Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants

Current practices in clinical gait analysis in Europe: A comprehensive survey-based study from the European society for movement analysis in adults and children (ESMAC) standard initiative

BACKGROUND

Clinical gait analysis (CGA) is a systematic approach to comprehensively evaluate gait patterns, quantify impairments, plan targeted interventions, and evaluate the impact of interventions. However, international standards for CGA are currently lacking, resulting in various national initiatives. Standards are important to ensure safe and effective healthcare practices and to enable evidence-based clinical decision-making, facilitating interoperability, and reimbursement under national healthcare policies. Collaborative clinical and research work between European countries would benefit from common standards.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the current laboratory practices for CGA in Europe.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey was conducted by the European Society for Movement Analysis in Adults and Children (ESMAC), in close collaboration with the European national societies. The survey involved 97 gait laboratories across 16 countries. The survey assessed several aspects related to CGA, including equipment used, data collection, processing, and reporting methods.

RESULTS

There was a consensus between laboratories concerning the data collected during CGA. The Conventional Gait Model (CGM) was the most used biomechanical model for calculating kinematics and kinetics. Respondents also reported the use of video recording, 3D motion capture systems, force plates, and surface electromyography. While there was a consensus on the reporting of CGA data, variations were reported in training, documentation, data preprocessing and equipment maintenance practices.

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of this study will serve as a foundation for the development of standardized guidelines for CGA in Europe.

A convenient approach for knee kinematics assessment using wearable inertial sensors during home-based rehabilitation: Validation with an optoelectronic system

Rehabilitation services are among the most severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has increased the number of people not receiving the needed rehabilitation care. Home-based rehabilitation becomes alternative support to face this greater need. However, monitoring kinematics parameters during rehabilitation exercises is critical for an effective recovery. This work proposes a detailed framework to estimate knee kinematics using a wearable Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU). That allows at-home monitoring for knee rehabilitation progress. Two MIMU sensors were attached to the shank and thigh segments respectively. First, the absolute orientation of each sensor was estimated using a sensor fusion algorithm. Second, these sensor orientations were transformed to segments orientations using a functional sensor-to-segment (STS) alignment. Third, the relative orientation between segments, i.e., knee joint angle, was computed and the relevant kinematics parameters were extracted. Then, the validity of our approach was evaluated with a gold-standard optoelectronic system. Seven participants completed three to five Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests. The estimated knee angle was compared to the reference angle. Root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were considered as evaluation metrics. Our results showed reasonable accuracy (RMSE < 8°), strong to very-strong correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.86), a mean difference within 1.1°, and agreement limits from -16° to 14°. In addition, no significant difference was found (p-value > 0.05) in extracted kinematics parameters between both systems. The proposed approach might represent a suitable alternative for the assessment of knee rehabilitation progress in a home context.

A dataset of asymptomatic human gait and movements obtained from markers, IMUs, insoles and force plates

Human motion capture and analysis could be made easier through the use of wearable devices such as inertial sensors and/or pressure insoles. However, many steps are still needed to reach the performance of optoelectronic systems to compute kinematic parameters. The proposed dataset has been established on 10 asymptomatic adults. Participants were asked to walk at different speeds on a 10-meters walkway in a laboratory and to perform different movements such as squats or knee flexion/extension tasks. Three-dimensional trajectories of 69 reflective markers placed according to a conventional full body markerset, acceleration and angular velocity signals of 8 inertial sensors, pressure signals of 2 insoles, 3D ground reaction forces and moments obtained from 3 force plates were simultaneously recorded. Eight calculated virtual markers related to joint centers were also added to the dataset. This dataset contains a total of 337 trials including static and dynamic tasks for each participant. Its purpose is to enable comparisons between various motion capture systems and stimulate the development of new methods for gait analysis.

Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-Derived 3D Joint Kinematics in Persons Wearing Transtibial Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

A validity and reliability assessment of inertial measurement unit (IMU)-derived joint angular kinematics during walking is a necessary step for motion analysis in the lower extremity prosthesis user population. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system compared to an optical motion capture (OMC) system in transtibial prosthesis (TTP) users.

METHODS

Thirty TTP users were recruited and underwent simultaneous motion capture from IMU and OMC systems during walking. Reliability and validity were assessed using intra- and inter-subject variability with standard deviation (S.D.), average S.D., and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The intra-subject S.D. for all rotations of the lower limb joints were less than 1° for both systems. The IMU system had a lower mean S.D. (^o), as seen in inter-subject variability. The ICC revealed good to excellent agreement between the two systems for all sagittal kinematic parameters.

CONCLUSION

All joint angular kinematic comparisons supported the IMU system's results as comparable to OMC. The IMU was capable of precise sagittal plane motion data and demonstrated validity and reliability to OMC. These findings evidence that when compared to OMC, an IMU system may serve well in evaluating the gait of lower limb prosthesis users.

Self-Calibrating Magnetometer-Free Inertial Motion Tracking of 2-DoF Joints

Human motion analysis using inertial measurement units (IMUs) has recently been shown to provide accuracy similar to the gold standard, optical motion capture, but at lower costs and while being less restrictive and time-consuming. However, IMU-based motion analysis requires precise knowledge of the orientations in which the sensors are attached to the body segments. This knowledge is commonly obtained via time-consuming and error-prone anatomical calibration based on precisely defined poses or motions. In the present work, we propose a self-calibrating approach for magnetometer-free joint angle tracking that is suitable for joints with two degrees of freedom (DoF), such as the elbow, ankle, and metacarpophalangeal finger joints. The proposed methods exploit kinematic constraints in the angular rates and the relative orientations to simultaneously identify the joint axes and the heading offset. The experimental evaluation shows that the proposed methods are able to estimate plausible and consistent joint axes from just ten seconds of arbitrary elbow joint motion. Comparison with optical motion capture shows that the proposed methods yield joint angles with similar accuracy as a conventional IMU-based method while being much less restrictive. Therefore, the proposed methods improve the practical usability of IMU-based motion tracking in many clinical and biomedical applications.