New Insights in the Setting of Transplant Oncology

Evolving Transplant Oncology: Evolving Criteria for Better Decision-Making

Transplant oncology integrates a wide variety of fields, such as surgery, oncology, and transplant medicine, intending to increase the range of studies and treatments for hepatobiliary cancers and other liver-related malignant lesions. Liver transplantation (LT) has proven to be an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. While the Milan criteria are still the gold standard, several new, more inclusive criteria have been proposed, and hepatocellular carcinoma has become a major indication for liver transplantation. The continuous evolution of diagnostic technologies supported this with higher image quality and more accurate staging. This review describes the current applications of transplant oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and liver metastatic disease from colorectal cancer and discusses the path that led to the development of transplant oncology as an organized approach to managing gastrointestinal malignancies through transplantation. More importantly, the significance of a multidisciplinary approach and criteria in the selection of suitable candidates are discussed. In addition, newer aspects of transplant oncology, such as immunotherapy, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), novel surgical techniques, and the utilization of artificial intelligence, are presented. Finally, the opportunities and challenges involved in the field's future, as well as the evolution of the criteria used over the years and insightful thoughts for the future of the criteria, are discussed.

Superficial Vein Thrombosis in an Asymptomatic Case of Cholangiocarcinoma with Recent History of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic brought into prominence several emergent medical and surgical entities, but, also, it served as trigger and contributor for numerous apparently unrelated ailments such as arterial and venous thromboembolic complications. Additional risk factors for these thrombotic traits may be concurrent (known or unknown) malignancies, including at hepatic level. Among these, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare cancer of intra- and extra-hepatic biliary ducts, represents a very aggressive condition that typically associates local and distant advanced stages on first presentation requiring a prompt diagnosis and a stratified management. This neoplasia has been reported to present a large spectrum of paraneoplastic syndromes in terms of dermatologic, renal, systemic, neurologic, endocrine, and cardiovascular settings, that, overall, are exceptional in their epidemiologic impact when compared to other cancers. Our aim was to introduce a most unusual case of CCA-associated distant thrombosis in a male adult who initially was considered to experience COVID-19-related thrombotic features while having a history of obesity and bariatric surgery. This is a hybrid type of paper: this clinical vignette is accompanied by two distinct sample-focused analyses as a basis for discussion; they each had different methods depending on their current level of statistical evidence. We only included English-published articles in PubMed, as follows: Firstly, we conducted a search of reports similar to the present case, regarding distant vein thrombosis in CCA, from inception until the present time. We performed a literature search using the keywords "cholangiocarcinoma", "thrombosis", and "Trousseau's syndrome" and identified 20 cases across 19 original papers; hence, the current level of evidence remains very low Secondly, we searched for the highest level of statistical evidence concerning the diagnosis of venous thrombosis/thromboembolism in patients who underwent COVID-19 infection (key search terms were "COVID-19", alternatively, "coronavirus", and "SARS-CoV-2", and "thrombosis", alternatively, "thromboembolism") and included the most recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that were published in 2024 (from 1 January 2024 until 8 July 2024). After excluding data on vaccination against coronavirus or long COVID-19 syndrome, we identified six such articles. To conclude, we presented a probably unique case of malignancy with an initial manifestation consisting of recurrent superficial vein thrombosis under anticoagulation therapy, with no gastrointestinal manifestations, in a patient with a notable history for multiple episodes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a prior endocrine (gastric) surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first identification of a CCA under these specific circumstances.

Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy

Background

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics, patterns of recurrence, survival outcomes, and implications for the addition of chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

Materials and methods

For the present retrospective study, we identified 38 and 10 patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic CCA. In perihilar CCA, adjuvant treatment was given as chemotherapy (n = 13) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 10). In intrahepatic CCA, neoadjuvant treatment was given with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 1) or chemotherapy plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, n = 1), and adjuvant treatment was given to 7 patients with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Results

