1
|
Campos Ramírez SE, Andrés García A, Blanco Abad C, Gomila Pons P, Gómez Mugarza P, Ruffini Egea SE, Gallart Caballero L, Polo Marques E, Alonso Orduña V. Evaluation of the Real-Life Efficacy and Safety of the Treatment with Lutetium-177 Dotatate for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Clin Med 2025; 14:2384. [PMID: 40217834 PMCID: PMC11989597 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14072384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2025] [Revised: 03/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/29/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Therapy using lutetium-177 dotatate (177LU) was approved in Europe for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in 2017. Since then, it has become part of the strategies in the treatment of NETs, making it now possible to evaluate real-life results. Research Design and Methods: Single-arm, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of all the patients with metastatic NETs treated with 177LU (four cycles of 200 mCi every 8 weeks) in the two medical centers dedicated to the treatment of NETs from the region of Aragón, Spain, from 2017 to 2024. Descriptive analysis of demographic characteristics, efficacy, and survival analysis were performed using the statistics software Jamovi 2.6.14. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included. The majority were male, and the most frequent primary location was the pancreas. The ORR was 30.9%. The DCR was 88%. The median OS was 47.4 months [95% CI, 25.6-NE]. The median PFS was 26.1 months [95% CI, 18.5-68.3]. High-grade tumors, multiple previous treatments, and pancreatic location presented worse OS. In total, 42.6% presented any grade adverse event (17.2% hematologic, 30.9% GI symptoms). Conclusions: The efficacy of 177LU in our study is like that observed in similar studies. Acceptable tolerance has been shown. Pancreatic tumors, previous treatments, and higher grades demonstrated worse outcomes. The new research line must consider the use of treatment with 177LU in earlier lines for metastatic disease as well as its possible use in local or locally advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alejandro Andrés García
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carmen Blanco Abad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Paula Gomila Pons
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Pablo Gómez Mugarza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Luis Gallart Caballero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Eduardo Polo Marques
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso Orduña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Padwal MK, Nazar AK, Parghane RV, Basu S, Basu B. Evaluating the prognostic significance of the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios in 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT treated patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine 2025:10.1007/s12020-025-04212-z. [PMID: 40131599 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-025-04212-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the role of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in the prognosis assessment of 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) treated patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS Eligible PRRT-treated patients (n = 247, 2010-2019) were included. Pre-PRRT NLR and MLR were calculated from complete blood count data. Data on tumor characteristics, response to PRRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using COXPH analyses. RESULTS In NET patients, median values of NLR and MLR were 2.21 (IQR = 1.66-3.00) and 0.14 (IQR = 0.06-0.24), respectively. NLR showed significant positive association with G3 tumors (median = 3.64, IQR = 2.1-4.26, p = 0.022) and high 18F-FDG avidity (SUVmax>5) (median = 2.5, IQR = 1.82-3.56, p = 0.003). MLR was significantly associated with high disease burden (median = 0.18, IQR = 0.08-0.29, p = 0.0083). MLR distinguished between the PRRT non-responders with progressive disease and responders with complete/partial response (median 0.19 versus 0.12, p = 0.043) or responders with stable disease (median 0.19 versus 0.14, p = 0.045). The ratios independently correlated with disease progression and OS. Patients in NLRhigh (>3.5) group displayed significantly shorter median PFS and OS (48 and 58 months) compared to NLRlow (≤3.5) group (108 and 96 months) (p < 0.01). Patients in MLRhigh (>0.25) group displayed significantly shorter median PFS and OS (40 and 52 months) compared to MLRlow (≤0.25) group (108 and 102 months) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pre-treatment NLR and MLR had an independent prognostic impact on disease progression and OS in PRRT-treated NET patients. This routine, inexpensive CBC-based test in the standard pre-PRRT workup demonstrates the prognostic value and may aid clinicians in the risk stratification of NET patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahesh K Padwal
- Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Amir K Nazar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul V Parghane
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, India
| | - Sandip Basu
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, India.
