The Relationship among Bowel [18]F-FDG PET Uptake, Pathological Complete Response, and Eating Habits in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Incidence of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients are increasingly affected by chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction. The reported incidence of this condition vary significantly across different studies.

HYPOTHESIS

A better comprehensive understanding of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction incidence in cancer patients is imperative. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to establish the overall incidence of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients.

METHODS

We searched articles in PubMed and EMBASE from database inception to May 1, 2023. Studies that reported the incidence of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients were included.

RESULTS

A total of 53 studies involving 35 651 individuals were finally included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients was 63.21 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 57.28-69.14). The chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction incidence increased steeply within half a year of cancer chemotherapy. Also, the trend of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction incidence appeared to have plateaued after a longer duration of follow-up. In addition, chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction incidence rates are significantly higher among patients with age ≥50 years versus patients with age <50 years (99.96 vs. 34.48 per 1000 person-years). The incidence rate of cardiac dysfunction was higher among breast cancer patients (72.97 per 1000 person-years), leukemia patients (65.21 per 1000 person-years), and lymphoma patients (55.43 per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis unveiled a definitive overall incidence rate of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients. In addition, it was found that the risk of developing this condition escalates within the initial 6 months postchemotherapy, subsequently tapering off to become statistically insignificant after a duration of 6 years.

Common Misconceptions about Diet and Breast Cancer: An Unclear Issue to Dispel

Breast cancer (BC) constitutes a prevalent health condition among women. Recent years have witnessed the identification of dietary proto-oncogenic factors that deserve attention. Besides the well-known role of alcohol and red and processed meat in BC development, the impact of other dietary components remains unclear. Our narrative review aims to explore the diet-BC relationship, focusing on sugar, dairy, and soy consumption. We conducted a PubMed literature search covering the last decade (2013-2023) and included 35 papers. We found limited evidence on the association between high sugar intake and BC incidence. On the other hand, dairy and soy consumption displayed a protective effect in the majority of the analyzed papers. However, a significant degree of heterogeneity was reported among the results. Menopausal status and the specific BC molecular subtypes were the main factors influencing the interpretation of the results. Exploring dietary factors and BC revealed inconsistencies: high glycemic index post-menopause may be a risk factor, while sugar-sweetened drinks and artificial sweeteners yielded conflicting results; fermented dairy showed potential benefits, non-fermented dairy presented inconsistent findings; soy impact on BC varied according to molecular subtype, with some studies suggesting a positive association in luminal-like BC. Hence, further investigation is crucial to obtain a uniform consensus on the diet-BC relationship.

Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Value in Non-Communicable Diseases

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) constitute the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with the four major contributors being cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancers, respiratory diseases, and diabetes [...].

Profiling the Spectrum of Headache Disorders on 440 Breast Cancer Patients: Highlights on Clinical and Pathological Mechanisms

Although widely studied, the association between migraines (M) and breast cancer (BC) risk remains evasive. In this prospective single-center study, 440 early or locally advanced BC patients were enrolled at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital. Clinical and demographical data were collected. Those who suffered from headaches were evaluated with the International Classification of Headache Disorders. M was found to be significantly more prevalent in BC patients: 56.1% versus an expected prevalence of 17% in the global population. M patients showed a higher risk of having stage II or III BC than stage I, which was more frequently found in the non-headache population. Interestingly, the frequency of headache attacks was positively correlated with estrogen (r = 0.11, p = 0.05) and progesterone (r = 0.15, p = 0.007) expression, especially in patients with migraine without aura. The higher the expression of hormone receptors in BC, the higher the headache frequency. Moreover, patients suffering from headaches showed an overall earlier onset of BC. Our findings challenge the idea of a net preventive role of M on BC, suggesting a rather complex interaction in which M mostly influences some BC subtypes and vice versa. Further multi-center studies with extended follow-up are needed.

Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women: Could Gut Microbiota Make a Difference?-"BiotaCancerSurvivors": A Case-Control Study

In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the "16S rRNA" gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called 'GutHealth_DB'. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.28 × 10^-12 for the Chao index and p = 1.64 × 10^-12 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p = 9.99 × 10^-5) and Anosim (p = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.