General Practitioners and Chronic Non-Malignant Pain Management in Older Patients: A Qualitative Study

General practitioners' and community pharmacists' beliefs and practices on opioids for non-malignant pain

BACKGROUND

In Europe, opioid use has surged, largely due to prescriptions for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP). General practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) play a major role in opioid prescribing for non-malignant pain. Exploring their personal beliefs and practices might reveal underlying mechanisms to identify measures that could halt the further escalation of opioid use.

METHODS

Guided by the health belief model, a survey was designed and distributed nationwide to examine the practices and beliefs of GPs and CPs in the domains: threats, benefits, barriers and self-efficacy. The results of GPs and CPs were compared at the statement level using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

Of 214 GPs and 212 CPs who completed the survey, the majority agreed that too many opioids are used in the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain (66.8% GPs and 66.5% CPs). Furthermore, they were concerned about the addictive potential of opioids (83.1% GPs and 71.7% CPs). In general, both professions have concerns about opioid use. GPs report a slightly higher degree of self-efficacy and perceive fewer benefits from opioids in treating CNMP. GPs and CPs valued the recommended measures to reduce opioid prescribing, yet less than half actively implement these strategies in their clinics.

CONCLUSION

GPs and CPs believe that opioids are being used too frequently to treat CNMP. However, both professions lack the actions to improve opioid-related care. GPs and CPs require education, collaboration and tools to implement guidelines on non-malignant pain and opioids.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study, guided by the health belief model, reveals that general practitioners and community pharmacists have serious concerns about opioid use in chronic non-malignant pain. Despite shared concerns, both professions differ in their beliefs about opioid benefits and perceived self-efficacy. Both professions have in common that they value recommended measures to reduce opioid prescribing. Also, they both struggle to implement strategies, emphasizing the urgent need for education, collaboration and tools to align practices with guidelines on non-malignant pain and opioids.

Feasibility of replacing face-to-face with telephone interviews for the World Mental Health Qatar survey during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the feasibility of replacing face-to-face with telephone interviews conducted as part of the World Mental Health Qatar (WMHQ) survey and discuss the main methodological changes across the two pilots that were subsequently implemented in the full-scale WMHQ telephone survey.

METHODS

We assessed the net mode effect by comparing the lifetime prevalence estimates of the main mental disorder classes (mood and anxiety disorders) and a number of disorders across the two survey pilots conducted prior to and post-pandemic.

RESULTS

The main differences in terms of methodology for both pilots stemmed from differences in the survey mode, including questionnaire length, study recruitment method, and fielding team size and structure. These factors influenced response rates and costs. However, the lifetime prevalence estimates and other key indicators of survey results did not differ across modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm the comparability of data collected via telephone and face-to-face modes, supporting the adoption of telephone surveys for future mental health studies, particularly in the context of pandemics. They also confirm the feasibility of changing or mixing modes depending on field conditions in future psychiatric epidemiological research.

Roles, barriers and behavioral determinants related to community pharmacists' involvement in optimizing opioid therapy for chronic pain: a qualitative study

Background Opioid are currently widely used to manage chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP), but there is a growing concern about harm resulting from opioid misuse and the need for medicine optimization, in which pharmacists could potentially play a key role. Objective This study explored pharmacists' roles, barriers and determinants related to their involvement in optimizing prescribed opioids for patients with chronic pain. Setting Community pharmacies in the United Kingdom. Method Semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted between January and May 2020 with 20 community pharmacists recruited through professional networks. Data were analysed thematically. Main outcome measure: Pharmacists’ perceived roles, barriers and behavioural determinants in relation to opioid therapy optimization. Result Pharmacists demonstrated desire to contribute to opioid therapy optimization. However, they described that they were often challenged by the lack of relevant knowledge, skills and training, inadequate time and resources, systemic constraints (such as lack of access to medical records and information about diagnosis), and other barriers including relationships with doctors and patients. Conclusion The contribution of community pharmacists to optimize opioid therapy in CNMP is unclear and impeded by lack of appropriate training and systemic constraints. There is a need to develop innovative practice models by addressing the barriers identified in this study to enhance the contribution of community pharmacists in optimization of opioid therapy for chronic pain.

Barriers and facilitators encountered by family physicians prescribing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Harms caused by prescription opioid analgesics (POAs) have been identified as a major international public health concern. Recent statistics show rising numbers of opioid-related deaths across Canada. However, Canadian family physicians appear to have inadequate resources to safely and effectively prescribe opioid analgesics to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP).

METHODS

We completed a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators to safe and effective prescribing of opioid analgesics for CNCP through semi-structured interviews with eight family physicians in Nova Scotia. Thematic analysis was used to identify the barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

Family physicians identified challenges in prescribing opioid analgesics for CNCP: the complexity of CNCP management, addictions risks and prescribing tools, physician training, the physician-patient relationship, prescription monitoring and control, and systemic factors.

CONCLUSION

Family physicians described themselves as inadequately supported in their prescribing of opioid analgesics for CNCP and could benefit from an integrated and coordinated approach to prescriber support.