The mutL Gene as a Genome-Wide Taxonomic Marker for High Resolution Discrimination of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Its Closely Related Taxa

Faecalibacterium taiwanense sp. nov., isolated from human faeces

Two Gram-stain-negative, straight rods, non-motile, asporogenous, catalase-negative and obligately anaerobic butyrate-producing strains, HLW78T and CYL33, were isolated from faecal samples of two healthy Taiwanese adults. Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA and DNA mismatch repair protein MutL (mutL) gene sequences revealed that these two novel strains belonged to the genus Faecalibacterium. On the basis of 16S rRNA and mutL gene sequence similarities, the type strains Faecalibacterium butyricigenerans AF52-21T(98.3-98.1 % and 79.0-79.5 % similarity), Faecalibacterium duncaniae A2-165T(97.8-97.9 % and 70.9-80.1 %), Faecalibacterium hattorii APC922/41-1T(97.1-97.3 % and 80.3-80.5 %), Faecalibacterium longum CM04-06T(97.8-98.0% and 78.3 %) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii ATCC 27768T(97.3-97.4 % and 82.7-82.9 %) were the closest neighbours to the novel strains HLW78T and CYL33. Strains HLW78T and CYL33 had 99.4 % both the 16S rRNA and mutL gene sequence similarities, 97.9 % average nucleotide identity (ANI), 96.3 % average amino acid identity (AAI), and 80.5 % digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values, indicating that these two strains are members of the same species. Phylogenomic tree analysis indicated that strains HLW78T and CYL33 formed an independent robust cluster together with F. prausnitzii ATCC 27768T. The ANI, AAI and dDDH values between strain HLW78T and its closest neighbours were below the species delineation thresholds of 77.6-85.1 %, 71.4-85.2 % and 28.3-30.9 %, respectively. The two novel strains could be differentiated from the type strains of their closest Faecalibacterium species based on their cellular fatty acid compositions, which contained C18 : 1  ω7c and lacked C15 : 0 and C17 : 1  ω6c, respectively. Phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic test results demonstrated that the two novel strains HLW78T and CYL33 represented a single, novel species within the genus Faecalibacterium, for which the name Faecalibacterium taiwanense sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is HLW78T (=BCRC 81397T=NBRC 116372T).

Molecular Detection and Identification of Plant-Associated Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is a lactic acid bacterium often isolated from a wide variety of niches. Its ubiquity can be explained by a large, flexible genome that helps it adapt to different habitats. The consequence of this is great strain diversity, which may make their identification difficult. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of molecular techniques, both culture-dependent, and culture-independent, currently used to detect and identify L. plantarum. Some of the techniques described can also be applied to the analysis of other lactic acid bacteria.

Comparison of Real-Time PCR and Droplet Digital PCR for the Quantitative Detection of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is one of the newest and most promising tools providing absolute quantification of target DNA molecules. Despite its emerging applications in microorganisms, few studies reported its use for detecting lactic acid bacteria. This study evaluated the applicability of a ddPCR assay targeting molecular genes obtained from in silico analysis for detecting Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, a bacterium mainly used as a starter or responsible for fermentation in food. The performance characteristics of a ddPCR were compared to those of a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). To compare the linearity and sensitivity of a qPCR and ddPCR, the calibration curve for a qPCR and the regression curve for a ddPCR were obtained using genomic DNA [102−108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] extracted from a pure culture and spiked food sample. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays exhibited good linearity with a high coefficient of determination in the pure culture and spiked food sample (R2 ≥ 0.996). The ddPCR showed a 10-fold lower limit of detection, suggesting that a ddPCR is more sensitive than a qPCR. However, a ddPCR has limitations in the absolute quantitation of high bacterial concentrations (>106 CFU/mL). In conclusion, a ddPCR can be a reliable method for detecting and quantifying lactic acid bacteria in food.