| | - Bhakti Basu
- Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prasad V, Koumarianou A, Denecke T, Sundin A, Deroose CM, Pavel M, Christ E, Lamarca A, Caplin M, Castaño JP, Dromain C, Falconi M, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Hofland J, Knigge UP, Kos-Kudla B, Krishna BA, Reed NS, Scarpa A, Srirajaskanthan R, Toumpanakis C, Kjaer A, Hicks RJ, Ambrosini V. Challenges in developing response evaluation criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: A consensus report from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Advisory Board Meeting 2022 and the ENETS Theranostics Task Force. J Neuroendocrinol 2025; 37:e13479. [PMID: 39653582 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
Abstract
Assessing the response to systemic therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is challenging since morphological imaging response is often delayed and not necessarily reflective of clinical benefit. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has a complex mechanism of action, further complicating response assessment. In response to these challenges, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Theranostics Task Force conducted a statement-based survey among experts to identify the current landscape and unmet needs in PRRT response assessment. The survey, presented at the 2022 ENETS Advisory Board (AB) meeting in Vienna, was completed by 70% of AB members, most of whom (81%) were from ENETS Centers of Excellence (CoE). It comprised a set of 13 questions with two substatements in three questions. Six (46%) of the statements achieved more than 75% agreement, while five (39%) additional statements reached over 60% consensus. Key points from the survey include: AB members agreed that lesions deemed equivocal on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be characterized by somatostatin receptor (SST) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT before being designated as target lesions. It was agreed that interim response assessments should occur after the second or third PRRT cycle. Over half (54%) preferred using both conventional cross-sectional imaging (CT and/or MRI) and hybrid imaging (SST PET/CT) for this purpose. Almost all AB members supported further response assessment 3 months after the final PRRT cycle. A majority (62%) preferred using a combination of conventional cross-sectional imaging and SST PET/CT. For cases showing equivocal progression (ambiguous lesions or nontarget lesions) on CT and/or MRI, further confirmation using SST PET/CT was recommended. A significant majority (74%) preferred assessing pseudo-progression and delayed response by combining SST PET with diagnostic CT and/ or MRI. Though just below the 75% consensus threshold, there was substantial agreement on selecting target lesions based on SST PET/CT uptake intensity and homogeneity. Sixty-nine percent noted the importance of documenting and closely following heterogeneity in lesions in liver, lymph nodes, primary tumors, or other organs. As to the statement on parameters for new response criteria, AB members recommended exploring maximum standard unit value, tumor-to-background ratio, Hounsfield Unit (Choi Criteria), total tumor burden, and novel serum or molecular markers for future response evaluation criteria. Sixty-five percent supported the use of a single SST PET/CT for response assessment of NET lesions treated with PRRT. These findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced imaging techniques and recognizing the need for more nuanced criteria in assessing the efficacy of PRRT in NET patients. This approach aims to enhance the accuracy of treatment monitoring and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Prasad
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anders Sundin
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Emanuel Christ
- Center of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence (CoE), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Oncology-OncoHealth Institute-Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Martyn Caplin
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Justo P Castaño
- Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
- Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
- CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Division of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Peter Knigge
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Center of Cancer and Transplantation, ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Beata Kos-Kudla
- Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Balkundi A Krishna
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET imaging, Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Christos Toumpanakis
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine & Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- St Vincent's Hospital, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Translational Medicine, the Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Badrane I, Urso L, Campennì A, Cittanti C, De Rimini ML, Bartolomei M. Radioligand therapy in sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis tumors: state of art and perspectives. Endocrine 2025; 87:67-72. [PMID: 39373830 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-04062-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
The approval in 2017 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of radioligand therapy (RLT) led to its wide application in therapeutic management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, the indications are currently limited to certain specific histotypes belonging to the broader NEN's family, mainly advanced well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic NENs. As a consequence, several other tumors of the NEN spectrum that can potentially benefit, due to their biological characteristics, from RLT are still ineligible and can be considered "RLT-orphans". Among those, the subgroup of NENs originating from the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis can be listed. This paper discusses the state of art and perspectives of the theragnostic applications in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, considering both the traditional theragnostic model - with radiolabelled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) - and the innovative one with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs), that will hopefully become available for these patients in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilham Badrane
