Gut Symptoms during FODMAP Restriction and Symptom Response to Food Challenges during FODMAP Reintroduction: A Real-World Evaluation in 21,462 Participants Using a Mobile Application

Exploring Dietitians' Perspectives Toward Current Practices and Services in Relation to Irritable Bowel Syndrome Management in Clinical Settings Across the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal condition that negatively impacts quality of life. Dietary triggers are common and dietary management is central to the IBS treatment pathway, and dietitians are the main education providers for patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore dietitians' perspectives on current practices and services in relation to IBS management in clinical settings across the United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken from May to October 2021 via videoconferencing software. Eligible participants were dietitians specializing in gastroenterology and working in National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in the United Kingdom. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed following intelligent transcription. Template analysis guided by naïve realism and its underlying epistemological assumptions was used.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Dietitians (N = 13) working in various NHS Trusts across the United Kingdom with at least 1 year of clinical experience in IBS management were included.

QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS

Template analysis, a form of thematic analysis with hierarchical coding, was used to explore dietitians' perspectives of IBS practices.

RESULTS

Participating dietitians were mostly female (92.3%), of White race (84.6%), working in various NHS Trusts across the United Kingdom, and had more than 5 years of clinical experience (69.2%). The following 3 main themes emerged: 1) dietetics services as part of IBS referral pathways; 2) practices in relation to dietetics services; and 3) patients' expectations and feelings. Each main theme had subthemes to facilitate the description and interpretation of data. The increasing number of IBS referrals to dietitians and the need for accurate and timely IBS diagnosis and specialist dietitians were reported, along with the use of digital innovation to facilitate practice and access to dietetic care. The use of internet as a source of (mis)information by patients and the limited time available for educating patients were identified as potential barriers to dietetic practice. Dietitians follow a patient-centered approach to dietary counseling and recognize the negative implications of perceived IBS-related stigma by patients on their feelings and treatment expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified areas and practices that can facilitate access to dietetic services and patient-centered care in IBS management, as outlined in UK-based guidelines.

Digital Health Interventions Are Effective for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions (DHIs) could be a valuable self-management tool for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but little research exists on IBS-focused DHIs and their effectiveness. This review aimed to identify DHIs for IBS and evaluate their characteristics, effectiveness, and feasibility.

METHODS

Our study team, including patient partners, conducted a systematic review using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL from database inception to May 2024. Experimental and observational studies evaluating DHIs designed for use by IBS patients were included. Data extraction and assessment included study and DHI characteristics, effectiveness outcomes (symptom severity, quality of life, psychological indices, patient empowerment), and feasibility measures (adherence, usability, user satisfaction). Study quality and bias were assessed using a modified checklist of Downs and Black.

RESULTS

Of the 929 identified, 13 studies of DHIs were included and deemed good quality on average (21,510 total participants) with six primary areas of focus: education, diet, brain-gut behavior skills, physiological support, health monitoring, and community engagement. Most DHIs were self-directed and reported statistically significant improvements in most effectiveness outcomes. Evidence suggests that DHIs focusing on brain-gut behavior skills or health monitoring may be most effective compared to other types of DHIs. However, their feasibility remains unclear, and the generalization of their impacts is limited.

CONCLUSION

This review underscores the potential of DHIs in supporting IBS patients and improving their outcomes. However, additional research is warranted for continued intervention use in this population, including assessments on feasibility, safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient empowerment and experiences.

A service evaluation of FODMAP restriction, FODMAP reintroduction and long-term follow-up in the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

The dietary restriction of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs), called the low-FODMAP diet (LFD), is frequently used to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This service evaluation aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of the LFD in managing IBS symptoms and whether symptom response and dietary adherence to the LFD were associated.

