Pilot and Feasibility of Combining a Medication Adherence Intervention and Group Diabetes Education for Patients with Type-2 Diabetes

Process Evaluations of Diabetes Self-Management Programs: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of process evaluations (PEs) of diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs).

DATA SOURCE

An electronic search using Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ensco), Academic Search (Ebsco), and APA PsycInfo (Ebsco).

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed, empirical quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method studies were included if they (1) were a traditional, group-based DSMP, (2) involved adults at least 18 years with T1DM or T2DM, (3) were a stand-alone or embedded PE, and (4) published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

The following process evaluation outcomes were extracted: fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, reach, recruitment, retention, and context. Additional items were extracted, (eg, process evaluation type, data collection methods; theories; frameworks or conceptual models used to guide the process evaluation, and etc).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Due to heterogeneity across studies, studies were synthesized qualitatively (narratively).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies (k) in 78 articles (n) (k = 68; n = 78) were included. Most were mixed methods of low quality. Studies were typically integrated into outcome evaluations vs being stand-alone, lacked theoretical approaches to guide them, and incorporated limited outcomes such as dose received, reach, and retention.

CONCLUSION

Future research should 1) implement stand-alone theoretically grounded PE studies and 2) provide a shared understanding of standardized guidelines to conduct PEs. This will allow public health practitioners and researchers to assess and compare the quality of different programs to be implemented.

Health care resource utilization in Medicare beneficiaries obtaining medication synchronization

BACKGROUND

An appointment-based medication synchronization (ABMS) is a service whuch aligns patients' chronic medications to a predetermined routine pickup date and includes a comprehensive medication review or other clinical appointment at the pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE(S)

We compared healthcare utilization outcomes (outpatient, inpatient, emergency department visits, and pharmacy utilization) of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a med-sync program to beneficiaries not enrolled in such a program.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries obtaining medications from pharmacies providing ABMS. All Medicare inpatient, outpatient, emergency, and pharmacy claims data from 2014 to 2016 obtained from the Research Data Assistance Center. These pharmacy claims were used to create med-sync (n = 13,193) and non-med-sync cohorts (n = 156,987). All patients were followed longitudinally for 12 months before and after a 2015 index or enrollment date. Baseline characteristics were used to create a logistic regression model for propensity score matching. A 1:1 greedy nearest neighbor matching algorithm was adapted for sequentially matching both cohorts. Difference in differences (DID) was used to compare mean changes in health care utilization outcomes (outpatient, inpatient, ED visits, and pharmacy utilization) between cohorts.

RESULTS

After matching, 13,193 beneficiaries in each cohort were used for analysis. DIDs for mean of health care utilizations were statistically significantly lower in the med-sync cohort than the non-med-sync cohort for outpatient visits (DID 0.012, P = 0.0073) and pharmacy utilization (DID 0.013, P < 0.0001). There was not a statistically significant DID for inpatient and ED visits between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient and pharmacy utilization changes were statistically significantly lower in the med-sync cohort than the non-med-sync cohort in the 12 months after enrollment. Lower pharmacy utilization could be caused by reducing duplicate prescriptions during synchronized refills or optimization of therapy during medication reviews if patients are enrolled in appointment-based model med-sync.

Systematic Review Examining the Behavior Change Techniques in Medication Adherence Intervention Studies Among People With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Although previous systematic reviews have studied medication adherence interventions among people with Type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), no intervention has been found to improve medication adherence consistently. Furthermore, inconsistent and poor reporting of intervention description has made understanding, replication, and evaluation of intervention challenging.

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) and characteristics of successful medication adherence interventions among PwT2D.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with BCT-codable interventions designed to influence adherence to anti-diabetic medication for PwT2D aged 18 years old and above and have medication adherence measure as an outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies were included. Successful interventions tend to target medication adherence only, involve pharmacists as the interventionist, contain "Credible source" (BCT 9.1), "Instruction on how to perform the behaviour" (BCT 4.1), "Social support (practical)" (BCT 3.2), "Action planning" (BCT 1.4), and/ or "Information about health consequences" (BCT 5.1). Very few interventions described its context, used theory, examined adherence outcomes during the follow-up period after an intervention has ended, or were tailored to address specific barriers of medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

We identified specific BCTs and characteristics that are commonly reported in successful medication adherence interventions, which can facilitate the development of future interventions. Our review highlighted the need to consider and clearly describe different dimensions of context, theory, fidelity, and tailoring in an intervention.

An Overview of Pharmaceutical Care in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: Current Position and Prospects

Diabetes mellitus is an ongoing disease that is related to a high mortality rate due to severe complications. Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DMT2) is a persistent metabolic deficiency and its prevalence has been increasing consistently worldwide. As a result, it is rapidly turning into a plague in some parts of the world, and the number of people affected is expected to double in the following decade due to an increase in the maturing populace, adding to the overall existing importance for medical service providers, particularly in the underdeveloped nations. Extensive diabetes care is an intricate task that takes a whole group of medical care experts, including drug specialists, to provide multidisciplinary care for the patients. The duty of drug experts has changed significantly in recent years, changing from conventional drug dispensing in the drug store to patient- centered clinical support services. Upgrading the medication treatment to accomplish better remedial results without causing drug-related issues has been considered the essential objective of treatment for diabetic patients. This review discusses the healthcare needs of patients with T2DM, the current evidence for the role of pharmacists in diabetes care, and insight into the upcoming role of pharmacists in its management. The advanced role of clinical pharmacists in diabetes control through drug treatment, diabetes care centers, and diabetes health counselor schooling, is also discussed in this review.

Feasibility study of a digitalized nurse practitioner-led intervention to improve medication adherence in type 2 diabetes patients in Dutch primary care

Purpose

The purpose of this feasibility study was to improve and implement an intervention aimed at enhancing medication adherence in sub-optimally controlled and non-adherent type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients in primary care.

Methods

Four phases were completed: (1) context analysis, (2) collaboration protocol development, (3) digitalization, and (4) process evaluation. Two community pharmacies and seven general practices participated. In phase 1, two focus groups were conducted, of which one with healthcare providers (HCP, N = 5) and one with patients (N = 11). In phase 4, four semi-structured interviews and one focus group (N = 6) were conducted with healthcare providers. The goal of these focus groups and interviews was to obtain insights into current care to support medication adherence (phase 1), opportunities for collaboration (phase 2) and process evaluation (phase 4). Data were analyzed in Atlas.ti using thematic analyses.

Results

Both T2DM patients and HCPs considered medication adherence vital. Suboptimal collaboration between HCPs and unreliable ways to monitor medication non-adherence appeared important barriers for adequate care to support medication adherence (phase 1). The nurse practitioner (NP) was chosen as the interventionist with supportive roles for other HCPs (phase 2). All components of the intervention were digitalized (phase 3). The implementation of the digitalized intervention was reported to be suboptimal (phase 4). Main reasons were that pharmacy refill data were unreliable, NPs experienced difficulties addressing medication non-adherence adequately and collaboration between HCPs was suboptimal.

Conclusions

The medication adherence enhancing intervention was successfully digitalized, but implementation of the digitalized intervention appeared not feasible as of yet.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00892-2.