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Alfredo Campennì
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa De Rimini
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Health Service, AO Colli Hospitals, Naples, Italy
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durma AD, Saracyn M, Kołodziej M, Jóźwik-Plebanek K, Brodowska-Kania D, Dmochowska B, Mróz A, Kos-Kudła B, Kamiński G. Adverse Events of Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Progressive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The Biggest Eastern European Prospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3509. [PMID: 39456603 PMCID: PMC11505743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are neoplastic tumors developing in every part of the body, mainly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Their treatment involves the surgical removal of the tumor and its metastasis, long-acting somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radioligand therapy (RLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 127 patients with progressive neuroendocrine neoplasms underwent RLT-4 courses, administered every 10 weeks-with the use of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE or tandem therapy with 1.85 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and 1.85 GBq [90Y]Y-DOTA-TATE. Assessment of short- and long-term complications, as well as the calculation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. RESULTS RLT caused a statistically but not clinically significant decrease in blood morphology parameters during both short- and long-term observations. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly decreased only in a long-term observation after RLT; however, it was clinically acceptable. Computed predictions of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) indicated that five years post-RLT, there is a 74% chance of patients surviving, with only a 58.5% likelihood of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS Computed predictions of PFS and OS confirmed treatment efficiency and good patient survival. RLT should be considered a safe and reliable line of treatment for patients with progressive NENs as it causes only a low number of low-grade adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Daniel Durma
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Marek Saracyn
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Maciej Kołodziej
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwik-Plebanek
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Dorota Brodowska-Kania
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Beata Dmochowska
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Adrianna Mróz
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| | - Beata Kos-Kudła
- Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Kamiński
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Camedda R, Frantellizzi V, Danieli R, De Vincentis G, Filippi L. Positron emission computed tomography targeting urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in cancer: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:137-145. [PMID: 38451196 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2328167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To provide an overview of the available literature data on clinical applications of positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in oncology. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases up to June 2023. The results were presented according to the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Program checklist. RESULTS Seven papers were selected for final analysis, involving 266 patients with solid tumors who underwent PET with uPAR-ligands. Thematic areas identified include feasibility studies (n = 2) on the safety, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of uPAR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals; uPAR-directed imaging in head and neck cancer (n = 2); uPAR PET in prostate cancer (n = 2); and the investigation of uPAR in neuroendocrine neoplasms (n = 1). Six of the seven studies used the radiopharmaceutical [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-AE105 while one study used [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-AE105. The studies showed protocol homogeneity, with static PET imaging at 20 minutes. The quality assessment revealed limitations such as small cohorts and the fact that all studies were performed by a single research group. CONCLUSIONS uPAR-PET appears to be a promising imaging tool in well-selected oncological settings, but it needs to be validated by multicentre collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Camedda
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Viviana Frantellizzi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Danieli
- Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Vincentis
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Filippi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncohaematology, Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Filippi L, Frantellizzi V, Bartoletti P, Vincentis GD, Schillaci O, Evangelista L. Head-to-Head Comparison between FDG and 11C-Methionine in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2009. [PMID: 37370904 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature, comparing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 11C-methionine (MET) for the imaging of multiple myeloma (MM) with positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT). Relevant studies published from 2013 up to March 2023 were selected by searching Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Selected imaging studies were analyzed using a modified version of the critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Ten studies encompassing 335 patients were selected. On a patient-based analysis, MET sensitivity ranged between 75.6% and 100%, resulting higher than that measured for FDG (0-100%). MET outperformed FDG for the detection of focal lesions, diffuse bone marrow involvement and mixed patterns. PET-derived parameters resulted higher for MET than for FDG, with a strong correlation with clinical variables (e.g., monoclonal component and beta-2-microglobulin levels, bone marrow infiltration, etc.), although FDG maintained a prognostic impact on outcome prediction. When compared to other tracers or imaging modalities, MET showed stronger correlation and inter-observer agreement than FDG. Although biased by the small cohorts and requiring confirmation through multicenter studies, preliminary findings suggest that MET-PET should be preferred to FDG for PET imaging of MM, or alternatively used as a complementary imaging modality. Some issues, such as tracer availability and the role of MET with respect to other emerging tracers (i.e., 68Ga-pentixafor, 18F-FACBC and 18F-FET), should be the topic of further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Filippi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, "Santa Maria Goretti" Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Viviana Frantellizzi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza, University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Bartoletti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Vincentis
