1
|
Yang QE, Lee N, Johnson N, Hong J, Zhao J(Q, Sun X, Zhang J. Quality assessment strategy development and analytical method selection of GMP grade biological drugs for gene and cell therapy. BBA ADVANCES 2025; 7:100151. [PMID: 40094061 PMCID: PMC11909464 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadva.2025.100151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 01/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Biological drugs with gene and cell therapy potentials, including natural or rationally created biomacromolecules, recombinant proteins/enzymes, gene-carrying DNA/RNA fragments, oncolytic viruses, plasmid and viral vectors or other gene delivering vehicles with specific therapeutic genes and gene manipulation tools, and genetically modified and reprogrammed human cells comprise a large fraction of drug development candidates in modern precision and regeneration medicine. These drugs have displayed unique capabilities in treating patients with previously incurable diseases. However, most of the drug preparations have complex multimolecular structures and require specific biomanufacturing systems and many other additional biological active materials for drug synthesis, cell expansion, and production enhancement. Thus, the final products would have to be subjected to sequential extensive purification processes to exclude impurities and to concentrate the drug products after manufacturing. The quality evaluation for each drug product is an individualized process and must be specifically designed and performed according to the characteristics of the drug and its manufacturing and purification methods. Some of the Quality Control (QC) assays may be very costly and time-consuming, frequently with inconsistent test results from batch-to-batch. This review focuses on QC assessment strategy development for common gene and cell therapy drugs which use prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells for manufacturing or cell factories for in vitro expansions, especially for drug identification and concentration determination, impurity detection and quantification, drug potency, stability, and safety evaluations; and discusses some key issues for drug quality assessments in different categories and emphasizes the importance of individualized QC strategy design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan-en Yang
- uBriGene Biosciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA
- Forecyte Biosciences, Inc., Frederick, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jenny (Qinghua) Zhao
- uBriGene Biosciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA
- Forecyte Biosciences, Inc., Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Xiulian Sun
- uBriGene Biosciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allisha J, Das J, Dunnigan T, Sharfstein ST, Datta P. Stipulations of cell and gene therapy and the ties to biomanufacturing. Biotechnol Prog 2025:e3521. [PMID: 39846483 DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Abstract
Cell and gene therapy (CGT) products are emerging and innovative biopharmaceuticals that hold promise for treating diseases that are otherwise beyond the scope of conventional medicines. The evolution of CGT from a research idea to a promising therapeutic product is due to the complementary advancements across various scientific disciplines. First, the innovations and advancements in gene editing and delivery technology have provided fundamental tools to manipulate genes and cells for therapeutic pursuits. Second, advancements in applied and translational research, including how clinical trials are designed, performed, evaluated, and analyzed, have transformed the technology into a potential therapeutic product. Third, advancements in scaling up the production of CGT products have been critical in delivering the product for preclinical studies, clinical trials, and approved treatments. In parallel, regulatory requirements have continuously evolved, with lessons learned from translational studies and biomanufacturing. These combined efforts have transformed CGT products from a promising concept into a reality with the potential to treat a wide range of diseases. However, continued R&D and regulatory oversight are crucial to further improve the safety, efficacy, and accessibility of CGT products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Allisha
- Department of Life Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Juthika Das
- Department of Life Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Dunnigan
- Department of Life Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Susan T Sharfstein
- Department of Nanoscale Science and Engineering and The RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Payel Datta
- Department of Life Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qi K, Jia D, Zhou S, Zhang K, Guan F, Yao M, Sui X. Cryopreservation of Immune Cells: Recent Progress and Challenges Ahead. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2024; 8:e2400201. [PMID: 39113431 DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202400201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Cryopreservation of immune cells is considered as a key enabling technology for adoptive cellular immunotherapy. However, current immune cell cryopreservation technologies face the challenges with poor biocompatibility of cryoprotection materials, low efficiency, and impaired post-thaw function, limiting their clinical translation. This review briefly introduces the adoptive cellular immunotherapy and the approved immune cell-based products, which involve T cells, natural killer cells and etc. The cryodamage mechanisms to these immune cells during cryopreservation process are described, including ice formation related mechanical and osmotic injuries, cryoprotectant induced toxic injuries, and other biochemical injuries. Meanwhile, the recent advances in the cryopreservation medium and freeze-thaw protocol for several representative immune cell type are summarized. Furthermore, the remaining challenges regarding on the cryoprotection materials, freeze-thaw protocol, and post-thaw functionality evaluation of current cryopreservation technologies are discussed. Finally, the future perspectives are proposed toward advancing highly efficient cryopreservation of immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kejun Qi