In perihilar CCA, preoperative biliary drainage procedures were performed in 27 out of 30 patients with jaundice. The adjacent liver showed secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 5) and fibrosis (n = 19). Locoregional recurrence involved the hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic site and lymph nodes. In intrahepatic CCA, the adjacent liver revealed cirrhosis (n = 1), secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1), and fibrosis (n = 6). The sites of recurrence were in the remnant liver and lymph nodes (n = 6). In perihilar CCA, the median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 30.1 months (95% CI: 22.9-37.4) and 15.1 months (95% CI: 9.74-20.5), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 60.5% and 44.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of no adjuvant treatment with decreased DFS (p = 0.004), HR 4.03 (95% CI: 1.57-10.4). Recurrence showed an unfavorable association with OS (p = 0.056), HR 2.90 (95% CI: 0.98-8.66). In intrahepatic CCA, the median OS and DFS rates were 41.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-68.9) and 10.8 months (95% CI: 1.98-19.6), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 66.7% and 53.3%, respectively. The patient with multiple intrahepatic CCA lesions and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT showed partial pathological necrosis after resection and was disease-free at 3.5 years.

Conclusions

The present study showed the effectiveness of the combination of chemoradiotherapy with resection in improving locoregional disease control and survival in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic CCA.

How to cite this article

Sahai P, Rastogi A, Gupta A, et al. Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(2):134-144.

Evolution of transplant oncology indications: a single-institution experience over 40 years

Liver transplantation (LT) for uncommon tumoral indications has changed across the decades, with impaired results reported in the first historical series mainly for non-tumoral-related causes. Recently, renewed interest in liver transplant oncology has been reported. The study aims to analyze a mono-center experience exploring the evolution and the impact on patient survival of LT in uncommon tumoral indications. A retrospective analysis of 851 LT performed during 1982-2023 was investigated. 33/851 (3.9%) uncommon tumoral indications were reported: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on non-cirrhotic liver (n = 14), peri-hilar (phCCA) (n = 8) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) (n = 3), metastatic disease (n = 4), hepatic hemangioendothelioma (n = 2), and benign tumor (n = 2). Uncommon tumoral indications were mainly transplanted during the period 1982-1989, with a complete disappearance after the year 2000 and a slight rise in the last years. Poor outcomes were reported: 5-year survival rates were 28.6%, 25.0%, 0%, and 0% in the case of HCC on non-cirrhotic liver, phCCA, i-CCA, and metastases, respectively. However, the cause of patient death was often related to non-tumoral conditions. LT for uncommon oncological diseases has increased worldwide in recent decades. Historical series report poor survival outcomes despite more recent data showing promising results. Hence, the decision to transplant these patients should be under the risk and overall benefit of the patient. The results of the ongoing protocol studies are expected to confirm the validity of the unconventional tumor indications.

Expanding MELD exceptions for colorectal liver metastasis: data and policy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While liver transplant for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has been demonstrated to be a promising treatment in selected patients, the typically low MELD score of these patients and lack of exception points may lead to challenges in receiving a deceased donor liver for transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have shown improved outcomes in select patients with CRLM who undergo liver transplant, and several trials are ongoing and will conclude in the next several years. MELD exception points have recently been proposed in qualifying patients with CRLM to help this group obtain more timely quality allografts. Under the current proposal, patients with CRLM would receive a score of the median MELD at transplant (MMaT) for their center minus 20 with a minimum score of 15 in cases where MMaT minus 20 would be less than 15. This would allow them to receive transplants faster without competing unnecessarily with those with greater medical need.

SUMMARY

Giving MELD exception points to patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in need of transplant may decrease time on the waitlist and improve outcomes for these patients.

Focusing on Ischemic Reperfusion Injury in the New Era of Dynamic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. Transplant indications have been progressively increasing, with a huge discrepancy between the supply and demand of optimal organs. In this context, the use of extended criteria donor grafts has gained importance, even though these grafts are more susceptible to ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI). Hepatic IRI is an inherent and inevitable consequence of all liver transplants; it involves ischemia-mediated cellular damage exacerbated upon reperfusion and its severity directly affects graft function and post-transplant complications. Strategies for organ preservation have been constantly improving since they first emerged. The current gold standard for preservation is perfusion solutions and static cold storage. However, novel approaches that allow extended preservation times, organ evaluation, and their treatment, which could increase the number of viable organs for transplantation, are currently under investigation. This review discusses the mechanisms associated with IRI, describes existing strategies for liver preservation, and emphasizes novel developments and challenges for effective organ preservation and optimization.