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza, University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Urso L, Nieri A, Uccelli L, Castello A, Artioli P, Cittanti C, Marzola MC, Florimonte L, Castellani M, Bissoli S, Porto F, Boschi A, Evangelista L, Bartolomei M. Lutathera® Orphans: State of the Art and Future Application of Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041110. [PMID: 37111596 PMCID: PMC10142322 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lutathera® is the first EMA- and FDA-approved radiopharmaceutical for radioligand therapy (RLT). Currently, on the legacy of the NETTER1 trial, only adult patients with progressive unresectable somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET) can be treated with Lutathera®. Conversely, patients with SSTR-positive disease arising from outside the gastroenteric region do not currently have access to Lutathera® treatment despite several papers in the literature reporting the effectiveness and safety of RLT in these settings. Moreover, patients with well-differentiated G3 GEP-NET are also still “Lutathera orphans”, and retreatment with RLT in patients with disease relapse is currently not approved. The aim of this critical review is to summarize current literature evidence assessing the role of Lutathera® outside the approved indications. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluating new possible applications of Lutathera® will be considered and discussed to provide an updated picture of future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Licia Uccelli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-053-232-6387
| | - Angelo Castello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Paolo Artioli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Maria Cristina Marzola
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Luigia Florimonte
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimo Castellani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Sergio Bissoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesca Porto
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
| | - Alessandra Boschi
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
PET Criteria by Cancer Type from Imaging Interpretation to Treatment Response Assessment: Beyond FDG PET Score. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13030611. [PMID: 36983767 PMCID: PMC10057339 DOI: 10.3390/life13030611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: in recent years, the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a reliable diagnostic tool in a wide variety of pathological conditions. This review aims to collect and review PET criteria developed for interpretation and treatment response assessment in cases of non-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) imaging in oncology. Methods: A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was made to find relevant published articles about non-[18F]FDG PET response criteria. Results: The comprehensive computer literature search revealed 183 articles. On reviewing the titles and abstracts, 149 articles were excluded because the reported data were not within the field of interest. Finally, 34 articles were selected and retrieved in full-text versions. Conclusions: available criteria are a promising tool for the interpretation of non-FDG PET scans, but also to assess the response to therapy and therefore to predict the prognosis. However, oriented clinical trials are needed to clearly evaluate their impact on patient management.
Collapse
|
10
|
Relevance of Volumetric Parameters Applied to [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET Patients Treated with PRRT. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040606. [PMID: 36832093 PMCID: PMC9955025 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND this study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of volumetric parameters on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 39 NET patients (21 male, 18 female; mean age 60.7 y) within the FENET-2016 trial (CTiD:NCT04790708). PRRT was proposed with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC alone or combined with [90Y]Y-DOTATOC. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 months after PRRT. For each PET/CT, we calculated SUVmax, SUVmean, somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SRETV), and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSRE), as well as their percentage of changes (Δ), both for liver (_L) and for total tumor burden (_WB). Early clinical response (3 months after PRRT) and PFS were evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and institutional NET board. RESULTS Early clinical response identified 9 partial response (PR), 25 stable disease (SD), and 5 progressive disease (PD). Post-SRETV_WB and ΔSRETV_WB were progressively increased among response groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Likewise, median post-SRETV_L was significantly higher in PD patients (p = 0.03). SUVmax and TLSRE did not correlate with early clinical response. Median PFS was 31 months. Patients with ΔSRETV_WB lower than -4.17% as well as those with post-SRETV_WB lower than 34.8 cm3 showed a longer PFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.06, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis identified ΔSRETV_WB as an independent predictor for PFS. CONCLUSIONS our results could strengthen the importance of evaluating the burden of disease on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET patients treated with PRRT.
