Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Preclinical Study of Pharmacokinetics after Sublingual Administration of Taste-Masked Tablets for Potential Pediatric Use

Updates in Food Anaphylaxis Management

The management of food allergy has evolved over the past several years with regulatory approval of food allergy therapeutics as well as the common practice of oral immunotherapy. Whether a patient or family chooses one of these therapies or avoidance, they are still considered at risk of reaction, and thus clinicians still need to stay up to date with the latest advancements in the management of anaphylaxis in patients with food allergy. This review will highlight some of these updates, starting with the definition, diagnosis, and classifications of anaphylaxis. It will then review the latest updates in the management of food anaphylaxis in the community. Finally, the review will discuss the latest in epinephrine including recommendations on epinephrine dosing and novel routes of epinephrine administration.

A Buffered Local Anesthetic Without Epinephrine: Development, Characterization, and In Vivo Efficacy and Toxicity Analysis

Lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine (LW/E) is widely used to prevent pain during dental procedures and has been associated with injection sting, jittering effects, slow onset, and a bitter aftertaste. Since LW/E's introduction in 1948, no significant modifications have been proposed. This study aims to design and characterize an improved dental lidocaine HCl injectable formulation without epinephrine (LW/O/E) via buffers, sweeteners, and amino acids. LW/O/E injections were prepared with pH and osmolality values of 6.5-7.0 and 590-610 mOsm/kg. Using the electronic tongue (ETongue), the LW/O/E injectable formulations were characterized for viscosity, injectability, and taste analysis. The results were compared with the LW/E control. In vivo efficacy and anesthetic duration of the samples were measured through radiant heat tail-flick latency (RHTFL) and hot plate (HP) tests and local toxicity was assessed after a single intra-oral injection in Sprague Dawley rats (SDR). The viscosity and injectability values of the LW/O/E samples were found to be comparable to the LW/E injection. ETongue taste analysis showed an improvement in bitterness reduction of the LW/O/E samples compared to the LW/E formulation. Toxicity studies of samples in SDR showed minor and transient signs of erythema/eschar and edema. Anesthetic duration via RHTFL and HP paw withdrawal latency time in SDR were found to be comparable for the LW/O/E Sample 3A and the LW/E injection (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the buffered, higher osmolality and reduced bitterness developed LW/O/E formulation (Sample 3A) could be considered a promising alternative to the LW/E formulation for dental use.

Investigation of the underuse of adrenaline (epinephrine) and prognosis among patients with anaphylaxis at emergency department admission

Background

Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal condition; in severe cases of anaphylaxis, the cardiovascular system is often heavily involved. Adrenaline (epinephrine) is a cornerstone of the initial treatment of anaphylaxis. The use of epinephrine remains below expectations in clinical practice. Whether the underuse of epinephrine affects the prognosis of patients with anaphylaxis is still unclear.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included patients with anaphylaxis between 2011 and 2020 who were admitted to an emergency department (ED) in Taiwan. All patients were divided into two groups based on the use of epinephrine (or not), and we compared the demographic characteristics, allergens, clinical manifestations, management, and patient outcomes.

Results

We reviewed the records of 314 subjects (216 males, 98 females; mean age: 52.78 ± 16.02 years) who visited our ED due to anaphylaxis; 107 (34.1%) and 207 (65.9%) patients were categorized into the epinephrine use group and the non-epinephrine use group, respectively. Arrival via ambulance (p = 0.019), hypotension (p = 0.002), airway compromise (p < 0.001) and altered consciousness (p < 0.001) were the deciding factors for epinephrine use among anaphylactic patients in the ED. The epinephrine use group had higher rates of other inotropic agent usage and fluid challenge. More than 90% of patients received bed rest, steroids, antihistamines, and monitoring. The epinephrine use group had a longer ED length of stay (387.64 ± 374.71 vs. 313.06 ± 238.99 min, p = 0.03) and a greater need of hospitalization. Among all severe symptoms, hypotension was the most tolerated decision factor for not using epinephrine. In this retrospective analysis, some patients with serious anaphylaxis did not experience adverse outcomes or death even without the use of epinephrine at ED admission. Emergent care focuses first on the airway, breathing, and circulation (ABC) and may compensate for the underusage of epinephrine. This could be the reason why epinephrine was underused among patients with anaphylaxis in the ED.