Survival Benefit Relative to Treatment Modalities Among Patients with Very Early Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: an Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) has been considered a potential curative treatment for patients with very early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and cirrhosis, yet the survival benefit of LT has not been well defined. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes of patients who underwent LT with that of individuals who received resection and non-curative intent treatment (non-CIT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent LT, hepatectomy, and non-CIT between 2004 and 2018 were included in the National Cancer Database. Survival benefits of LT over resection and non-CIT were analyzed relative to overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 863 patients, 54 (6.3%) underwent LT, while 342 (39.6%) underwent surgical resection, and 467 (54.1%) received non-CIT, respectively. While the rates of non-CIT increased over time, the percentages of LT remained consistent during the study period. LT patients had similar 5-year OS to individuals who underwent resection (referent, resection: LT, HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.84-1.58, p=0.84). In contrast, 5-year OS was better among patients who underwent LT versus individuals who had non-CIT after controlling other variables using propensity score overlapping weighting (5-year OS, LT 57.1% vs. LR 25.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of very early ICC patients who underwent LT were similar to individuals who underwent hepatectomy, but better than patients treated with non-CIT. LT should be may be a consideration as a treatment option for patients with early stage ICC who are unsuitable candidates for resection.

New Insights into Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in the Era of “Transplant Oncology”

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents the second most frequent type of primary liver neoplasm. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with iCCA involves many challenges. To date, surgical resection with negative margins is the main curative option, achieving an acceptable long-term survival. Despite enabling a considerable improvement in the outcome, iCCA recurrence after surgery is still common. Tumor extension and the histological subtype, as well as vascular and lymph node involvements, are key factors used to define the prognosis. In this narrative review, we aimed to discuss the potential benefits of using different surgical strategies in the field of iCCA, including vascular resection, the mini-invasive approach, liver transplantation, the mechanism used to enable future liver remnant augmentation, and lymph node dissection. We also discussed the new protocols developed in the field of systemic treatment, including immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. Recent advancements in the diagnosis, surgical treatment, and understanding of tumor biology have changed the landscape in terms of treatment options. Creating a multidisciplinary tumor board is essential to achieving the best patient outcomes. Further investigational trials are required with the intent of tailoring the treatments and establishing the right patient population who would benefit from the use of new therapeutics algorithms.

The Role of Donor Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase as a Risk Factor for Early Graft Function after Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Growing interest has been recently reported in the potential detrimental role of donor gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) peak at the time of organ procurement regarding the risk of poor outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). However, the literature on this topic is scarce and controversial data exist on the mechanisms justifying such a correlation. This study aims to demonstrate the adverse effect of donor GGT in a large European LT cohort regarding 90-day post-transplant graft loss.

METHODS

This is a retrospective international study investigating 1335 adult patients receiving a first LT from January 2004 to September 2018 in four collaborative European centers.

RESULTS

Two different multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the risk factors for 90-day post-transplant graft loss, introducing donor GGT as a continuous or dichotomous variable. In both models, donor GGT showed an independent role as a predictor of graft loss. In detail, the log-transformed continuous donor GGT value showed an odds ratio of 1.46 (95% CI = 1.03-2.07; p = 0.03). When the donor GGT peak value was dichotomized using a cut-off of 160 IU/L, the odds ratio was 1.90 (95% CI = 1.20-3.02; p = 0.006). When the graft-loss rates were investigated, significantly higher rates were reported in LT cases with donor GGT ≥160 IU/L. In detail, 90-day graft-loss rates were 23.2% vs. 13.9% in patients with high vs. low donor GGT, respectively (log-rank p = 0.004). Donor GGT was also added to scores conventionally used to predict outcomes (i.e., MELD, D-MELD, DRI, and BAR scores). In all cases, when the score was combined with the donor GGT, an improvement in the model accuracy was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor GGT could represent a valuable marker for evaluating graft quality at transplantation. Donor GGT should be implemented in scores aimed at predicting post-transplant clinical outcomes. The exact mechanisms correlating GGT and poor LT outcomes should be better clarified and need prospective studies focused on this topic.