The Current Status, Challenges, and Future Potential of Therapeutic Vaccination in Glioblastoma

Efficient Photosensitizer Delivery by Neutrophils for Targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Glioblastoma

Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor and photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment modality of GBM. However, insufficient photosensitizer distribution in the GBM critically limits the success of PDT. To address this obstacle, we propose tumoritropic neutrophils (NE) as active carriers for photosensitizer delivery to achieve GBM-targeted PDT. Methods: Isolated mouse NE were loaded with functionalized hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles carrying the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (BNPD-Ce6). In vitro experiments were conducted to determine drug release from the loaded NE (BNPD-Ce6@NE) to mouse GBM cells and consequential photo-cytotoxicity. In vivo experiments were performed on mice bearing intracranial graft GBMs to demonstrate GBM-targeted drug delivery and the efficacy of anti-GBM PDT mediated by BNPD-Ce6@NE. Results: BNPD-Ce6@NE displayed good viability and migration ability, and rapidly released BNPD-Ce6 to co-cultured mouse GBM cells, which then exhibited marked reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and cytotoxicity following 808 nm laser irradiation (LI). In the in vivo study, a single intravenous bolus injection of BNPD-Ce6@NE resulted in pronounced Ce6 distribution in intracranial graft GBMs 4 h post injection, which peaked around 8 h post injection. A PDT regimen consisting of multiple intravenous BNPD-Ce6@NE injections each followed by one extracranial tumor-directed LI 8 h post injection significantly slowed the growth of intracranial graft GBMs and markedly improved the survival of host animals. Histological analysis revealed massive tumor cell damage and NE infiltration in the PDT-treated GBMs. Conclusions: NE are efficient carriers for GBM-targeted photosensitizer delivery to achieve efficacious anti-GBM PDT.

Immune Resistance in Glioblastoma: Understanding the Barriers to ICI and CAR-T Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor, with fewer than 5% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), followed by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, marked major advancements in oncology. Despite demonstrating efficacy in other blood and solid cancers, these therapies have yielded limited success in clinical trials for both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. A deeper understanding of GBM's resistance to immunotherapy is essential for enhancing treatment responses and translating results seen in other cancer models.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we examine clinical trial outcomes involving ICIs and CAR-T for GBM patients and explore the evasive mechanisms of GBM and the tumor microenvironment.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Multiple clinical trials investigating ICIs in GBM have shown poor outcomes, with no significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Results from smaller case studies with CAR-T therapy have warranted further investigation. However, no large-scale trials or robust studies have yet established these immunotherapeutic approaches as definitive treatment strategies. Future research should shift focus from addressing the scarcity of functional T cells to exploiting the abundant myeloid-derived cells within the tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

Translating these therapies into effective treatments for glioblastoma in humans remains a significant challenge. The highly immunosuppressive nature of GBM and its tumor microenvironment continue to hinder the success of these innovative immunotherapeutic approaches. Targeting the myeloid-derived compartment may lead to more robust and sustained immune responses.

Review of Novel Surgical, Radiation, and Systemic Therapies and Clinical Trials in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite an established standard of care including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, GBM unfortunately is associated with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, researchers are extensively evaluating avenues to expand GBM therapy and improve outcomes in patients with GBM. In this review, we provide a broad overview of novel GBM therapies that have recently completed or are actively undergoing study in clinical trials. These therapies expand across medical, surgical, and radiation clinical trials. We additionally review methods for improving clinical trial design in GBM.

Novel Clinical Trials and Approaches in the Management of Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss a wide variety of novel therapies recently studied or actively undergoing study in patients with glioblastoma. This review also discusses current and future strategies for improving clinical trial design in patients with glioblastoma to maximize efficacy in discovering effective treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the years, there has been significant expansion in therapy modalities studied in patients with glioblastoma. These therapies include, but are not limited to, targeted molecular therapies, DNA repair pathway targeted therapies, immunotherapies, vaccine therapies, and surgically targeted radiotherapies. Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and unfortunately remains with poor overall survival following the current standard of care. Given the dismal prognosis, significant clinical and research efforts are ongoing with the goal of improving patient outcomes and enhancing quality and quantity of life utilizing a wide variety of novel therapies.

Epigenetic remodeling to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in human glioblastoma: pre-clinical evidence for development of new immunotherapy approaches

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor, that is refractory to standard treatment and to immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Noteworthy, melanoma brain metastases (MM-BM), that share the same niche as GBM, frequently respond to current ICI therapies. Epigenetic modifications regulate GBM cellular proliferation, invasion, and prognosis and may negatively regulate the cross-talk between malignant cells and immune cells in the tumor milieu, likely contributing to limit the efficacy of ICI therapy of GBM. Thus, manipulating the tumor epigenome can be considered a therapeutic opportunity in GBM.