Conclusion

In summary, early ABC management continues to play an important role in treating patients with severe anaphylaxis, even when epinephrine is not immediately available in clinical scenarios.

Evaluation and Optimization of Prolonged Release Mucoadhesive Tablets of Dexamethasone for Wound Healing: In Vitro–In Vivo Profiling in Healthy Volunteers

The aim of the projected study was to design and develop a novel strategy for evaluating the mucoadhesive potential of polymeric tablets of dexamethasone (DXM) for local delivery against wounds. Therefore, formulations (Q1–Q7) were synthesized via direct compression method by varying the concentrations of polymers, i.e., ethyl cellulose (EC) and agar extract (AG). Moreover, the mucoadhesive polymeric tablets were characterized via physicochemical, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments. However, physicochemical characteristics such as FTIR showed no interaction with different polymeric combination. Surface pH of all formulations was normal to slightly alkaline. Highest hydration of up to 6.22% and swelling index was comprehended with maximum concentration of AG (50% of total tablet weight). Whereas, ex vivo and in vivo residence time and mucoadhesion were attributed to the increased concentrations of polymers. Moreover, Q7, (optimized formulation), containing 10% of EC and 40% of AG, exhibited maximum release of DXM (100%) over 8 h, along with sufficient mucoadhesive strength up to 11.73 g, following first-order kinetics having r² value of 0.9778. Hemostatic effects and epithelialization for triggering and promoting wound healing were highly pronounced in cases of Q7. Furthermore, in vivo residence time was 7.84 h followed by salivary drug concentration (4.2 µg/mL). However, mucoadhesive buccal tablets showed stability for 6 months, thus following the standardization (ICH-Iva) stability zone. In summary, DXM mucoadhesive tablets seem to be an ideal candidate for eradication of wound infections via local targeted delivery.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Anaphylaxis

The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review the literature and develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of anaphylaxis, with an emphasis on a field-based perspective. The review also included literature regarding the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of anaphylaxis. The increasing prevalence of food allergies in the United States raises concern for a corresponding rise in the incidence of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular epinephrine is the primary treatment for anaphylaxis and should be administered before adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, and inhaled β agonists. For outdoor schools and organizations, selecting a method to administer epinephrine in the field is based on considerations of cost, safety, and first responder training, as well as federal guidelines and state-specific laws.

Orodispersible tablets for pediatric drug delivery: current challenges and recent advances

INTRODUCTION

Child appropriate dosage forms are indispensable in modern medicine and are a prerequisite for successful pediatric drug therapy. For years, experts have called for a paradigm shift, from liquid dosage forms to novel oral solid dosage forms. This review aims to shed light on recent developments in Orodispersible tablets (ODTs) and mini-tablets (ODMTs).

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the presentation and critical discussion of current challenges as well as recent advances in ODTs for pediatric drug delivery. Highlighted aspects are the evidence for acceptability by children, e.g. in comparison to other dosage forms, and limitations given by tablet size at different ages, as well as advances in special ODT formulations (taste masking, modified release, enabling formulations).

EXPERT OPINION

It is the authors' belief that OD(M)Ts have significant potential as dosage forms in pediatric therapy that has not yet been fully exploited. The reasons for this are, first, that the number of direct acceptance studies is extremely low and the resulting knowledge is therefore rather anecdotal. Despite the high relevance, there seems to be reluctance both in the therapeutic use and conduction of respective studies in children. However, if one combines the knowledge from the few existing studies, surveys, and from approved products, it becomes apparent that so far there is no evidence on limitations of the use of ODTs in pediatric patients.

