limb pain was measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS) the day after treatment and 1 and 3 months after treatment. Prognostic factors were assessed, categorizing participants into an improvement group (I-group) for NRS lower limb pain scores of ≥3.5 and a non-improvement group (N-group) for scores of <3.5. This study included a total of 225 patients treated between April 2020 and March 2023. The mean age was 46.5 ± 16.5 years, with 151 males. The mean duration of illness was 6.2 ± 8.52 months. As of the day after treatment, 60 cases were classified into the I-group, 118 cases at 1 month after surgery, and 152 cases at 3 months after surgery. The disease duration before treatment was significantly shorter in the I-group at 1 (8.19 ± 8.74 [I-group] vs. 5.17 ± 8.04 [N-group] months) and 3 months (8.51 [I-group] ± 7.35 vs. 5.69 ± 8.87[N-group] months) after treatment. The comparison of baseline leg pain NRS shows a difference in leg pain NRS in the I-group when compared on the day after treatment (6.02 ± 2.64 [I-group] vs. 7.50 ± 1.79 [N-group]), 1 (5.13 ± 2.69 [I-group] vs. 7.58 ± 1.66 [N-group]), and 3 months (4.42 ± 2.70 [I-group] vs. 7.34 ± 1.77 [N-group]). Chemonucleolysis using condoliase for LDH can improve symptoms the day after treatment and can be a minimally invasive treatment to avoid surgery.

Enzymatic chemonucleolysis for lumbar disc herniation-an assessment of historical and contemporary efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is often managed surgically. Enzymatic chemonucleolysis emerged as a non-surgical alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of chemonucleolytic enzymes for LDH. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy through "treatment success" (i.e., pain reduction) and severe adverse events (SAEs) rates. Additionally, differences in efficacy and safety trends among chemonucleolytic enzymes are explored. Following our PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42023451546) and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 18, 2023. Inclusion criteria involved human LDH treatment with enzymatic chemonucleolysis reagents, assessing pain alleviation, imaging changes, and reporting on SAEs, with focus on allergic reactions. Quality assessment employed the Cochrane Source of Bias and MINORS tools. Meta-analysis utilized odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among 62 included studies (12,368 patients), chemonucleolysis demonstrated an 79% treatment success rate and significantly outperformed placebo controls (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.41-4.65) and scored similar to surgical interventions (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20-2.10). SAEs occurred in 1.4% of cases, with slightly higher rates in chymopapain cohorts. No significant differences in "proceeding to surgery" rates were observed between chemonucleolysis and control cohorts. Limitations include dated and heterogeneous studies, emphasizing the need for higher-quality trials. Further optimization through careful patient selection and advances in therapy implementation may further enhance outcomes. The observed benefits call for wider clinical exploration and adoption. No funding was received for this review.

Histological analysis of nucleus pulposus tissue from patients with lumbar disc herniation after condoliase administration

Background

Condoliase is an enzyme used as a treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This enzyme degrades chondroitin sulfate (CS) in the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc (IVD). However, there are cases in which symptoms do not improve, despite condoliase administration. This study reports histological analysis of lumbar disc tissue of LDH patients who underwent surgery because condoliase had no therapeutic effect.

Methods

Between March 2019 and August 2019, 12 LDH patients who underwent full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) discectomy at the Dezawa Akira PED Clinic were the subjects of the study. There are two study groups: six cases underwent FESS after condoliase administration, while six underwent FESS without condoliase administration. The average duration from drug administration to surgery was 152 days. Herniated disc removed at surgery was evaluated by histological staining including immunohistochemistry by anti-CS antibodies.

Results

Multiple large clusters (40-120 μm in diameter) were observed in the nucleus pulposus of those who received condoliase, but no clusters were observed in those who did not. The lumbar disc tissues, including the nucleus pulposus of recipients, were stained with anti-CS antibodies that recognize the CS unsaturated disaccharide, but non-administration tissue was not stained. These findings suggest that the enzyme acted on the nucleus pulposus, even in cases where symptoms were not improved by condoliase administration. Furthermore, there was no histological difference between stained images of the extracellular matrix in those who did or did not receive condoliase, suggesting that condoliase acted specifically on CS in the nucleus pulposus.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that CS in the nucleus pulposus was degraded in patients in whom condoliase did not have a therapeutic effect. Moreover, condoliase acts in human IVD without causing necrosis of chondrocytes and surrounding tissues.

