Towards Efficient and Accurate SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequence Typing Based on Supervised Learning Approaches

Epidemiological and clinical features of COVID-19 inpatients in Changsha, China: A retrospective study from 2020 to 2022

Objectives

The spread of SARS-Cov-2 remains a global concern along with the emergence of variants. This study aims to characterize the epidemiological and clinical features of hospitalized patients who were dragonized with five different variants of SARS-CoV-2 during the past 3 years.

Methods

This retrospective study recruited 432 COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in the First Hospital of Changsha from January 2020 to August 2022. Clinical records on clinical symptoms, laboratory profiles, and chest CT images was collected. The epidemiological and clinical features were compared between COVID-19 patients infected with either the wild-type, Omicron variant or pre- Omicron variants (e.g., Alpha, Beta, Delta).

Results

A total of 432 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 inpatients were dialogized during three waves, including 247 cases during the wild-type transmission period, 65 cases during the transmission period of pre-Omicron variants, and 119 cases during the transmission period of Omicron variants. The proportion of moderately or severely ill inpatients showed a gradual decline from the wild-type transmission period to the Omicron transmission period. The common symptoms of inpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2 wildtype strains included fever (67.61 %), cough (57.89 %), fatigue (33.60 %), and shortness of breath (12.15 %). In contrast, patients infected with other variants mostly showed upper respiratory symptoms. Based on chest CT images, a lower degree of acute pulmonary infection was observed among inpatients infected with the Omicron variants than those infected with the wild-type strain (31.09 % vs 93.12 %, p-value<0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with the wild-type strain, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, especially the Omicron variant, mostly caused a lower degree of acute pulmonary infection, indicating the reduced disease severity and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Comparative effectiveness of oseltamivir versus peramivir for hospitalized children (aged 0-5 years) with influenza infection

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of oseltamivir versus peramivir in children infected with influenza remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate their effectiveness in young children (aged 0-5 years) infected with severe influenza A virus (IAV) or influenza B virus (IBV).

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of 1662 young children with either IAV (N = 1095) or IBV (N = 567) who received oseltamivir or peramivir treatment from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022. Propensity score matching methods were applied to match children who were oseltamivir-treated versus peramivir-treated.

RESULTS

Children who were IAV-infected and IBV-infected shared similar features, such as influenza-associated symptoms and comorbidities at baseline. Among children infected with IAV with bacterial coinfection, the recovery rate was significantly greater in children treated with oseltamivir than in children treated with peramivir (15.6% vs 4.4%, P = 0.01). The median duration of hospitalization was also shorter in children treated with oseltamivir. Among children infected with IAV without bacterial coinfection, the recovery rate was greater in children treated with oseltamivir than in children treated with peramivir (21.1% vs 3.7%, P = 0.002). However, oseltamivir and peramivir offered similar recovery rates and duration of hospitalization (P >0.05 for both) among children infected with IBV.

CONCLUSION

Oseltamivir and peramivir exhibit similar effectiveness in young children with severe influenza B, whereas oseltamivir demonstrated improved recovery and shorter hospitalization in the treatment of severe influenza A in hospitalized children.