Slow but Steady-The Responsiveness of Sympathoadrenal System to a Hypoglycemic Challenge in Ketogenic Diet-Fed Rats

Still Excited, but Less Aroused-The Effects of Nutritional Ketosis on Epinephrine Response and Hypothalamic Orexin Neuron Activation Following Recurrent Hypoglycemia in Diabetic Rats

Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) is a serious, life-threatening complication of intensive insulin therapy, particularly in people with type 1 diabetes. The ketogenic diet is reported to beneficially affect glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes, however its effects on the neurohormonal counterregulatory response to recurrent hypoglycemia and HAAF development are understudied. In this study we used Sprague Dawley rats to establish a HAAF model under non-diabetic and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic conditions and determined how nutritional ketosis affected the neurohormonal counterregulation and the activity of energy-sensing orexin (OX) neurons. We found that antecedent hypoglycemia diminished the sympathoexcitatory epinephrine response to subsequent hypoglycemia in chow-fed non-diabetic rats, but this did not occur in STZ-diabetic animals. In all cases a ketogenic diet preserved the epinephrine response. Contrary to expectations, STZ-diabetic keto-fed rats showed reduced OX activity in the recurrent hypoglycemia group, which did not occur in any other group. It is possible that the reduced activation of OX neurons is an adaptation aimed at energy conservation accompanied by diminished arousal and exploratory behaviour. Our data suggests that while a ketogenic diet has beneficial effects on glycemia, and epinephrine response, the reduced activation of OX neurons could be detrimental and warrants further investigation.

Beta Blockers can mask not only Hypoglycemia, but also Hypotension

Background:

Beta-adrenergic (β-AR) receptor blockers (BBs) are an essential class of drugs as they have numerous indications. On the other hand, they have numerous unwanted effects which decrease the compliance, adherence, and persistence of this very useful group of drugs.

Objective:

The paper aims to analyze the possibility that an unnoticed side effect may contribute to a less favorable pharmacologic profile of BBs, e.g., a diminished reaction to a sudden fall in BP.

Methods:

We searched two medical databases for abstracts and citations (Medline and SCOPUS). Moreover, we searched the internet for drug prescription leaflets (of the individual BBs).

Results:

Whichever cause of stress is considered, the somatic manifestations of stress will be (partially) masked if a patient takes BB. Stress–induced hypercatecholaminemia acts on β-AR of cardiomyocytes; it increases heart rate and contractility, effects suppressed by BBs. The answers of the organism to hypoglycemia and hypotension share the main mechanisms such as sympathetic nervous system activation and hypercatecholaminemia. Thus, there is a striking analogy: BBs can cover up symptoms of both hypoglycemia (which is widely known) and of hypotension (which is not recognized). It is widely known that BBs can cause hypotension. However, they can also complicate recovery by spoiling the defense mechanisms in hypotension as they interfere with the crucial compensatory reflex to increase blood pressure in hypotension.

Conclusion:

Beta blockers can cause hypotension, mask it, and make recovery more difficult. This is clinically important and deserves to be more investigated and probably to be stated as a warning.