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Danqi Jia
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Shengxi Zhou
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Kun Zhang
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Fangxia Guan
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Minghao Yao
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| | - Xiaojie Sui
- School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park M, Safford M, Scheers J, Hammill L, Pleitez D, Jerbi T, Koudji EM, Yelity S, Campion S, Miller MM, Gibb SL, Sargent A. Automation preserves product consistency and quality for the formulation, fill, and finish of T cell-based therapies. Cytotherapy 2024; 26:1566-1570. [PMID: 39078352 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Scaling up the manufacture of cell therapies can be complex and challenging. Maintaining critical quality attributes of the cell product during its final formulation and fill-finish into multiple containers can be especially difficult and laborious. Here, we tested the automated Finia™ Fill and Finish System to efficiently scale up the formulation and fill-finish of a T cell product, and then assessed cell quality and product consistency across different sub-lots filled during this expanded process. We found that this automated system could be effectively scaled to 4 times its singular capacity in a 2-h time interval, with variation in cell number and product volume less than 12% across all containers. Analysis of the different sub-lots of the final product revealed high cell viability and consistent T cell phenotype, with a high proportion of effector memory and central memory T cells and low expression of T cell senescence and exhaustion markers. The functionality of the T cell product was compared by measuring cytokine response after restimulation, with secreted levels of effector cytokines like IFN-γ and TNF-α being similar across the different sub-lots. Collectively, these results show that automation can scale up the formulation and fill-finish of a cell manufacturing process while maintaining the phenotype and functionality of the cell product. Better understanding of how to maintain product uniformity and quality during final manufacturing is important to the further scale-up and development of successful cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsung Park
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Meredith Safford
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Jade Scheers
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Lora Hammill
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Despina Pleitez
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri Jerbi
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Eyram Marcelle Koudji
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Shanelle Yelity
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Campion
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA
| | - Mindy M Miller
- Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies Inc., Lakewood, Colarado, USA
| | - Stuart L Gibb
- Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies Inc., Lakewood, Colarado, USA
| | - Alex Sargent
- Process and Assay Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, Charles River Laboratories, Hanover, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mamo T, Cox CA, Demorest C, Fontaine MJ, Hubel A, Kelley L, Khan A, Marks DC, Pati S, Reems JA, Spohn G, Schäfer R, Shi R, Shao L, Stroncek D, McKenna DH. Cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells using a DMSO-free solution is comparable to DMSO-containing cryoprotectants: results of an international multicenter PACT/BEST collaborative study. Cytotherapy 2024; 26:1522-1531. [PMID: 39066775 PMCID: PMC11841823 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM An essential aspect of ensuring availability and stability of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) products for clinical use is that these cells are cryopreserved before individual infusion into patients. Currently, cryopreservation of MSCs involves use of a cryoprotectant solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). However, it is recognized that DMSO may be toxic for both the patient and the MSC product. In this Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) and Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative study, we compared a novel DMSO-free solution with DMSO containing cryoprotectant solutions for freezing MSCs. METHODS A DMSO-free cryoprotectant solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine (SGI) in a base of Plasmalyte A was prepared at the University of Minnesota. Cryoprotectant solutions containing 5-10% DMSO (in-house) were prepared at seven participating centers (five from USA, one each from Australia and Germany). The MSCs were isolated from bone marrow or adipose tissue and cultured ex vivo per local protocols at each center. The cells in suspension were frozen by aliquoting into vials/bags. For six out of the seven centers, the vials/bags were placed in a controlled rate freezer (one center placed them at -80°C freezer overnight) before transferring to liquid nitrogen. The cells were kept frozen for at least one week before thawing and testing. Pre- and post-thaw assessment included cell viability and recovery, immunophenotype as well as transcriptional and gene expression profiles. Linear regression, mixed effects models and two-sided t-tests were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS MSCs had an average viability of 94.3% (95% CI: 87.2-100%) before cryopreservation, decreasing by 4.5% (95% CI: 0.03-9.0%; P: 0.049) and 11.4% (95% CI: 6.9-15.8%; P< 0.001), for MSCs cryopreserved in the in-house and SGI solutions, respectively. The average recovery of viable MSCs cryopreserved in the SGI was 92.9% (95% CI: 85.7-100.0%), and it was lower by 5.6% (95% CI: 1.3-9.8%, P < 0.013) for the in-house solution. Additionally, MSCs cryopreserved in the two solutions had expected level of expressions for CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 with no significant difference in global gene expression profiles. CONCLUSION MSCs cryopreserved in a DMSO-free solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine in a base of Plasmalyte A had slightly lower cell viability, better recovery, and comparable immunophenotype and global gene expression profiles compared to MSCs cryopreserved in DMSO containing solutions. The average viability of MSCs in the novel solution was above 80% and, thus, likely clinically acceptable. Future studies are suggested to test the post-thaw functions of MSCs cryopreserved in the novel DMSO-free solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodros Mamo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | | | - Connor Demorest
- Masonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Allison Hubel
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Evia Bio, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Aisha Khan
- University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA
| | - Denese C Marks
- Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shibani Pati
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Gabriele Spohn
- German Red Cross Blood Donor Service and Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Richard Schäfer
- German Red Cross Blood Donor Service and Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Medical Center, Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rongye Shi
- Center for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lipei Shao
- Center for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - David Stroncek
- Center for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - David H McKenna
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kang X, Mita N, Zhou L, Wu S, Yue Z, Babu RJ, Chen P. Nanotechnology in Advancing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:1228. [PMID: 39339264 PMCID: PMC11435308 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for hematological cancers, yet it faces significant hurdles, particularly regarding its efficacy in solid tumors and concerning associated adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the advancements and ongoing challenges in CAR-T therapy. We highlight the transformative potential of nanotechnology in enhancing CAR-T therapy by improving targeting precision, modulating the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, and overcoming physical barriers. Nanotechnology facilitates efficient CAR gene delivery into T cells, boosting transfection efficiency and potentially reducing therapy costs. Moreover, nanotechnology offers innovative solutions to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Cutting-edge nanotechnology platforms for real-time monitoring of CAR-T cell activity and cytokine release are also discussed. By integrating these advancements, we aim to provide valuable insights and pave the way for the next generation of CAR-T cell therapies to overcome current limitations and enhance therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejia Kang
- Materials Research and Education Center, Materials Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (L.Z.); (S.W.)
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (N.M.); (Z.Y.); (R.J.B.)
| | - Nur Mita
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (N.M.); (Z.Y.); (R.J.B.)
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Mulawarman University, Samarinda 75119, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
| | - Lang Zhou
- Materials Research and Education Center, Materials Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (L.Z.); (S.W.)
| | - Siqi Wu
- Materials Research and Education Center, Materials Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (L.Z.); (S.W.)
| | - Zongliang Yue
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (N.M.); (Z.Y.); (R.J.B.)
| | - R. Jayachandra Babu
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (N.M.); (Z.Y.); (R.J.B.)
| | - Pengyu Chen
- Materials Research and Education Center, Materials Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; (L.Z.); (S.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goto A, Moriya Y, Nakayama M, Iwasaki S, Yamamoto S. DMPK perspective on quantitative model analysis for chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy: Advances and challenges. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024; 56:101003. [PMID: 38843652 DOI: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2024.101003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cells are genetically engineered immune cells that specifically target tumor-associated antigens and have revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly in hematological malignancies, with ongoing investigations into their potential applications in solid tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and challenges in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) for CAR cell therapy, specifically emphasizing on quantitative modeling and simulation (M&S). Furthermore, the recent advances in quantitative model analysis have been reviewed, ranging from clinical data characterization to mechanism-based modeling that connects in vitro and in vivo nonclinical and clinical study data. Additionally, the future perspectives and areas for improvement in CAR cell therapy translation have been reviewed. This includes using formulation quality considerations, characterization of appropriate animal models, refinement of in vitro models for bottom-up approaches, and enhancement of quantitative bioanalytical methodology. Addressing these challenges within a DMPK framework is pivotal in facilitating the translation of CAR cell therapy, ultimately enhancing the patients' lives through efficient CAR cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Goto
- Center of Excellence for Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Modeling, Preclinical and Translational Sciences, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuu Moriya
- Center of Excellence for Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Modeling, Preclinical and Translational Sciences, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Miyu Nakayama
- Center of Excellence for Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Modeling, Preclinical and Translational Sciences, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shinji Iwasaki
