1
|
Ghanavati E, Salehinejad MA, Beaupain MC, Melo L, Frese A, Kuo M, Nitsche MA. Contribution of Glutamatergic and GABAergic Mechanisms to the Plasticity-Modulating Effects of Dopamine in the Human Motor Cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2025; 46:e70162. [PMID: 39945316 PMCID: PMC11822652 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Dopamine, a key neuromodulator in the central nervous system, regulates cortical excitability and plasticity by interacting with glutamate and GABA receptors, which are affected by dopamine receptor subtypes (D1- and D2-like). Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques can induce plasticity and monitor cortical facilitation and inhibition in humans. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, we investigated how dopamine and D1- and D2-like receptors impact transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-induced plasticity concerning glutamatergic and GABAergic mechanisms. Eighteen healthy volunteers received 1 mA anodal (13 min) and cathodal tDCS (9 min) over the left motor cortex combined with the dopaminergic agents l-dopa (general dopamine activation), bromocriptine (D2-like receptor agonist), combined D2 antagonism via sulpiride and general dopaminergic activation via l-dopa to activate D1-like receptors, and placebo medication. Glutamate-related cortical facilitation and GABA-related cortical inhibition were monitored using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques, including I-O curve, intracortical facilitation (ICF), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and I-wave facilitation protocols. Our results indicate that anodal tDCS alone enhanced the I-O curve and ICF while decreasing SICI. Conversely, cathodal tDCS decreased the I-O curve and ICF while increasing SICI. General dopamine and D2 receptor activation combined with anodal tDCS decreased the I-O curve and ICF, but enhanced SICI compared to tDCS alone. When paired with cathodal tDCS, general Dopamine and D2-like receptor activity enhancement prolonged the cathodal tDCS effect on excitability. After anodal tDCS, D1-like receptor activation increased the I-O curve and ICF while reducing SICI. These effects were abolished with cathodal tDCS. Dopaminergic substances combined with anodal and cathodal tDCS did not have a significant effect on I-wave facilitation. These results suggest that D1-like receptor activation enhanced LTP-like plasticity and abolished LTD-like plasticity via glutamatergic NMDA receptor enhancement, while global dopaminergic and D2-like receptor enhancement weakened LTP-like but strengthened LTD-like plasticity primarily via glutamatergic NMDA receptor activity diminution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Ghanavati
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
- Department of PsychologyRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
| | - Mohammad Ali Salehinejad
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
- School of Cognitive SciencesInstitute for Research in Fundamental SciencesTehranIran
| | - Marie C. Beaupain
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
- Department of PsychologyRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
| | - Lorena Melo
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
| | - Amba Frese
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
- International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr University BochumBochumGermany
| | - Min‐Fang Kuo
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
| | - Michael A. Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and NeurosciencesLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
- Bielefeld University, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of Bethel FoundationUniversity Clinic of Psychiatry PsychotherapyBielefeldGermany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG)BochumGermany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sohn MN, Brown JC, Sharma P, Ziemann U, McGirr A. Pharmacological adjuncts and transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity: a systematic review. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2024; 49:E59-E76. [PMID: 38359933 PMCID: PMC10890793 DOI: 10.1503/jpn.230090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neurostimulation modality that has been used to study human synaptic plasticity. Leveraging work in ex vivo preparations, mechanistically informed pharmacological adjuncts to TMS have been used to improve our fundamental understanding of TMS-induced synaptic plasticity. METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature pairing pharmacological adjuncts with TMS plasticity-induction protocols in humans. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase from 2013 to Mar. 10, 2023. Studies published before 2013 were extracted from a previous systematic review. We included studies using repetitive TMS, theta-burst stimulation, paired associative stimulation, and quadripulse stimulation paradigms in healthy and clinical populations. RESULTS Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria (28 in healthy and 8 in clinical populations). Most pharmacological agents have targeted the glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 15 studies) or dopamine receptors (13 studies). The NMDA receptor is necessary for TMS-induced plasticity; however, sufficiency has not been shown across protocols. Dopaminergic modulation of TMS-induced plasticity appears to be dose-dependent. The GABAergic, cholinergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems have small evidence bases supporting modulation of TMS-induced plasticity, as do voltage-gated calcium and sodium channels. Studies in clinical populations suggest that pharmacological adjuncts to TMS may rescue motor cortex plasticity, with implications for therapeutic applications of TMS and a promising clinical trial in depression. LIMITATIONS This review is limited by the predominance in the literature of studies with small sample sizes and crossover designs. CONCLUSION Pharmacologically enhanced TMS largely parallels findings from ex vivo preparations. As this area expands and novel targets are tested, adequately powered samples in healthy and clinical populations will inform the mechanisms of TMS-induced plasticity in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myren N Sohn
- From the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann)
| | - Joshua C Brown
- From the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann)
| | - Prayushi Sharma
- From the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann)
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- From the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann)
| | - Alexander McGirr
- From the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D'Urso G, Toscano E, Barone A, Palermo M, Dell'Osso B, Di Lorenzo G, Mantovani A, Martinotti G, Fornaro M, Iasevoli F, de Bartolomeis A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for bipolar depression: systematic reviews of clinical evidence and biological underpinnings. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2023; 121:110672. [PMID: 36332699 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Despite multiple available treatments for bipolar depression (BD), many patients face sub-optimal responses. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been advocated in the management of different conditions, including BD, especially in treatment-resistant cases. The optimal dose and timing of tDCS, the mutual influence with other concurrently administered interventions, long-term efficacy, overall safety, and biological underpinnings nonetheless deserve additional assessment. The present study appraised the existing clinical evidence about tDCS for bipolar depression, delving into the putative biological underpinnings with a special emphasis on cellular and molecular levels, with the ultimate goal of providing a translational perspective on the matter. Two separate systematic reviews across the PubMed database since inception up to August 8th 2022 were performed, with fourteen clinical and nineteen neurobiological eligible studies. The included clinical studies encompass 207 bipolar depression patients overall and consistently document the efficacy of tDCS, with a reduction in depression scores after treatment ranging from 18% to 92%. The RCT with the largest sample clearly showed a significant superiority of active stimulation over sham. Mild-to-moderate and transient adverse effects are attributed to tDCS across these studies. The review of neurobiological literature indicates that several molecular mechanisms may account for the antidepressant effect of tDCS in BD patients, including the action on calcium homeostasis in glial cells, the enhancement of LTP, the regulation of neurotrophic factors and inflammatory mediators, and the modulation of the expression of plasticity-related genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the matter to concurrently provide a synthesis of the clinical evidence and an in-depth appraisal of the putative biological underpinnings, providing consistent support for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giordano D'Urso
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Elena Toscano
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Annarita Barone
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Palermo
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Ospedale Luigi Sacco Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford University, CA, USA; CRC "Aldo Ravelli" for Neuro-technology & Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Di Lorenzo
- Laboratory of Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Italy; Psychiatric and Clinical Psychology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Mantovani
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "V. Tiberio" Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy; Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e delle Dipendenze, Azienda Sanitaria Regionale del Molise (ASReM), Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, Clinical Sciences, University Gabriele d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy; Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Clinical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Herts, UK
| | - Michele Fornaro
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Felice Iasevoli
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Andrea de Bartolomeis
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|