Psychological Factors Can Affect the Clinical Outcome of Chemonucleolysis with Condoliase in Patients with Lumbar Disk Herniation

Introduction

Condoliase-based chemonucleolysis is a minimally invasive intermediate treatment option between conservative approaches and surgical interventions for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). In this study, the effects of psychological factors on the clinical outcomes of condoliase therapy for LDH were assessed.

Methods

This study involved patients with LDH who received condoliase injections over a 1-year follow-up period. Data from the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which was utilized for the psychological assessment, were collected. Using magnetic resonance imaging, changes in disk height and degeneration were evaluated. Data were assessed at baseline and 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year follow-ups. Condoliase therapy was considered effective in patients whose VAS score for leg pain improved by ≥50% at 1 year from baseline and who did not require surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those who reported effective treatment (Group E) and those who did not (Group I). Between these two groups, comparative analyses were carried out.

Results

In this study, a total of 102 patients (70 men; mean age, 43.8±18.2 years) were included. Condoliase therapy was effective in 76 patients (74.5%). Thirty-five patients (34.3%) showed psychological factors (HADS-Anxiety [HADS-A]≥8 or HADS-Depression [HADS-D]≥8) preoperatively and had a significantly lower rate of effectiveness than did those without psychological factors. Group I demonstrated significantly higher baseline back pain VAS, HADS, and HADS-D scores when compared with Group E. Logistic regression analysis identified females and the baseline HADS-D score as independent factors that were related to the effectiveness of condoliase therapy.

Conclusions

The patients with psychological factors tended to experience residual pain resulting in adverse effects on the clinical outcomes of chemonucleolysis with condoliase.

Intradiscal Condoliase Injection Therapy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Case Series and Literature Review

Background and objectives: Although chemonucleolysis with condoliase for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become common, few reports have described its application in the treatment of recurrent LDH. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of condoliase treatment in six patients with recurrent LDH and review the available literature on condoliase treatment for LDH. Materials and Methods: Six patients (four men and two women; mean age, 64.7 years) with recurrent LDH who were treated with condoliase at our hospital between 2019 and 2022 were included. The clinical records and images of the patients were retrospectively evaluated. In addition, the available English literature on condoliase treatment for LDH was retrieved and reviewed. Results: Among the six patients included in the study, three showed >50% improvement in leg pain after treatment, which is a lower efficacy rate than that in previous reports. In addition, two patients required surgery after treatment, which is a higher rate than that in previous reports. The mean intervertebral disc height significantly decreased from 8.4 mm before treatment to 6.9 mm after treatment, consistent with the results of previous studies. None of the cases showed Modic type I changes on magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions: Although the efficacy of condoliase treatment for recurrent LDH may be lower than that for primary LDH, this treatment was found to be safe and applicable for recurrent LDH.

The efficacy and safety of condoliase for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Chemonucleolysis is a minimally invasive treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the low specificity of the enzyme and the existence of serious adverse events limit the application of chemonucleolysis. Clinical studies in recent years have shown that Chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase (condoliase) is a potential therapeutic enzyme for LDH. Aim. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of condoliase in LDH treatment. Methods: We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The outcomes were the total effective rate, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score change, the proportion of lumbar surgery after condoliase treatment, herniated mass volume change, Pfirrmann grade change, and adverse events. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for meta-, sensitivity, and bias analysis. Results: Ten studies were included. A single-arm meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate was 78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75%-81%], the proportion of surgery was 9% (95% CI 7%-12%), the proportion of Pfirrmann grade change was 43% (95%CI 38%-47%), and the adverse events were 4% (95% CI 2%-6%) after condoliase treatment. The two-arm meta-analysis showed that the ODI score change [standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.46, 95% CI -3.30 to -1.63] and the herniated mass volume change (SMD -16.97, 95% CI -23.92 to -10.03) of the condoliase treatment group were greater than those of the placebo control group, and there was no difference in adverse events between the two groups (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.60-3.85). The results of sensitivity and publication bias analyses showed that the results were robust. Conclusion: Condoliase intradiscal injection has excellent eutherapeutic and safety for LDH, thus, has considerable potential as a treatment option besides conservative treatment and surgical intervention for LDH. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022375492, PROSPERO (CRD42022375492).