The Impact of Meal Dietary Inflammatory Index on Exercise-Induced Changes in Airway Inflammation in Adults with Asthma

Effect of dietary interventions on markers of type 2 inflammation in asthma: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 (T2) inflammation is a key mechanism in the pathophysiology of asthma. Diet may have immunomodulatory effects, and a role for diet in T2 inflammation has been suggested in the literature. Indeed, diet and food allergies play a role in children with atopic asthma, but less is known about diet in relation to adult asthma, which is often non-atopic.

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of dietary interventions on markers of T2 inflammation in adults with asthma.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for eligible studies until December 2022. We included studies of all types of foods, nutrients, diets or supplements, either as an exposure or as an intervention, in adults and adolescents with asthma. Outcomes of interest included the T2 biomarkers FeNO, eosinophils, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil peroxidase. The methodological quality of eligible studies was systematically evaluated, and the results were summarised according to dietary clusters.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified studies on the dietary clusters antioxidants (n = 14), fatty acids, (n = 14), Mediterranean-style diets (n = 5), phytotherapy (n = 7), prebiotics & probiotics (n = 8), vitamin D (n = 7), and other dietary factors (n = 5). Studies within the phytotherapy and omega-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) clusters showed possible improvements in T2 inflammation. Furthermore, we found little evidence for an effect of antioxidants, prebiotics & probiotics, and Mediterranean-style diets on T2 inflammation. However, heterogeneity in study protocols, methodological shortcomings and limited power of almost all studies make it difficult to fully determine the impact of different dietary approaches on T2 inflammation in asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the current evidence does not support a specific dietary intervention to improve T2 inflammation in asthma. Interventions involving phytotherapy and omega-3 PUFA currently have the best evidence and warrant further evaluation in well-designed and adequately powered studies, while taking into account T2-high phenotypes of asthma.

Dietary Inflammatory Index and Clinical Outcome Measures in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Diet is increasingly recognized as a modifiable factor in lung health, predominantly due to the immunomodulatory effects of nutrients. The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is a score developed to express the inflammatory potential of a diet.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the association of the DII and food groups, with clinical, functional, and inflammatory asthma outcomes in adults with asthma.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe asthma were included in this cross-sectional study between June 2019 and October 2021, and completed a 3-day food diary, to calculate the DII and intake of food groups (ie, fruits, whole grains, processed meats, and sugar-sweetened beverages). Functional outcomes included pulmonary function tests and the 6-minute walking distance, whereas clinical outcomes were assessed using questionnaires on asthma control, quality of life, and health care utilization. Inflammatory markers were exhaled nitric oxide and blood leukocytes, eosinophils, and IL-6. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association of DII and food groups with asthma outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients participated (35% male, mean ± standard deviation age 51.8 ± 14.2 years, body mass index 27.4 ± 5.3 kg/m2). Overall, 62% had a DII score >0, indicating a proinflammatory diet, which was not related to asthma severity. A more proinflammatory diet was consistently associated with lower forced vital capacity (%pred), but inconsistent results were observed with respect to airway obstruction. Neither the DII nor food groups were associated with clinical outcomes. Except for higher levels of exhaled nitric oxide in relation to an anti-inflammatory diet, we found no associations between inflammatory markers and the DII.

CONCLUSION

Results from this cross-sectional study among patients with moderate-to-severe asthma do not support the hypothesis that a proinflammatory diet is associated with worse asthma outcomes, although limitations in study design and dietary intake estimation should be considered. Future well-designed experimental studies are needed to assess whether targeting the inflammatory potential of diet could lead to better outcomes in adults with asthma.

Diet-Related Inflammation Is Associated with Worse COVID-19 Outcomes in the UK Biobank Cohort

Diet, the most important modulator of inflammatory and immune responses, may affect COVID-19 incidence and disease severity. Data from 196,154 members of the UK biobank had at least one 24 h dietary recall. COVID-19 outcomes were based on PCR testing, hospital admissions, and death certificates. Adjusted Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dietary inflammatory index (DII)/energy-adjusted DII (E-DII) scores. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, smoking status, physical activity, and sleep duration. Between January 2020 and March 2021, there were 11,288 incident COVID-19 cases, 1270 COVID-19-related hospitalizations, and 315 COVID-19-related deaths. The fully adjusted model showed that participants in the highest (vs. lowest) DII/E-DII quintile were at 10-17% increased risk of COVID-19 (DII: RR _{Q5 vs}. _Q1 = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, P_trend < 0.001; E-DII: RR _{Q5 vs}. _Q1 = 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.24, P_trend < 0.001) and ≈40% higher risk was observed for disease severity (DII: RR _{Q5 vs}. _Q1 = 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.67, P_trend < 0.001; E-DII: RR _{Q5 vs}. _Q1 = 1.39, 95% CI 1.16-1.66, P_trend < 0.001). There was a 43% increased risk of COVID-19-related death in the highest DII quintile (RR _{Q5 vs}. _Q1 = 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.01, P_trend = 0.04). About one-quarter of the observed positive associations between DII and COVID-19-related outcomes were mediated by body mass index (25.8% for incidence, 21.6% for severity, and 19.8% for death). Diet-associated inflammation increased the risk of COVID-19 infection, severe disease, and death.

The dietary inflammatory index and its association with the prevalence of hypertension: A cross-sectional study

Aims

We aim to investigate the association of the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) with the prevalence of hypertension in a large multiracial population in the United States.

Methods

Participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (1999-2018) were included in this cross-sectional study. Dietary information was obtained and used to calculate DII. Blood pressures of participants were measured by experienced examiners. The NHANES used the method of "stratified multistage probability sampling," and this study is a weight analysis following the NHANES analytic guidance. Weight logistic regression analysis was adopted to investigate the association of hypertension with DII. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was carried out to screen the most important dietary factors associated with the risk of hypertension. Moreover, a nomogram model based on key dietary factors was established; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of the nomogram model for screening hypertension risk.

Results

A total of 45,023 participants were included in this study, representing 191 million residents in the United States. Participants with hypertension had an elevated DII compared with those without hypertension. Weight logistic regression showed that an increment of DII was strongly associated with hypertension after adjusting for confounding factors. The nomogram model, based on key dietary factors screened by LASSO regression, showed a favorable discriminatory power with an area under the curve (AUC) of 78.5% (95% CI: 78.5%-79.3%). Results of the sensitivity analysis excluding participants who received any drug treatment were consistent with those in the main analysis.

Conclusion

An increment of DII is associated with the risk of hypertension. For better prevention and treatment of hypertension, more attention should be paid to controlling dietary inflammation.