Collapse
|
11
|
Urso L, Evangelista L, Alongi P, Quartuccio N, Cittanti C, Rambaldi I, Ortolan N, Borgia F, Nieri A, Uccelli L, Schirone A, Panareo S, Arnone G, Bartolomei M. The Value of Semiquantitative Parameters Derived from 18F-FDG PET/CT for Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in a Cohort of Patients with Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235869. [PMID: 36497351 PMCID: PMC9738922 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a strong prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC). The aim of this study was to investigate whether semiquantitative parameters derived from baseline [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission computed tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could predict pCR after NAC and survival outcomes in patients affected by different molecular subtypes of BC. We retrospectively retrieved patients from the databases of two Italian hospitals (Centre A: University Hospital of Ferrara; Centre B: University of Padua) meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosis of BC; (2) history of NAC; (3) baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT performed before the first cycle of NAC; (4) available follow-up data (response after NAC and survival information). For each [18F]FDG PET/CT scan, semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG) related to the primary tumor (B), to the reference lesion for both axillary (N) and distant lymph node (DN), and to the whole-body burden of disease (WB) were evaluated. Patients enrolled were 133: 34 from centre A and 99 from centre B. Patients' molecular subtypes were: 9 luminal A, 49 luminal B, 33 luminal B + HER-2, 10 HER-2 enriched, and 32 triple negative (TNBC). Luminal A and HER-2 enriched BC patients were excluded from the analysis due to the small sample size. pCR after NAC was achieved in 47 patients (41.2%). [18F]FDG PET/CT detected the primary tumor in 98.3% of patients and lymph node metastases were more frequently detected in Luminal B subgroup. Among Luminal B patients, median SUVmean_B values were significantly higher (p = 0.027) in responders (7.06 ± 5.9) vs. non-responders (4.4 ± 2.1) to NAC. Luminal B + HER-2 non-responders showed a statistically significantly higher median MTV_B (7.3 ± 4.2 cm3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.5 cm3; p = 0.003) and TLG_B (36.5 ± 24.9 vs. 18.9 ± 17.7; p = 0.025) than responders at baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT. None of the semiquantitative parameters predicted pCR after NAC in TNBC patients. However, among TNBC patients who achieved pCR after NAC, 4 volumetric parameters (MTV_B, TLG_B, MTV_WB and TLG_WB) were significantly higher in patients dead at follow-up. If confirmed in further studies, these results could open up a widespread use of [18F]FDG PET/CT as a baseline predictor of response to NAC in luminal B and luminal B + HER-2 patients and as a prognostic tool in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90146 Palermo, Italy
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0532326387
| | - Ilaria Rambaldi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Naima Ortolan
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Francesca Borgia
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Licia Uccelli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | - Alessio Schirone
- Oncology Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Stefano Panareo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncology and Haematology Department, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Gaspare Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Detection of Bone Metastases by 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs and 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Two-Center Head-to-Head Study of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:1750132. [PMID: 36447752 PMCID: PMC9663244 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1750132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to assess the efficacy of dual-tracer [68Ga-DOTA-somatostatin receptor analogs (SSAs) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)] positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging for detecting bone metastases (BMs) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Methods We retrospectively enrolled 74 GEP-NEN patients with BMs from two centers, who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT from January 2014 to March 2021. We compared and analyzed effectiveness of the dual PET/CT imaging techniques on the BMs, based on 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs. Specifically, we analyzed the imaging results using χ 2 tests for classification variables, paired-sample tests for number of BMs, Wilcoxon's signed rank test for number of lesions, and the Kruskal-Wallis test for standard uptake value (SUV) ratio comparison. The correlation of dual-tracer SUVmax with Ki-67 index was analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results The detection efficiencies of dual-tracer PET/CT imaging in patients with different pathologies showed discordant for detecting liver metastases and BMs in group neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3, 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs was better at detecting BMs for NET G3 (P=0.049 for SUVT/B and P=0.026 for the number of metastatic lesions). In addition, statistical significance was found among osteogenesis group, osteolysis group, and the no-change group (for bone SUVT/B value detected by 18F-FDG and Ki-67 index, osteogenesis group < osteolysis group; for bone SUVT/B detected by 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs, osteogenesis group > the no-change group). What is more, liver and bone SUVmax and Ki-67 index were positively correlated in 18F-FDG imaging (P < 0.001 for liver; P=0.002 for bone), and negatively correlated in 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs imaging (P < 0.001 for liver; P=0.039 for bone). Conclusions 68Ga-DOTA-SSAs was superior to 18F-FDG for detecting BMs in NET G1/G2 (well and moderately differentiated NETs), as well as in NET G3 (poorly differentiated NETs). Relatively good differentiation was observed in the osteogenesis group. In addition, dual-tracer PET/CT imaging results were observably correlated with tumor differentiation.
Collapse
|