Assessment of epinephrine sublingual stability and permeability pathways to enhance its permeability for the treatment of anaphylaxis

Prompt epinephrine (Epi) injection using auto-injectors is the initial life-saving out-of-hospital treatment for anaphylaxis. However, patients and healthcare providers are eagerly awaiting a more convenient alternative dosage form that would overcome auto-injectors drawbacks. Previously, we extensively evaluated multiple alternative fast-disintegrating sublingual Epi tablet (FDSTs) formulations. However, the sublingual stability of Epi and effect of modifying the sublingual microenvironment pH on its stability and transport pathways were not yet fully investigated. Results depicted that Epi remained sufficiently stable at various pHs in human saliva and porcine sublingual tissue's extract. Epi permeability (EP) through excised porcine sublingual membrane was greatest at pH 8.0 (p < 0.05), 11-fold higher than the negative control (Epi at pH 6.8). Sodium carbonate (Na Carb) 0.75% was the most efficient buffer to modify Epi solution pH to 8.0. Both sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) 0.075% and palmitoyl-DL-carnitine chloride (PCC) 1.2% increased paracellular EP 10-fold and 3-fold, respectively; however, both demonstrated a delayed enhancement (>5 min). Meanwhile, Na Carb and SDS combination increased EP 23-fold without a delay. It is evident that pH-modifiers or their SDS combination showed promising potential to enhance Epi sublingual permeability and further reduce the required Epi dose using FDSTs as a feasible alternative to Epi auto-injectors.

Autoinjector - A smart device for emergency cum personal therapy

Autoinjectors are self-injectable devices; they are important class of medical devices which can deliver drugs through subcutaneous or intramuscular route. They enclose prefilled syringes or cartridges which are driven by a spring system. The major benefits of this device are easy self-administration, improved patient compliance, reduced anxiety, and dosage accuracy. Immediate treatment during emergency conditions such as anaphylaxis, migraine, and status epilepticus or for chronic conditions like psoriasis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis, Reformulation of first-generation biologics, technical advancements, innovative designs, patient compliance, overwhelming interest for self-administration all these made entry of more and more autoinjectors into use. In this review, intensive efforts have been made for exploring the different types of currently available autoinjectors for the management of emergency and chronic diseases.

Epinephrine in anaphylaxis: too little, too late

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epinephrine is the agreed-upon first line treatment for anaphylaxis, yet it continues to be underused by patients/caregivers and providers alike.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are unfortunately limited data on how epinephrine can best be utilized in anaphylaxis, which hinders how best to inform patients and providers. Studies reporting underuse suggest various barriers and themes on why this may happen.

SUMMARY

Continued education of patients, caregivers, and providers is needed; however, is not likely to be enough to close the gap. Thus, novel studies on how to increase use; increase availability in a cost-effective manner; and newer, effective delivery routes are still needed.

Evaluating parameters affecting drug fate at the intramuscular injection site

Intramuscular (IM) injections are a well-established method of delivering a variety of therapeutics formulated for parenteral administration. While the wide range of commercial IM pharmaceuticals provide a wealth of pharmacokinetic (PK) information following injection, there remains an inadequate understanding of drug fate at the IM injection site that could dictate these PK outcomes. An improved understanding of injection site events could improve approaches taken by formulation scientists to identify therapeutically effective and consistent drug PK outcomes. Interplay between the typically non-physiological aspects of drug formulations and the homeostatic IM environment may provide insights into the fate of drugs at the IM injection site, leading to predictions of how a drug will behave post-injection in vivo. Immune responses occur by design after e.g. vaccine administration, however immune responses post-injection are not in the scope of this article. Taking cues from existing in vitro modelling technologies, the purpose of this article is to propose "critical parameters" of the IM environment that could be examined in hypothesis-driven studies. Outcomes of such studies might ultimately be useful in predicting and improving in vivo PK performance of IM injected drugs.

Emerging Therapies in Anaphylaxis: Alternatives to Intramuscular Administration of Epinephrine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening, systemic allergic reaction that should be recognized and treated promptly. Intramuscular (IM) epinephrine is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis and there are no absolute contraindications to its use. Despite its established track record of efficacy and safety, physicians and patients face barriers in the recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis, including the maintenance and appropriate use of epinephrine auto-injectors. This has led to investigation into potential alternatives to IM epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review investigates the current standard of care in the treatment of anaphylaxis, barriers to IM epinephrine use, and alternative therapies under investigation for administration in anaphylaxis. Alternative routes under investigation include intranasal, sublingual, inhaled, and needle-free intramuscular administration of epinephrine. There are currently numerous investigational alternatives to IM epinephrine therapy which could hold promise as future effective treatments in the emergent management of anaphylaxis.