METHODS

Microarray transcriptional and methylation profiles, followed by gene set enrichment and IPA analyses, were performed to study the differences in the constitutive expression profiles of GBM vs MM-BM cells, compared to the extracranial MM cells and to investigate the modulatory effects of the DNA hypomethylating agent (DHA) guadecitabine among the different tumor cells. The prognostic relevance of DHA-modulated genes was tested by Cox analysis in a TCGA GBM patients' cohort.

RESULTS

The most striking differences between GBM and MM-BM cells were found to be the enrichment of biological processes associated with tumor growth, invasion, and extravasation with the inhibition of MHC class II antigen processing/presentation in GBM cells. Treatment with guadecitabine reduced these biological differences, shaping GBM cells towards a more immunogenic phenotype. Indeed, in GBM cells, promoter hypomethylation by guadecitabine led to the up-regulation of genes mainly associated with activation, proliferation, and migration of T and B cells and with MHC class II antigen processing/presentation. Among DHA-modulated genes in GBM, 7.6% showed a significant prognostic relevance. Moreover, a large set of immune-related upstream-regulators (URs) were commonly modulated by DHA in GBM, MM-BM, and MM cells: DHA-activated URs enriched for biological processes mainly involved in the regulation of cytokines and chemokines production, inflammatory response, and in Type I/II/III IFN-mediated signaling; conversely, DHA-inhibited URs were involved in metabolic and proliferative pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Epigenetic remodeling by guadecitabine represents a promising strategy to increase the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy of GBM, supporting the rationale to develop new epigenetic-based immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of this still highly deadly disease.

Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future

Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.

Targeting survivin for cancer therapy: Strategies, small molecule inhibitors and vaccine based therapeutics in development

Survivin is a member of the family of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). It is involved in the normal mitotic process and acts as an anti-apoptotic molecule. While terminally differentiated normal tissues lack survivin, several human malignancies have significant protein levels. Resistance to chemotherapy and radiation in tumor cells is associated with survivin expression. Decreased tumor development, apoptosis, and increased sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation are all effects of downregulating survivin expression or activity. As a prospective cancer treatment, small molecules targeting the transcription and translation of survivin and molecules that can directly bind with the survivin are being explored both in pre-clinical and clinics. Pre-clinical investigations have found and demonstrated the effectiveness of several small-molecule survivin inhibitors. Unfortunately, these inhibitors have also been shown to have off-target effects, which could limit their clinical utility. In addition to small molecules, several survivin peptide vaccines are currently under development. These vaccines are designed to elicit a cytotoxic T-cell response against survivin, which could lead to the destruction of tumor cells expressing survivin. Some survivin-based vaccines are advancing through Phase II clinical studies. Overall, survivin is a promising cancer drug target. However, challenges still need to be addressed before the survivin targeted therapies can be widely used in the clinics.

Therapeutic cell-based vaccines for glioblastoma multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a highly aggressive tumor, poses significant challenges in achieving successful treatment outcomes. Conventional therapeutic modalities including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have demonstrated limited efficacy, primarily attributed to the complexities associated with drug delivery to the tumor site and tumor heterogeneity. To address this critical need for innovative therapies, the potential of cancer vaccines utilizing tumor cells and dendritic cells has been explored for GBM treatment. This article provides a comprehensive review of therapeutic vaccinations employing cell-based vaccine strategies for the management of GBM. A meticulous evaluation of 45 clinical trials involving more than 1500 participants revealed that cell-based vaccinations have exhibited favorable safety profiles with minimal toxicity. Moreover, these vaccines have demonstrated modest improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival among patients. However, certain limitations still persist. Notably, there is a need for advancements in the development of potent antigens to evoke immune responses, as well as the optimization of dosage regimens. Consequently, while cell-based vaccinations show promise as a potential therapeutic approach for GBM, further research is imperative to overcome the current limitations. The ultimate objective is to surmount these obstacles and establish cell-based vaccinations as a standard therapeutic modality for GBM.

Current Status and Challenges of Oncolytic Virotherapy for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Despite decades of research and numerous clinical trials, the prognosis of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) remains dire with median observed survival at 8 months. There is a critical need for novel treatments for GBM, which is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Major advances in cancer therapeutics such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have not yet led to improved outcomes for GBM. Conventional therapy of surgery followed by chemoradiation with or without tumor treating fields remains the standard of care. One of the many approaches to GBM therapy currently being explored is viral therapies. These typically work by selectively lysing target neoplastic cells, called oncolysis, or by the targeted delivery of a therapeutic transgene via a viral vector. In this review, we discuss the underlying mechanisms of action and describe both recent and current human clinical trials using these viruses with an emphasis on promising viral therapeutics that may ultimately break the field's current stagnant paradigm.