METHODS

This observational service evaluation collected data via questionnaires during clinical dietetic appointments for IBS management. Symptom severity was reported at baseline, short term (following FODMAP restriction) and long term (following FODMAP reintroduction). Additional data that captured experiences following the LFD were collected at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 184 patients, 14% reported satisfactory relief from global symptoms at baseline, which increased to 69% at short-term follow-up and 57% at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). The most notable improvements in individual symptoms between baseline and long-term follow-up were abdominal bloating (72% baseline, 48% long term, p < 0.001), abdominal pain (61% baseline, 30% long term, p < 0.001) and flatulence (71% baseline, 40% long term, p < 0.001). High adherence with the LFD at short-term follow-up was not associated with long-term symptom improvement, but there was an association between long-term adherence and global symptom severity (p = 0.032). Completion of FODMAP reintroduction as per protocol was associated with long-term symptom improvement (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The LFD is an effective treatment for managing IBS symptoms in the long term, particularly, when the diet is adhered to and reintroduction is completed as per dietetic education. Further randomised-controlled trials are required to explore the cause-and-effect relationship between LFD and IBS symptom management.

Comparison of 4-week versus 8-week dietitian-led FODMAP diet group education sessions in tertiary care clinical practice for irritable bowel syndrome: A service evaluation

BACKGROUND

The implementation of the fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can be effectively delivered by dietitians in group settings. The initial FODMAP restriction phase is recommended to be followed for 4 weeks; however, limited efficacy data exist for 4-week FODMAP restriction in group education clinical practice.

METHODS

We aimed to compare 4-week versus 8-week FODMAP group treatment pathways on clinical outcomes using a prospective service evaluation design of IBS patients attending FODMAP restriction (baseline) and reintroduction (follow-up) group sessions (between 2015 and 2019). Clinical outcomes included global symptom question (GSQ) measuring satisfactory relief, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), stool frequency (SF), stool consistency using Bristol stool form scale (BSFS), diet acceptability, patient satisfaction with group sessions and dietary adherence. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in treatment effects when clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 284) included were aged 18 to 86 years (mean ± SD [standard deviation], 44.6 ± 15.5), 80% female, and were split into 4-week (41%, 117/284) versus 8-week (59%, 167/284) pathways with no differences in baseline characteristics. Mean ± SD time gap between baseline and follow-up was 4.6 ± 0.9 weeks in the 4-week pathway and 9.6 ± 3.3 weeks in the 8-week pathway. When groups were compared at follow-up, no statistical differences were observed in any measures (GSQ, GSRS, SF, BSFS, dietary adherence, diet acceptability and patient satisfaction).

CONCLUSION

A 4-week dietitian-led group FODMAP treatment pathway is as clinically effective and maintains patient acceptability when compared to 8-weeks and should be considered as part of routine clinical practice.

Dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome: considerations, challenges, and solutions

Diet is a cornerstone in the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There is evidence of efficacy across the spectrum of dietary management strategies, including some supplements (eg, specific fibres), foods, and whole diets (eg, a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols [known as the low-FODMAP diet]). Whole-diet interventions, in particular those that restrict intake, can be challenging to deliver effectively and safely. Factors to consider include patient demographics, food cost and availability, and the acceptability of dietary management and its impact on food-related quality of life. There is concern regarding a potential role of restrictive whole-diet interventions in eating disorder risk. Optimal approaches to delivering dietary management in the health-care setting are unclear. The aim of this Review is to summarise the clinical evidence for the dietary management of IBS; to discuss the challenges, burdens, and risks of dietary management; and to propose how these challenges, burdens, and risks should be mitigated and minimised in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Findings of a Blinded Randomized Reintroduction Phase for the Low FODMAP Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The efficacy of a low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is well established. After the elimination period, a reintroduction phase aims to identify triggers. We studied the impact of a blinded reintroduction using FODMAP powders to objectively identify triggers and evaluated the effect on symptoms, quality of life, and psychosocial comorbidities.

METHODS

Responders to a 6-week low FODMAP diet, defined by a drop in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) compared with baseline, entered a 9-week blinded randomized reintroduction phase with 6 FODMAP powders (fructans, fructose, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol) or control (glucose). A rise in IBS-SSS (≥50 points) defined a FODMAP trigger. Patients completed daily symptom diaries and questionnaires for quality of life and psychosocial comorbidities.

RESULTS

In 117 recruited patients with IBS, IBS-SSS improved significantly after the elimination period compared with baseline (150 ± 116 vs 301 ± 97, P < .0001, 80% responders). Symptom recurrence was triggered in 85% of the FODMAP powders, by an average of 2.5 ± 2 FODMAPs/patient. The most prevalent triggers were fructans (56%) and mannitol (54%), followed by galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, fructose, sorbitol, and glucose (respectively 35%, 28%, 27%, 23%, and 26%) with a significant increase in abdominal pain at day 1 for sorbitol/mannitol, day 2 for fructans/galacto-oligosaccharides, and day 3 for lactose.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the significant benefit of the low FODMAP diet in tertiary-care IBS. A blinded reintroduction revealed a personalized pattern of symptom recurrence, with fructans and mannitol as the most prevalent, and allows the most objective identification of individual FODMAP triggers. Ethical commission University hospital of Leuven reference number: s63629; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04373304.