- Center of Excellence for Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Modeling, Preclinical and Translational Sciences, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Syunsuke Yamamoto
- Center of Excellence for Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Modeling, Preclinical and Translational Sciences, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kanagawa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arroyo A, Booij P, Woldemariam G, Bruen U, Creasey J, Stanard B, Parris P, Nagao L, Bielinski MK. Cell and Gene Therapies: Challenges in Designing Extractables and Leachables Studies and Conducting Safety Assessments. J Pharm Sci 2024; 113:513-522. [PMID: 38176455 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2023.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Over the past decade, Cell and Gene Therapies (C>) have been an emerging therapeutic area with more than twenty C> drug products approved and over 1000 registered trials. The remarkable progress in these modalities brings new challenges for scientists who evaluate manufacturing and storage materials, including risk assessments for extractables and leachables (E&L). Establishing a business process to qualify materials for these applications is an important risk mitigation strategy in support of these assessments. Process validation verifying process performance and product quality requirements using qualified materials also ensures that leachables from the materials do not result in an impact to process and product. The authors provide an overview of available guidelines and publications relevant to E&L risk assessments that can be used to support ex vivo C> products, highlighting gaps and standardization needs in the areas of biocompatibility and extractables conditions. Finally, the authors present leachable testing strategies, relevant to the specific manufacturing and storage conditions of C> products, and safety assessment considerations for organic and inorganic chemical entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeyma Arroyo
- Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | | | - Uma Bruen
- Organon, LLC., Jersey City, NJ 07302, USA
| | | | - Brad Stanard
- Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA 94949, USA
| | - Patricia Parris
- Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Kent, UK
| | - Lee Nagao
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Washington, DC, 20005, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kruglova N, Shepelev M. Increasing Gene Editing Efficiency via CRISPR/Cas9- or Cas12a-Mediated Knock-In in Primary Human T Cells. Biomedicines 2024; 12:119. [PMID: 38255224 PMCID: PMC10813735 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
T lymphocytes represent a promising target for genome editing. They are primarily modified to recognize and kill tumor cells or to withstand HIV infection. In most studies, T cell genome editing is performed using the CRISPR/Cas technology. Although this technology is easily programmable and widely accessible, its efficiency of T cell genome editing was initially low. Several crucial improvements were made in the components of the CRISPR/Cas technology and their delivery methods, as well as in the culturing conditions of T cells, before a reasonable editing level suitable for clinical applications was achieved. In this review, we summarize and describe the aforementioned parameters that affect human T cell editing efficiency using the CRISPR/Cas technology, with a special focus on gene knock-in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Kruglova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology RAS, 119334 Moscow, Russia;
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Y, Stevens HY, Sivaraman S, Porter LN, Hoffman AR, Gibb SL, Selvam S, Bowles-Welch AC. Streamlined Methods for Processing and Cryopreservation of Cell Therapy Products Using Automated Systems. Bio Protoc 2023; 13:e4900. [PMID: 38156031 PMCID: PMC10751237 DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.4900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Streamlined procedures for processing and cryopreservation of cell therapies using good laboratory practices are integral to biomanufacturing process development and clinical applications. The protocol herein begins with the preparation of human cell types cultured as adherent (i.e., mesenchymal stromal cells, MSCs) or suspension cells (i.e., peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PBMCs) to comprehensively demonstrate procedures that are applicable to commonly used primary cell cultures. Cell processing steps consist of preparing high yields of cells for cryopreservation using instruments routinely used in cell manufacturing, including the Finia® Fill and Finish System and a controlled-rate freezer. The final steps comprise the storage of cells at subzero temperatures in liquid nitrogen vapor phase followed by the analysis of cell phenotypes before and after processing and cryopreservation, along with cell quality metrics for validation. Additionally, the protocol includes important considerations for the implementation of quality control measures for equipment operation and cell handling, as well as Good Laboratory Practices for cell manufacturing, which are essential for the translational use of cell therapies. Key features • The protocol applies to small- or large-scale manufacturing of cell therapy products. • It includes streamlined procedures for processing and cryopreservation of cells cultured as adherent cells (MSCs) and suspension cells (PBMCs). • Provides temperature control and rapid partitioning of sample in cryopreservation solution to maintain high viability of a range of cell types throughout the procedures. • This protocol employs the Finia® Fill and Finish System and a controlled-rate freezer. Graphical overview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Li
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hazel Y. Stevens
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Srikanth Sivaraman
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Logan N. Porter
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Stuart L. Gibb
- Terumo Blood Cell and Technologies, Lakewood, Colorado, USA
| | - Shivaram Selvam
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Annie C. Bowles-Welch
- Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|