AAAAI/ACAAI Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Surveillance Study (2013-2017): Fatalities, Infections, Delayed Reactions, and Use of Epinephrine Autoinjectors

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is highly effective but safety risks exist.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to: (1) identify clinical practices that could influence fatal and nonfatal systemic allergic reactions (SRs) to SCIT, and (2) identify SCIT-associated infections.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2016, 27% to 51% of American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology members completed an annual survey of SCIT-related SRs of varying severity. Injection-related local cutaneous and systemic infections were queried for 2014-2016. For 2014-2016, respondents were queried about timing of onset of SRs, postinjection waiting times, and prescription/use of epinephrine autoinjectors.

RESULTS

Data were gathered on 54.4 million injection visits (2008-2016). Two confirmed fatalities from SCIT occurred between 2008 and 2014. An additional 5 confirmed fatalities occurred between 2015 and 2017. No infections occurred in 17.3 million injection visits (2014-2016). Among practices monitoring patients for at least 30 minutes, 15% of SRs occurred after 30 minutes. Practices prescribing an epinephrine autoinjector >90% of the time (29% of practices) did not experience lower rates of delayed grade 3/4 SRs. Of patients experiencing grade 3/4 delayed SRs, 26% and 8% used prescribed self-injectable epinephrine devices during 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an unexplained slight increase in SCIT-related fatalities for 2015-2017, although mean annual reported events over 9 years (0.8 fatal reactions per year) have declined. SCIT-related infections were not identified during 2 years of surveillance. The 15% incidence of delayed-onset SRs (>30 minutes) is similar to a prior annual survey. Prescribing epinephrine autoinjectors for SCIT does not appear to improve outcomes, possibly due to low rates of self-administration.

In Vivo Evaluation of Taste-Masked Fast-Disintegrating Sublingual Tablets of Epinephrine Microcrystals

In community settings, IM injection of 0.3 mg epinephrine (Epi) using an auto-injector is the drug of choice for treatment of anaphylaxis. Previously, a taste-masking (TM) formulation of fast-disintegrating sublingual tablets (FDSTs) was developed in our lab. Also, Epi was micronized (Epi-MC) successfully and reduced the previously achieved bioequivalent sublingual Epi dose to 0.3 mg IM injection by half using non-taste-masked fast-disintegrating sublingual tablets (TM-FDSTs). Our objective for this study was to evaluate the sublingual absorption of Epi-MC using TM-FDST. These sublingual Epi tablets have potential for out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis and are suitable for human studies. TM-FDSTs containing Epi-MC were manufactured by direct compression. The rate and extent of Epi absorption from our developed 20 mg Epi-MC-TM-FDSTs (n = 5) were evaluated in rabbits and compared to the previous result from 20 mg Epi-MC in non-TM-FDSTs and EpiPen® auto-injector. Blood samples were collected over 1 h, and Epi concentrations were measured using HPLC with electrochemical detection. Mean ± SEM AUC0-1 h and Cmax from 20 mg Epi-MC-TM-FDSTs (733 ± 78 ng/ml/min and 30 ± 8 ng/ml) and 20 mg Epi-MC-non-TM-FDSTs (942 ± 109 ng/ml/min and 38 ± 4 ng/ml) were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from each other or from EpiPen® (592 ± 50 ng/ml/min and 28 ± 3 ng/ml) but were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than endogenous Epi after placebo FDSTs (220 ± 32 ng/ml/min and 8 ± 1 ng/ml). Mean ± SD Tmax was not significantly different (p > 0.05) among all formulations. Epi-MC-TM-FDSTs formulation improved Epi absorption twofold and reduced the required bioequivalent dose by 50%, similar to results obtained using non-TM-FDSTs. The incorporation of TM excipients did not interfere with the absorption of Epi-MC.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism in Canada: The Current Landscape-A Summary of This Indispensable Special Issue

Canadian Pharmaceutical Scientists have a rich history of groundbreaking research in pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism undertaken primarily throughout its Pharmacy Faculties and within the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology industry.[...].