Evolution, adaptation, and new applications of the FODMAP diet

The FODMAP diet has been a treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) for many years. Rigorous scientific evaluation and clinical application of the FODMAP diet have generated deep understanding regarding clinical efficacy, mechanisms of action, and potential adverse effects of this dietary approach. In turn, this knowledge has allowed fine-tuning of the diet to optimize treatment benefits and minimize risks, in the form of the traditional three-phase diet; the FODMAP-gentle approach, which is a less restrictive iteration; and a proposed FODMAP-modified, Mediterranean-style diet which endeavours to optimise both gastrointestinal symptoms and other health parameters. Furthermore, recognition that IBS-like symptoms feature in other conditions has seen the FODMAP diet tested in non-IBS populations, including in older adults with diarrhea and women with endometriosis. These areas represent new frontiers for the FODMAP diet and a space to watch as future research evaluates the validity of these novel clinical applications.

A dietitian-led low-FODMAP diet webinar: a pre-post study evaluating its impact on symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that the low fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet improves irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms when delivered by a dietitian. However, demand for dietetic appointments exceeds supply. Prerecorded webinars are acceptable and cost-effective for delivering first-line IBS dietary advice.

METHODOLOGY

This study, using a pre-post design, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-FODMAP diet restriction phase webinar at improving IBS symptoms. Participants with self-reported IBS symptoms were asked to report their IBS symptoms, stool frequency, stool consistency and IBS medication use, before and 8 weeks postwebinar via an online questionnaire. The presence and severity of participants' symptoms and bowel habits were captured using validated tools and a global symptom question.

RESULTS

In total 228 participants responded to both pre- and postsurveys. A statistically significant improvement in all symptoms was observed 8 weeks postwebinar (p < 0.05). The proportion of participants rating their overall symptoms as moderate-to-severe reduced from 85.5% at baseline to 34.6% postwebinar (50.9% reduction [p < 0.001]). The proportion of participants reporting normal stool consistency and frequency significantly increased postwebinar (23.2%-39.9% [p < 0.001] and 76.3%-89% [p < 0.001], respectively). Satisfactory relief of symptoms increased from 16.7% to 53.1%, (p < 0.001) 8 weeks postwebinar.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are comparable with literature on the efficacy of face-to-face delivery of low-FODMAP diet education. Dietitians should consider directing triaged patients with IBS, who have tried first-line dietary advice, to this webinar as an alternative or alongside current practice.

The Role of the FODMAP Diet in IBS

The low FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol) diet is a beneficial therapeutic approach for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, how the low FODMAP diet works is still not completely understood. These mechanisms encompass not only traditionally known factors such as luminal distension induced by gas and water but also recent evidence on the role of FOMAPs in the modulation of visceral hypersensitivity, increases in intestinal permeability, the induction of microbiota changes, and the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), as well as metabolomics and alterations in motility. Although most of the supporting evidence is of low quality, recent trials have confirmed its effectiveness, even though the majority of the evidence pertains only to the restriction phase and its effectiveness in relieving abdominal bloating and pain. This review examines potential pathophysiological mechanisms and provides an overview of the existing evidence on the effectiveness of the low FODMAP diet across various IBS subtypes. Key considerations for its use include the challenges and disadvantages associated with its practical implementation, including the need for professional guidance, variations in individual responses, concerns related to microbiota, nutritional deficiencies, the development of constipation, the necessity of excluding an eating disorder before commencing the diet, and the scarcity of long-term data. Despite its recognized efficacy in symptom management, acknowledging these limitations becomes imperative for a nuanced comprehension of the role of a low FODMAP diet in managing IBS. By investigating its potential mechanisms and evidence across IBS subtypes and addressing emerging modulations alongside limitations, this review aims to serve as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, researchers, and patients navigating the intricate landscape of IBS.