1
|
Lhotáková Z, Neuwirthová E, Potůčková M, Červená L, Hunt L, Kupková L, Lukeš P, Campbell P, Albrechtová J. Mind the leaf anatomy while taking ground truth with portable chlorophyll meters. Sci Rep 2025; 15:1855. [PMID: 39805920 PMCID: PMC11730753 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84052-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
A wide range of portable chlorophyll meters are increasingly being used to measure leaf chlorophyll content as an indicator of plant performance, providing reference data for remote sensing studies. We tested the effect of leaf anatomy on the relationship between optical assessments of chlorophyll (Chl) against biochemically determined Chl content as a reference. Optical Chl assessments included measurements taken by four chlorophyll meters: three transmittance-based (SPAD-502, Dualex-4 Scientific, and MultispeQ 2.0), one fluorescence-based (CCM-300), and vegetation indices calculated from the 400-2500 nm leaf reflectance acquired using an ASD FieldSpec and a contact plant probe. Three leaf types with different anatomy were included: dorsiventral laminar leaves, grass leaves, and needles. On laminar leaves, all instruments performed well for chlorophyll content estimation (R2 > 0.80, nRMSE < 15%), regardless of the variation in their specific internal structure (mesomorphic, scleromorphic, or scleromorphic with hypodermis), similarly to the performance of four reflectance indices (R2 > 0.90, nRMSE < 16%). For grasses, the model to predict chlorophyll content across multiple species had low performance with CCM-300 (R2 = 0.45, nRMSE = 11%) and failed for SPAD. For Norway spruce needles, the relation of CCM-300 values to chlorophyll content was also weak (R2 = 0.45, nRMSE = 11%). To improve the accuracy of data used for remote sensing algorithm development, we recommend calibration of chlorophyll meter measurements with biochemical assessments, especially for species with anatomy other than laminar dicot leaves. The take-home message is that portable chlorophyll meters perform well for laminar leaves and grasses with wider leaves, however, their accuracy is limited for conifer needles and narrow grass leaves. Species-specific calibrations are necessary to account for anatomical variations, and adjustments in sampling protocols may be required to improve measurement reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Lhotáková
- Department of Plant Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Eva Neuwirthová
- Department of Plant Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Markéta Potůčková
- Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Červená
- Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lena Hunt
- Department of Plant Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Kupková
- Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Lukeš
- Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petya Campbell
- University of Maryland Baltimore County and NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 618, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
| | - Jana Albrechtová
- Department of Plant Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang J, Wang C, Wang H, Fu Z, Cao Q, Tian Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Liu X. Evaluation of Three Portable Optical Sensors for Non-Destructive Diagnosis of Nitrogen Status in Winter Wheat. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21165579. [PMID: 34451022 PMCID: PMC8402299 DOI: 10.3390/s21165579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The accurate estimation and timely diagnosis of crop nitrogen (N) status can facilitate in-season fertilizer management. In order to evaluate the performance of three leaf and canopy optical sensors in non-destructively diagnosing winter wheat N status, three experiments using seven wheat cultivars and multi-N-treatments (0–360 kg N ha−1) were conducted in the Jiangsu province of China from 2015 to 2018. Two leaf sensors (SPAD 502, Dualex 4 Scientific+) and one canopy sensor (RapidSCAN CS-45) were used to obtain leaf and canopy spectral data, respectively, during the main growth period. Five N indicators (leaf N concentration (LNC), leaf N accumulation (LNA), plant N concentration (PNC), plant N accumulation (PNA), and N nutrition index (NNI)) were measured synchronously. The relationships between the six sensor-based indices (leaf level: SPAD, Chl, Flav, NBI, canopy level: NDRE, NDVI) and five N parameters were established at each growth stages. The results showed that the Dualex-based NBI performed relatively well among four leaf-sensor indices, while NDRE of RS sensor achieved a best performance due to larger sampling area of canopy sensor for five N indicators estimation across different growth stages. The areal agreement of the NNI diagnosis models ranged from 0.54 to 0.71 for SPAD, 0.66 to 0.84 for NBI, and 0.72 to 0.86 for NDRE, and the kappa coefficient ranged from 0.30 to 0.52 for SPAD, 0.42 to 0.72 for NBI, and 0.53 to 0.75 for NDRE across all growth stages. Overall, these results reveal the potential of sensor-based diagnosis models for the rapid and non-destructive diagnosis of N status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Jiang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Cuicun Wang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Hui Wang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Zhaopeng Fu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Qiang Cao
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yongchao Tian
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Weixing Cao
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xiaojun Liu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-25-8439-6804; Fax: +86-25-8439-6672
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaniszewski S, Kowalski A, Dysko J, Agati G. Application of a Combined Transmittance/Fluorescence Leaf Clip Sensor for the Nondestructive Determination of Nitrogen Status in White Cabbage Plants. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21020482. [PMID: 33445510 PMCID: PMC7827347 DOI: 10.3390/s21020482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The correct fertilization of vegetable crops is commonly determined on the basis of soil and plant costly destructive analyses, demanding more sustainable non-invasive optical detection. Here, we tested the ability of the combined transmittance/fluorescence leaf clip Dualex device for determining the nitrogen (N) status of cabbage plants. Fully developed leaves from plants grown under different N rates of 0; 100; 200; 300 kg N ha−1 in 2018 and 2019 were measured in the field by the Dualex sensor twice a year in July and October. The chlorophyll (Chl) and nitrogen (nitrogen balance index, NBI) indices and the flavonols (Flav) index of the sensor were positively and negatively correlated to leaf nitrogen, respectively. Merging the two-years data, the NBI versus leaf N correlation was less point dispersed in October than July (R2 = 0.76 and 0.64, respectively). NBI was also correlated to cabbage yield, better in July than October. Our results showed that the multiparametric Dualex device can be used as precision agriculture tool for the early prediction of plant N and cabbage yield with economic advantage for the growers and reduced environmental contamination due to nitrate leaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanisław Kaniszewski
- Research Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; (S.K.); (A.K.); (J.D.)
| | - Artur Kowalski
- Research Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; (S.K.); (A.K.); (J.D.)
| | - Jacek Dysko
- Research Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; (S.K.); (A.K.); (J.D.)
| | - Giovanni Agati
- Istituto di Fisica Applicata “Nello Carrara”-CNR, Via Madonna del Piano, 10-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-055-5225-306
| |
Collapse
|